<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 nzetc-p5.xsd" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc xml:id="fileDesc-0001">
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="marc245">Tuatara: Volume 19, Issue 3, August 1972</title>
        <title type="sort">Tuatara: Volume 19, Issue 3</title>
        <title type="gmd">[electronic resource]</title>
        <editor><name type="person" key="name-102052">J. W. Dawson</name></editor>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0005">
          <resp>Creation of machine-readable version</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">Keyboarded by TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0006">
          <resp>Creation of digital images</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0007">
          <resp>Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">Keyboarded by TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0004">
          <resp>TEI header, validation, and MADS markup</resp>
          <name key="name-111717" type="person">Shelley Gurney</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <extent>ca. 187 kilobytes</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>New Zealand Electronic Text Centre</publisher>
        <pubPlace>Wellington, New Zealand</pubPlace>
        <idno type="etc">Modern English, Bio19Tuat03</idno>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>Publicly accessible</p>
          <p n="public">URL: http://www.nzetc.org/collections.html</p>
          <p>copyright 2006, by Victoria University of Wellington</p>
        </availability>
        <date when="2006">2006</date>
      <idno type="vuw-bbid">1035249</idno></publicationStmt>
      <seriesStmt xml:id="seriesStmt-0001">
        <title>
          <name key="name-204009" type="work">Tuatara</name>
        </title>
        <idno type="vol">19:3</idno>
      </seriesStmt>
      <notesStmt xml:id="notesStmt-0001">
        <note xml:id="note-0001"/>
        <!-- <note id="page-images">
<list>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_001" id="Bio19Tuat03_001"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_002" id="Bio19Tuat03_002"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_003" id="Bio19Tuat03_003" n="fp105"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_004" id="Bio19Tuat03_004" n="fp106"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_005" id="Bio19Tuat03_005" n="fp107"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_006" id="Bio19Tuat03_006" n="fp108"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_007" id="Bio19Tuat03_007" n="fp109"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_008" id="Bio19Tuat03_008" n="fp110"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_009" id="Bio19Tuat03_009" n="fp111"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_010" id="Bio19Tuat03_010" n="fp112"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_011" id="Bio19Tuat03_011" n="fp113"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_012" id="Bio19Tuat03_012" n="fp114"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_013" id="Bio19Tuat03_013" n="fp115"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_014" id="Bio19Tuat03_014" n="fp116"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_015" id="Bio19Tuat03_015" n="fp117"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_016" id="Bio19Tuat03_016" n="fp118"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_017" id="Bio19Tuat03_017" n="fp119"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_018" id="Bio19Tuat03_018" n="fp120"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_019" id="Bio19Tuat03_019" n="fp121"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_020" id="Bio19Tuat03_020" n="fp122"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_021" id="Bio19Tuat03_021" n="fp123"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_022" id="Bio19Tuat03_022" n="fp124"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_023" id="Bio19Tuat03_023" n="fp125"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_024" id="Bio19Tuat03_024" n="fp126"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_025" id="Bio19Tuat03_025" n="fp127"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_026" id="Bio19Tuat03_026" n="fp128"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_027" id="Bio19Tuat03_027" n="fp129"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_028" id="Bio19Tuat03_028" n="fp130"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_029" id="Bio19Tuat03_029" n="fp131"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_030" id="Bio19Tuat03_030" n="fp132"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_031" id="Bio19Tuat03_031" n="fp133"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_032" id="Bio19Tuat03_032" n="fp134"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_033" id="Bio19Tuat03_033" n="fp135"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_034" id="Bio19Tuat03_034" n="fp136"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_035" id="Bio19Tuat03_035" n="fp137"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_036" id="Bio19Tuat03_036" n="fp138"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_037" id="Bio19Tuat03_037" n="fp139"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_038" id="Bio19Tuat03_038" n="fp140"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_039" id="Bio19Tuat03_039" n="fp141"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_040" id="Bio19Tuat03_040" n="fp142"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_041" id="Bio19Tuat03_041" n="fp143"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_042" id="Bio19Tuat03_042" n="fp144"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_043" id="Bio19Tuat03_043" n="fp145"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_044" id="Bio19Tuat03_044" n="fp146"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_045" id="Bio19Tuat03_045" n="fp147"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_046" id="Bio19Tuat03_046" n="fp148"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_047" id="Bio19Tuat03_047" n="fp149"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_048" id="Bio19Tuat03_048" n="fp150"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_049" id="Bio19Tuat03_049" n="fp151"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_050" id="Bio19Tuat03_050" n="fp152"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_051" id="Bio19Tuat03_051" n="fp153"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_052" id="Bio19Tuat03_052" n="fp154"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_053" id="Bio19Tuat03_053" n="fp155"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_054" id="Bio19Tuat03_054" n="fp156"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_055" id="Bio19Tuat03_055" n="fp157"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_056" id="Bio19Tuat03_056" n="fp158"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_057" id="Bio19Tuat03_057" n="fp159"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_058" id="Bio19Tuat03_058" n="fp160"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_059" id="Bio19Tuat03_059" n="fp161"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_060" id="Bio19Tuat03_060" n="fp162"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_061" id="Bio19Tuat03_061" n="fp163"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_062" id="Bio19Tuat03_062" n="fp164"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_063" id="Bio19Tuat03_063" n="fp165"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_064" id="Bio19Tuat03_064" n="fp166"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_065" id="Bio19Tuat03_065" n="fp167"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_066" id="Bio19Tuat03_066"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_067" id="Bio19Tuat03_067"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_068" id="Bio19Tuat03_068"/></item>
</list>
</note> -->
      </notesStmt>
      <sourceDesc xml:id="sourceDesc-0001">
        <biblFull>
          <titleStmt>
            <title>
              <name key="name-102921" type="work">Tuatara: Volume 19, Issue 3, August 1972</name>
            </title>
            <editor>
              <name type="person" key="name-102052">J. W. Dawson</name>
            </editor>
          </titleStmt>
          <editionStmt>
            <p/>
          </editionStmt>
          <publicationStmt>
            <pubPlace>Wellington, New Zealand</pubPlace>
            <publisher>Victoria University of Wellington</publisher>
            <idno type="callno">Source copy consulted: Victoria University of Wellington Library, QH1 T883 19</idno>
            <idno type="issn">0041-3860</idno>
          </publicationStmt>
        </biblFull>
        <bibl xml:id="text-1-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102434" type="work">Concepts in Vegetation/Soil System Dynamics<lb/>
II. Post Steady-State</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170435">G. N. Park</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-2-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102435" type="work">Studies on The ‘Kerosene Fungus’ Cladosporium Resinae (Lindau) De Vries</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name key="name-170432" type="person">J. E. Sheridan</name>
          </author>
          <author>
            <name key="name-170466" type="person">Y. L. Tan</name>
          </author>
          <author>
            <name key="name-170465" type="person">Jan Nelson</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-3-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102436" type="work">A Review of the Parasites of New Zealand Reptiles</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170436">Graham S. Hardy</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-4-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102437" type="work">Corrections to “The Lizards of New Zealand”</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170442">Charles McCann</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed and
                    the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding
                    line, except in the case of those words that break over a
                    page. Every effort has been made to preserve the Māori
                    macron using unicode.</p>
        <p xml:id="ETC">Some keywords in the header are a local
                    Electronic Text Center scheme to aid in establishing
                    analytical groupings.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy xml:id="nzetc-subjects">
          <bibl>NZETC Subject Headings</bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc xml:id="profileDesc-0001">
      <creation>
        <date/>
      </creation>
      <langUsage>
        <language ident="en">English</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="http://www.nzetc.org/nzetc-subjects">
          <list>
            <item>
              <rs key="subject-000009" type="subject">Science and Natural History</rs>
            </item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
        <keywords scheme="http://www.example.org/folksonomy">
          <term>Non-Fiction</term>
          <term>Masculine/Feminine</term>
          <term>Prose</term>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change n="quickProof"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Text-proofing of a sample of the text</change>
      <change n="teiMarkup"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Conversion to TEI.2-conformat markup</change>
      <change n="scriptedMarkup"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Adding scripted markup</change>
      <change n="encodingDesc"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of encodingDesc</change>
      <change n="addBibls"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of bibls</change>
      <change n="assembleImages"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Assembled all images</change>
      <change n="derivativeCreation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Creation of derivative images</change>
      <change n="teiValidation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Validation of TEI</change>
      <change n="nameValidation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Validation of names</change>
      <change n="utf8Conversion"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Conversion to Unicode (utf-8)</change>
      <change n="makeProduction"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Promotion to production</change>
      <change n="drmAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to access control</change>
      <change n="harvestTopicMap"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Harvest into Topic Map</change>
      <change n="browserCheck"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Checking of text using browser</change>
      <change n="corpusAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to corpus</change>
      <change n="catalogueAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:45">21:17:45, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to Library Catalogue<!-- BBID=1035249 --></change>
      <change n="live"><date when="2008-09-23T14:47:02">14:47:02, Tuesday 23 September 2008</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Make text available on NZETC website</change>
    <change n="epubPreparation"><date when="2009-08-04T14:07:00">14:07:00, Tuesday 4 August 2009</date><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Preparation of EPUB (and other formats such as DaisyBook)</change></revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text xml:id="t1">
    <front xml:id="t1-front">
      <divGen type="toc" rend="div"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-front-d1" type="covers">
        <p>
          <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_FCo">
            <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_FCo.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_FCo-g"/>
            <figDesc>Front Cover</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </p>
        <!-- <p>
<figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_001" id="Bio19Tuat03_Spi">

<figDesc>Spine</figDesc>
</figure>
</p> -->
        <p>
          <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_BCo">
            <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_BCo.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_BCo-g"/>
            <figDesc>Back Cover</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </p>
        <!-- <p>
<figure entity="Bio19Tuat03_001" id="Bio19Tuat03_Tit">

<figDesc>Title Page</figDesc>
</figure>
</p> -->
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n1"/>
      <titlePage xml:id="t1-front-d1-d1">
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main">
            <hi rend="c">Tuatara</hi>
          </titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <docImprint><hi rend="c">Journal of the Biological Society<lb/>
Victoria University of Wellington<lb/>
New Zealand</hi><lb/><hi rend="c">Volume</hi> 19 <hi rend="c">Part</hi> 3 <hi rend="c">August</hi> 1972</docImprint>
      </titlePage>
      <pb xml:id="n2"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-front-d2" type="section">
        <p>Tuatara aims to stimulate and widen interest in the natural sciences in New Zealand, by publishing articles which (a), review recent advances of broad interest; or (b), give clear illustrated, and readily understood keys to the identification of New Zealand plants and animals; or (c), relate New Zealand biological problems to a broader Pacific or Southern Hemisphere context. Authors are asked to explain any special terminology required by their topic. Address for contributions: Editor of Tuatara, c/o Victoria University of Wellington, Box 196, Wellington, New Zealand. Enquiries about subscriptions should be sent to: Business Manager of Tuatara, c/o Victoria University of Wellington, Box 196, Wellington, New Zealand.</p>
        <p>
          <table rows="11" cols="22">
            <row>
              <cell>Subscription $2 (N.Z.) per volume.</cell>
              <cell>Single copies 80c (N.Z)</cell>
            </row>
          </table>
        </p>
      </div>
      <div xml:id="t1-front-d3" type="contents">
        <head>
          <hi rend="c">Contents</hi>
        </head>
        <p>
          <table rows="5" cols="3">
            <row>
              <cell>Concepts in Vegetation-Soil Dynamics II</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="sc">
                  <name key="name-170435" type="person">G. N. Park</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref target="#n3">105</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Book Reviews</cell>
              <cell/>
              <cell>
                <ref target="#n24">126</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Studies on the ‘Kerosene Fungus’ <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> (Lindau) de Vries. Part III</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="sc"><name key="name-170432" type="person">J. E. Sheridan</name>, <name key="name-170466" type="person">Y. L. Tan</name> and <name key="name-170465" type="person">Jan Nelson</name></hi>
              </cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref target="#n28">130</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>A Review of the Parasites of New Zealand Reptiles</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="sc">
                  <name key="name-170436" type="person">Graham S. Hardy</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref target="#n63">165</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Corrections to “The Lizards of New Zealand”</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="sc">
                  <name key="name-170442" type="person">Charles McCann</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref target="#n65">167</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
          </table>
        </p>
      </div>
      <div xml:id="t1-front-d4" type="contents">
        <head>Future Contents</head>
        <p>Vol. 20. Part I. <hi rend="c">New Zealand Whales and Dolphins</hi>, by <name key="name-170563" type="person">Alan Baker</name>. This will be a booklet issue with a special cover incorporating a colour plate.</p>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n3" n="105"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-front-d5" type="section">
        <head>
          <hi rend="c">Tuatara</hi>
        </head>
        <p>is the journal of the Biological Society, Victoria University of Wellington New Zealand, and is published three times a year. Editor: <name type="person" key="name-102052">J. W. Dawson</name>. Business Manager: <name type="person" key="name-111627">G. W. Gibbs</name>. Distribution: G. Stephenson.</p>
        <p>
          <table rows="11" cols="33">
            <row>
              <cell><hi rend="sc">Volume</hi> 19</cell>
              <cell><hi rend="sc">Part</hi> 3</cell>
              <cell><hi rend="sc">August</hi> 1972</cell>
            </row>
          </table>
        </p>
      </div>
    </front>
    <body xml:id="t1-body">
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d1" type="article" decls="#text-1-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">Concepts in Vegetation/Soil System Dynamics<lb/>
II. Post Steady-State</title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-170435">G. N. Park</name><lb/>
Botany Department, Victoria University of Wellington Present address: Forestry Dept., Australian National University, Canberra.</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction</hi>
          </head>
          <p><hi rend="sc">The Following Paper</hi> is a sequel to a review (Park, 1970) that examined the multitude of terms and concepts pertaining to the state of climax, stability, maturity and steady-state. <hi rend="i">Steady-state</hi> was preferred as a term of comparative stability that may be preceded and succeeded by states of comparative instability — ‘pre-steady state’ and ‘post-steady state’ respectively.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Post-Steady State</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The steady-state has been defined as a temporary state of dynamic equilibrium in an open system. Any open system is continually directional in time (Bray, 1958). Therefore, theoretically, no one stage can <hi rend="i">a priori</hi> be used as a reference point in the sense that ‘climax’ has traditionally been used (Clements, 1936; Whittaker, 1953, 1957). Kovda (1933), referring to this open system, stated that all soils are subject to constant progressive change and constant self-development, independent of their stage of self-development and independent of external conditions. Rowe (1961a) objected strongly to the common concept of vegetation development proceeding to a pre-determined endpoint or ‘climax’.</p>
          <p>A ‘post steady-state change’ can be thought of with reference to the vector field in n-dimensional space (Goodall, 1962; Lewontin, 1969; Whittaker, 1969) as simply a positional shift, or series of shifts, of the points in the vector field away from a relatively stable position. Odum (1959) considered that after a period of disequilibrium, another steady-state is attained. Bray (1958) and Whittaker (<hi rend="i">pers. comm.</hi> to Becking, 1968) implied that stages subsequent to a steady-state will be characteristed by a steady increase in entropy (energy disorder), decreased biomass, organisational structure and negentropy. Likewise, a state of imbalance will develop in the energy system, nutrient cycling and population dynamics.</p>
          <pb xml:id="n4" n="106"/>
          <p>Sanders (1969) developed the Stability-Time hypothesis to explain patterns of diversity in marine benthic communities under increasing physical stress. It is applicable to a vegetation/soil system where environmental stress factors, operating with increased intensity or effect, give rise to post-steady-state situations.</p>
          <p>‘Where physiological stresses have been historically low, biologically accommodated communities have evolved. As the gradient of physiological stress increases, resulting from increased physical fluctuations, or by unfavourable physical conditions regardless of fluctuations, the nature of the community gradually changes from a predominantly biologically accommodated, to a predominantly physically controlled community. Finally, when the stress conditions become greater than the adaptive abilities of the organisms, an abiotic condition is reached. The number of species diminish continuously along the gradient.’ (Sanders, 1969) Similarly, Wright (1959), discussing post steady-state changes in tropical vegetation and soils on old stable sites, considered that with increasing age, weathering and leaching reduce the nutrient supply within root range. Accordingly, ‘gross-feeding’ species gradually give way to ‘frugal-feeding’ species.</p>
          <p>Rode (1949) stressed the importance of the effect of catastrophic changes such as sudden forest removal and other catastrophic phenomena of drought, rapid temperature changes, wind and fire. Rode also discussed post steady-state soil evolution as part of a gradual process, e.g., podzolisation. These gradual processes bring about changes in the composition and the structure of the vegetation, which in turn result in further changes in the composition and properties of the soil. These will occur so long as the entire process proceeds under unchanging conditions of the macro-climate, topography and ground water level. Rode defined ‘reversibility’ and ‘irreversibility’ in the evolution of these soils. Similar changes in the vegetation which Rode called irreversible can prevail under environmental conditions conducive to nutrient losses. According to Rode, ‘The inevitable loss of mineral substances is the real cause of the completely irreversible evolution of soils, and consequently of vegetation also in a definite direction. The existence of such a cause eradicates the possibility of the establishment under such conditions of a ‘climax’ as a system of dynamic equilibrium, i.e. endowed with a closed cycle in the migration of substances.’</p>
          <p>Rode's ideas were based on extensive work on iron and humuspodzols.</p>
          <p>Bryan and Teakle (1949) introduced the concept of ‘pedogenic inertia’ defined as the continuation of a soil-forming process, for example podzolisation, despite environmental changes inimical to it. In a study which they claimed supported Bryan and Teakle's concept, Walker and Adams (1959) and Walker (1965) analysed pedogenic sequences from basalt and greywacke in North Auckland. They
<pb xml:id="n5" n="107"/>
demonstrated that once the stage of soil development is reached where on basalt, laterisation leaves only sesquioxides and on greywacke, podzolisation leaves only secondary silica, then it is virtually impossible to reverse the soil formation process unless erosion occurs.</p>
          <p>This erosion then initiates a new cycle of soil formation. At these states of protracted laterisation or podzolisation, which Walker (1965) defined as <hi rend="i">senility</hi>, carbon is thought to be the last element to decline, following the restriction of photosynthesis in the vegetation/soil system, and causing decreasing litter returns. Walker (1965) and Stevens (1968) emphasised the essential role of phosphorus in an ecosystem and indicated its ultimate removal from the system. Phosphorus is one of the major elements in soil that must be supplied almost entirely by the parent material. Stevens (1968) demonstrated that very low nutrient levels, of phosphorus in particular, existed for approximately 10,000 years on podzolic soils formed from loess on outwash terraces on the West Coast, South Island. Jenny (1941) asked if there was, in fact, a degree of degradation beyond which reversion becomes impossible.</p>
          <p>Clements (1916, 1936) used the term ‘post-climax’ as well as using numerous other prefixes to accommodate ‘climax’ vegetation that was divergent from the ‘climatic climax’ ideal. Whittaker (1953) termed the vegetation changes subsequent to steady-state as ‘retrogressive’. He defined a retrogressive change in vegetation as a change involving decrease in one or more characteristics of ‘mature’ or ‘climax’ communities such as ‘maximum diversity, productivity, soil maturity, stability’. Unlike much of Whittaker's (1953) review, this was a very static argument, almost in the tradition of Clements (1916, 1936). It treated the climax as an entity in itself rather than a temporary state in an open system of continual change. Whittaker distinguished between retrogression of a community and retrogression of a particular community parameter. He stated that the decision as to whether a given change is retrogressive may be necessarily subjective.</p>
          <p>Godwin (in Whittaker, 1953) referred to post steady-state change as ‘deflected development’, in an analysis of the effect of severe grazing on the productivity of a community. The inference was that the direction of development under grazing is different from what it would be otherwise. Whittaker (1953) still considered this as retrogressive.</p>
          <p>The term ‘deterioration’ was used by Dimbleby (1952, 1962) to refer to floristic and soil changes occurring under heath vegetation that was once forest. These changes are quite reversible according to Dimbleby who defines their reversibility as ‘regeneration’. The term ‘regeneration’ in relation to ‘deterioration’ is of questionable value unless some accretion of fresh soil material (e.g. Vucetich and Pullar, 1963) can be established. ‘Retrogression’, ‘reversible’ and ‘post-climax’ can be similarly criticised in that they imply a trend
<pb xml:id="n6" n="108"/>
backwards from some <hi rend="i">a priori</hi> ‘pre-determined endpoint’ (Rowe, 1961a) in vegetation/soil system development.</p>
          <p>In terms of the concept of ‘steady-state’, which has been qualified previously, the term ‘post steady-state’ is used to maintain consistency in usage and meaning. Similarly to steady-state, it is an alternative to a large number of loosely defined terms explaining the same situation. ‘Post steady-state’ change is therefore defined as any change within a period of disequilibrium following a temporary state of dynamic equilibrium in an open system.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Post Steady-State Changes Within The Forest/Podzol System</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3-d1" type="section">
            <p>This review is restricted to research on forest vegetation and forest podzols in the cool super-humid environments of the montane-subalpine belt and the cool temperate-subarctic regions. The processes of development of forests and podzols have, in the main, been studied under the <hi rend="i">a priori</hi> assumptions of ‘climax’ and ‘maturity’ respectively.</p>
            <p>In this review, the two groups of post steady-state conditions that were distinguished by Rode (1947) are discussed. They are:—</p>
            <list>
              <label>(a)</label>
              <item>
                <p>Those created by progressive developments within the forest/podzol system such as ‘overmaturing’ of even-aged dominant trees, iron pan formation, loss of nutrients, etc.</p>
              </item>
              <label>(b)</label>
              <item>
                <p>Those created by environmental stress factors, including wind, introduced browsing animals, clear-felling, thinning, fire and drought.</p>
              </item>
            </list>
            <p>Most of the latter group are anthropogenic in origin and therefore have been mainly studied by silviculturists. The results of these studies are equally applicable to ‘natural’ post steady-state processes.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3-d2" type="section">
            <head>(a) Post steady-state change created by development within the forest/podzol system</head>
            <p>The development of forest vegetation on podzol soil beyond a steady-state can be interpreted in terms of changes in the podzolisation process leading to gleying and waterlogging. As reported in the literature, these changes may occur for two reasons: on one hand, the formation of gleying and a mildly or completely impervious illuvial horizon, and on the other, the loss of nutrients. Both processes may occur together. In the latter, plants exacting in their nutrient requirements will be physiologically weakened (Russell, 1961), giving way to those that are less exacting (Wright, 1959). Crocker and Dickson (1952) in a study of a chronosequence on glacial moraines suggested that the ‘inevitable process of soil degradation’ following podzolisation would eventually allow species of lower nutrient requirement to dominate if a seed source was available. Among these species are usually many acidophilous shrubs (Ericaceae), grasses, herbs, sedges,
<pb xml:id="n7" n="109"/>
rushes and sphagnum mosses; the latter often causing waterlogging (Rode, 1947; Zach, 1950). Rode refers to Tanfil'ev (1911) who thought that the primary cause of waterlogging was the incoming of hydrophitic species, such as sphagnum moss, conducive to soil water accumulation.</p>
            <p>The Russian and Scandinavian literature contains many references to the theme that waterlogging of podzolised soils under forest is a ‘normal’ part of ecosystem development in the northern coniferous forests in the absence of external environmental factors. Sibertsev (1895) termed the successive changes from podzolised forest soils the ‘sod-podzolic process’. Sod-podzolic soils contain a well developed A<hi rend="sub">1</hi> horizon with abundant roots forming the ‘sod’. Muir (1961), reviewing podzol soils, referred to a process of sod-formation whereby, in the ‘opening up’ of a closed-canopy forest with podzolic soils, a grass-herb cover may become so dominant as to exclude regeneration of the woody vegetation. This theory of non-regeneration was formulated by Vil'yams (1940). Despite subsequent criticism of the theory, recent Russian pedology has recognised the sod-podzolic soils as a separate group. The main point of the postulated process is that in contrast to the thick mor of the forest podzol, the herb-grass litter undergoes a melanising mull type of decomposition leading to increased humus content and increased base-status of the mineral soil.</p>
            <p>Tiurin (1933) recognised a developmental series of five stages in podzolisation: cryptopodzolic, weakly podzolic, medium podzolic, strongly podzolic and podzols. ‘Sod-podzolisation’, under grassland within a forest zone could occur at any of these stages. Kononova (1951) showed a distinct difference in the proportions of humic and fulvic acids in the podzolic and sod-podzolic soils despite Rode's (1944) conclusion that, chemically, there was no strict division between the two soils. Gorshenin (1961) used the prefix ‘turf-’ in the sense of ‘sod’, describing ‘turf-podzols’ as widespread in the upland, Southern Taiga of Southern Siberia. Podzols and turf-podzols were classified on a regional dynamic basis as separate soil types.</p>
            <p>The conversion of forest podzol soils to ‘non-forest’ humus-gley-podzol soils has been described and identified in part by Keller (1927), Sukatchev (1928), Katz (1929), Rigg (1940), Muir and Fraser (1940), Wilde (1940, 1953), Zach (1950), Wright (1951) and Mackney (1961). The non-forest vegetation was described as bog, muskeg, heath, coniferous scrub and grassland on humus-, turf-, or gley-podzols. Katz considered that any bog vegetation which was developed from forest was in a state of ‘disequilibrium’. He placed emphasis on progressive endogenous development of vegetation. Wilde noted gleying, depletion of bases, and increased water-holding capacity under a thick raw forest litter, which adversely affected transpiration of trees, and lowered soil aeration to below critical levels for most tree species. Zach (1950) outlined regional forest ‘deterioration’ in South East Alaska as the result of encroachment
<pb xml:id="n8" n="110"/>
of ‘muskeg’; an expanse of land occupied by bog development (Dansereau, 1957), on flat and gentle slopes. Surplus water, the result of low evapotranspiration in a low radiant energy environment inhibited decay of organic matter causing waterlogging. The cool, wet climate was mild enough, however, for vegetative growth.</p>
            <p>In a study of swamping processes from upland coniferous forest, Pierce (1953) found that species composition and regeneration rate was largely determined by the content of electrolytes in water, represented by the supply of available nutrients. Pierce correlated the slow rates of tree growth with a deficiency of dissolved O<hi rend="sub">2</hi> and low redox potentials. Aeration and nutrient supply in the ground water was unfavourable to natural regeneration of most upland tree species. Any reproduction was of acidophilous shrub species. Pierce (1953) also studied the nature <hi rend="i">of Sphagnum</hi> in processes of swamping from forest. <hi rend="i">Sphagnum</hi> was found to concentrate nutrients and retard ground water movement. Rigg (1940) considered <hi rend="i">Sphagnum</hi> to be associated with the death of forest trees. Recent work by Raid (1965) on sod-podzolic soils under heath vegetation found close relationships between soil moisture, climatic factors and ground water levels. Satterlund (1961) found a very significant inverse relationship between forest growth and ground water in forest sites affected by swamping processes.</p>
            <p>Lutz and Chandler (1947) discussed in detail the soil ‘deterioration’ which resulted from pure forest stands. They stated that the rate of podzolisation is greatest in pure stands of a species whose litter is low in bases. An example of this in New Zealand would be silver beech (<hi rend="i">Nothofagus menziesii</hi>) (Wright, 1951) or mountain beech (<hi rend="i">N. solandri</hi> var. <hi rend="i">cliffortioides</hi>) (J. Wardle <hi rend="i">pers. comm.</hi>). Lutz and Chandler noted that many misconceptions about this aspect of soil deterioration have been based on the long-term silviculture of pure spruce stands in Saxony.</p>
            <p>Ludi (1923) described a situation where self-maintaining heath replaced forest. In this context, Whittaker (1953) considered that ‘seral’ forest communities could be replaced by ‘climax’ communities of lower growth form. This is how Cockayne (1928) and Robbins (1952) interpreted the change from rimu-rata/tawa forest to tawa forest.</p>
            <p>Wright (1959) described vegetation/soil system ‘deterioration’ on old stable terraces in British Honduras, British Guiana and Brazil. At a certain stage the soils start to become really low in nutrients and the even forest canopy becomes ragged, with emergence of the crowns of those species best able to tolerate the ‘deteriorated’ soil conditions. The under-storey gradually degenerates and is successively dominated by broadleaved trees, then palms and eventually tall grasses. As the soils become poorer with iron pan or clay pan formation the scattered large trees are replaced by smaller trees of species tolerant of swamp or semi-swamp conditions. Throughout the
<pb xml:id="n9" n="111"/>
‘deterioration’ sequence there is a general development of an acid surface litter. Only when rainwater is held perched above the sub-soil pan layers, does a deep layer of organic residue accumulate. Some species bring about soil deterioration at a faster rate than others. The rate of the process is also accentuated in soils derived from quartz-rich materials. Wright emphasised the individual successional effect of various species, for example <hi rend="i">Podocarpus</hi> and <hi rend="i">Dacrydium</hi> spp., on podzolisation. Often in island vegetation there may be an insufficient range of species in the flora which are adapted to a range of soil development. For example, in Western Samoa, old, stable, very low nutrient soils are, under natural conditions, still occupied by ‘gross-feeding’ forest trees, much reduced in height and more spindly in form than normally. In the absence of low nutrient-demanding woody species windfalls are occupied by stable areas of grassland.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d4" type="section">
          <head>Post-podzol changes involving gleying</head>
          <p>Until recently it was believed that each kind of soil was formed by one process (Rode 1947). Thus ‘podzolisation’ was a process that formed ‘podzols’. The podzolisation process has been defined as one that occurs under humid temperate forest environments in which the strong acidity is the result of the weak-base nutrient cycle and humic acids in the accumulating organic matter (Lavkulich, 1969). Under this system, sesquioxides, organic and clay colloids are translocated, and various theories have been put forward to explain why and how these substances are moved. The result was a zonal ‘podzol’ (Taylor and Pohlen, 1962).</p>
          <p>Recently, gross-processes such as podzolisation have been largely discounted. It is now considered that the course of soil development is a function of the ‘relative rates’ of a large number of component reactions involving —</p>
          <list>
            <label>(1)</label>
            <item>
              <p>The continual accumulation of parent materials.</p>
            </item>
            <label>(2)</label>
            <item>
              <p>The continual differentiation of horizons within the profile.</p>
            </item>
          </list>
          <p>As long as the relative rates of these processes do not change, a soil should continue to age along a given course (Jenny, 1941; Simonsen, 1967; Lavkulich, 1969) towards the condition of steady-state (Nikiforoff, 1959). When a change of relative rates of processes or reactions exceeds critical limits (Lavkulich, 1969), or is effected by environmental stress factors, a change in the course of development is initiated. Development of a compact argillic B horizon, or a rise in the water table, of a podzol can restrict permeability and/or induce reducing conditions and gleying with concurrent changes in base status, vegetation and rates of other processes.</p>
          <p>Much of the literature on the effect of impeded drainage and ground-water comes from the research on hydrological sequences of podzols, gleyed podzols and their variants in the United Kingdom
<pb xml:id="n10" n="112"/>
and elsewhere (Glentworth and Dion, 1949; Crompton, 1952; Crampton, 1963, 1965). This research was carried out in soils from freely drained parent materials under cool superhumid conditions with a considerable excess of rainfall over evapotranspiration. Gleying, defined by Mitchell <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1968) as simply the reduction of ferric oxide to the ferrous state under anaerobic conditions induced by waterlogging, is the dominant process involved. The nature of the gleying process throughout a typical sequence from a well-drained ‘iron podzol’ to a peat moss under a progressively rising water table was described by Russell (1961). Briefly, the iron podzol is converted first to an iron humus podzol, then to a humus podzol. During these stages, the A<hi rend="sub">1</hi> horizon thickens at the expense of the A<hi rend="sub">0</hi>, usually due to the melanisation by organic matter from grasses and herbs replacing trees (Kononova, 1961). There is an increase in organic matter at the top of the B<hi rend="sub">1</hi> horizon accompanied by gleying below the B. With increased gleying and higher water tables, the A<hi rend="sub">0</hi> thickens, the A<hi rend="sub">1</hi> A<hi rend="sub">2</hi> and B thin, and the translocation of humus and sesquioxides becomes less, forming a peat podzol, then a gleyed-peat and finally a ‘peat moss’.</p>
          <p>The mechanism of the gleying process was attributed by Bloomfield (1951, 1954, 1959) to plant degradation products and certain bacteria. These extract and mobilise iron compounds within the low pH range occurring in iron-pan podzols. These iron compounds produce the essential gley colour of greys rather than the ochreous mottlings which are a secondary feature (Bloomfield, 1962).</p>
          <p>Crompton (1952) and Crampton (1965) considered that once surface reducing conditions were established, gleying developed rapidly and iron-pans could form within 100 years or less. This is much faster than the time required for iron-pan formation under ‘normal’ podzolising conditions (Franzmeier <hi rend="i">et al.</hi>, 1963; Stevens, 1968).</p>
          <p>The reducing environment from which humus iron-pans develop is formed at the soil surface by a saturated mottled layer of litter and roots (Crompton, 1956). Crampton (1963) considered that accumulation of ferrous material was related to areas of aeration at the capillary fringe between air-filled and water-filled pores and the direction of water movement; either from above, from below or laterally. Crompton (1952) suggested that gleying accelerated weathering. This was disputed by Mitchell <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1968) who considered that only certain compounds were translocated.</p>
          <p>Gleys in shallow soils, overlying a bedrock surface or an iron pan, are usually very leached and are consequently particularly low in pH and clay content. This is particularly so in areas characterised by zonal gleying (Wright and Miller, 1952; Crompton, 1956; Gibbs, 1959; Crampton, 1963).</p>
          <p>Gibbs (1959) described gleying as a dominant zonal process in soil development in the Tararua Range, where the rainfall is above
<pb xml:id="n11" n="113"/>
100 inches and the percolation rate is insufficient to cope with the supply of water on slopes up to 30°. With decreasing rainfall or increasing evaporation, the zonal gleys grade into gleyed and podzolised yellow brown earths. Gibbs considered that topography and climate are the chief factors responsible for gleying. Gleying in lowland environments is intrazonal, being controlled by topographic ground water, whilst in upland areas climate is more important, forming zonal gleys.</p>
          <p>Crompton (in Stevens, 1968) distinguished between surface-water and ground-water gleys. The former are caused by the relative impermeability of some part of the soil profile itself and the latter are associated with the saturation of the profile from below by regional or perched ground-water tables. Thus the peaty gleyed podzol (humus-gley podzol) is the result of surface-water gleying, beneath a saturated humus layer, while a gley podzol is attributed to ground-water gleying, related to a topographic water-table.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d5" type="section">
          <head>Post steady-state change created by environmental stress external to the forest/podozol system</head>
          <p>Rode (1947) made reference to the ‘swamping process’ which appears to follow clear-felling in northern coniferous forests on podzolised soils. He considered that such swamping, or waterlogging, is temporary, with renewed forest growth producing a drying-out of the soils, and a return of the soil-forming processes to their ‘normal’ course. Sudden forest removal and other catastrophic phenomena such as drought, wind, rapid temperature change, Rode described as significant factors in the evolutionary processes of soil formation beyond any steady-state. Rowe (1961b) clarified the importance of environmental stress on forest vegetation considered to be ‘climax’ in a criticism of the work of a German phytosociologist, Plochman, on stand structure and species succession in the north-west coniferous forest of Alberta. Plochman considered that the ‘climax’ forest was cyclic and self-maintaining with continual developing, aging and renewing phases. Rowe's critique was based on long-term familiarity with the forests which, he said, are disturbance forests usually maintained in youth and health by frequent windfalls and fires to which all species with the exception of fir are well adapted. Where decadent forests do exist (Rowe, 1961b), they do not rejuvenate through any inevitable cycle of renewal and development, but rather tend to remain open and unhealthy with a dense shrub-component, awaiting the rejuvenating action of fire, flood and wind. A later statement of Rowe (1961b) suggested that the state is soil-fertility based.</p>
          <p>As early as 1887, Muller outlined the effects of forest removal on podzol soils with a more humus. He found decomposition to be hastened and nitrification and biological activity to be favoured by the absence of a forest canopy. Keller (1927) and Gorshenin (1961)
<pb xml:id="n12" n="114"/>
described regional ‘swamp’ formation in felled or burnt areas. Muir (1961) referred to a grass/herb phase in cutover-forest areas, and described the work of Tiurin (1936) who demonstrated increased fertility in forest soils, converted to agriculture, in both the A<hi rend="sub">1</hi> and A<hi rend="sub">2</hi> horizons and increased pH, depth and humus content of the A<hi rend="sub">1</hi> horizon. Tiurin also demonstrated a marked increase in soil moisture in the first 10-15 years after clear-felling and noted a subsequent process in which soil moisture levels fell. In similar situations, Wittich (1930) found increased pore volume in sandy soils. Bethlahmy (1962) studied the effects on soil moisture in the first year following clear-felling of forest, by comparison with adjacent unmilled sites. Sampling was at four soil depths, every month from late spring to early autumn. During the dynamic periods of soil water depletion and recharge the soil in the unmilled site required twice the quantity of water to attain field capacity as the clear-felled site. The duration of the dynamic periods in the unmilled forest site was likewise twice that of the clear-felled site. Wilde (1953) suggested that, in terms of a rise in the water-table leading to ‘water-logging’, clear-felling of forest had a greater effect on podzolised soils than on non-podzolised soils. Both McDonald (1955) and Lutz and Chandler (1947) stressed the need to avoid generalising on the equally untenable views that clear-felling of forest is beneficial or harmful.</p>
          <p>Data of relevance to canopy opening in forest has emerged from forestry studies on plantation thinning. Watterston and Dyer (1964) demonstrated changes in the soil as a result of thinning spruce forests. Initial thinning stimulated increased stem diameter growth, but any thinning above 30% of the original basal area caused extreme fluctuations in ground water. The effects of thinning were compared with structural deterioration of the forest. Similar inferences can be drawn from the work of Kresl (1967) who formulated a relation expressing the effect of forest gaps resulting from thinning, on the amount of precipitation reaching the ground. Bray and Struik (1963) found from a study of glacial advance into Douglas Fir (<hi rend="i">Pseudotsuga menziesii</hi>) forest that if some trees were removed by glacial action, the remaining marginal trees responded by a very rapid increase in stem diameter growth. The effect of thinning on under-storey vegetation was studied by Pase and Hurd (1957) in stands of Ponderosa pine. They showed a significant curvilinear relationship between openings and under-storey productivity, of little increase in under-storey productivity as basal area decreased from 200-140 sq. ft. per acre but a rapid increase, particularly in grasses, below 140 sq. ft. per acre. Total under-storey herbs and crown cover showed a similar relationship, with an associated continuum of species replacement in the under-storey. Recent work by Anderson <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1969) evaluated the response of herbaceous plants to forest canopy opening in
<pb xml:id="n13" n="115"/>
coniferous forest. Canopy opening was found to control the quantity of both radiant energy and precipitation reaching the litter layer. These both influenced soil moisture recharge at the soil surface.</p>
          <p>The effect of periodic wind-damage in causing structural deterioration in forest has received little attention. Heinselman (1957) studied wind-caused mortality in black spruce (<hi rend="i">Picea mariana</hi>) forest on peaty, poorly aerated ‘swampland’ soils. Ground vegetation included <hi rend="i">Sphagnum</hi> spp. and ericaceous shrubs. Stands on shallow peat, less than 1ft. deep, were susceptible to windthrow, due to shallow root systems. Sixty-five per cent. of stand volume loss was attributed to wind. Heinselman considered that wind-caused mortality tended to increase with intensity of partial cutting with decreased residual basal area and with increased stand and site ages. The effect of wind on over-mature even-aged forest was discussed by Oshima <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1958) and Iwaki and Totsuka (1959) in an area of subalpine fir forest (<hi rend="i">Abies</hi> spp.) in Japan. The authors offered little explanation for the formation of strips of dead standing trees. They inferred that the process was obviously dynamic, but not necessarily due to stress in the soil component of the system. There was a progressive movement of the dead tree strips upslope and rapid regeneration of fir forest within them. The most likely explanation was wind destruction of the canopy of the over-mature even-aged forest at one point, followed by rapid enlargement of the canopy gap to a ‘strip’ of dead trees. There was close correlation between direction of prevailing wind, slope direction and occurrence of dead strips. Wind turbulence and structure in forests was studied by Geiger (1955), Gloyne (1968) and Bull and Reynolds (1968). The former two described the rapid decrease in most forests of mean wind speed, below the canopy/atmosphere interface.</p>
          <p>The effects of warmer and drier conditions since late last century on <hi rend="i">Nothofagus</hi> forests in South Chile and Argentina were summarised by Auer (1966). The response to drought has been debility and absence of tree regeneration at the forest-steppe margin, permanence of large non-forest areas and changes in forest composition. <hi rend="i">Sphagnum</hi> appears in drying bogs, but quickly disappears under the influence of drought and wind. Auer termed this ‘retrogressive’.</p>
          <p>As discussed above, the usual post-podzol steady-state changes involve a vegetational change from forest to heathland or grassland. However, Dimbleby (1952, 1962) discussed quite contrary changes in the vegetation/soil system resulting from anthropogenic forest removal 2,500 years ago on the Yorkshire moors. Heathland podzols with thin iron pans are, in cases, re-afforested by birch (<hi rend="i">Betula pubescens</hi>) stands. As the birch stands develop, the raw humus of the heath vegetation becomes activated and eventually destroyed. A deep A<hi rend="sub">1</hi> horizon develops in the mineral soil and the iron-pan becomes partially destroyed. At the soil surface, in particular, there is an increase in pH. The whole process, which Dimbleby called
<pb xml:id="n14" n="116"/>
‘soil regeneration’, takes about 60-100 years. From pollen data Dimbleby related the presence of the heathland podzol systm to Bronze Age anthropogenic influences. He considered that the soil regeneration is re-establishing the brown forest soil that 2,500 years ago covered the Yorkshire moors, under birch forest. The birch forest is very favourable to grasses and herbs, which are normally absent from heathland or coniferous forest. The soil changes which Dimbleby ascribed to birch forest establishment appear to be very similar to the changes resulting from ‘sod-podzolisation’ (see Muir, 1961). Kononova (1951) considered that differences in organic chemical constituents between strongly podzolic-forest soils and sod-podzolic post-forest soils, were attributable to the presence or absence of grass ground vegetation.</p>
          <p>There is some support for Dimbleby's thesis in the work of Griffith <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1930) who traced a sequence of soil ‘degeneration’ and ‘regeneration’ on abandoned pastures in New England. The colonising species, white pine (<hi rend="i">Pinus strobus</hi>) was associated with raw humus formation and podzolisation. After 80 years there was a mixed hardwood forest on the site that ‘re-developed the brown forest soil’. Fisher (1928) considered that a mull profile could develop from such podzols in only 15-20 years. Research in Sweden, Switzerland and U.S.S.R. has shown similar results (Dimbleby, 1952).</p>
          <p>Mark (1958) made an extensive review and analysis of processes of ‘bald’ formation in the Appalachian Mountains. He defined a ‘bald’ as an area of naturally occuring treeless vegetation located on a well-drained site below the climatic tree line in a predominantly forested region. Two types of bald can be distinguished: the ericaceous heath-balds and the herbaceous grass-balds. Mark stated that most of the numerous theories explaining the origin or maintenance of balds were not acceptable because of failure to distinguish between the separate problems of bald origin, maintenance and extension. Mark considered that cooling climate subsequent to the Climatic Optimum 4,000-5,000 years B.P., and extending to the present day, appears to have caused the formation of a bald-susceptible zone along the ecotone between hardwood and spruce-fir forests and at the potential ecotone on the mountains from which spruce-fir forest had been eliminated. At the Climatic Optimum (5,000 B.P.) spruce-fir forest was restricted to an altitude 300 to 1,000 feet higher than its present lower limit; thus causing the elimination of this forest from many peaks. In the bald-susceptible zone, seedling re-establishment of forest species is very slow or nil, giving rise to an herbaceous or heath vegetation derived from the regional flora and later by adventive species. Maintenance and extension of the balds depends on relative severity of the environment, lack of a spruce and fir seed source, possible elimination of spruce and fir biotypes best adapted to invasion into warmer and drier lower altitude areas, and recent grazing and browsing pressure. The only obvious differences in soil profile
<pb xml:id="n15" n="117"/>
between bald and adjacent forest sites were the relatively thick litters of the forest profiles, greater soil depth under the balds, and slightly darker coloured A<hi rend="sub">1</hi> horizons in the balds. Similar comparisons were made by Mark (1958) for soil moisture tension in the upper soil during one summer. The forest sites showed uniformly very low moisture tensions compared with the fluctuating values at the bald sites. Only at the bald sites did soil moisture tension exceed 1 bar.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d6" type="section">
          <head>Post steady-state changes in the forest/podzol system in New Zealand</head>
          <p>In New Zealand, the only areas in cool superhumid climates where progressive post steady-state charges within the forest/podzol system occur are throughout the Westland-Fiordland district and elsewhere in a few sites near timber-line or on flat sites in high rainfall areas. In Fiordland, Wright and Miller (1952) stated that under a rainfall of 150 inches or more per annum, the normal processes of soil development produce podzols, gley podzols or zonal peat. They found evidence of accelerated leaching under species, for example silver beech (<hi rend="i">Nothofagus menziesii</hi>), rimu (<hi rend="i">Dacrydium cupressinum</hi>) and kamahi (<hi rend="i">Weinmannia racemosa</hi>) that in other parts of New Zealand maintain more of a nutrient balance in which the soil does not deteriorate markedly.</p>
          <p>Gibbs <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1953) divided the high terrace soils of the West Coast, in which podzolisation was advanced, into two groups.</p>
          <list>
            <label>(a)</label>
            <item>
              <p><hi rend="i">Podzolic soils</hi> — semi-mature to sub-mature stages.</p>
            </item>
            <label>(b)</label>
            <item>
              <p><hi rend="i">Podzol soils</hi> — mature stage to gley podzol.</p>
            </item>
          </list>
          <p>A separate classification by Cutler (1960) considered these terrace soils in two main categories: —</p>
          <list>
            <label>(a)</label>
            <item>
              <p>The podzolised yellow-brown earths of the well-drained rolling and hilly land.</p>
            </item>
            <label>(b)</label>
            <item>
              <p>The gley-podzols of the poorly drained lower-lying land.</p>
            </item>
          </list>
          <p>The processes of vegetation/soil system development are dominated by topography and water throughout, as is clear from the summarised sequential classification of Cutler which in terms of vegetation/soil system terminology can be interpreted as follows:—</p>
          <list>
            <label>(a)</label>
            <item>
              <p>Rimu/rata/kamahi forest//podzolised yellow brown earths on rolling to hilly slopes.</p>
            </item>
            <label>(b)</label>
            <item>
              <p>Rimu/kamahi forest//gleyed, podzolised yellow brown earths on undulating and concave slopes.</p>
            </item>
            <label>(c)</label>
            <item>
              <p>Rimu forest//gley podzols on higher flats.</p>
            </item>
            <label>(d)</label>
            <item>
              <p>Rimu/silver pine forest and manuka scrub//peaty gley podzols, on lower flats.</p>
            </item>
            <label>(e)</label>
            <item>
              <p>Open sphagnum and rushland//peats and gley on low-lying depressions.</p>
            </item>
          </list>
          <p>These soils developed on terraces formed of 24 to 30 inches of loess over gravels. The gley podzols, peaty gley podzols and peats
<pb xml:id="n16" n="118"/>
are typical of ‘pakihi’ land which is very extensive on flat terraces in Westland. The term ‘pakihi’ strictly means an open clearing in forest and is applied to vegetation of low ericaceous, epacridaceous and manuka shrubs, umbrella fern (<hi rend="i">Gleichenia circinata</hi>), grasses, herbs, sedges, rushes and sphagnum moss (Rigg, 1951). Rigg considered that pakihi formation is similar to the development of heath, muskeg, bog or swamp vegetation from coniferous forest. Apart from the general acidophilous nature of such vegetation only the sphagnum/peat system of some areas of pakihi is comparable with overseas situations.</p>
          <p>In the past, pakihi comprised innumerable small swampy non-forest clearings with many gradients of structural and compositional change to adjacent forest (<name type="person" key="name-111651">P. Wardle</name>, <hi rend="i">pers. comm.</hi>). Most present-day pakihi, however, is extensive moorland created by man's destruction of rimu-silver pine forest and rimu-kamahi forest (Vucetich, 1960; Chavasse, 1962) under which the gley-podzols developed. In Westland National Park, the vegetation of ‘natural’ pakihi at about 1,000 ft. it characterised by a very poor flora with both its exclusive and subalpine components (Wardle, 1964, <hi rend="i">pers. comm.</hi>). Similar features characterise low-lying pakihi areas in the Urewera Range, at 2,000 ft. (<hi rend="i">pers. obs.</hi>). A paleo-climatic view of pakihi formation was that of Holloway (1954) who postulated that the open ‘natural’ pakihis were more extensive during a warm wet period about 1200-1300 A.D. He suggested that the pakihis were subsequently invaded by silver pine (<hi rend="i">Dacrydium colensoi</hi>), then by rimu, whilst progressively ‘drying out’. In terms of the amptitude of climatic change envisaged by Lamb (1965) the precipitation differences influencing soil water levels were not as great in the last 1,000 years as Holloway implied. Holloway claimed that the present climate is unfavourable for rimu regeneration on higher land. Cutler (1960) stated that sites of current and active rimu regeneration (gley podzols) and non-regeneration (gleyed and podzolised yellow brown earths and peats) are climatically too similar to justify the assumption of climatic change. However, the same sites are pedologically very different.</p>
          <p>Wright (1951) demonstrated a high negative relationship between deteriorating soil conditions in gley podzols and failure of beech regeneration, in the silver beech and mountain beech forests of south-west Fiordland. Wright inferred a sequence of forest ‘deterioration’ on terraces in soils from loess-like material, in which the water table is rarely more than 12 in. from the surface. The sequence was, briefly, from silver beech forest, which despite an over-all youthful age, contained a progressively higher proportion of dead and dying trees, to <hi rend="i">Dacrydium</hi> spp. bog forest, followed by progressive burial of the soil profile by sphagnum peat.</p>
          <p>Very little is known of the inter-relationships of podzols, gley podzols, peaty gley podzols and peats and forest growth. Cutler (1960) has described litter mineralisation as at a minimum in drier
<pb xml:id="n17" n="119"/>
podzol sites and at a maximum in the gley podzol-peaty gley podzol sites. Incorporation of humus within the mineral soil decreases from the drier to the wetter sites (cf. Kononova, 1951). As Cutler said, there is a need for careful chemical and physical analysis of such a soil sequence.</p>
          <p>Stevens (1968) studied a chronosequence of moraine and terrace sites aged from 22,000 B.P. to the present in South Westland. He considered that well differentiated gley podzols formed from virgin parent material in 5,000 years. Soils were first podzolised, then gleyed; the course of soil development being ‘directly and completely correlated with the advent and growth of various vegetation types’. Each soil component appeared to attain equilibrium at different rates and within different periods of time. Organic carbon, nitrogen and cation exchange capacity increased rapidly for 12,000 years then slowly declined. There were also losses in exchangeable Ca and Mg, organic P and non-occluded inorganic P after this time. Stevens interpreted these changes as a trend towards ‘ultimate soil degradation after 12,000 years’. Twelve thousand years was considered the appropriate date of final physical communition of stones and gravel whereupon no further materials from fresh rock could enter the system. (See also Walker and Adams, 1959; Walker, 1965.)</p>
          <p>A study of soil physical properties of gley podzols and peaty gley podzols was made by McDonald (1955) who attempted to establish whether or not water-logging due to observed raised water tables was consequent on forest removal. He found no statistically significant differences between clear-felled and unmilled sites for moisture contents (on either weight or volume basis) or any other soil physical property. The wetter conditions on cleared land he attributed to surface water on the water-logged soil, whereas inside the forest, the soil was covered with a thick spongy litter. McDonald considered that 10-20 years after clear-felling was sufficient time to produce a change in soil moisture. There was no evidence to show that non-regeneration of forest trees in clear-felled sites was due to adverse changes in soil moisture content or other physical properties.</p>
          <p>Although lacking statistical significance of differences, McDonald's results certainly showed the expected nature of a difference between the clear-felled and forest sites. His data is of minimal use in that it tells nothing of the <hi rend="i">processes</hi> of change, such as at what stage did any change occur to the steady-state forest soil. McDonald only replicate-sampled one forest site and one non-forest site at four locations, and with only one non-saturation sampling period had little control over the essential field nature of the soil physical properties. (Cf. Stewart and Adams, 1969.) Understanding a soil process requires not only a large number of replicate samples from one site but also a large range of different sampling sites representing a sequence of change. Ecologically, it is the nature and trend of a process that is
<pb xml:id="n18" n="120"/>
important, rather than a statistically significant difference between two points separated in space and/or time.</p>
          <p>On Chatham Island the usual vegetation types associated with development of non-forest from forest — podocarp forest, manuka scrub and tussock-grassland — are absent. Their various places in the developmental sequence have been taken over by <hi rend="i">Dracophyllum</hi> forest. Wright (1959) described soil formation on stabilised dunes under <hi rend="i">Dracophyllum</hi> forest in a cool, damp and windy climate. The <hi rend="i">Dracophyllum</hi> litter is particularly slow to break down and deep layers of forest peat build up, adding greatly to the rate of soil leaching. Podzol characteristics have developed very rapidly in the permeable sand. On gentle slopes the iron-pans inevitably cause bog conditions to develop.</p>
          <p>In a study of post steady-state changes Park (1971) demonstrated close gradient relationships between the vegetation and soils in a forest/podzol system in the Tararua Range. A near-threshold steady-state consists of depauperate vegetation and soils of extremely weak base-status undergoing gleying and reduced aeration.</p>
          <p>Changes from the steady-state silver beech forest/gley podzol form gradients of decreasing stature of the vegetation, increasing numbers of non-forest species and wetter, less aerated and more organic soils. The progression of post steady-state changes is through silver beech woodland//humic gley podzol, mixed shrub/fernland//humic gley podzol and sedge mossland//humic peaty gley podzol. The gradients of change are not simply linear because environmental factors, mainly topographic, complicate the relationship.</p>
          <p>Numerous references have been made to the effects of widespread environmental stresses on forest vegetation and podzol soils in New Zealand (cf. Molloy, 1969). Holloway (1954) stated that much of the South Island forest vegetation was climatically ‘maladjusted’. In general, podocarp forest, mainly situated on warm, moist sites, was thought to be not regenerating, being replaced by beech forests, which were considered to require colder and drier sites. Holloway's hypothesis was supported by Wardle (1963, 1964) who related a ‘regeneration gap’ in podocarp species from ecologically discrete environments to widespread climatic change during the last 700 years. Holloway (1954) also considered that, from pedological evidence, fire was responsible for the ‘final decay and breaking up’ of the forest/podzol system in a climatically induced period of non-re-establishment. Following the fires, the sites were occupied by tussock grassland vegetation and soils. Earlier, from pedological evidence, Raeside (1948) had postulated a climatic change affecting a change from forest to grassland vegetation. Nicholls (1957) also attributed lack of podocarp regeneration in upland Taranaki to effects of climatic change. He disputed Cockayne's (1927) hypothesis that lack of regeneration in rimu forest was part of a linear succession to tawa forest.</p>
          <pb xml:id="n19" n="121"/>
          <p>Cumberland (1962) attached many misunderstandings to the Holloway-Raeside hypothesis. He argued that a climatic change, if it existed at all, either was not great enough to affect forest vegetation or it came after fires had transformed the forest to grassland. Molloy <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1963) on sub-fossil evidence confirmed the widespread removal of forest vegetation by fire in the eastern South Island. Molloy (1964) considered that ‘profile degradation’ of forest podzol soils in upland Canterbury dated from climatic deterioration since the post-glacial optimum between 3,000 and 5,000 years B.P. This degradation was first accentuated by widespread Polynesian fires and then by early burning and grazing under European influence.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d7" type="section">
          <head>Conclusion</head>
          <p>Although it is not difficult to demonstrate changes with time in the vegetation/soil system it is difficult to demonstrate the existence of a state of stability. Once this state is recognised the problem then is to define it in terms of the open system concept whereby vegetation and soils are subject to constant progressive change and constant self development. In such a system stability must be relative and temporary and will only exist in parts of the system at any one time as vegetation and soils are polythetic systems in which any parameter is part of a continuum.</p>
          <p>The chronosequence approach to vegetation and soil analysis (Stevens and Walker, 1971) relies to a large extent on accurate time-control and consequently is restricted to successional studies tracing vegetation and soil development on newly-formed geomorphic surfaces. Most authors are in agreement that in succession, parameters gradually taper to a state of minimal change over a long period of time. Description of this state of comparative stability has varied between ‘terminal’ and ‘non-existent’; it is probably best defined using the term steady-state meaning a temporary state of dynamic equilibrium in an open system.</p>
          <p>In studies of forest ecosystems the steady-state<note xml:id="fn1-121" n="*"><p>In preference to the untenable concept of ‘climax’.</p></note> is invariably assumed to be the forest that is maintaining both healthy structure and constant composition overlying a soil with which it has an adequate nutrient balance and from which advanced gleying, swamping and loss of essential elements are absent. On this basis any development beyond the forest ecosystem can be termed post steady-state.</p>
          <p>Although there are many references to post steady-state development of this type there is a lack of studies of soil and/or vegetation <hi rend="i">sequences</hi> beginning with a steady-state system and measuring gradients of change. In cool, superhumid environments the change from a forest//podzol system to heathland and herbaceous vegetation over gley podzols and peats has been consistently demonstrated,
<pb xml:id="n20" n="122"/>
particularly in the northern latitudes of the coniferous zone where the conversion of forests to ‘muskeg’ is a natural regional process.</p>
          <p>In general, there are close relationships between deteriorating forest structure, increasing species diversity and increasingly wetter, less aerated and more organic soils. The understanding of the processes involved requires the sampling of many ecosystem parameters from a wide range of sites of different ages; from a newly formed geomorphic surface to sites where heathland and herbaceous vegetation have replaced forest. It is the lot of the student of vegetation and soil dynamics that such an ideal is so unique that it is probably non-existant.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d8" type="biblio">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Anderson, R.C., Loucks, O.L., <name type="person" key="name-032427">Swain, A. M.</name>, 1969: Herbaceous Response to Canopy Cover, Light Intensity and Throughfall Precipitation in Coniferous Forests. <hi rend="i">Ecology</hi> 50: 255-63.</bibl>
            <bibl>Auer, V., 1966: Climatic Variations in Fuego-Patagonia in ‘Pleistocene and Post-Pleistocene Climatic Variations in the Pacific Area’ 37-56. Bishop Museum Press, Hawaii.</bibl>
            <bibl>Becking, R., 1968: Vegetational Response to Change in Environment and Changes in Species Tolerance with Time. <hi rend="i">Vegetatio XVI Fasc.</hi> 1-4: 135-58.</bibl>
            <bibl>Bethlahmy, R., 1962: First Year Effects of Timber Removal on Soil Moisture. <hi rend="i">Bull. Int. Ass. Sc. Hydrol.</hi> Lourain 7: 2.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s1_122">Bloomfield, C.</seg>, 1951: Experiments on the Mechanism of Gley Formation. <hi rend="i">J. Soil Sci.</hi> 2: 196-211.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_122">——</seg>, 1954: The Reduction of Iron Oxide by Bacteria. <hi rend="i">J. Soil Sci.</hi> 5: 129-37.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_122">——</seg>, 1959: Experiments on Gleying. <hi rend="i">N.Z. Soil News</hi> 2.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s2_122">Bray, J. R.</seg>, 1958: Notes towards an Ecological Theory. <hi rend="i">Ecology</hi> 39: 4.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_122">——</seg>, and Struik, G. J., 1963: Forest Growth and Glacier Chronology in Yoho National Park. <hi rend="i">Canad. J. Bot.</hi> 41: 1245.</bibl>
            <bibl>Bryan and Teakle, 1949: Pedogenic Inertia; a Concept in Soil Science. <hi rend="i">Nature</hi>, Lond., 164: 969.</bibl>
            <bibl>Bull, C. A., and Reynolds, B. R. C., 1968: Wind Turbulence Generated by Vegetation and its Implications. <hi rend="i">Suppl. to Forestry</hi>, Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 28-37.</bibl>
            <bibl>Chavasse, C. G. R., 1962: Forests, Soils and Landforms of Westland. <hi rend="i">N.Z. For. Ser. Info. Series</hi>, Bull. No. 43.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s3_122">Clements, F. E.</seg>, 1916: Plant Succession: an Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. <hi rend="i">Publ. Carnegie Inst.</hi> 242.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s3_122">——</seg>, 1936: Nature and Structure of the Climax. <hi rend="i">J. Ecol.</hi> 24: 252-84.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s4_122">Crampton, C. B.</seg>, 1963: The Development and Morphology of Iron Pan Podzols in Mid and South Wales. <hi rend="i">J. Soil Sci.</hi> 14: 282-302.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s4_122">——</seg>, 1965: Vegetation, Aspect and Time as Factors of Gleying in Podzols of South Wales. <hi rend="i">J. Soil Sci.</hi> 16: 210-29.</bibl>
            <bibl>Crocker, R. L., and Dickson, B. A., 1957: Soil Development on the Recessional Moraines of the Herbert and Menderhall Glaciers, S.E. Alaska. <hi rend="i">J. Ecol.</hi> 45: 169-85.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s5_122">Crompton, E.</seg>, 1952: Some Morphological Features associated with Poor Soil Drainage. <hi rend="i">J. Soil Sci.</hi> 3: 277-89.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s5_122">——</seg>, 1956: The Environmental and Pedological Relationships of Peaty Gleyed Podzols. <hi rend="i">6th Int. Congr. Soil Sci.</hi>, Paris, 9: 155-61.</bibl>
            <bibl>Cumberland, K. B., 1962: Climatic Change or Cultural Interference? New Zealand in Moa-hunter Times, in McCaskill, M. (Ed.), Land and Livelihood, Christchurch, N.Z. Geog. Soc., pp. 88-142.</bibl>
            <bibl>Cutler, E. J. B., 1960: Forest Growth on Podzolised Soils. <hi rend="i">N.Z. Soil News</hi> No. 3: 132-286.</bibl>
            <bibl>Dansereau, P., 1957: <hi rend="i">Biogeography; an Ecological Perspective.</hi></bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s1_123">Dimbleby, G. W.</seg>, 1952: Soil Regeneration on the N.E. Yorkshire Moors. <hi rend="i">J. Ecol.</hi> 40: 331-41.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_123">——</seg>, 1962: The Development of the British Heathlands and their Soils. <hi rend="i">Oxford Forestry Memoirs Nos.</hi> 23. Clarendon Press.</bibl>
            <bibl>Fisher, B. T., 1928: Soil Changes and Silviculture in the Harvard Forest. <hi rend="i">Ecology</hi> 9: 6.</bibl>
            <bibl>Franzmeier, P. P., Whiteside, R. P., and Mortland, M. M., 1963: A. Chronosequence of Podzols in Northern Michigan. <hi rend="i">Quart. Bull. Michigan State Univ.</hi> 46: 1-57.</bibl>
            <bibl>Geiger, R., 1965: <hi rend="i">The Climate near the Ground</hi> (rev. ed.), Harvard Univ. Press.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s2_123">Gibbs, H. S.</seg>, 1959: Gleying in Soils of the North Island. <hi rend="i">N.Z. Soil News</hi> No. 2.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_123">——</seg>, Mercer, A. D., and Collie, T. W., 1950: Soils and Agriculture of Westland, N.Z. <hi rend="i">Soil Bureau Bull.</hi> No. 2, D.S.I.R.</bibl>
            <bibl>Glentworth, R., and Dion, H. G., 1949: The Association of Hydrological Sequeces in Certain Soils of the Podzol Zone of N.E. Scotland. <hi rend="i">J. Soil Sci.</hi> 1: 35-49.</bibl>
            <bibl>Gloyne, R. W., 1968: The Structure of the Wind and its Relevance to Forestry. <hi rend="i">Suppl. to Forestry</hi>, Oxford Univ. Press, 7-19.</bibl>
            <bibl>Goodall, D. W., 1962: The Continuum and the Individualistic Association. <hi rend="i">Vegetatio</hi> 11: 297-316.</bibl>
            <bibl>Gorshenin, K. F., 1961: <hi rend="i">The Soils of Southern Siberia.</hi> Israel program for scientific translations.</bibl>
            <bibl>Griffith, E. C., Hartwell, E. W., and Shaw, T. E., 1930: The Evolution of Soils as Affected by the Old Field Succession of White Pine-Mixed Hardwood in Central New England. <hi rend="i">Bull. Harv. For.</hi> No. 15.</bibl>
            <bibl>Heinselman, M. L., 1957: Wind-caused Mortality in Minnesota Swamp Black Spruce in Relation to Cutting Methods and Stand Condition. Proc. Soc. Amer For., 1957.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-208259">Holloway, J. T.</name>, 1954: Forests and Climates of the South Island of New Zealand, <hi rend="i">Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z.</hi>, 82: 329-410.</bibl>
            <bibl>Iwaki, N., and Totsuka, T., 1959: Ecological and Physiological Studies on the Vegetation of Mt. Shimagare. II. On the Crescent-shaped ‘Dead Tree Strips’ in the Tatsugataka and Chichibu Mts. <hi rend="i">Bot. Mag.</hi> 72: 852.</bibl>
            <bibl>Jenny, H., 1941: <hi rend="i">Factors in Soil Formation.</hi> McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.</bibl>
            <bibl>Katz, L., 1929: Sphagnum Bogs of Central Russia. <hi rend="i">J. Ecol.</hi> 4: 177-202.</bibl>
            <bibl>Keller, R., 1927: Moss Peat Moors on Podzols on the Russian Plains. <hi rend="i">J. Ecol.</hi> 15: 205.</bibl>
            <bibl>Kononova, M. M., 1951: Problems of Soil Humus. <hi rend="i">Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R.</hi>, Moscow (in Russ.); Engl. transl. Pergamon Press.</bibl>
            <bibl>Kovda, V. A., 1933: Principles of Soil Classification. Trudy Soviet sekts. <hi rend="i">M.A.P. (Prov. Soviet Section Int. Soc. Soil Sci.)</hi>, II, 1, 7-22, Moscow.</bibl>
            <bibl>Kresl, J., 1967: The Influence on Atmospheric Precipitation of Gaps in a Forest Stand. <hi rend="i">Acta. Univ. Agric. Bruo (Fac. Silv.)</hi>, 36: 3: 257-91.</bibl>
            <bibl>Lamb, H. H., 1965: The Warm Mediaeval Epoch and Its Sequel. <hi rend="i">Palaeogeog., Palaeoclimatol., Palaeoecol.</hi> 1: 13-37.</bibl>
            <bibl>Lavkulich, L. M., 1969: Soil Dynamics in the Interpretation of Palaeosols in ‘Pedology and Quaternary Research’. Univ. of Alberta Printing Dept., 25-38.</bibl>
            <bibl>Lewantin, H. C., 1969: The Meaning of Stability in ‘Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems’. Brookhaven Symposia on Biology, No. 22: 13-24. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.</bibl>
            <bibl>Ludi, W., 1923: Die Untersuchung und Gleiderung der Sukzessionsvorgange in Uunserer Vegeation. <hi rend="i">Naturf. Gesell., Bord. Verhandl</hi> 35: 277-302.</bibl>
            <bibl>Lutz, H. J., and Chandler, R. F., 1949: <hi rend="i">Forest Soils.</hi> John Wiley, New York.</bibl>
            <bibl>Mackney, D., 1961: A Podzol Developmental Sequence in Oakwoods and Heath in Central England. <hi rend="i">J. Soil Sci.</hi> 12: 23-40.</bibl>
            <bibl>McDonald, D. C., 1955: Soil Moisture and Physical Properties of a Westland ‘Pakihi’ Soil in Relation to Deforestation. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Sci. Tech.</hi> 37B: 258-66.</bibl>
            <bibl>Mark, A. F., 1958: The Ecology of the Southern Appalachian Grass Balds. <hi rend="i">Ecol. Monogr.</hi> 28: 293-336.</bibl>
            <bibl>Mitchell, B. D., Bracewell, J. M., de Embredy, A. S., Hardy, W. J., and Smith, B. F. L., 1968: Mineralogical and Chemical Characteristics of a Gley Soil from N.E. Scotland. <hi rend="i">Trans. 9th Int. Congr. Soil Sci.</hi> 3: 67-77.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s1_124">Molloy, B. P. J.</seg>, 1964: Soil Genesis and Plant Succession in the Subalpine and Alpine Zones of Torlesse Range, Canterbury, New Zealand. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Bot.</hi> 2: 143-76.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_124">——</seg>, <name type="person" key="name-170388">Burrows, C. J.</name>, Cox, J. E., <name type="person" key="name-015930">Johnston, J. A.</name>, and Wardle, D., 1963: Distribution of Sub-fossil Remains, Eastern South Island, New Zealand. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Bot.</hi> 1: 68-77.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s2_124"><name type="person" key="name-111229">Muir, A.</name></seg>, 1961: The Podzol and Podzolic Soils. <hi rend="i">Adv. in Agr.</hi> 13: 1-56.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_124">——</seg>, and Fraser, G. K., 1940: <hi rend="i">Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh</hi> 60: 233-341.</bibl>
            <bibl>Muller, P. H., 1887: <hi rend="i">Studier uber Naturlichen Humusformen und Decren Tinwirkung auf Vegetation und Boden.</hi> vii and 324 pp. Julius Springen, Berlin.</bibl>
            <bibl>Nicholls, J. F., 1957: The Historical Ecology of the Indigenous Forests of the Taranaki Uplands. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. For.</hi> 7: 17-34.</bibl>
            <bibl>Nikiforoff, C. C., 1959: Re-appraisal of the Soil. <hi rend="i">Science</hi> 129: 186-96.</bibl>
            <bibl>Oshima, Y., Himura, M., Iwaki, H., and Kuriowa, S., 1958: Ecological and Physiological Studies on the Vegetation of Mt. Shimagare. I. Preliminary Survey of Vegetation. <hi rend="i">Bot. Mag.</hi> 71: 289-301.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s3_124"><name type="person" key="name-170435">Park, G. N.</name></seg>, 1970: Concepts in Vegetation/Soil System Dynamics. I. Stability, Climax, Maturity and Steady-state. <hi rend="i">Tuatara</hi> 18.3: 132-144.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s3_124">——</seg>, 1971: Changes in the Structure and Composition of the Vegetation/Soil System, Maymorn Ridge, Tararua Range, New Zealand. M.Sc. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, N.Z.</bibl>
            <bibl>Pase, C. P., and Hurd, R. W., 1957: Understorey Vegetation as Related to Basal Area, Crown Cover and Litter produced by Miniature Ponderosa Pine Stands in the Black Hills. <hi rend="i">Proc. Soc. Amer. For.</hi>, 1957.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-009648">Pierce, R.</name>, 1953: Oxidation-Reduction Potentials and Specific Conductances of Ground Water; — their Influence on Ground Water. <hi rend="i">Proc. Soil Soc. Amer.</hi> 17: 61-65.</bibl>
            <bibl>Raeside, J. D., 1948: Some Post-Glacial Changes in Canterbury and Their Effect on Soil Formation. <hi rend="i">Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z.</hi> 77, 1: 153-71.</bibl>
            <bibl>Raid, L., 1968: The Relationships Between Soil Moisture, Meteorological Conditions and Ground Water in Various Forest Types. <hi rend="i">Easti. N.S.V. Tead. Acad. Toimet (Biol.)</hi> 17, 3: 312-19.</bibl>
            <bibl>Rigg, G. S., 1940: Development of Bogs in North America. <hi rend="i">Bot. Rev.</hi> 6: 12.</bibl>
            <bibl>Rigg, H. H., 1951: An Ecological Survey of the Pakihi Lands of the Westport District, Nelson. Univ. of N.Z. thesis (Canterbury University).</bibl>
            <bibl>Robbins, R. G., 1962: The Podocarp-Broadleaf Forests of New Zealand. <hi rend="i">Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z.</hi> 1: 33-76.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s4_124">Rode, A. A.</seg>, 1944: Pochvovedenie No. 4-5: 159-79.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s4_124">——</seg>, 1947: <hi rend="i">The Soil Forming Process and Soil Evolution.</hi> V. S. Volynskaya (ed.). Israel Program for Scientific Translations. Transl. by J. S. Joffe, 1961.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s5_125">Rowe, J. S.</seg>, 1961a: The Level of Integration Concept in Ecology. <hi rend="i">Ecology</hi> 42: 420-27.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s5_125">——</seg>, 1961b: Critique of Some Vegetational Concepts as Applied to Forests of N.W. Alberta. <hi rend="i">Can. J. Bot.</hi> 42: 420-27.</bibl>
            <bibl>Russell, E. W., 1961: <hi rend="i">Soil Conditions and Plant Growth.</hi> Longmans, Green and Co., New York.</bibl>
            <bibl>Sanders, R. L., 1969: Benthic Marine Diversity and the Stability-Time Hypothesis, in ‘Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems’. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology No. 22: 71-81: U.S. Atomic Energy Comm.</bibl>
            <bibl>Satterlund, D. R., 1961: Some Inter-Relationships Between Ground-water and Swamp Forest in the Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Abstract of thesis in <hi rend="i">Dissert. Abstr.</hi> 21: 8.</bibl>
            <bibl>Sibertsev, N. W., 1895: Soils of the Arzamas District, in <hi rend="i">Selected Works</hi>, Vol 2, pp. 109 et seq. <hi rend="i">Isdatel stva Sel’ skokhozaistvenoi Literatury</hi>, Moscow.</bibl>
            <bibl>Simonsen, R., 1967: The Concept of the Soil. <hi rend="i">Adv. in Agronomy</hi> 19.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-209330">Stevens, P. R.</name>, 1968: A Chronosequence of Soils near the Franz Josef Glacier. Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln College Library, N.Z.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-209330">Stevens, P. R.</name>, and Walker, T. W., 1971; The Chronosequence Concept and Soil Development. <hi rend="i">Q. Biol. Rev.</hi> 45: 333-350.</bibl>
            <bibl>Stewart, V. I., and Adams, W. A., 1968: The Quantitative Description of Soil Moisture States in Natural Hagitats, with Special Reference to Wet Soils, in ‘Measurement of Environmental Factors in Ecology’. <hi rend="i">Brit. Ecol. Soc. Sympos.</hi> 8.</bibl>
            <bibl>Tanfil'ev, 1911: <hi rend="i">Pradely Lesov Polyarnoi Rossii</hi> (The Borders of Forests in Soviet Russia), Odessa.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-209409">Taylor, N. H.</name>, and Pohlen I., 1962: Soil Survey Method. <hi rend="i">N.Z. Soil Bur. Bull.</hi> 25</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s1_125">Tiurin, I. V.</seg>, 1933: ‘Kurs Pochvovedeniya’. <hi rend="i">Gosydarstvennoye Izdatel 'stve Kolkhoznoi i Soulkhoznoi Literatury</hi>, Moscow.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_125">——</seg>, 1935: Contribution to the Swamping Process of Forest Soils (podzol) After Cutting. <hi rend="i">Trans. 3rd Int. Congr. Soil Sci.</hi></bibl>
            <bibl>Vil'yams, V. N., 1940: ‘Pochvovedenie’. 4th ed., Sel’khosgiz, Moscow.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s2_125">Vucetich, C. G.</seg>, 1960: Gley Podzols, in ‘New Zealand Soil Groups’. <hi rend="i">Proc. N.Z. Soc. Soil Sci.</hi> 131-33.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_125">——</seg>, and Pullar, W. A., 1963: Ash Beds and Soils in the Rotorua District. <hi rend="i">Proc. N.Z. Ecol. Soc.</hi> 10: 65-72.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s3_125">Walker, T. W.</seg>, 1965: The Significance of Phosphorus in Pedogenesis in ‘Experimental Pedology’. Hallsworth and Crawford (ed.), Butterworths.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s3_125">——</seg>, and Adams, A. F., 1959: Studies on Organic Matter. 2: Influence of Weathering on Levels of C, N, S and organic and total P. <hi rend="i">Soil Sci.</hi> 87: 1-10.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s4_125">Wardle, D.</seg>, 1963: Population Structure and Growth of Rimu <hi rend="i">(Dacrydium cupressinum). N.Z. J. Bot.</hi> 1: 208-14.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s4_125">——</seg>, 1964: The Regeneration Gap in New Zealand Gymnosperms. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Bot.</hi> 1: 301-15.</bibl>
            <bibl>Watterston, K. G., and Iyer, J. C., 1962: Changes in Hydromorphic Soils produced by Thinning Black Spruce Stands. <hi rend="i">For. Res. Note Wisc. Coll. Agric. No.</hi> 107.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s6_125">Whittaker, R. H.</seg>, 1953: A Consideration of Climax Theory: the Climax as a Population and Pattern. <hi rend="i">Ecol. Monogr.</hi> 23: 41-78.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s6_125">——</seg>, 1957: Recent Evolution of Ecological Concepts in Relation to the Eastern Forests of North America. <hi rend="i">Am. J. Bot.</hi> 44: 197-206.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s6_125">——</seg>, 1969: Evolution of Diversity in Plant Communities, in ‘Diversity and Stability in Ecological Systems’, in Brookhaven Symposia in Biology No. 22: 1-12. U.S. Atomic Energy Comm.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s7_125">Wilde, S. A.</seg>, 1940: Classification of Gley Soils for Forest Management and Re-afforestation. <hi rend="i">Ecology</hi> 21: 34-.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s7_125">——</seg>, 1953: The Influence of Forest Cover on the State of the Water Table. <hi rend="i">Proc. Soil Soc. Amer.</hi> 17: 64-67.</bibl>
            <bibl>Wittich, R., 1930: Untersuchungen uber der Einfluss des Kahlschlages auf der Bodenzustand. <hi rend="i">Mitt a forstwirtshaft u. forstwissenshaft</hi> 1: 498-506.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s8_125"><name type="person" key="name-170420">Wright, A. C. S.</name></seg>, 1951: Soils of S.W. Southland. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Sci. Tech.</hi> 33A: 66-75.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s8_125">——</seg>, 1959: The Soil Factor in Plant Ecology. Part 2. <hi rend="i">Wgtn. Bot. Soc. Bull.</hi> No. 31.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s8_125">——</seg>, and Miller, R. B., 1952: Soils of S.W. Fiordland. <hi rend="i">N.Z. Soil Bur. Bull.</hi> n.s. 7.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n24" n="126"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d2" type="article">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Book Reviews</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d1" type="section">
          <head>‘<hi rend="c">New Zealand Insects and Their Story</hi>’</head>
          <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-101975">Richard Sharell</name>,<lb/>
Published by Collins, Auckland and London, 1971<lb/>
268 pp. 299 illustrations, 200 in colour.</byline>
          <p><hi rend="sc">Richard Sharrell</hi> has collected, observed and photographed New Zealand insects for nearly 30 years in the role of an enthralled naturalist. His aim in this book is to convey ‘in text and pictures something of the enchantment of living things’ without dwelling overmuch on the ‘dreary textbook approach’, an aim which he has achieved with distinction. Hs writing is sensitive, some scientists would say over-emotional, but it is in harmony with the concept of the book.</p>
          <p>Naturally enough, Mr Sharell's own investigations have included only a relatively small proportion of our insect fauna. This is reflected in the structure of the book which is a blending of these observations with material derived from other sources. His accounts and illustrations of such examples as the Praying Mantis, Red Admiral butterfly, Monarch butterfly, Magpie moth, Lichen moth, Gum Emperor moth, Tiger beetle and wetas, to name the main ones, are full of interest and originality for all readers, be they professional scientists or interested laymen. For instance on p. 27, the well-known and bizarre habit female mantids have of consuming their mate during copulation is discussed and Sharell has shown with simple experiments that males of the New Zealand mantis, at least in cages, are able to consummate several successive matings without suffering this fate. Again, on p. 128 there is an interesting and so far as am aware, original suggestion, that stick insects living on manuka infected by the black manuka-blight may possibly be evolving towards a melanic form in the manner of industrial melanism in European Lepidoptera. Snippets such as these and many others testify to Sharell's acute observations, the data are first-hand and first rate.</p>
          <p>However, this is not a book on a few species, it aims to be comprehensive. To broaden the coverage of New Zealand insects, Sharell has called upon information on species unfamiliar to him. Here one finds less confidence in some of his statements. For example on p. 129 the short-horned grasshoppers (Fam. Acridiidae) are described as dull greyish-brown or yellowish insects of small size. This scarcely does justice to the specialised subalpine fauna
<pb xml:id="n25" n="127"/>
of grasshoppers where brilliant colours can be quite striking and females may reach 48mm. total length. Moreover the peculiarity of our fauna of 15 species of grasshoppers is not that only three occur above 3000ft, but that only three occur below that altitude. Although not the author's intended meaning, a statement on p. 108 suggests that aphids, leaf-hoppers, scale insects and cicadas have no wings at all.</p>
          <p>Common names for New Zealand insects have always led to confusion among different authors, to the extent that the Entomological Society of N.Z. in 1967 published a list of accepted names for common insects. Sharell uses these in conjunction with scientific names and in many cases Maori names as well. Nomenclature is thus as accurate as it can be in the midst of change, with the exception of a plate caption (pl. 69) which describes a noctuid larva as a ‘grass grub’.</p>
          <p>The superb colour plates are definitely the highlight of the book. The subjects are carefully arranged with the touch of an artist. Colour reproduction is generally of high standard but no indication of natural size is given, a common fault with close-up photographic illustrations.</p>
          <p>The insects are presented in groupings more or less akin to their taxonomic categories. The basis of insect classification is explained in the general text and in more detail in a ‘catalogue of insects’, a section borrowed from Wiggleworth's ‘The Life of Insects’ (1964) with some new illustrations applicable to the local fauna.</p>
          <p>Insect origins are discussed with particular reference to <hi rend="i">Peripatoides</hi> and <hi rend="i">Ooperipatus</hi>, the New Zealand genera of Onychophora, but coverage of the zoogeographical relationships of our insect fauna is disappointingly brief. A chapter devoted to the life and work of J. H. Fabre and <name type="person" key="name-208285">G. V. Hudson</name> is included to emphasise the heights to which ‘insectmen’ without professional training (like Sharell himself) can rise.</p>
          <p>This book is a valuable contribution to the New Zealand literature, providing illustrations and snippets of original information on a wide array of living insects with more detail lavished on certain selected examples. I hope it will go a long way toward stimulating interest in insects as living entities to be appreciated rather than annihilated.</p>
          <closer rend="right">G.W.G.</closer>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n26" n="128"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3" type="article">
          <head>
            <title level="a">Freshwater Fishes and Rivers of Australia</title>
          </head>
          <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-102010">John S. Lake</name>,<lb/>
Published by <name type="person">Thomas Nelson</name> (Australia) Ltd., Melbourne,<lb/>
1971, 61 pages.</byline>
          <p><hi rend="sc">At Last</hi> there is a book on Australian freshwater fishes! This is a much neglected field of activity in Australian biology, and it is really pleasing to see the publication of a book about these little known fishes. Although the book is only 61 pages long, the relatively large format and small print mean that much useful information is packed between the covers. There seems a rather excessive wastage of space, e.g. p. 19 is little more than half occupied, but the organisation of the book into family groups is probably partly responsible for this.</p>
          <p>The title of the book is a curious one, as only two and a half pages deal with the rivers and all the remainder of the book is on fishes, although each species has listed the catchments in which it has been recorded. No doubt fish students will be pleased to know that nearly all the book is concerned with fishes!! The inside covers have maps of Australia, on which the subdivision of the continent into numbered catchments is portrayed, and there is also a key to the catchment numbers and a series of letter codes that indicate the status of each species, noting occurrence outside Australia, utility as sports fish or food, etc. Unfortunately the key to these numbers and letters is hidden by the inside fold of the dust cover, and takes a little finding.</p>
          <p>The book lists 231 species, in family groups. Many of these are really freshwater vagrants, and only about half (including diadromous species) are truly freshwater fishes. Introduced species are given coverage comparable with native species. Each chapter covers a family, containing a list of species with common names, and details on distribution. A simple but quite adequate representative outline drawing is included for each family. In the text there is a general discussion of distribution, and then all known details of breeding (Lake's special interest) are discussed. The feeding habits of some species, as well as their quality as food, are briefly mentioned. Some species are discussed in considerable detail, others appear only in the family listing, and this variation in depth of treatment reflects how variable is the present knowledge of the fauna, and how little is known about so many of the species. Lake mentions several times, the poor state of the taxonomy of the fauna, and the need for comprehensive revisions. The dust cover states that the book will ‘aid in correct identification’, but this just isn't true. No aids to identifications appear, apart from colour photographs, and a great many of the species are not illustrated in any
<pb xml:id="n27" n="129"/>
way. I doubt that coloured photos of one or two species in a diverse family can be regarded as aids to identification of the species in the family. But at least we have a list of species, even though Lake emphasises its tentativeness. The dust cover is more to the point in noting that the book ‘highlights … gaps in our knowledge and should aid and stimulate those who wish to make a study of our freshwater fishes’. This, I think, is the true function of the book, apart from its very useful compilation of information on reproduction. Current knowledge of the fauna does not permit a comprehensive guide to the fauna.</p>
          <p>Following the family accounts is a short and succinct chapter on reproduction and distribution, and another on the future of Australian freshwater fishes. There is a short but helpful glossary, although the uninitiated may have difficulty locating pelvic fins — defined as situated between the pectoral and anal fins—in species such as <hi rend="i">Gadopsis, Kurtus</hi> and <hi rend="i">Pseudaphritis</hi>, in which the fins are jugular. There is a very brief list of references limited to literature cited, a table for conversion of metric units (used throughout) to British Units, and separate indices for common and scientific names. Although he does not labour the point Lake places strong emphasis on the damaging effects of dams and water control projects on the fish fauna and reveals an interesting form of pollution — thermal pollution in which there is a decline in water temperatures due to release of cold water from the bottoms of large dams. He minimises the role of introduced fishes in affecting the indigenous fauna, a controversial subject about which little is really known.</p>
          <p>There are 16 fine colour plates with 96 individual photographs, mostly of fish, a few of habitats. It seems a shame that so many of the fishes had their tails cut off, or were nosing out of the edge of the picture, because the photos themselves would be the envy of any aquarium photographer; they make the book a candidate for the coffee table in an era of some competition.</p>
          <p>I found few errors, one or two mis-spellings, including the old gremlin <hi rend="i">Oncorhynchus</hi> (spelt <hi rend="i">Onchorynchus)</hi>, and <hi rend="i">truttaceus (truttaceous);</hi> one author cited has his name spelt in different ways on one page.</p>
          <p>If you are interested in identifying members of the diverse fishes in the Australian freshwater fish fauna, this book may be a disappointment, but I don't know where you could turn for help. If you are interested in learning what is known about the small freshwater fish fauna of this enormous and dry continent this book should supply you with some interesting reading.</p>
          <p>
            <hi rend="right">R. M. McD.</hi>
          </p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n28" n="130"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d4" type="article" decls="#text-2-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Studies on The ‘Kerosene Fungus’ Cladosporium Resinae (Lindau) De Vries<lb/>
Part III. Morphology, Taxonomy and Physiology</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name key="name-170432" type="person">J. E. Sheridan</name>, <name key="name-170466" type="person">Y. L. Tan</name> and <name key="name-170465" type="person">Jan Nelson</name><lb/>
Botany Department, Victoria University of Wellington</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Contents</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Introduction</p>
          <list>
            <label>1.</label>
            <item>
              <p>Morphology
<list><label>(a)</label><item><p>The sexual (perfect) state</p></item><label>(b)</label><item><p>The asexual (imperfect) state</p></item><label>(c)</label><item><p>Fine structure</p></item></list></p>
            </item>
            <label>2.</label>
            <item>
              <p>Taxonomy</p>
            </item>
            <label>3.</label>
            <item>
              <p>Physiology
<list><label>(a)</label><item><p>Growth in kerosene</p></item><label>(b)</label><item><p>Tolerance to creosote</p></item><label>(c)</label><item><p>Growth on different culture media</p></item><label>(d)</label><item><p>Nutrition — carbon and nitrogen source requirements</p></item><label>(e)</label><item><p>Effect of pH on growth</p></item><label>(f)</label><item><p>Effect of temperature on growth</p></item><label>(g)</label><item><p>Pigment production</p></item></list></p>
            </item>
            <label>4.</label>
            <item>
              <p>Summary and Conclusions</p>
            </item>
          </list>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction</hi>
          </head>
          <p><hi rend="sc">The Sexual</hi> (perfect or ascal) state of the ‘kerosene fungus’ was first described by Parbery in 1969. He erected a new family and genus to accommodate it and named this fungus <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> Parbery (1969a). Almost thirty years earlier Christensen <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1942) described what they called ‘sclerotia’ within the agar of six-week-to-two-month old cultures. These were probably sterile sexual fruiting bodies (ascocarps). The occurrence of the sexual state in nature or in pure culture is rare (Parbery, 1969a; Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971) but when cultures are stored under mineral oil mature ascocarps often develop (Sheridan and Steel, 1971). Morphology of ascocarps produced on creosoted matchsticks and under mineral oil, and mode of development are apparently unique (Parbery, 1969a; Sheridan and Steel, 1971).</p>
          <p>Four forms of the asexual (imperfect or conidial) state have been described (de Vries, 1952; Parbery, 1969a); f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> which is the most common, f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> (= f. <hi rend="i">viride</hi>), f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">sterile.</hi> De Vries (1952) obtained all four from a single spore culture of the fungus. He prepared monospore cultures of the first three mentioned
<pb xml:id="n29" n="131"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_131a"><graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_131a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_131a-g"/><head>Fig. 1: Typical asexual reproductive structures of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (left) and f. <hi rend="i">resinae.</hi></head></figure>
forms and he found these to be constant over a number of years. Later workers (Parbery, 1969a; Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971) have found f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> arising from f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> in culture on a number of occasions; f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> may also give rise to f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi> (Tan, unpublished). The <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> and <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> form are morphologically distinct (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_131a">Fig. 1</ref>), but sometimes they arise side by side from the same hypha in slide cultures on malt agar (Ellis, 1971—personal communication). Intermediates occur and the asexual state of this fungus is considered to be very variable (Hendey, 1964; Parbery, 1969a). De Vires (1952) described f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> as being morpholo gically similar to f. <hi rend="i">resinae.</hi> Other workers have found an albino morphologically similar to f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (Parbery, 1969a; Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971). All forms apparently have the same perfect state <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> Parbery (Parbery, 1969a).</p>
          <p>A knowledge of the fine structure of this fungus may throw light on its variability and reproduction. However, nothing has yet been published on this aspect as far as we are aware. We have studied the surface morphology of all forms, except f. <hi rend="i">sterile</hi>, in the scanning electron microscope (Sheridan and Troughton, in preparation) and the internal structure of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> in the transmission electron microscope (Tan, 1972). Results of these studies will be discussed in this paper in an attempt to elucidate the problems concerning the variability, reproduction and recognition of this fungus.</p>
          <pb xml:id="n30" n="132"/>
          <p>De Vries (1955) made the combination <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> (Lindau) de Vries for the asexual state and Hendey (1964) applied the name ‘kerosene fungus’ to this organism. Although the name <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> has subsequently been widely used not all research workers have accepted it. The reasons for this appear to arise from its morphological and physiological variability and lack of knowledge of its occurrence and role in nature. This last aspect has been reviewed in Part II of these studies. As a result of an intensive study of this fungus in its natural habitat, the soil, and in pure culture Parbery (1969a) concluded that it is correctly placed in the form-genus <hi rend="i">Cladosporium.</hi> This is in agreement with Nicot and Zakartchenko (1966) and Sheridan, Steel and Knox (1971). Now that soil isolates of the fungus collected in a number of different parts of the world (Australia, England, Wales and parts of Europe by Parbery, 1969a; New Zealand, by Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971; England and Ireland by Sheridan, unpublished) and air isolates and feather isolates from New Zealand (Sheridan, 1971) are available for study in addition to fuel isolates also from many parts of the world, new knowledge is rapidly accumulating. In the light of this new knowledge the name of the ‘kerosene fungus’ and its taxonomic position is discussed in this paper.</p>
          <p>Apart from reports that kerosene may be used as a sole carbon source and that the optimum temperature for growth in kerosene and in pure culture is close to 30° C. (Hazzard, 1963; Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971; Parbery, 1971a) very little has been published in the open scientific literature in relation to the nutrition of the ‘kerosene fungus’ and chemical and physical factors affecting its growth in culture, soil or fuel. There may, however, be valuable contributions to knowledge of this aspect contained in technical reports which we have been unable to procure or the existence of which is unknown to us. In a recent article Parbery (1971a) reports that in pure culture work the shape and size of the flask influences growth and that shaking has a deleterious effect on growth. Different isolates have different temperature requirements. Different isolates also show different growth rates in kerosene (Sheridan and Nelson, 1971a) and many different strains of the fungus possibly exist. Nothing is known about the effect of light on growth and reproduction. Over the past two years an extensive study of the nutrition of local isolates of the fungus has been made in our laboratory, and the growth in kerosene of isolates collected from different parts of the world is currently being studied. Our findings will be discussed in so far as they throw additional light on the physiology of this fungus.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4" type="section">
          <head>1. <hi rend="c">Morphology</hi></head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4-d1" type="section">
            <head>(a) The sexual (perfect) state</head>
            <p>The discovery of the sexual (perfect or ascal) state of the ‘kerosene fungus’ was reported in 1968 (Parbery and Ford, 1968) and a
<pb xml:id="n31" n="133"/>
full description published in 1969 (Parbery, 1969a). Initially, mature ascocarps were produced only in paired cultures of isolates from south-eastern Australia which suggested that the fungus was heterothallic. Subsequently several unpaired isolates collected in Britain, France and Germany, as well as some other Australian isolates, produced fertile ascocarps. On Bushnell-Haas or malt agar 6-8 weeks’ incubation was necessary for the development of mature ascocarps while on modified Weitzman and Silva-Hutner agar some isolates produced fertile ascocarps in 14-20 days (Parbery, 1969a). A few New Zealand isolates produced mature ascocarps on V-8 juice agar in 4-8 weeks at normal laboratory temperatures but this was a rare occurrence (Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971) and in general only the asexual state was produced. When cultures on 2% malt extract agar were stored under mineral oil (B.P. quality, Sp.gr. 0.870-0.890) mature ascocarps were present, in many isolates, in the oil after five months (Sheridan and Steel, 1971). V-8 juice agar has also been successfully used (Sheridan, unpublished). Mature ascocarps were found on soil and on creosoted matchsticks in Australia (Parbery, 1969c) but not in New Zealand (Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971).</p>
            <p>In culture ascocarps appear as very small, black, more or less spherical bodies, 71-128 micron high by 43-86 micron wide, usually immersed in the medium (Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971) whereas on soil and creosoted matchsticks in some cases they produce flanged or funnel-shaped outgrowths from their apical regions (Parbery, 1969c). Parbery (1969c) has suggested that this funnel-shaped apex is not normally produced by the ascocarp in nature but appears as a result of development at high humidity. The majority of ascocarps, in any one isolate, produced under mineral oil possess funnel-shaped apices (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_134a">Fig. 2</ref>). These appear to originate as blown-out, spherical portions of the ascocarp, the weakest point being that furthest from the ascocarp body. They rupture at this point, giving a funnel-shaped appearance. The internal wall of the funnel appears to be ornamented (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_135a">Fig. 3</ref>). In many cases asci containing ascocarps can be seen through the semi-transparent wall of the immature ascocarp (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_135a">Fig. 4</ref>).</p>
            <p>Mature ascocarps measured 139 micron high by 80 micron wide. The funnel-shaped apex ranged from 27 to 110 micron wide by 24 to 71 micron high. The narrowest part between apex and body of the ascocarp ranged from 20 to 68 micron wide. An isolate producing spherical ascocarps in culture has produced funnel-shaped apices on ascocarps in mineral oil. It appears, therefore, that ascocarps with funnel-shaped apices are the natural form. No other fungus is known to produce this type of ascocarp. Some of our New Zealand isolates have produced atypical ascocarp-like bodies which were very much elongated and some of which carried coarse, black hairs in the early stages of development (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_135a">Fig. 5</ref>). No asci or ascospores have been found inside these bodies.</p>
            <pb xml:id="n32" n="134"/>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_134a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_134a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_134a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 2: Ascocarps. Top: from agar medium. Bottom from mineral oil.</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p>Gametangia consist of a spirally coiled ascogonium enveloping a simple, cylindric, antheridium (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_136a">Fig. 6</ref>). Parbery (1969a) has followed the development of the ascocarp. He describes an amorphous peridium composed of a melanoid substance apparently deposited around the sphere of hyphae within which the asci develop. He has not observed the development of the ascogenous hyphae from the
<pb xml:id="n33" n="135"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_135a"><graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_135a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_135a-g"/><head>Fig. 3: Pits inside apical funnel of ascocarp.<lb/>
Fig. 4: Asci within immature ascocarp.<lb/>
Fig. 5: Atypical, sterile, ascocarp-like body.</head></figure>
<pb xml:id="n34" n="136"/>
ascogonium. There does not appear to be a true ostiole in the mature ascocarp. The mode of ascocarp development is believed to be quite unlike that of any other ascomycete (Parbery, 1969a).</p>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_136a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_136a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_136a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 6: a. Ascogonium. b. Radiating hyphae around ascogonia.</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p>Asci are scattered within the ascocarp and contain 8 one-celled, ellipsoid, hyaline to light-brown, ascospores. Asci from New Zealand isolates measured 15-26 micron by 10-15 micron and ascospores measured 5-10 micron by 3.2-5.4 micron (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_137a">Fig. 7</ref>).</p>
            <p>Ascospores appear to be reluctant to germinate. Parbery (1969a) reports that of 21 single spore isolations only 4 germinated. We have also obtained poor germination (Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971). The reason for this reluctance to germinate is unknown and this warrants further study. Those that germinated, in the above-mentioned case, produced colonies which gave rise to the asexual state.</p>
            <p>Ascocarp-like bodies and appressorium-like bodies have been observed by us in old cultures of the fungus in aviation kerosene but neither asci nor ascospores have been seen. The demonstration of mature, fertile, ascocarps in kerosene would be of considerable interest. Parbery's diagnosis of <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> is reproduced below.</p>
            <pb xml:id="n35" n="137"/>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_137a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_137a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_137a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 7: Asci and ascospores.</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p><hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> Parbery (Parbery, 1969a)</p>
            <p>‘Ascocarps in culture usually embedded in medium, sometimes superficial, on finger nails and snake skin superficial, dark brown to black, globose to subglobose, 52-112 micron high by 40-90 micron wide; peridium a melanoid membrane, dark brown, amorphous, sometimes incorporating some hyphae, 5-20 micron thick, often uneven in thickness, aerial portions of superficial ascocarps thinner than embedded portions; ostiole absent; asci up to 8-spored, subglobose to pyriform, hyaline, lyse at maturity; 10-15 micron wide by 12-27 micron long; ascospores 1-celled, ellipsoid to slightly naviculoid, hyaline becoming light brown, occasionally dark, often biguttulate, inner membrane constricted, 3.5-5.5 micron wide by 7-9.5 micron long (most commonly 4 by 8 micron). Conidial state polymorphic and variable. Extreme types apparently genetically fixed.</p>
            <p>‘Type specimen: From soil, south-eastern Australia, MELU 7130 (= IMI, 129861 X 129862) (= D.G.P. W1.1 X V2.0).’</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4-d2" type="section">
            <head>(b) The asexual (imperfect) state</head>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4-d2-d1" type="section">
              <p>Four forms of the asexual state have been described (de Vries, 1952, 1955). Two of these are morphologically distinct (see Fig. 1); f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> is a typical <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi>, f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> is very similar to a paniculate <hi rend="i">Septonema</hi> or <hi rend="i">Xylohypha</hi> but differs from the former in having one-celled conidia and from the latter in the lighter colour of the conidia (see Hughes, 1953). According to Parbery (1969a) both forms produce the same perfect state <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae.</hi> We have also found gametangia and mature ascocarps in our New Zealand isolates of both forms. The albino, f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi>, was described by de Vries (1955) as being of the <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> form; our New Zealand isolates are of the <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> form (Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971) while Parbery (1969a) states that the albino can be of either morphology. Recently, however, we have found one albino saltant in culture morphologically similar to f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> (unpublished). A fourth
<pb xml:id="n36" n="138"/>
form, f. <hi rend="i">sterile</hi>, was described by de Vries (1955) as being a pigmented sterile saltant. Parbery (1969a) found both pigmented and white sterile forms. The forms found by us are pigmented.</p>
              <p>
                <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_138a">
                  <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_138a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_138a-g"/>
                  <head>Fig. 8: Colonies of three forms of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> growing on V-8 juice agar.<lb/>
Fig. 9: Colony of f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> showing sectoring.</head>
                </figure>
              </p>
              <p>De Vries (1952) described colonies of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> as greyish brown and colonies of f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> as dark olivaceous green. However, according to Parbery (1969a) there is no correlation between form and colour. Our two basic forms are distinct in colour and colony appearance on V-8 juice agar medium (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_138a">Fig. 8</ref>). Colonies of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> are hazel to brown, sometimes with an orange tint developing with age; a narrow white margin is often present, there is little or no aerial mycelium and the colonies sporulate profusely. Sometimes coremia are present. Colonies of f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> are darker brown in colour generally with an olivaceous green tint; they produce copious mycelium, never have a white margin to the colony, sometimes grow more slowly than f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi>, sector frequently and sporulate less profusely (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_139a">Fig. 9</ref>).</p>
              <p>The colour of colonies of these two forms depends to some extent on culture medium and is generally darker on malt agar than on V-8 juice agar. Colonies of f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> are white on all media.</p>
              <p>Typically f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> produces unbranched or sparsely branched, dark, septate, warted, conidiophores each with a mass of one-celled, ellipsoid to oval, blastospores (up to 1,000) borne on ramoconidia (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_139a">Fig. 10a</ref>). The sporulating structure at the apex of the conidiophore is very compact. In contrast f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> produces branched conidiophores
<pb xml:id="n37" n="139"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_139a"><graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_139a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_139a-g"/><head>Fig. 10 a. Typicial f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi> b. Intermediate. c. Typical f. <hi rend="i">resinae.</hi></head></figure>
<pb xml:id="n38" n="140"/>
(dark and warted) which themselves may become divided into spore-like cells, and long chains of one-celled, ellipsoid to elongate blastospores (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_139a">Fig. 10c</ref>). No true ramoconidia are produced. The whole structure is very open and has been described as paniculate although dendritic is probably a better term.</p>
              <p>
                <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_140a">
                  <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_140a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_140a-g"/>
                  <head>Fig. 11: ‘Foot-cell’ produced by f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> on creosoted matchsticks.<lb/>
Fig. 12: Hyphae fusion in f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi><lb/>
Fig. 13: Hyphae developing in place of spores in f. <hi rend="i">resinae.</hi></head>
                </figure>
              </p>
              <pb xml:id="n39" n="141"/>
              <p>Intermediates in morphology and colour have been reported by Parbery (1969a). When we examined de Vries's type of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> on which Parbery (1969a) has also based his description, we found that in colour and other colony characters it resembled our f. <hi rend="i">resinae.</hi> It produced the open, dendritic, asexual reproductive structures typical of this form but also both ramoconidia and blastospores typical of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_139a">Fig. 10b and c</ref>). It is considered by us to be intermediate but very close to f. <hi rend="i">resinae.</hi> On passage through kerosene this isolate changed back to a form close to f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi> Hendey (1964) has found a variant which corresponds very closely to f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> but differs in colour, being light fawn with paler margins, almost identical in colour with f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi> We have also found one such isolate. Because of this variability Hendey is of the opinion that it is unlikely that these forms have any real taxonomic significance and that the subspecific epithets are of use only to facilitate reference to the different growth forms (see 3 Taxonomy).</p>
              <p>Most of our soil isolates of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> produced a ‘foot-cell’ when growing on creosoted matchsticks and sometimes on agar (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_140a">Fig. 11</ref>). Parbery (1969a) has also observed this but states that it is not common. The significance of the foot-cell is unknown. Hyphal fusion is of common occurrence in both f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_140a">Fig. 12</ref>).</p>
              <p>The majority of our New Zealand isolates, which are morphologically f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi>, also produce conidia directly on undifferentiated hyphae in pure culture; f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> has not been observed to do this. No setae have been seen in f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> as reported by de Vries (1952), but in both forms a hypha may sometimes develop in place of a spore (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_140a">Fig. 13</ref>).</p>
              <p>The form most commonly encountered in soils, fuels and air is f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi> Parbery (1969a) gives the frequency of isolation from soil of the various forms as follows: f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> 80%, f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> 4% f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> 2% (not directly but as a saltant from f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi>), f. <hi rend="i">sterile</hi> 2% (one culture as a saltant from f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi>) and intermediate types 12%. We have isolated only f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> directly from soils, fuels, air and feathers in New Zealand: all the other forms have arisen in culture.</p>
              <p>Because the type material of f. avellaneum (IMI 49620) is no longer true to type and because Parbery (1969a) based his description on it we have redescribed this form together with f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> from material isolated in our laboratory and originating from soil. We should point out that there is no guarantee that any of the forms described here will be stable for long periods of time. Our stocks are stored on V-8 juice agar under mineral oil.</p>
            </div>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4-d2-d2" type="section">
              <head><hi rend="b">C. resinae f. avallaneum</hi> (description based on Cl, = IMI 145195)</head>
              <p><hi rend="i">Cultural characters</hi>, on V-8 juice agar plates, after 5 days at 25° C. Colony powdery, due to profuse sporulation, with little aerial
<pb xml:id="n40" n="142"/>
mycelium, hazel to brown in colour with a white margin, mean diam. 33 millimetres. Sometimes pointed coremia are produced. Reverse darker brown with whitish margin. When 0.1% creosote is added to the medium the colonies are ashy-brown with a less distinct margin, and a strong characteristic smell is produced. Sporulating structures are very compact.</p>
              <p><hi rend="i">Conidiophores.</hi> On creosoted matchsticks, erect, unbranched, stout, dark, septate, warted often with a distinct ‘foot-cell’, 112-225 micron long but sometimes up to 1 millimetre, X 4.8-6.4 micron wide at the base and 3.0-4.0 micron at the apex. On V-8 juice agar similar but sometimes not warted and only occasionally with a foot-cell’. Ramoconidia numerous, and blastospores up to 1.000 in short chains. Conidial heads ashy-grey to brown. On soil and in culture often more slender conidiophores are produced which appear little different from hyphae.</p>
              <p><hi rend="i">Ramoconidia.</hi> One-celled, smooth or warted, 9.7-12.9 micron long X 3.2-3.8 micron wide, usually with 3 projections.</p>
              <p><hi rend="i">Blastospores.</hi> Ellipsoid to oval, one-celled, smooth, brown <hi rend="i">en masse</hi>, 6.4 X 3.2 micron.</p>
            </div>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4-d2-d3" type="section">
              <head><hi rend="b">C. resinae f. resinae</hi> (description based on R1, = IMI 159585)</head>
              <p><hi rend="i">Cultural characters</hi>, on V-8 juice agar plates, after 5 days at 25° C. Colony woolly with much aerial mycelium, dark brown with olivaceous green tint, lacking white margin, few spores, diam. 33 millimetres. Coremia absent. Reverse similar in colour to surface. When 0.1% creosote is added to the medium the same characteristic smell as that produced by f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> is noticeable — after a number of weeks the smell is very strong. Sporulating structures very open.</p>
              <p><hi rend="i">Conidiophores.</hi> On V-8 juice agar, dendritic or paniculate, horizontal to erect, several times branched towards the apex, dark, septate, smooth or warted, up to 1 or 2 millimetres long by 2-4 micron wide. <hi rend="i">Conidia</hi> blastospores, produced in long chains, one-celled, ellipsoid to elongate-cylindric, smooth, brown, 3.5-15 micron X 2.5 micron. Also large, brown, warted, spore-like cells towards top of conidio-phore, 10-37 micron X 2.5 micron. Where these give rise to first blastospores, the cell resembles a ramoconidium. Sporulating portions of colony lighter in colour than rest of colony.</p>
            </div>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4-d3" type="section">
              <head>C. resinae f. albidum</head>
              <p>(1) <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> form (description based on C31W — 1M1 159589) <hi rend="i">Cultural characters</hi>, on V-8 juice-agar plates, after 5 days at 25° C.: colony powdery due to profuse sporulation, little aerial mycelium, pure white, diam. 33 millimetres, strong characteristic smell produced.</p>
              <p>Conidiophores and conidia as for f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi></p>
              <pb xml:id="n41" n="143"/>
              <p>(2) <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> form (description based on ‘albino-<hi rend="i">resinae</hi> form,) <hi rend="i">Cultural characters</hi>, on V-8 juice-agar plates, and smell, similar to the <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> form.</p>
              <p>Conidiophores and conidia as for f. <hi rend="i">resinae.</hi></p>
              <p>The conidiophores and conidia of both (1) and (2) appear to be more fragile than those of the pigmented forms. No surface ornamentation has been seen in the light microscope; in the scanning eelctron microscope rather indefinite wart-like structures have been seen but further studies are needed.</p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4-d3-d2" type="section">
            <head>(c) Fine structure</head>
            <p>Apart from de Vries's (1952) statement that hyphae of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> are uninucleate little is known about the nuclear state of hyphae or asexual spores and nothing about the nuclear state of the sexual spores (ascospores) of the ‘kerosene fungus’. Parbery (1969a) thinks it is likely that the asexual spores and the parent mycelium can be heterokaryotic. Our initial attempts to clearly demonstrate the nuclear condition of mycelium and spores using the usual nuclear staining techniques have failed. However, in electron microscope studies we have invariably found only one nucleus in asexual spores of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (blastospores) and it appears from these studies that each blastospore has only one nucleus, many mitochondria and, in most cases, a vacuole (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_144a">Fig. 14</ref>). Unidentified membrane-bound bodies have been seen in some electron micrographs (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_145a">Fig. 14a</ref>—arrowed). The cell wall and the outer membrane appear to be unusually thick. Much more work needs to be done on the fine structure of this fungus especially in view of recent reports that all methane-utilising bacteria so far examined possess a complex internal membrane system (Davies and Whittenbury, 1970; Whittenbury, 1969).</p>
            <p>If all spores are uninucleate the occurrence of other forms of the fungus in single spore cultures cannot be due to heterokaryon formation but would appear to be due to a mutation. One would, therefore, expect these forms to be stable.</p>
            <p>The external morphology of three forms isolated in New Zealand, f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi>, f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi>, has been studied in the scanning electron microscope (stereoscan at P.E.L., D.S.I.R.: this work carried out by Dr. John Troughton). Mature conidiophores and ramoconidia of all isolates of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> so far examined are coarsely warted while the blastospores show no surface ornamentation at all (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_146a">Fig. 15</ref>). Although f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> has proved more difficult to handle, blastospores appear to be smooth while the conidiophores, and spore-like cells of the conidiophores, are warted as in f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (Sheridan and Troughton — in preparation). The albinos of both forms do not possess conspicuous warts. The lack of any surface ornamentation on the blastospores indicates that little help will
<pb xml:id="n42" n="144"/>
be obtained from these studies in elucidating taxonomic problems (see 3 Taxonomy). The ascospores are currently being studied.</p>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_144a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_144a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_144a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 14: Electron micrograph showing single nucleus and many mitochondria in blastospore of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi></head>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d5" type="section">
          <head>2. <hi rend="c">Taxonomy</hi></head>
          <p>Lindau (1907) described a fungus which he isolated from resin of <hi rend="i">Picea excelsa</hi> and named <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum resinae</hi> Lindau. De Vries
<pb xml:id="n43" n="145"/>
(1952) named a fungus which he isolated from Nivea ointment <hi rend="i">Cladosporium avellaneum;</hi> later (1955) he found that <hi rend="i">H. resinae</hi> and <hi rend="i">C. avellaneum</hi> were identical and made the new combination <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> (Lindau) de Vries.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_145a">
              <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_145a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_145a-g"/>
              <head>Fig. 14a: Note zigzag membrane, nucleus, vacuole, many mitochondria, microtubules and two unidentified bodies (arrowed).</head>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>Since its introduction in 1955, the name <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> has been widely accepted but the earlier name <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum resinae</hi> has continued to appear in the literature. De Vries himself had noted that this
<pb xml:id="n44" n="146"/>
fungus differs in some respects from other species of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> and placed some reserve on his decision. These differences are both morphological (two distinct forms produced by <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> and setae produced by one of these forms) and physiological.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_146a">
              <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_146a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_146a-g"/>
              <head>Fig. 15: Ornamentation on conidiophore and ramoconidum of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> as seen in the scanning electron microscope.</head>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>The genus <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> was founded by Link in 1816, and was studied by Fries (1829) and Corda (1837). However, the original Latin descriptions of these earliest workers are too brief and indefinite for precision. Janczewski (1894) reported that in <hi rend="i">C. herbarum</hi> Fries after the terminal formation of conidial chains, the conidiophore continued its growth to form a sympodium. Later this condition was referred to as the ‘Cladosporium type’ (see de Vries, 1952; pp. 34-5). The conidiophore of <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum cladosporioides</hi> (Fres) Sacc. did not continue its growth after the appearance of conidia and was referred to as ‘Hormodendrum type’. Gilman (1945) stated that the conidia of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> are at first one-celled and then usually a cross-wall is formed. Bisby (1944) noted that in a week-old culture 90% of the spores of this genus are produced acropetally and are oval or globose; most of the remaining 10% are larger and one-celled but about 0.1% of all spores are 1-septate.</p>
          <p>The genus <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum</hi> was founded by Bonorden in 1851. Harz (1871) gave a fairly clear description: conidiophore erect, simple or unequally branched towards the apex; conidia heterogenous,
<pb xml:id="n45" n="147"/>
in chains, easy to break up, 2-celled, oval or elliptic. Lindau (1907) noted that in his material there are two different ways in which spores were formed, acrogenous budding and fragmenting of the branches into conidia. He placed <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum</hi> in the unicellular Phaeo-sporae, and <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> in the bicellular Phaeodidymae. Brooks and Hansford (1922-23) associate <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum</hi> with short conidiophores and chains of smaller spores while <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> was always represented by larger conidia. Gilman (1945) stated that conidial chains in <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> are developed acrogenously on branches and that all the branches are borne on a single main stipe. In general it appears that <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum</hi> species have been associated with human skin diseases and <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> with plant diseases.</p>
          <p>The essential fundamental characters of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> and <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum</hi> as described by various authors are summarised below.</p>
          <p>
            <table rows="4" cols="2">
              <row>
                <cell role="label" rend="center">
                  <hi rend="b">Cladosporium</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell role="label" rend="center">
                  <hi rend="b">Hormodendrum</hi>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Hyphae: creeping, septate, branched.</cell>
                <cell>Hyphae: creeping, septate, branched.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Conidiophore: almost erect, branched and floccose, prolongation may or may not occur.</cell>
                <cell>Conidiophore: erect, shorter (than those of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi>), simple or variously branched to the apex forming a more or less elongated pyramid, does not prolongate.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Conidia: form in chains acrogenously, most conidia one-celled, a few may be 2- or 3-celled. Each conidium oval or globose, some species ‘without exception’ bi- to pluricellular.</cell>
                <cell>Condia: in chains acrogenously at the tip of the branches. Each generally smaller (than those of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi>) and generally unicellular. Shape may be oval, globose, elliptic or lanceolate. Some are elongated, septate or 2-celled.</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
          <p>Schostakowitsch (1895) had shown that in a medium with 10% potassium nitrate <hi rend="i">H. cladosporioides</hi> (Fres.) Sacc. produced conidiophore prolongation, while on agar medium, <hi rend="i">C. herbarum</hi> Fres. produced no prolongation. De Vries (1952) has made the most thorough investigation of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> species. He clearly demonstrated how the conidiophore of <hi rend="i">C. macrocarpum</hi> Preuss developed from a ‘Hormodendrum type’ into ‘Cladosporium type’ through conidiophore prolongation (1952, pp. 35-36, 77). In fact, the ‘kerosene fungus’, an accepted ‘Hormodendrum type’ has quite often produced conidiophore prolongation on malt slide cultures (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_148a">Fig. 16</ref>). Because of this it is considered that conidiophore prolongation cannot be regarded as a criterion to separate the two genera.</p>
          <pb xml:id="n46" n="148"/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_148a">
              <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_148a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_148a-g"/>
              <head>Fig. 16: Camera lucida drawings to show conidiophore prolongation in f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi></head>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>In <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi>, conidia are considered as larger and bi- to pluricellular while in <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum</hi> they are smaller and one-celled. This is not true in all or even in most cases. Septation, unicellular and bi- to pluricellular conidia generally occur in both <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> and <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum.</hi></p>
          <p>Since almost all the essential characters of both genera are overlapped, and there are no definite criteria to separate them, it is only natural that the two merge into one. Mycologists such as Laurent (1888). Costantin (1889), Bennett (1928), Brett (1948), Bisby (1944), de Vries (1952), Smith (1969) and von Arx (1970) generally regard <hi rend="i">H. cladosporioides</hi> as synonymous with <hi rend="i">C. herbarum.</hi> Since <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> is preferred, and predates <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum</hi>, the name <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum</hi> should be dropped.</p>
          <p>We believe that the fundamental characters of the ‘kerosene fungus’ such as acrogenous formation of blastospores and ramoconidia, and shape and size of conidiophores and conidia are in one way or the other related to <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> species. The whole morphology is such that it cannot form a new genus or be assigned
<pb xml:id="n47" n="149"/>
to any other existing genus, but is correctly placed within <hi rend="i">Cladosporium.</hi> This is in agreement with de Vries (1952, 1955), Nicot and Zakartchenko (1966) and Parbery (1969a).</p>
          <p><hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> as known at the present time exists as f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi>, f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi>, f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi>, f. <hi rend="i">sterile</hi> and intermediate forms The last two forms occur rarely. Forma <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> can be morphologically identical to f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> (de Vries, 1955) or to f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (Sheridan <hi rend="i">et al.</hi>, 1971): f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> are morphologically distinct (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_131a">Figs. 1</ref> and <ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_139a">10</ref>). Forma <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> gives rise to f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> in cultures but in general is relatively stable. Parbery (1969a) reported that no reversion occurred, but only recently we have observed reversion to occur in our subcultures of de Vries (1955) type of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (which changed to f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> and back again) and two of our New Zealand isolates. Ellis (personal communication, 1971) has observed both forms to exist side by side being produced by the same hyphae. He suggested that it is best to refer all forms to the sexual state <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae.</hi></p>
          <p>Because the four asexual forms are relatively stable, we are of the opinion that the subspecific epithet should be retained as an aid for recognition until such times as further cytological and genetical information is available and more is known about the sexual state.</p>
          <p>The perfect state of some <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> species has been described and all of them belong to different families. <hi rend="i">Mycosphaerella tassiana</hi> (de Not.) Johanson, is the sexual state of <hi rend="i">C. herbarum</hi> (Pers.) Link. (von Arx, 1949). Most <hi rend="i">Mycosphaerella</hi> species are reported as having functional male organs producing spermatia and the ascocarps are ostiolate. The perfect state of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium ladina</hi> Muller is <hi rend="i">Leptosphaeria ladina</hi> Muller which is characterised by the extrusion of the ascus and release of ascospores on maturation (Muller, 1950). <hi rend="i">Microascus pedrosoi</hi> (Fuentes and Wolf, 1956) is the perfect state of <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum pedrosoi</hi> Brumpt, and is placed in a group, i.e. Haerangiomycetes, characterised by ostiolate ascocarps and the absence of a definite ascal wall.</p>
          <p>The perfect state of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> as described here (see (a) sexual state) obviously shows no affinity towards <hi rend="i">Mycosphaerella, Leptosphaeria</hi> or Haerangiomycetes. The formation of gametangia (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_136a">Fig. 6a</ref>), the presence of radiating ground tissue in the early stage (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_136a">Fig. 6b</ref>) and peridium in later stage shows it to be closely related to various members of Eurotiales. However, its unique character, the amorphous peridium, make it difficult to fit into any of the previously existing families of this order. Parbery (1969a) erected a new family, Amorphothecaceae, with one genus <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca</hi> and named the perfect stage of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae, Amorphotheca resinae.</hi> Since its introduction in 1969, the name has been widely accepted by mycologists interested in this fungus. In his book ‘Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes’ Ellis (1971) describes <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> as the asexual state of <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> Parbery.</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n48" n="150"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d6" type="section">
          <head>3.<hi rend="c">Physiology</hi></head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d6-d1" type="section">
            <head>(a) Growth in kerosene</head>
            <p>The form of the ‘kerosene fungus’ usually recovered from aviation kerosene is f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (Hazzard, 1963; Hendey, 1964), Parbery's (1968) isolates of f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> from soils are reported by him as not growing in kerosene but New Zealand isolates of this form and f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> have grown readily in kerosene (Sheridan and Nelson, 1971a). When the growth of New Zealand soil, fuel and air isolates of the ‘kerosene fungus’ in aviation turbine and lighting kerosene was compared (Sheridan and Nelson, 1971a) it was found that some soil and air isolates of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> grew better and faster in kerosene than fuel isolates (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_151a">Fig. 17</ref>). This is somewhat surprising because association with kerosene would be expected to select in favour of increased tolerance. However, it seems possible that naturally occurring hydrocarbons in the soil may select in favour of these vigorous strains, and the sexual state, if it occurs in nature, may allow new strains to arise.</p>
            <p>During these studies it was observed that the amount of growth produced by many isolates decreased on successive passage through kerosene. It would be interesting to know whether vigour is restored on passage through soil, and whether the sexual state occurs in kerosene.</p>
            <p>Further evidence for the existence of different strains comes from the fact that some isolates produce a brown pigment in the mineral salts medium while others do not. Pigment production in culture has also been observed by us and by de Vries (1952). <ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_151a">Fig. 18</ref> shows five isolates, and a mixture of isolates growing in aviation turbine and lighting kerosene after four weeks at 25°C. All are soil isolates from the United Kingdom, except A89/71 which is an air isolate from New Zealand and ‘mixed’. From the left: the first is from soil collected in a garden at Hayley Green, near Birmingham—note the presence of pigment in the mineral salts medium in both bottles; the second is from soil collected in Dixon Park, Belfast — note the presence of pigment in aviation turbine kerosene only; the third is from a soil collected in Wales and the fourth from a soil collected in the Lickey Hills near Birmingham — neither have produced pigment. Growth is in every case greater in aviation than in lighting kerosene. After six weeks the amount of growth in lighting kerosene is often greater than that in aviation kerosene indicating that the rate of growth in the former speeds up after three to four weeks.</p>
            <p>The optimum temperature for growth in kerosene appears to depend on the strain of the fungus and the type of kerosene. In one experiment where the growth was harvested after six weeks, an isolate of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> had an optimum of 25°C., while f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> had an <hi rend="i">optimum</hi> of 20°C. in aviation turbine kerosene. The optimum for both was 30°C. in lighting kerosene. It would be interesting to know
<pb xml:id="n49" n="151"/>
whether this difference in optimum temperature is of general occurrence among isolates of the fungus.</p>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_151a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_151a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_151a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 17: Growth of isolates of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> in aviation turbine kerosene after six weeks. Left: Four soil isolates. Centre: Three fuel isolates. Right: Four air isolates.<lb/>
Fig. 18: Isolates of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> growing in kerosene: note the pigment present in the mineral salts medium (lower layer) in some of the bottles. See text for explanation.</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p>No attempt has been made here to review the literature on pathways of carbon assimilation or enzymes produced by the ‘kerosene fungus’ and no work is being done in our laboratory in this connection at the present time. Recent work elsewhere, however, has shown that methane-utilising bacteria use one of two pathways of carbon assimilation, the serine pathway or the ribose phosphate cycle of formaldehyde fixation. Lawrence and Quayle (1970) have examined the distribution of two key enzymes each of which appears to be specifically involved in one of the assimilation pathways.</p>
            <p>It is hoped that the application of gas chromatographic techniques will throw some light on the components of kerosene utilised by this fungus and on the relationship between naturally occurring hydrocarbons and the occurrence of the ‘kerosene fungus’ in soil.</p>
          </div>
          <pb xml:id="n50" n="152"/>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d6-d2" type="section">
            <head>(b) Tolerance to creosote</head>
            <p>All the strains studied by Marsden (1954) and Christensen <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1942), isolated from creosted timbers, were able to grow on a basal mineral salts agar medium containing either 4% coal tar or 1% creosote.</p>
            <p>De Vries (1955) compared the growth of five strains comprising one of Marsden's (‘Enola’), one of Christensen's and three of his own which were isolated from Nivea ointment <hi rend="i">(C. resinae</hi> f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum, C. resinae</hi> f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> and <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> f. <hi rend="i">albidum)</hi>. He used the same basal mineral medium and method as that used by Marsden (1954). The three strains from Nivea ointment did not grow while Marsden's and Christensen's isolates made good growth. De Vries (1955) did not carry this experiment any further but he thought it likely that the three strains from Nivea ointment were able to grow in lower concentration of creosote or coal tar and that they might be gradually accustomed to higher concentrations. Parbery's (1969a) observation that some of his soil isolates lose their ability to grow in kerosene if kept on some agar media such as malt may have some bearing on this.</p>
            <p>A large number of New Zealand soil isolates of the ‘kerosene fungus’ were tested for tolerance to creosote (Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971). All grew on creosote at concentrations up to 1% in V-8 juice agar and Bushnell-Haas agar (see under ‘growth on different culture media’). Most soil isolates grew better at all concentrations of creosote than did an isolate from kerosene. No growth occurred at concentrations of creosote of 3% or above and no isolate has so far been found which will tolerate pure creosote. In the absence of any other carbon source 0.1%–0.2% creosote was optimum. Both f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> behaved similarly: f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> has not yet been tested. Results for growth of three isolates on two media are shown in <ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_153a">Fig. 19</ref>. An attempt was made to train selected isolates to tolerate increasing concentrations of creosote but was unsuccessful. It would be interesting to compare Marsden's and Christensen's isolates from creosoted timbers, de Vries's isolates from Nivea ointment and New Zealand soil, fuel and air isolates.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d6-d3" type="section">
            <head>(c) Growth on different culture media</head>
            <p>The choice of culture media for growth of the ‘kerosene fungus’ is very important because the medium influences the production of ascocarps, ability to grow subsequently in kerosene, rate of growth, colony chracteristics and pigment production (Parbery, 1969; Sheridan. Steel and Knox, 1971; de Vries, 1952). The constituents of a number of useful media are given here together with brief notes on their suitability. Parbery (1969a) found that isolates do not lose their ability to grow in kerosene when kept on Bushnell-Haas agar with 2% glucose but some do lose it on other agar media such as
<pb xml:id="n51" n="153"/>
malt. Bushnell-Haas medium, without agar, is generally the basalmineral salts medium of choice in experiments on growth in kerosene. The kerosene is layered on top of the medium (see for example <ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_151a">Fig. 17</ref>). For the production of the sexual state (ascocarps) Parbery (1969a) found cherry agar, which is the standard medium of the Centraalbureau Voor Schimmelcultures, very useful. On this medium and on modified Weitzman and Silva-Hutner agar some isolates produced fertile ascocarps in 14-20 days. On most other media two or three times this period was required. Ascocarps develop frequently in mineral oil layered on top of V-8 juice agar or malt agar slopes of the fungus (Sheridan and Steel, 1971). Czapek-Dox agar has been also used for maintenance and culture studies. Sucrose should be replaced with some other sugar: Parbery and de Vries used glucose (see (d) Nutrition. 1. Carbon source requirements).</p>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_153a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_153a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_153a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 19: Growth of isolates of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> on V-8 juice agar and Bushnell-Haas agar containing different concentrations of creosote (after 11 days at 25° C.).</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p>Growth of 141 New Zealand soil isolates was compared on four different media: Czapek-Dox agar minus sucrose (C/D), Bushnell-Haas agar (B/H), modified Weitzman and Silva-Hunter agar (WS/H) and V-8 juice agar (V-8) (Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971). All
<pb xml:id="n52" n="154"/>
media contained 0.1% creosote, and V-8 juice agar without creosote was included for comparison. All isolates behaved similarly. <ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_154a">Fig. 20</ref> shows results after 10 days at 25°C. Best growth was obtained on V-8 juice agar without added creosote indicating that creosote of this concentration depressed growth. Since Czapek-Dox and Bushnell-Haas media had no carbon source other than creosote all isolates were able to utilise creosote. The pure white form, f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi>, behaved similarly. Sporulation was good on all media but the perfect state was not seen in these experiments.</p>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_154a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_154a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_154a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 20: Mean diameter of 141 isolates of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> after 10 days at 25° C. on different media (all contain 0.1% creosote except V-8—).</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p><hi rend="i">Bushnell-Haas medium</hi> (Bushnell and Haas, 1941)</p>
            <p>
              <table rows="7" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>Magnesium sulphate (7H<hi rend="sub">2</hi>O)</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">0.20 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Potassium dihydrogen phosphate</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1.00 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1.00 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Ammonium nitrate</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1.00 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Calcium chloride</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">0.02 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Ferric chloride (6H<hi rend="sub">2</hi>O)</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">2 drops concentrated soln.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Distilled water</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1,000 ml.</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <p>To this mineral salts medium 2% glucose may be added as a carbon source, and the medium may be solidified with 2% agar. The pH is adjusted to 7-7.2 with dilute sodium hydroxide.</p>
            <p><hi rend="i">Modified Weitzman and Silva-Hutner agar</hi> (Weitzsman and Silva-Hutner, 1966)</p>
            <p>
              <table rows="7" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>Magnesium sulphate (7H<hi rend="sub">2</hi>O)</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1.0 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Potassium dihydrogen phosphate</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1.0 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Sodium nitrate</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1.0 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>‘Pomodoro’ tomato paste</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">10 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>‘Thistle’ oat meal</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">10 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Agar</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">18 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Distilled water</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1,000 ml.</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <pb xml:id="n53" n="155"/>
            <p>The pH is adjusted to 5.6 with dilute sodium hydroxide. <hi rend="i">Czapek-Dox agar</hi></p>
            <p>
              <table rows="11" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>Magnesium sulphate (7H<hi rend="sub">2</hi>O)</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">0.5 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Potassium dihydrogen phosphate</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1.0 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><note xml:id="fn1-155" n="*"><p>Ammonium nitrate is a better nitrogen source than sodium nitrate and could replace it.</p></note>Sodium nitrate</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">2.0 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Potassium chloride</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">0.5 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Ferrous sulphate (7H<hi rend="sub">2</hi>O)</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">0.01 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><note xml:id="fn2-155" n="**"><p>Glucose is a better carbon source than sucrose and should replace it.</p></note>Sucrose</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">30.0 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Agar</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">20.0 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Distilled water</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1,000 ml.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">V-8 juice agar</hi> V-8 vegetable juice (Campbell Soup Co. Ltd.)</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">350 ml.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Tap water</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1,500 ml.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Agar</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">40 g.</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <p>The V-8 juice is added to the melted agar. This is a a very acid medium and does not withstand prolonged autoclaving. <hi rend="i">Malt extract agar</hi></p>
            <p>
              <table rows="3" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>Plain maltexo (Wilson's)</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">20 g.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Tap water</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">1,000 ml.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Agar</cell>
                  <cell rend="right">20 g.</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <p>Glucose and peptone may be added at 2% and 1% respectively to give a richer medium for the production of ascocarps.</p>
            <p>All media are autoclaved at 103kNm<hi rend="sup">-2</hi> (121° C.) for 15 minutes. When required sterile creosote is added aseptically to melted media just before pouring plates.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d6-d4" type="section">
            <head>(d) Nutrition</head>
            <p>1.<hi rend="i">Carbon source requirements.</hi> The carbon source requirements of a New Zealand isolate of the ‘kerosene fungus’ were studied in our laboratory (Tan, unpublished). Carbon sources tested included mono-, di-, tri- and polysaccharides — all were used at 1.5% by weight. Ammonium chloride was used as nitrogen source. Results are presented in <ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_156a">Fig. 21</ref>. Best growth (measured as dry weight) was obtained with xylose followed by maltose and cellobiose. Sucrose and glucose did not give such good growth. Other workers have found glucose to be a better carbon source than sucrose (Parbery, 1969a; de Vries, 1952); we found glucose to be only slightly better than sucrose. Arabinose, casein and glycogen depressed growth below that of the control — the growth in the control indicates that impurities were present as contaminants in sufficient amount to allow growth without any added carbon.</p>
            <pb xml:id="n54" n="156"/>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_156a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_156a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_156a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 21: Comparison of different carbon sources for growth of <hi rend="i">C. resinae.</hi></head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p>Cochrane (1958) states that xylose has been reported to be superior to glucose for some organisms. However, he points out that xylose is known to be broken down to furfural during autoclaving so that reports of its non-utilisability should be regarded with some reserve until confirmed with filter-sterilised xylose. The xylose used in the work reported here was sterilised by autoclaving.</p>
            <p>2. <hi rend="i">Nitrogen source requirements.</hi> Eight different nitrogen sources were compared at 0.15% nitrogen level (Tan, unpublished). Glucose at 2.5% was used as carbon source. Results are presented in <ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_157a">Fig. 22</ref>. Ammonium salts gave better growth (as dry weight) than nitrite or nitrate. This is in agreement with Marsden's findings (1954). Urea appears to be toxic to this fungus. Asparagine has been reported as a good nitrogen source for other fungi (Papavizas, 1970). On ammonium nitrate medium the pH decreased during growth from over 6 to around 3. This decrease has also been noted by Parbery (1971a).</p>
            <pb xml:id="n55" n="157"/>
            <p>However, the optimum pH for growth of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> is low so that this decrease, which adversely affects fungi with higher optima, has little or no effect on <hi rend="i">C. resinae.</hi></p>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_157a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_157a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_157a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 22: Comparison of different nitrogen sources for growth of <hi rend="i">C. resinae.</hi></head>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d6-d5" type="section">
            <head>(e) Effect of pH on growth</head>
            <p>Christensen <hi rend="i">et al.</hi> (1942) found that their isolates of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> could grow between pH 3 and 9.6. Parbery (1971a) considers it hard to evaluate their results because the final pH of most of their media was about 7. All New Zealand isolates of the fungus grew well between pH 2 and 6.5 (Tan, unpublished). At pH 1.5 growth stopped abruptly and no growth occurred beyond pH 10. The optimum pH
<pb xml:id="n56" n="158"/>
was close to 3 (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_158a">Fig. 23</ref>). This is extremely low. Among 34 species listed by Cochrane (1958) only two had an optimum pH of 4.0 or below. <hi rend="i">Dothistroma pini</hi>, the causal agent of pine needle blight, is reported to have an optimum pH of 3.5 (Ivory, 1967).</p>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_158a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_158a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_158a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 23: The effect of pH on growth of <hi rend="i">C. resinae.</hi></head>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d6-d6" type="section">
            <head>(f) Effect of temperature on growth</head>
            <p>The optimum temperature for growth of the kerosene fungus on an agar medium is reported to be around 30°C with a range from 5-40°C. (Hendey, 1964; Parbery, 1971a; Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971). There is one report of an optimum at 37° C. (in Parbery, 1971a). None of the New Zealand isolates so far studied would grow below 5° C. or above 45° C. (Tan, unpublished). The optimum on an agar medium lay somewhere between 20° C. and 35° C.; in general it was close to 30° C. but this appeared to depend on isolate and medium (<ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_159a">Figs. 24</ref> and <ref target="#Bio19Tuat03_159b">25</ref>). In lighting kerosene the optimum for an</p>
            <pb xml:id="n57" n="159"/>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_159a">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_159a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_159a-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 24: The effect of temperature on the growth of <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> on V-8 juice agar. X — X f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum.</hi> O — O f. <hi rend="i">albidum.</hi></head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_159b">
                <graphic url="Bio19Tuat03_159b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio19Tuat03_159b-g"/>
                <head>Fig. 25: Effect of different temperatures on the growth rate of <hi rend="i">C. resinae.</hi></head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <pb xml:id="n58" n="160"/>
            <p>isolate of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> was 30° C. while in aviation turbine kerosene it was 25° C. and 20° C. respectively. On an agar medium the optimum for growth of f. <hi rend="i">albidum</hi> was 30° C. Further work is clearly desirable since some strains may have a lower optimum temperature in kerosene than hitherto realised.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d6-d7" type="section">
            <head>(g) Pigment production</head>
            <p>De Vries (1952) reported that <hi rend="i">C. resinae</hi> is the only species of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> which produced a dark brown pigment. The presence or absence of pigment and the amount produced appears to depend on the nitrogen source supplied and on pH (de Vries, 1952). In recent work New Zealand isolates of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> produced more pigment when the medium contained sodium nitrate or nitrite than when it contained ammonium salts (Tan, unpublished). The concentration of pigment was greater at pH's above 4. Further work is necessary to determine precisely under what conditions pigment is produced, to chemically analyse it, and to determine its significance. Some isolates produce pigment, which appears in the aqueous phase, when growing in kerosene. The albino, of course, does not produce pigment under any conditions as far as is known.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d7" type="section">
          <head>4. <hi rend="c">Summary and Conclusions</hi></head>
          <p>The recent discovery of the sexual or perfect state of the ‘kerosene fungus’ was a major contribution both to knowledge of the life cycle of this unusual and interesting fungus and to a better understanding of its phylogenetic and taxonomic position. Parbery's (1969 a and b) observations for Australian isolates have been confirmed for New Zealand isolates (Sheridan, Steel and Knox, 1971; Sheridan and Steel, 1971). Most mycologists familiar with this fungus have accepted Parbery's (1969a) name <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> in the new family Amorphothecaceae even though a considerable amount of work still needs to be done on the cytology and genetics of this fungus and the relationship between the many asexual forms and the sexual state.</p>
          <p>There are two distinct morphological, asexual, forms of the ‘kerosene fungus’ and three distinct colony forms. In this paper the morphologically and culturally distinct f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> and f. <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> have been redescribed, and it is pointed out that intermediates are of frequent occurrence. The albino, which is pure white on all culture media, can be of either morphology. A fourth form, f. <hi rend="i">sterile</hi>, may be either pigmented or white. None of these forms appear to remain stable for long periods; although de Vries (1952) found his forms to be constant, his type of f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> (IMI 49620) is no longer true to type. In view of this variability, we would agree with Hendey (1964) that it is unlikely that the various forms have any real taxonomic significance and that ‘the subspecific epithets are of use only to facilitate reference to the different growth forms’. All forms of the ‘kerosene fungus’ should be referred to <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae.</hi></p>
          <pb xml:id="n59" n="161"/>
          <p>The <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> form is a good <hi rend="i">Cladosporium;</hi> the <hi rend="i">resinae</hi> form is not. Nevertheless, because both have the same perfect state, one can change into the other and vice versa and intermediates exist, and both appear to be physiologically similar, it is undesirable to place them in separate genera. The name <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> should be retained for the asexual state of the ‘kerosene fungus’. <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> predates <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum.</hi></p>
          <p>It appears that isolates of the ‘kerosene fungus’ differ in their ability to utilise kerosene and creosote and that this is dependent to some extent on past history and genetical make-up. As already pointed out cytological and genetical studies are needed and much more needs to be done on its physiology because of the significance of this fungus as a fuel contaminant. A large number of isolates from different parts of the world should be studied. Very recently Parbery (1971b) has published a review of biological problems in jet aviation fuel and the biology of <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> in which he points out some of the research problems associated with studies on this fungus and the need for these to be overcome in future work.</p>
          <p>The ‘kerosene fungus’ is a most unusual organism; it grows in the presence of substances normally considered to be fungistatic or fungicidal (kerosene and creosote) and can utilise these as a source of carbon, it produces an unusual brown pigment, has an unusually thick membrane and spore wall, is very variable in asexual morphology and produces a unique sexual form. Yet very few mycologists have shown interest in it in the past. It can only be hoped that the publication of these papers will arouse and stimulate interest in this fungus and its activities, and that the many problems mentioned here will be solved in the near future.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d8" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgments</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The authors wish to express their appreciation to the following: Professor <name type="person" key="name-170396">H. D. Gordon</name>, head of the Botany Department, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, for his constant encouragement and helpful advice during the course of our studies, and the technical staff of our department, Mr. Ron Hoverd, Mrs. Ila Labone, Miss Margaret Priday and Mr. Herbert Christophers for competent technical assistance; the director of the Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, England, and his staff, particularly Dr. M. <name type="person" key="name-002094">B. Ellis</name>, Dr. B. C. Sutton and Dr. Agnes H. S. Onions, for identifications and supplying isolates of <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> and for helpful discussions; Professor R. K. McKee, head of the Department of Mycology and Plant Pathology, the Queen's University of Belfast, Northern Ireland, who kindly allowed the senior author the use of laboratory facilities during a recent visit, and Mr. J. C. Taylor and Dr. J. P. Malone of the same department for assisting with collection of soil samples and air monitoring; Mr. Walter Freitag and Mr. <name type="person">Walter Johnston</name> of B.P. (N.Z.) Ltd. for supplying samples of kerosene and
<pb xml:id="n60" n="162"/>
cultures of fungi isolated from aviation fuel, and Mr. Ken Chater of B.P. Research Centre, Sunbury-on-Thames, England, for providing us with a fuel isolate of <hi rend="i">A. resinae</hi> and for useful discussions; and Dr. John Troughton of Physics and Engineering Laboratory, D.S.I.R., New Zealand, for Stereoscan studies, and Mr. Mervyn Loper of the Electron Microscope Unit of Victoria University for electron microscope studies.</p>
          <p>The costs of research were met by our department and grants from the Internal Research Fund of this university. One of us (Y.L.T.) gratefully acknowledges financial help from the Lee Foundation of Singapore. The maps are reproduced by permission of the Lands and Survey Department of the New Zealand Government.</p>
          <p>Finally it is a pleasure to thank Mrs. Mary Sheridan for supervising the air samplers on many occasions and for reading and criticising the manuscripts, Mrs. Shona Greer for typing the manuscripts, and the staff of the library for help in procuring many of the publications referred to in these studies.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d9" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Anon., 1961: An analysis of certain microbiological matter in aircraft fuels. London: Shell International Petroleum Co. Ltd., Aviation Dept.</bibl>
            <bibl>Anon., 1968: Catalogue of the Culture Collection of the Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew.</bibl>
            <bibl>Anon., 1970: ‘Heathrow Dew’ in <hi rend="i">Your Environment</hi> 1 (5): 184.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-015516">Bennett, F. T.</name>, 1928: On <hi rend="i">Cladosporium herbarum;</hi> The question of its parasitism and its relation to ‘thinning out’ and ‘deaf ears’ in wheat. <hi rend="i">Ann. appl. Biol.</hi> 15: 191-212.</bibl>
            <bibl>Bisby, G. R., 1944: Notes on British Hyphomycetes. <hi rend="i">Trans Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 27: 101-12.</bibl>
            <bibl>Bonorden, H. F., 1851: Handbuch der Allgemeinen Mykologie etc. 76-77. Stuttgart: <hi rend="i">Schweizerbart.</hi></bibl>
            <bibl>Brett, M. A., 1948: The problem <hi rend="i">Cladosporium herbarum. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 30: 141-52.</bibl>
            <bibl>Brooks, F. T., and Hansford, C. G., 1922-23: Mould growths upon cold-store meat. <hi rend="i">Trans Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 8: 113-42.</bibl>
            <bibl>Bushnell, L. D., and Haas, H. F., 1941: The utilization of certain hydrocarbons by micro-organisms. <hi rend="i">J. Bact.</hi> 41: 65-74.</bibl>
            <bibl>Chabert, J., 1968: Les spores de champignons dans 1'air de Rabat (Maroc). Apercu floristique et e’cologique. Applications allergologiques et phyto-pathologiques possibles. <hi rend="i">Bulletin de la Societe des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc</hi> 48: 1-48.</bibl>
            <bibl>Christensen, C.M., Kaufert, F. H., Schmitz, H., and Allison J. L., 1942: <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum resinae</hi> (Lindau), an inhabitant of wood impregnated with creosote and coal tar. <hi rend="i">Amer. J. Bot.</hi> 29: 552-58.</bibl>
            <bibl>Cochrane, V. W., 1958: Physiology of fungi. <hi rend="i">John Wiley</hi>, New York.</bibl>
            <bibl>Costantin, M. J., 1889: Researches sur le <hi rend="i">Cladosporium herbarum. J. de Bot.</hi> 3: 1-3.</bibl>
            <bibl>Corda, A. C. J., 1837: Icones Fungorum hucusque cognitorum, 1: 14. Prag. <hi rend="i">Ehrlich.</hi></bibl>
            <bibl>Darby, R. T., Simmons, E. G., and Wiley, Bonnie J., 1968: A survey of fungi in a military aircraft fuel supply system. <hi rend="i">Int. Biodetn. Bull.</hi> 4: 39-41.</bibl>
            <bibl>Davies, S. L., and Whittenbury, R., 1970: Fine structure of methane-utilizing bacteria. <hi rend="i">J. Gen. Microbiol.</hi> 61: 227-32.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s1_162">De Vries, G. A.</seg>, 1952: Contribution to the knowledge of genus <hi rend="i">Cladosporium</hi> Link ex Fr. <hi rend="i">Bibliotheca Mycologia</hi> 3: 46-56. Taxonomical Part 1. Classification of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium.</hi></bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_162">——</seg>, 1955: <hi rend="i">Cladosporium avellaneum</hi> de Vries, a synonym of ‘<hi rend="i">Hormodendrum’ resinae</hi> Lindau. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 21: 166-68.</bibl>
            <bibl>Ellis, M. B., 1971: Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. <hi rend="i">Commonwealth Mycological Institute</hi>, Kew, England.</bibl>
            <bibl>Engel, W. B., and Swatek, F. E., 1966: Some ecological aspects of hydrocarbon contamination and associated corrosion in aircraft. <hi rend="i">Devs. Indust. Microbiol.</hi> 7: 354-66.</bibl>
            <bibl>Fonken, C. S., Murray, H. C., and Reinke, L. M., 1960: <hi rend="i">J. Am. Chem. Soc.</hi> 82: 5507.</bibl>
            <bibl>Fries, E., 1829: Systema Mycologicum, 3: 368-73.</bibl>
            <bibl>Fuentes, C. A., and Wolf, F. A., 1956: The perfect stage of <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum pedrosoi.</hi> Mycologia, 48: 56-63.</bibl>
            <bibl>Gilman, J. C., 1945: A manual of soil fungi. <hi rend="i">Iowa State College Press.</hi></bibl>
            <bibl>Gutheil, N. C., 1966: Ocorrencia de <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> (Lindau) de Vries em querosene de aviaca o no Brazil. <hi rend="i">Communicacao previa foi asresentada ao 1° Simposie de Fermentacao, realizado pela Associacao Brasileira de Quimica em Sao Paulo, de 9 a 13 de nov de 1964.</hi></bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s2_163"><name type="person">Harvey, R.</name></seg>, 1967: Air-spora studies in Cardiff. I. <hi rend="i">Cladosporium. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 50 (3): 479-95.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_163">——</seg>, 1970: Spore productivity in <hi rend="i">Cladosporium. Mycopath. Mycol. appl.</hi> 41: 251-56.</bibl>
            <bibl>Harz, C. O., 1871: Einige neue Hyphomyceten Berlin's und Wien's nebst Beitragen zur Systematik derselben. <hi rend="i">Bull. Soc. Imp. Natur. Moscou.</hi> 44: 139-40.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s3_163">Hazzard, G. F.</seg>, 1963: Fungal growths in aviation fuel systems. Part 4. Fungi in aviation fuel systems in Australia and the Far East. <hi rend="i">Defence Standards Lab. (Australia) Rep.</hi> 252, 52 pp.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s3_163">——</seg>, 1967: The detection of micro-organisms in petroleum products. <hi rend="i">J. of Instit. of Petroleum</hi> 53 (524): 267-74.</bibl>
            <bibl>Hendey, N. I., 1964: Some observations on <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> as a fuel contaminant, and its possible role in the corrosion of aluminium alloy fuel tanks. <hi rend="i">Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 47 (4): 467-75.</bibl>
            <bibl>Hughes, S. J., 1953: Conidiophores, conidia and classification. <hi rend="i">Canad. J. Bot.</hi> 31: 577-659.</bibl>
            <bibl>Inoue, M., Iwamoto, R., and Minoura, K., 1965: Corrosion of aluminium alloy fuel tank and <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> f. <hi rend="i">avellaneum</hi> de Vries. <hi rend="i">Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan</hi> 6: 75-77.</bibl>
            <bibl>Ivory, M. H., 1967: Spore germination and growth in culture of <hi rend="i">Dothistroma pini</hi> var. <hi rend="i">keniensis. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 50 (4): 563-72.</bibl>
            <bibl>Janczewski, E., 1894: <hi rend="i">Cladosporium herbartum</hi> i jego najpospolitzena zbozu towardzysze (Recherches sur le <hi rend="i">Cladosporium herbarum</hi> et ses champignons habituels sur les céréales). <hi rend="i">Bull. Int. Acad. Sci.</hi>, Cracovie, 187-208.</bibl>
            <bibl>Jones, J. G., and Edington, M. A., 1968: An ecological survey of hydrocarbon-oxidising micro-organisms. <hi rend="i">J. gen. Microbiol.</hi> 52: 381-90.</bibl>
            <bibl>Jones, J. G., 1970: The origin and distribution of hydrocarbons in an upland moorland soil and underlying shale. <hi rend="i">J. Soil Sci.</hi> 21 (2): 330-39.</bibl>
            <bibl>Laurent, M. E., 1888: Recherches sur le polymorphisme du <hi rend="i">Cladosporium herbarum. Ann. Inst. Pasteur</hi>, 558-66, 581-603.</bibl>
            <bibl>Lawrence, A. J., and Quayle, J. R., 1970: Alternative carbon assimilation pathways in methane-utilizing bacteria. <hi rend="i">J. Gen. Microbiol.</hi> 63: 371-74.</bibl>
            <bibl>Leonard, J. M., and Klemme, D. E., 1961: Microbial deterioration of jet fuel. Paper to advisory committee on public affairs. American Petroleum Institute, California.</bibl>
            <bibl>Lindau, G., 1907: <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum resinae</hi> (Lindau) nov. spec., in Rabenhorst, ‘Kryptogamen-Flora’ 8: 699, 800-802.</bibl>
            <bibl>Link, H. F., 1816: Observations in ordines plantarum naturales 3. <hi rend="i">Mag. Ges. Naturf. Fr. Berlin</hi>, 7: 37-38.</bibl>
            <bibl>Marsden, D. H., 1954: Studies of the creosote fungus, <hi rend="i">Hormodendrum resinae. Mycologia</hi> 46: 161-83.</bibl>
            <bibl>Muller, E., 1950: Die schweizerischen Arten der Gattung <hi rend="i">Leptosphaeria</hi> und ihrer Verwandten. <hi rend="i">Sydowia</hi> 4: 185-319.</bibl>
            <bibl>Nicot, J., and Zakartchenko, V., 1966: Remarques sur la morphologie et la biologie du <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> (Lindau) de Vries. <hi rend="i">Rev. Mycol.</hi> 31: 48-74.</bibl>
            <bibl>Papavizas, G. C., 1970: Carbon and nitrogen nutrition of <hi rend="i">Sclerotium cepivorum. Mycologia</hi>, 62: 1195-1203.</bibl>
            <bibl>Parbery, D. G., and Ford, H. N., 1968: <hi rend="i">Aust. J. Sci.</hi> 30: 465.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s1_164">Parbery, D. G.</seg>, 1967: Isolation of the kerosene fungus <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> from Australian soil. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 50 (4): 682-85.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_164">——</seg>, 1968: The soil as a natural source of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae. Biodet. of Materials.</hi> Elsevier Pub. Co., Lond. 371-80.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_164">——</seg>, 1969a: <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> Gen. Nov. Sp. Nov.: the perfect state of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae. Aust. J. Bot.</hi> 17: 331-57.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_164">——</seg>, 1969b: The natural occurrence of <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae. Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 53 (1): 15-23.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_164">——</seg>, 1969c: Isolation of the ascal state of <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> direct from soil. <hi rend="i">Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 53 (3): 482-84.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_164">——</seg>, 1971a: Physical factors influencing growth of <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> in culture. <hi rend="i">Int. Biodetn. Bull.</hi> 7 (1): 5-9.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_164">——</seg>, 1971b: Biological problems in jet aviation fuel and the biology of <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae. Material und Organismen.</hi> 6 Bd. Heft 3: 161-207.</bibl>
            <bibl>Prince, A. E., 1961: Microbiological sludge in jet aircraft fuel. <hi rend="i">Dev. Indust. Microbiol.</hi> 2: 197-203.</bibl>
            <bibl>Schostakowitsch, W., 1895: Uber die bedingunge der conidienbildung bei Russthaupilzen Flora 81: 362-93.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s2_164"><name type="person" key="name-170432">Sheridan, J. E.</name></seg>, 1971: The ‘kerosene fungus’ <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> Parbery as a natural component of the airspora and on bird feathers. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Sci.</hi> 14: 1094-96.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_164">——</seg>, and Knox, M. D. E., 1970: Note on the discovery of the ‘kerosene fungus’ <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> Parbery con state <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> (Lindau) de Vries in New Zealand. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Science</hi> 13 (1): 140-2.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_164">——</seg>, and <name type="person" key="name-170465">Nelson, Jan</name>, 1971a: A comparison of growth of New Zealand soil, fuel and air isolates of the ‘kerosene fungus’ <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> (Lindau) de Vries in aviation turbine and lighting kerosene. <hi rend="i">Tuatara</hi> 19 (1): 12-20.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_164">——</seg>, and <name type="person" key="name-170465">Nelson, Jan</name>, 1971b: The selective isolation of the ‘kerosene fungus’ <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> from the air. <hi rend="i">Int. Biodetn. Bull.</hi> 7 (4): 161-62.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_164">——</seg>, and <name type="person" key="name-170433">Steel, Jan</name>, 1971: Nature of the ascal state of <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> produced in mineral oil. <hi rend="i">Trans. Br. mycol. Soc.</hi> 56 (3): 477-78.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_164">——</seg>, Sheridan, Mary, Hoverd, R., and <name type="person" key="name-170433">Steel, Jan</name>, 1971: Isolation of the ‘kerosene fungus’, <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi>, from the atmosphere in New Zealand. <hi rend="i">Search</hi> 2 (10): 384-85.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_164">——</seg>, <name type="person" key="name-170433">Steel, Jan</name>, and Knox, M. D. E., 1971: The natural occurrence of the ‘kerosene fungus’ <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> in New Zealand soils. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Science</hi> 14 (1): 147-60.</bibl>
            <bibl>Smith, G., 1969: An introduction to industrial mycology. Edward Arnold, Lond.</bibl>
            <bibl>Sokolski, W. T., Chidester, G. C., and Honeywell, G. E., 1965: <hi rend="i">Dev. Indust. Microbiol.</hi> 3: 179-87.</bibl>
            <bibl>Tan Yeap Leong, 1972: Studies on the morphology, physiology and taxonomy of the ‘kerosene fungus’ <hi rend="i">Amorphotheca resinae</hi> Parbery (Conidial state <hi rend="i">Cladosporium resinae</hi> (Lindau) de Vries). M.Sc. thesis, Victoria Univ. of Wellington.</bibl>
            <pb xml:id="n63" n="165"/>
            <bibl>Von Arx, J. A., 1949: Beitrage zur kenntnis der gattung <hi rend="i">Mycosphaerella. Promotionsarbeit, Eidg. Techn. Hochschule</hi> U<hi rend="i">urich</hi>, 58.59.</bibl>
            <bibl>Von Arx, J. A., 1970: The genera of fungi sporulating in pure culture. Verlag von. J. Cramer, 3301 Lehre.</bibl>
            <bibl>Warner, Gloria, and French, D. W., 1970: Dissemination of fungi by migratory birds: survival and recovery of fungi from birds. <hi rend="i">Canad. J. Bot.</hi> 48 (5): 907-10.</bibl>
            <bibl>Weitzman, I., and Silva-Hutner, M., 1966-67: Non-keratinous agar media as substrates for the ascigerous state in certain members of the Gymnoascaceae pathogenic for man and animals. <hi rend="i">Sabouraudia</hi> 5: 335-40.</bibl>
            <bibl>Whittenbury, R., 1969: Microbial utilization of methane. <hi rend="i">Process Biochem.</hi> 4: 51-56.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d5" type="article" decls="#text-3-bibl">
        <head><title level="a"><hi rend="c">A Review of the Parasites of New Zealand Reptiles</hi></title></head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-170436">Graham S. Hardy</name>,<lb/>
Zoology Department, Victoria University of Wellington.</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d1" type="section">
          <p><hi rend="sc">A Search</hi> through the ever-increasing literature on animal parasites indicates that there have been but a limited number of publications pertaining to parasites of New Zealand's endemic reptiles.</p>
          <p>Doré (1919) recorded the presence of a blood-parasite, for which he proposed the name <hi rend="i">Haemogregarina lygosomarum</hi>, from the skink <hi rend="i">Lygosoma moco</hi>, collected from the Makara district. It now seems likely, in the light of McCann's (1955) work, that this skink was <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma zelandica.</hi> Doré notes that he was unable to find haematozoa from the geckos <hi rend="i">Naultinus elegans, Naultinus grayi (= N. elegans)</hi> and <hi rend="i">Dactylocremis<note xml:id="fn1-165" n="*"><p>Note the spelling error in the generic name. Hutton and Drummond (1904) refer to <hi rend="i">Dactylocnemis granulatus.</hi></p></note> granulatus</hi> (= <hi rend="i">Hoplodactylus granulatus</hi>), and the tuatara <hi rend="i">Sphenodon punctatus</hi>, which of course is not a lizard as he incorrectly assumed.</p>
          <p>The tuatara was later examined for blood parasites by Laird (1950), who discovered and named a new species, <hi rend="i">Haemogregarina tuatarae.</hi> McCann (1955) subsequently notes Dr Laird as having recorded haemogregarines from <hi rend="i">Hoplodactylus duvaucelli and H. pacificus.</hi></p>
          <p>A haemosporidian parasite has also been recorded. In heart-blood smears from <hi rend="i">Lygosoma moco</hi> (= <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma zelandica</hi>), Laird (1951) identified specimens of a new species, which he named <hi rend="i">Plasmodium lygosomae.</hi></p>
          <p>The only other protozoan parasite recorded from a New Zealand reptile is <hi rend="i">Trichomonas hoplodactyli</hi> by Percival (1941). This species was found in the hind gut of <hi rend="i">Hoplodactylus maculatus</hi> (= <hi rend="i">H. pacificus</hi>).</p>
          <pb xml:id="n64" n="166"/>
          <p>Two nematodes have been recorded from New Zealand reptiles. Barwick (1959) noted the rectal infection of <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma zelandica</hi> by <hi rend="i">Pharyngodon</hi> sp., a genus with a world-wide distribution, while Chabaud and Dolllfus (1965) have recorded a new genus of the family Heterakidae from the intestine of the tuatara. Unfortunately the latter authors referred the tuatara to the genus <hi rend="i">Hatteria</hi>, which has for decades been recognised as a synonym for <hi rend="i">Sphenodon</hi> and treated accordingly. A consequence of this mistake lies in their naming of the parasite <hi rend="i">Hatterianema hollandei.</hi></p>
          <p>More recently, Allison and Climo (1969) have described a trematode, <hi rend="i">Paradistomum pacificus</hi>, from the gall bladder of <hi rend="i">Hoplodactylus pacificus.</hi></p>
          <p>Although ectoparasites had been noted from New Zealand reptiles for some years (Doré, 1919 and others), it was Womersley (1941) who first named and described any of the mites. <hi rend="i">Geckobia naultina</hi> and <hi rend="i">G. haplodactyli</hi> were described from <hi rend="i">Naultinus elegans</hi> and <hi rend="i">Haplodactylus duvaucellii</hi>* respectively. Not only is Womersley's error in the spelling of the generic name of <hi rend="i">Hoplodactylus</hi> perpetuated in the naming of the mite, but it is also listed accordingly in Biological Abstracts!</p>
          <p>A few years later Dumbleton (1947) described two further mites, <hi rend="i">Acomatacarus lygosomae</hi> from <hi rend="i">Lygosoma grande</hi> (= <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma grande</hi>) and <hi rend="i">Trombicula naultini</hi> from <hi rend="i">Naultinus elegans.</hi> Since the locality of the latter is given as Invercargill, it seems highly likely that the host was in fact <hi rend="i">Heteropholis gemmeus</hi> and not <hi rend="i">N. elegans</hi> as stated.</p>
          <p>A tick has been described from the tuatara by Dumbleton (1943), who repeated Doré's mistake by referring to the ‘tuatara lizard’. A specimen of this tick (<hi rend="i">Aponomma sphenodonti</hi>) is illustrated in a colour photograph in Sharell (1966). Sharell also mentioned the occurrance of mites (<hi rend="i">Trombicula spp.</hi>) on the tuatara.</p>
          <p>Most obvious from this review is the naming, with one exception, of new parasitic species after the generic or specific name of the host. This has proven an unfortunate pursuit with regard to the New Zealand lizard fauna, when one considers the highly confused state of the nomerclature prior to McCann (1955). It would seem therefore, a much more worthwhile practice to base the naming of any hitherto undescribed parasites on the description of such, rather than on the hosts.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d2" type="biblio">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Allison, F. R., and Climo, F., 1969: <hi rend="i">Paradistomum pacificits</hi> n.sp. (A Dicrocoelid Trematode) from the gecko, <hi rend="i">Hoplodactylus pacificus. Rec. Canterbury Mus.</hi>, 8 (4): 371-378.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170512">Barwick, R. E.</name>, 1959: The life history of the common New Zealand skink, <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma zelandica</hi> (Gray, 1843). <hi rend="i">Trans. R. Soc. N.Z.</hi>, 86 (3/4): 331-380. * Wermuth (1965) records the spelling of the specific name as <hi rend="i">duvaucelli.</hi></bibl>
            <pb xml:id="n65" n="167"/>
            <bibl>Chabaud, A. G. and Dollfus, R. P., 1965: <hi rend="i">Hatterianema hollandei</hi> n.g., n.sp., Nématode Hétérakide parasite de Rhynchocéphale. <hi rend="i">Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. nat., Paris, series</hi> 2, 37 (6): 1041-1045.</bibl>
            <bibl>Doré, A. B., 1919: The occurence of <hi rend="i">Haemogregarina</hi> in New Zealand lizards. <hi rend="i">N.Z. J. Sci. Technol.</hi>, B (3): 163-164.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s1_167"><name type="person" key="name-170387">Dumbleton, L. J.</name></seg>, 1943: A new tick from the Tuatara (<hi rend="i">Sphenodon punctatus</hi>). <hi rend="i">N.Z. Jl. Sci. Technol.</hi>, 24 (4B): 185-190.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s1_167">——</seg>, 1947: Trombidiidae (Acarina) from the Solomon Islands and New Zealand. <hi rend="i">Trans. Proc. R. Soc. N.Z.</hi>, 76 (3): 409-413.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-208309">Hutton, F. W.</name> and <name type="person" key="name-207855">Drummond, J.</name>, 1904: <hi rend="i">The Animals of New Zealand.</hi> Whitcombe and Tombs Ltd., Christchurch. 381 pp.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg xml:id="s2_167"><name type="person" key="name-033158">Laird, M.</name></seg>, 1950: <hi rend="i">Haemogregarina tuatarae</hi> sp.n., from the New Zealand Rhynchocephalian <hi rend="i">Sphenodon punctatus</hi> (Gray). <hi rend="i">Proc. zool. Soc. Lond.</hi>, 120(3): 529-533.</bibl>
            <bibl><seg sameAs="#s2_167">——</seg>, 1951: <hi rend="i">Plasmodium lygosomae</hi> n.sp., a parasite of a New Zealand skink, <hi rend="i">Lygosoma moco</hi> (Gray, 1839). <hi rend="i">J. Parasit.</hi>, 37 (2): 183-189.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170442">McCann, C.</name>, 1955: The lizards of New Zealand. <hi rend="i">Dom. Mus. Bull.</hi>, no. 17: 1-127.</bibl>
            <bibl>Percival, E., 1941: <hi rend="i">Trichomonas hoplodactyli</hi> n.sp. from a New Zealand gecko. <hi rend="i">Rec. Canterbury Mus.</hi>, 4 (7): 373-375.</bibl>
            <bibl>Sharell, R., 1966: <hi rend="i">The Tuatara, Lizards and Frogs of New Zealand.</hi> Collins, London. 94 pp.</bibl>
            <bibl>Wermuth, H., 1965: Liste der rezenten Amphibien und Reptilien, Gekkonidae, Pygopodidae, Xantusidae. <hi rend="i">Tierreich</hi>, 80: 1-246.</bibl>
            <bibl>Womersley, H., 1941: New species of <hi rend="i">Geckobia</hi> (Acarina, Pterygosomidae) from Australia and New Zealand. <hi rend="i">Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust.</hi>, 65 (2): 323-328.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d6" type="article" decls="#text-4-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Corrections to “The Lizards of New Zealand”</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <p>(Dominion Museum Bulletin No. 17 — 1955)</p>
        <p>On arranging the ‘foundation drawings and notes’ on which the publication was based, I discovered, to my horror, that the legends to Plates X and XI had been transposed. Undoubtedly, this transposition has caused and will cause, in the future, much confusion, I therefore hasten to make the necessary corrections:</p>
        <p><hi rend="c">Plate</hi> X (p. 86); <hi rend="sc">For</hi> <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma grande waimatense</hi> sub.sp.nov. <hi rend="sc">Read</hi> <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma homalonotum</hi> (Boulenger): <hi rend="sc">For</hi> <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma fallai</hi> sp.nov. <hi rend="sc">Read</hi> <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma suteri</hi> (Boulenger).</p>
        <p><hi rend="c">Plate</hi> XI (p. 90); <hi rend="sc">For</hi> <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma homalonotum</hi> (Boulenger) <hi rend="sc">Read</hi> <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma grande waimatense</hi> (Gray) sub.sp.nov. <hi rend="sc">For</hi> <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma suteri</hi> (Boulenger) <hi rend="sc">Read</hi> <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma fallai</hi> sp.nov.</p>
        <p><hi rend="c">Text</hi>: Page 85: fourth line from the bottom <hi rend="sc">Alter</hi>: Plate X to XI. Page 89: third line from the bottom <hi rend="sc">Alter</hi>: Plate XI to X.</p>
        <closer rend="right">
          <name type="person" key="name-170442">Charles McCann</name>
        </closer>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n66"/>
      <pb xml:id="n67"/>
      <pb xml:id="n68"/>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>