<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 nzetc-p5.xsd" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader>
    <fileDesc xml:id="fileDesc-0001">
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="marc245">Tuatara: Volume 30, Issue 1, December 1988</title>
        <title type="sort">Tuatara: Volume 30, Issue 1</title>
        <title type="gmd">[electronic resource]</title>
        <editor>
          <name type="person" key="name-111627">G. W. Gibbs</name>
        </editor>
        <editor>
          <name type="person" key="name-121161">F. B. Sampson</name>
        </editor>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0005">
          <resp>Creation of machine-readable version</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">Keyboarded by TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0006">
          <resp>Creation of digital images</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">Keyboarded by TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0007">
          <resp>Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">Keyboarded by TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0004">
          <resp>TEI header, validation, and MADS markup</resp>
          <name key="name-111717" type="person">Shelley Gurney</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <extent>ca. 321 kilobytes</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>New Zealand Electronic Text Centre</publisher>
        <pubPlace>Wellington, New Zealand</pubPlace>
        <idno type="etc">Modern English, Bio30Tuat01</idno>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>Publicly accessible</p>
          <p n="public">URL: http://www.nzetc.org/collections.html</p>
          <p>copyright 2006, by Victoria University of Wellington</p>
        </availability>
        <date when="2006">2006</date>
      <idno type="vuw-bbid">1035249</idno></publicationStmt>
      <seriesStmt xml:id="seriesStmt-0001">
        <title level="j">
          <name key="name-204009" type="work">Tuatara</name>
        </title>
        <idno type="vol">30:1</idno>
      </seriesStmt>
      <notesStmt xml:id="notesStmt-0001">
        <note xml:id="note-0001"/>
        <!-- <note id="page-images">
<list>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_001" id="Bio30Tuat01_001"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_002" id="Bio30Tuat01_002"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_003" id="Bio30Tuat01_003" n="fp1"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_004" id="Bio30Tuat01_004" n="fp2"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_005" id="Bio30Tuat01_005" n="fp3"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_006" id="Bio30Tuat01_006" n="fp4"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_007" id="Bio30Tuat01_007" n="fp5"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_008" id="Bio30Tuat01_008" n="fp6"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_009" id="Bio30Tuat01_009" n="fp7"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_010" id="Bio30Tuat01_010" n="fp8"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_011" id="Bio30Tuat01_011" n="fp9"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_012" id="Bio30Tuat01_012" n="fp10"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_013" id="Bio30Tuat01_013" n="fp11"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_014" id="Bio30Tuat01_014" n="fp12"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_015" id="Bio30Tuat01_015" n="fp13"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_016" id="Bio30Tuat01_016" n="fp14"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_017" id="Bio30Tuat01_017" n="fp15"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_018" id="Bio30Tuat01_018" n="fp16"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_019" id="Bio30Tuat01_019" n="fp17"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_020" id="Bio30Tuat01_020" n="fp18"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_021" id="Bio30Tuat01_021" n="fp19"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_022" id="Bio30Tuat01_022" n="fp20"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_023" id="Bio30Tuat01_023" n="fp21"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_024" id="Bio30Tuat01_024" n="fp22"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_025" id="Bio30Tuat01_025" n="fp23"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_026" id="Bio30Tuat01_026" n="fp24"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_027" id="Bio30Tuat01_027" n="fp25"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_028" id="Bio30Tuat01_028" n="fp26"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_029" id="Bio30Tuat01_029" n="fp27"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_030" id="Bio30Tuat01_030" n="fp28"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_031" id="Bio30Tuat01_031" n="fp29"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_032" id="Bio30Tuat01_032" n="fp30"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_033" id="Bio30Tuat01_033" n="fp31"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_034" id="Bio30Tuat01_034" n="fp32"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_035" id="Bio30Tuat01_035" n="fp33"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_036" id="Bio30Tuat01_036" n="fp34"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_037" id="Bio30Tuat01_037" n="fp35"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_038" id="Bio30Tuat01_038" n="fp36"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_039" id="Bio30Tuat01_039" n="fp37"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_040" id="Bio30Tuat01_040" n="fp38"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_041" id="Bio30Tuat01_041" n="fp39"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_042" id="Bio30Tuat01_042" n="fp40"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_043" id="Bio30Tuat01_043" n="fp41"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_044" id="Bio30Tuat01_044" n="fp42"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_045" id="Bio30Tuat01_045" n="fp43"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_046" id="Bio30Tuat01_046" n="fp44"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_047" id="Bio30Tuat01_047" n="fp45"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_048" id="Bio30Tuat01_048" n="fp46"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_049" id="Bio30Tuat01_049" n="fp47"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_050" id="Bio30Tuat01_050" n="fp48"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_051" id="Bio30Tuat01_051" n="fp49"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_052" id="Bio30Tuat01_052" n="fp50"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_053" id="Bio30Tuat01_053" n="fp51"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_054" id="Bio30Tuat01_054" n="fp52"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_055" id="Bio30Tuat01_055" n="fp53"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_056" id="Bio30Tuat01_056" n="fp54"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_057" id="Bio30Tuat01_057" n="fp55"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_058" id="Bio30Tuat01_058" n="fp56"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_059" id="Bio30Tuat01_059" n="fp57"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_060" id="Bio30Tuat01_060" n="fp58"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_061" id="Bio30Tuat01_061" n="fp59"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_062" id="Bio30Tuat01_062" n="fp60"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_063" id="Bio30Tuat01_063" n="fp61"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_064" id="Bio30Tuat01_064" n="fp62"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_065" id="Bio30Tuat01_065" n="fp63"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_066" id="Bio30Tuat01_066" n="fp64"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_067" id="Bio30Tuat01_067" n="fp65"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_068" id="Bio30Tuat01_068" n="fp66"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_069" id="Bio30Tuat01_069" n="fp67"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_070" id="Bio30Tuat01_070" n="fp68"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_071" id="Bio30Tuat01_071" n="fp69"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_072" id="Bio30Tuat01_072" n="fp70"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_073" id="Bio30Tuat01_073" n="fp71"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_074" id="Bio30Tuat01_074" n="fp72"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_075" id="Bio30Tuat01_075" n="fp73"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_076" id="Bio30Tuat01_076" n="fp74"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_077" id="Bio30Tuat01_077" n="fp75"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_078" id="Bio30Tuat01_078" n="fp76"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_079" id="Bio30Tuat01_079" n="fp77"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_080" id="Bio30Tuat01_080" n="fp78"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_081" id="Bio30Tuat01_081" n="fp79"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_082" id="Bio30Tuat01_082" n="fp80"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_083" id="Bio30Tuat01_083" n="fp81"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_084" id="Bio30Tuat01_084" n="fp82"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_085" id="Bio30Tuat01_085" n="fp83"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_086" id="Bio30Tuat01_086" n="fp84"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_087" id="Bio30Tuat01_087" n="fp85"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_088" id="Bio30Tuat01_088" n="fp86"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_089" id="Bio30Tuat01_089" n="fp87"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_090" id="Bio30Tuat01_090"/></item>
<item><figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_091" id="Bio30Tuat01_091"/></item>
</list>
</note> -->
      </notesStmt>
      <sourceDesc xml:id="sourceDesc-0001">
        <biblFull>
          <titleStmt>
            <title>
              <name key="name-134446" type="work">Tuatara: Volume 30, Issue 1, December 1988</name>
            </title>
            <editor>
              <name type="person" key="name-111627">G. W. Gibbs</name>
            </editor>
            <editor>
              <name type="person" key="name-121161">F. B. Sampson</name>
            </editor>
          </titleStmt>
          <editionStmt>
            <p/>
          </editionStmt>
          <publicationStmt>
            <pubPlace>Wellington, New Zealand</pubPlace>
            <publisher>Victoria University of Wellington</publisher>
            <idno type="callno">Source copy consulted: Victoria University of Wellington Library, QH1 T883 30</idno>
            <idno type="issn">0041-3860</idno>
          </publicationStmt>
        </biblFull>
        <bibl xml:id="text-1-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102482" type="work">Deer Velvet And Palynology: An Example Of The Use of Forensic Palynology In New Zealand</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-111639">D. C. Mildenhall</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-2-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102483" type="work">Fossombronia Species in New Zealand</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-101956">Ella O. Campbell</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-3-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102484" type="work">A Comparison of the Prey of Three Common Web-Building Spiders of Open Country, Bush Fringe and Urban Areas</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170545">D. J. Laing</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-4-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102485" type="work">Behaviour of Young Tuatara (Sphenodon Punctatus) in Total Darkness</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170546">V. B. Meyer-Rochow</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-5-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102486" type="work">Reptiles and the Biogeographic Interpretation of New Caledonia</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170547">Aaron M. Bauer</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-6-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102487" type="work">The use of increment cores for the analysis of tree ring chronologies for fijian kauri (Agathis Macrophylla)</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170548">S.A. Weaver</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-7-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102488" type="work">Soil differences between secondary and old growth Agathis Macrophylla forest at nadarivatu, Fiji</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170548">S.A. Weaver</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-8-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102489" type="work">The Waitoreki of New Zealand - Marsupial or Monotreme?</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170549">Gunter G. Sehm</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-9-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102490" type="work">Cone and Seed Phenology in Several New Zealand Conifer Tree Species</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name key="name-102480" type="person">W. Mary McEwen</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
        <bibl xml:id="text-10-bibl">
          <title level="a">
            <name key="name-102491" type="work">Geology and Revegetation of An 1855 Landslide, Ruamahanga River, Kopuaranga, Wairarapa</name>
          </title>
          <author>
            <name type="person" key="name-170551">Rodney H. Grapes</name>
          </author>
        </bibl>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed and
                    the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding
                    line, except in the case of those words that break over a
                    page. Every effort has been made to preserve the Māori
                    macron using unicode.</p>
        <p xml:id="ETC">Some keywords in the header are a local
                    Electronic Text Center scheme to aid in establishing
                    analytical groupings.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy xml:id="nzetc-subjects">
          <bibl>NZETC Subject Headings</bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc xml:id="profileDesc-0001">
      <creation>
        <date/>
      </creation>
      <langUsage>
        <language ident="en">English</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="http://www.nzetc.org/nzetc-subjects">
          <list>
            <item>
              <rs key="subject-000009" type="subject">Science and Natural History</rs>
            </item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
        <keywords scheme="http://www.example.org/folksonomy">
          <term>Non-Fiction</term>
          <term>Masculine/Feminine</term>
          <term>Prose</term>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc>
      <change n="quickProof"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Text-proofing of a sample of the text</change>
      <change n="teiMarkup"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Conversion to TEI.2-conformat markup</change>
      <change n="scriptedMarkup"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Adding scripted markup</change>
      <change n="encodingDesc"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of encodingDesc</change>
      <change n="addBibls"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of bibls</change>
      <change n="assembleImages"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Assembled all images</change>
      <change n="derivativeCreation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Creation of derivative images</change>
      <change n="teiValidation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Validation of TEI</change>
      <change n="nameValidation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Validation of names</change>
      <change n="utf8Conversion"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Conversion to Unicode (utf-8)</change>
      <change n="makeProduction"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Promotion to production</change>
      <change n="drmAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to access control</change>
      <change n="harvestTopicMap"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Harvest into Topic Map</change>
      <change n="browserCheck"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Checking of text using browser</change>
      <change n="corpusAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to corpus</change>
      <change n="catalogueAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:17:47">21:17:47, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to Library Catalogue<!-- BBID=1035249 --></change>
      <change n="live"><date when="2008-09-23T14:47:04">14:47:04, Tuesday 23 September 2008</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Make text available on NZETC website</change>
    <change n="epubPreparation"><date when="2009-08-04T14:07:09">14:07:09, Tuesday 4 August 2009</date><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Preparation of EPUB (and other formats such as DaisyBook)</change></revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text xml:id="t1">
    <front xml:id="t1-front">
      <divGen type="toc" rend="div"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-front-d1" type="covers">
        <p>
          <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_FCo">
            <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_FCo.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_FCo-g"/>
            <figDesc>Front Cover</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </p>
        <!--
<p>
<figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_001" id="Bio30Tuat01_Spi">

<figDesc>Spine</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>-->
        <p>
          <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_BCo">
            <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_BCo.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_BCo-g"/>
            <figDesc>Back Cover</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </p>
        <!--
<p>
<figure entity="Bio30Tuat01_001" id="Bio30Tuat01_Tit">

<figDesc>Title Page</figDesc>
</figure>
</p>
-->
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n1"/>
      <titlePage xml:id="t1-front-d1-d1">
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main">
            <hi rend="c">Tuatara</hi>
          </titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <docImprint>Journal of the Biological Society
Victoria University OF Wellington<lb/>
New Zealand</docImprint>
        <docEdition><hi rend="sc">Volume</hi> 30</docEdition>
        <docDate><hi rend="sc">December</hi> 1988</docDate>
      </titlePage>
      <pb xml:id="n2"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-front-d2" type="contents">
        <head>
          <hi rend="c">Contents</hi>
        </head>
        <div xml:id="t1-front-d2-d1" type="section">
          <p>
            <table rows="13" cols="3">
              <row>
                <cell>Deer Velvet and palynology: an example of the use of forensic palynology in New Zealand.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-111639" type="person">D. C. Mildenhall</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n3">1</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell><hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> species in New Zealand.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name type="person" key="name-101956">Ella O. Campbell</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n14">12</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>A comparison of the prey of three common web-building spiders of open country, bush fringe and urban areas.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-170545" type="person">D. J. Laing</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n25">23</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Behaviour of young tuatara (<hi rend="i">Sphenodon punctatus</hi>) in total darkness.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-170546" type="person">V.B. Meyer-Rochow</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n38">36</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Reptiles and the biogeographic interpretation of New Caledonia.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-170547" type="person">A. M. Bauer</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n41">39</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>The use of increment cores for the analysis of tree ring chronologies for Fijian kauri (<hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla</hi>).</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-170548" type="person">S. A. Weaver</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n53">51</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Soil differences between secondary and old growth <hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla</hi> forest in Nadarivatu, Fiji.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-170548" type="person">S. A. Weaver</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n57">55</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>The <hi rend="i">Waitoreki</hi> of New Zealand - marsupial or monotreme?</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-170549" type="person">G. G. Sehm</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n64">62</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cone and seed phenology in several New Zealand conifer tree species.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-170550" type="person">W. M. McEwan</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n68">66</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Geology and revegetation of an 1855 landslide, Ruamahanga River, Kopuaranga, Wairarapa.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-170551" type="person">R. H. Grapes</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n79">77</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Book Reviews:</hi>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell><hi rend="i"><name key="name-209378" type="person">William Swainson</name> of Fern Grove, F.R.A., F.L.S., &amp;c - The Anatomy of a Nineteenth-Century Naturalist</hi> by <name key="name-170543" type="person">Sheila Natusch</name> and <name key="name-102481" type="person">Geoffrey Swainson</name>.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-111643" type="person">J. R. H. Andrews</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n86">84</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell><hi rend="i">Forest Vines to Snow Tussocks: the Story of New Zealand Plants</hi> by John Dawson.</cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="c">
                    <name key="name-111627" type="person">G. W. Gibbs</name>
                  </hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <ref target="#n87">85</ref>
                </cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-front-d2-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Editorial</hi>
          </head>
          <p>This issue marks a change in <hi rend="c">Tuatara</hi>. From now on we will be publishing a single annual Volume of similar size, or larger, than the combined size of the two (or three) parts per Volume, published previously. This brings <hi rend="c">Tuatara</hi> “into line’ with similar publications and reduces printing costs. As Editors, we find it easier too, to produce a single annual issue, especially as there is a tendency for the bulk of the papers submitted to arrive at one time of the year! We very much appreciate the loyalty of our subscribers and hope that the change will be welcomed.</p>
          <p>We record, with great regret, the sudden death of Byron Buick-Constable (aged 43) on 5 November, 1988. Mr Buick-Constable, the Assistant Registrar (Information and Publications), Victoria University of Wellington, has for many years, been Business Manager of <hi rend="c">Tuatara</hi> and we are grateful for the care and enthusiasm which he devoted to the publishing of this journal.</p>
          <p>
            <hi rend="b">
              <hi rend="c">
                <name type="person" key="name-111627">G. W. Gibbs</name>
              </hi>
            </hi>
          </p>
          <p>
            <hi rend="b">
              <hi rend="c">
                <name type="person" key="name-121161">F. B. Sampson</name>
              </hi>
            </hi>
          </p>
        </div>
      </div>
    </front>
    <body xml:id="t1-body">
      <pb xml:id="n3" n="1"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d1" type="article" decls="#text-1-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Deer Velvet And Palynology: An Example Of The Use of Forensic Palynology In New Zealand</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-111639">D. C. Mildenhall</name><lb/>
New Zealand Geological Survey, P.O. Box 30 368, Lower Hutt.</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Forensic palynology has the capability of proving or disproving alibis; connecting suspects to the scenes of their crimes; connecting an item or items to either the scene of the crime or to suspects; and sourcing items, including drugs, to their point of origin. A brief history of one of the earliest New Zealand cases, involving the theft of deer velvet, is presented as an illustration. Palynological evidence given in this case is summarised and placed in context with other evidence.</p>
          <p><hi rend="b">Key words:</hi> Forensic palynology, palynology, criminology, pollen assemblages, case history, deer velvet, New Zealand.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The objective of this paper is to present evidence of the usefulness of palynology in forensic science (Mildenhall, in press), with particular reference to New Zealand.
<pb xml:id="n4" n="2"/>
It is written primarily with the lay person in mind and will be devoid of undefined scientific terms. The paper takes the form of a summary of the evidence presented at a trial that generated much publicity. Although all the information about this trial can be gleaned from the newspapers of the time, the names of the people involved will not be mentioned in this paper.</p>
          <p>One scientific term that is unavoidable is “palynology”. Palynology is the study of spores and pollen, the very small fertile bodies of all plants, usually disseminated by air. The term pollen assemblage refers to the total range and relative numbers of different types of spores and identified plants to avoid confusion over the use of common names, which often apply to different types of plants in different countries.</p>
          <p>A pollen sample is obtained by acetolysis, which entails heating the rock or soil sample with a mixture of one part concentrated sulphuric acid and nine parts acetic anhydride. The organic material is then separated by centrifuging, floated off and mounted on glass slides ready for examination under a high-powered microscope. The exact technique varies with the material to be analysed; acetolysis is not used if viable pollen is to be studied.</p>
          <p>Palynology has proved useful in a number of forensic cases over the past ten years, although not all cases have come to court. Both New Zealand Geological Survey and Botany Division (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research or (<hi rend="c">Dsir</hi>) have been active in this field. New Zealand Geological Survey's involvement in forensic palynological work has been the result of a number of factors. Firstly we are close to Chemistry Division (<hi rend="c">Dsir</hi>) in Lower Hutt, where the bulk of New Zealand's forensic science is carried out and it is but a simple matter, and easily demonstrated in court, to pass samples from hand to hand without recourse to couriers. We are therefore able to work closely with the other forensic scientists involved in each case. Secondly, New Zealand Geological Survey provides a forensic petrological service and in many cases it is logical to provide a palynological service in the same laboratory at the same time. This avoids problems of explaining continuity of sample handling, a bugbear of many court cases, since it must be always quite clear where individual samples were at any instant during an investigation. Thirdly, our staff of four palynologists have expertise in a variety of palynological fields which are of potential use to the Police. Finally, we have been able to build up a case file from experience gained in the field over the last ten years.</p>
          <p>The purpose of palynological evidence is to attempt to identify and then correlate spores, pollen and other acid resistant organic materials at the scene of a crime, or on a suspect, with each other. In essence we try and determine the relationship between a suspect and the scene of a crime, by linking an item left at the scene and a suspect, or an item at the discovery scene with the scene of the actual crime. We also attempt to disprove or prove alibis, and source items to their point of origin. Palynology can also be useful in cases of suspicious death where poisoning is thought to be involved, particularly with botulism and honey poisoning, although this is more the role of the medical profession. There are many problems with forensic palynology and some of these are briefly mentioned in Mildenhall (in press).</p>
          <p>Forensic palynology is a relatively new science. Erdtman (1969) in a chapter headed “pollen analysis and criminology” described several ways in which palynology has solved crime, including a murder investigation in Vienna, Austria, in which a unique combination of spore and pollen types on a suspect's shoes pointed to the scene of a murder, even though at the time the body of the murdered person had not been discovered. The diet of a murdered person can sometimes
<pb xml:id="n5" n="3"/>
be determined by pollen analysis of stomach and gut contents and by analysis of faeces (copropalynology). Archeologists use these methods in determining the environmental, social and cultural conditions of primitive peoples by study of the plant remains associated with buried bodies (Leroi-Gourhan, 1975; Stead et al. 1986).</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Case History: The Case Of The Stolen Deer Velvet</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3-d1" type="section">
            <head>Preamble</head>
            <p>This case history involves the theft of deer velvet (antlers in a soft state). Some mention of the case has already been made in the literature by Mildenhall (1982), Skinner et al. (1988), and Mildenhall (in press). This description of the case in greater detail permits the role of forensic palynology to be placed in context, as well as confirming that it is only one of a series of techniques that are available to the courts in seeking out the truth.</p>
            <p>On 27 February 1980 the Police executed a search warrant and seized a large quantity of deer velvet from a suspect's house. The deer velvet was later identified as having been stolen three months previously from Ohinepaka Station, Wairoa. The velvet was found in a freezer in a garage at the suspect's home and weighed 37.5 kg; the original amount stolen was estimated to be over 100 kg and worth about $16,300. The suspect was charged with stealing the velvet on 23 November 1979 and an alternative charge of receiving 66 pieces of deer velvet between 23 November 1979 and 26 February 1980 was also laid. The suspect denied the charges and maintained that the velvet had been colleccted by him over two seasons and was being stored until the price of velvet, which was low at the time, rose. The suspect elected trial by jury.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3-d2" type="section">
            <head>The non-palynological physical evidence</head>
            <p>The theft was first noticed by the manager of the deer farm on the 23 November 1979, when a large amount of velvet was found to be missing from a padlocked freezer on Ohinepaka Station. Also missing was a wool bale sack, which had been covering the floor of the freezer, and a quantity of sausages. The stolen material consisted of 97 kg of A (= first) grade and 20 kg of fourth grade velvet, some of which had distinguishing marks caused by the cutting equipment used at the time to cut the antlers off the farmed deer. These distinguishing marks were found on some of the velvet located in the suspect's freezer. Moreover, string marks on the antlers were consistent with those left by the manager's method of hanging the antlers in the freezer at Ohinepaka Station.</p>
            <p>One of the stolen antlers had come from an animal that the manager had been keeping a close eye on because it had an unusually shaped antler with a break at the base. Furthermore, some of the antlers still had string attached, consistent with string used at Ohinepaka Station. A wool bale sack, similar to the one stolen from the station, was found in the corner of the suspect's garage.</p>
            <p>The high quality of the velvet recovered was regarded, in part, as being due to the method of storage. The velvet recovered was found stacked in a small freezer, but if the antlers had been frozen in that position from a soft state then identations would appear on the velvet. These indentations were not apparent on the recovered velvet. It was quite clear that this velvet had been frozen individually by hanging in a large freezer, attached by string. In the event of thawing and being refrozen some marks would be apparent on the antlers. Stags grow antlers annually, and being at their most valuable state when soft, the antlers are usually harvested about sixty days after the commencement of growth, in November through to
<pb xml:id="n6" n="4"/>
January, depending on the area. After harvesting they are hung up to cool in such a way as to prevent blood loss, then hung in a freezer until frozen, and finally stacked. The retention of blood adds to the weight, and the subsequent possible value of the antlers, which, if not frozen, would be unsaleable within 48 hours.</p>
            <p>Since the suspect maintained that he had obtained the antlers over a period of two years hunting in native bush, and that he had carried the velvet out attached to his belt, it was difficult to see how the velvet could have been of such high quality, since some damage would be unavoidable considering the stated method of transport. Experienced hunters giving evidence at the trial confirmed that the method of carrying velvet, as stated by the accused, would cause much damage and that hunters would normally carry velvet tucked down the front of their jerseys or well wrapped up, because “it was like gold and has to be well protected”. Considering the suspect's statement that he had collected the velvet over the previous two seasons, further evidence from experienced hunters indicated that, because the harvesting period for velvet was so short, the amount of velvet seized by the Police was too great to have been collected in a two year period of time from free ranging deer. The hunters also maintained that it would be impossible for one man hunting alone to get 18 kg per month and that most of what was obtained would be well below A grade quality. It was estimated that a total of only about 20 velvet carrying stags would be shot in the area per year, averaging three animals per week for a full time hunter, at an average weight of about 1 kg of velvet per stag.</p>
            <p>Evidence also presented suggested that velvet was usually cut off free ranging deer by sawing, not cutting and that tourniquets were not normally used when collecting velvet from free ranging deer killed in the wild. The suspect explained the existence of the string and string marks on the velvet by stating that he had applied a tourniquet to the antlers immediately after cutting them off with bolt cutters or a saw (which he could not produce in evidence) in order to stop blood loss. He also maintained that the string had been given to him, along with the wool bale sack, by an employee from a local Lands and Survey farm.</p>
            <p>The police recovered 66 pieces of velvet in total, but of these only 10 matched in colour and development, indicating that they had came from the same five deer. If the suspect had done his own harvesting then a higher degree of pairing would have been expected. This was explained by the suspect as resulting from damage to some antlers when the animal fell to the ground after being shot, and the damaged antlers being left in the bush. However, experienced hunters stated that all velvet was of some value and that it was most unusual to leave damaged antlers after the effort of shooting the deer.</p>
            <p>Evidence was also presented from an agent for a velvet-buying company, who examined the recovered velvet and maintained that it could only have come from animals growing in a very good environment, possibly pasture. This was on the grounds that animals from the wild always have a percentage of malformed or damaged velvet, and that only about 25% of deer velvet collected in the wild would be of A grade quality. This witness estimated that the antlers examined contained well over 60% A grade velvet, while another witness put this figure at 90% A grade velvet.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3-d3" type="section">
            <head>The non-palynological forensic evidence</head>
            <p>Forensic scientists from the DSIR were called on to examine the velvet, wool bale sacks, twine, wool bale string, and the cutters used at Ohinepaka Station to remove the velvet from the deer. The scientists were unable to confirm that the
<pb xml:id="n7" n="5"/>
cutters were used to cut the antlers, although it appeared that a similar two-bladed instrument was used, which cut into the antlers a small distance and then snapped them. Hence there was no evidence to prove or disprove that the cutters from Ohinepaka Station, which were presented in court, were the ones used. The string at Ohinepaka Station was the same as that attached to the stolen deer antlers, but it was of a fairly common type in wide use. The stolen wool bale sack was similar to those still in use at Ohinepaka Station, but again they were of a fairly common type and in wide use.</p>
            <p>A quantity of dung was found on one of the stolen antlers. Examination of the material indicated that it came from an animal that fed off pasture grass and not on bush vegetation.</p>
            <p>Six soil samples were collected from the deer pens, two samples from inside and outside the stolen wool bale sack, one sample from a wool bale sack at Ohinepaka Station and three samples from three separate antlers found in the suspect's freezer, one of the samples coming from the base of one of the deer antlers. Petrological examination of all 12 samples showed that they contained minerals and rock fragments consistent with coming from a similar source, and that they all contained a large amount of organic matter that appeared suitable for pollen analysis.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3-d4" type="section">
            <head>The palynological forensic evidence</head>
            <p>The twelve petrological samples were also examined palynologically, and the plants from which the spores and pollen came from were identified in ten cases. However, two of the samples, from material adhering to the stolen antlers, did not contain any spores or pollen. All ten samples were consistent with derivation from a cultivated grassland source and no sample contained evidence of having been derived from a forest or bushland environment. The similarity of the pollen assemblages from the stock pens and the wool bale sack at Ohinepaka Station with those on the stolen wool bale sack and on the base of one of the stolen antlers suggested that they were derived from a very similar source. The combination of spore and pollen types suggested that the farm on which the stock pens occurred was the original source of all samples. It was impossible for the samples to have come from a grassy clearing in bush or forest as the pollen assemblage from the clearing would have been dominated by pollen from the surrounding trees. The percentages of spores and pollen, given below, could not be derived from soil samples cultivated plants suggested derivation from a cultivated area in which both exotic and native plants occurred together (Table 1).</p>
            <p>
              <table rows="106">
                <head>
                  <hi rend="c">Table 1</hi>
                </head>
                <row>
                  <cell>List of plants identified</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Samples</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Ohinepaka Station</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Suspect</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>stock</cell>
                  <cell>stock</cell>
                  <cell>wool</cell>
                  <cell>inside</cell>
                  <cell>outside</cell>
                  <cell>deer</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>pen</cell>
                  <cell>pens</cell>
                  <cell>bale</cell>
                  <cell>wool bale</cell>
                  <cell>wool bale</cell>
                  <cell>antler</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Liverworts; mosses; etc.</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Anthocerotales</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Anthoceros</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Megaceros</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Phaeoceros</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Rudolphisporis</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">rudolphi</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <pb xml:id="n8" n="6"/>
                <row>
                  <cell>Unidentified megaspore</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Lycopods:</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Lycopodium fastigiatum</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Ferns:</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Cyathea</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">C. dealbata</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">C. smithii</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Dicksonia lanata</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">D. squarrosa</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Histiopteris incisa</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">?Ophioglossum</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Paesia scaberula</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Phymatosorus</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">diversifolius</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Pteridum aquilinum</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Pteris cf P</hi>.</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">macilenta</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Polypodiaceae</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">spores (?including</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Blechnum)</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Total spores counted</cell>
                  <cell>65</cell>
                  <cell>-</cell>
                  <cell>13</cell>
                  <cell>4</cell>
                  <cell>12</cell>
                  <cell>10</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Conifers: Agathis australis</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">(or Araucaria)</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Dacrycarpus dacrydioides</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Dacrydium cupressinum</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>4%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Phyllocladus</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Pinus</hi> cf. <hi rend="i">P. radiata</hi></cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>4%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>2%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">P. totara</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>2%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Prumnopitys ferruginea</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Flowering plants;</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>dicotyledons:</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Acacia</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Acaena</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Anthriscus</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Araliaceae</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Betulaceae</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Carystegia</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Caryophyllaceae</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Casuarina</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Chenopodiaceae</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Chenopodium</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Colobanthus</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Compositae</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>(Liguliflorae)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Compositae</cell>
                  <cell>)15%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>)10%</cell>
                  <cell>)3%</cell>
                  <cell>)2%</cell>
                  <cell>)3%</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>(Tubuliflorae)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>incl. <hi rend="i">Chrysanthemum</hi></cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Cotula</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Coprosma</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                  <cell>X)</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Cornaceae</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Cruciferae</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Dracphyllum</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Dysoxylum spectabile</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">? Elytranthe</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Eucalyptus</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Geranium</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Hebe</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Hoheria</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Ixerba brexioides</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Juglans</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Knightia excelsa</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <pb xml:id="n9" n="7"/>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Leptospermum</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>2%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Metrosideros</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Myriophyllum</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>7%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Myrsine</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Nothofagus brassi</hi> group</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>2%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">N. fusca group</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>2%</cell>
                  <cell>3%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">N. menziesii</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Pelargonium</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Pomaderris</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>?</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Proteaceae (extinct?)</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Pseudowintera</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Quintinia</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Ranunculus</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Rumex</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>3%</cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>3%</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Salix</hi> cf. <hi rend="i">S. nigra</hi></cell>
                  <cell>2%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>2%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>9%</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Sapindaceae</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">? Spergularia</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Ulex europeus</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Umbelliferae</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>unknowns-croton pattern</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>polycolporate</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>tricolporate</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>3%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>16%</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>tricolpate</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Flowering plants;</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>monocotyledons:</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Cordyline australis</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Cyperaceae</cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Gramineae</cell>
                  <cell>69%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>62%</cell>
                  <cell>73%</cell>
                  <cell>80%</cell>
                  <cell>63%</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Plantago lanceolata</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>1%</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Restionaceae</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Typha orientalis</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>X</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Total pollen counted</cell>
                  <cell>145</cell>
                  <cell>-</cell>
                  <cell>161</cell>
                  <cell>137</cell>
                  <cell>125</cell>
                  <cell>158</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Total spores and pollen</cell>
                  <cell>210</cell>
                  <cell>-</cell>
                  <cell>174</cell>
                  <cell>141</cell>
                  <cell>137</cell>
                  <cell>168</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <p>
              <table rows="5" cols="3">
                <row>
                  <cell>Notes:</cell>
                  <cell>1.</cell>
                  <cell>Column one is a selected sample from the stock pens; column two consists of a composite of the other 5 samples from the stock pens, with only those taxa not found in the first sample being indicated.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>2.</cell>
                  <cell>The percentages are based on counts of pollen only (spores are not included). Only those plants forming 1% or more of the total pollen count are included in the above percentages.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>3.</cell>
                  <cell>X = present in the sample;</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>? = uncertain identification.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>4.</cell>
                  <cell>The sample from the outside of the wool bale sack collected from the suspect's garage had a sparse assemblage in which grasses (Gramineae) were over-represented, thus giving a higher percentage. However, the sparseness of the pollen count is caused by the very small size of the sample and the resultant lack of total spores and pollen, but this does not detract from the conclusion that the soil sample comes from a grassland environment.</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <p>As can be calculated from the above list, up to 84% of the total pollen count consists of pollen from Gramineae (grasses) and Compositae (daisies). Other plants rarely form more than 4% of the count. The samples do show some variation, but no more than is to be expected from mud collected from stock pens, where ground is constantly stirred up and often muddied by animals brought in from outside the immediate area. What the samples do show are that they are all derived from a grassland environment and that both native and exotic plants grew in the area, but not in any great abundance and not very close to the stock pens. The variations that appear in the percentages of the more infrequent plants are in part caused by the very low counts done at the time, ranging from 137 to 210
<pb xml:id="n10" n="8"/>
spores and pollen. It was not considered profitable to count further since the demonstration of a grassland environment would not change with a higher count. Another reason for the variation is simply that they reflect pollen influx over different seasons in the year in one area, and influxes of soil from outside the immediate environment. However, in spite of the variation there was no evidence to suggest that the samples from the stolen antler and wool bale sack could have come from any area other than Ohinepaka Station.</p>
            <p>A few spores and pollen were not idenfified, as these were from exotic (not native) plants not represented in our spore/pollen reference collection. However, this does not negate the fact that the samples, within the limits of the palynological tehnique, were very similar, and all came from the same environment.</p>
            <p>A point to be stressed about the sample from the base of the antler found in possession of the suspect is that the mud sample was mixed with blood. This indicated that the spores and pollen in the mud and the blood arrived on the antlers at the same time, while the blood was still wet. This time must have been immediately after the antlers were cut. and since the mud contained pollen from a grassland environment they could not have been taken from free ranging deer in either native or exotic forest or bush.</p>
            <p>There are one or two intereting aspects of the plants identified. The sample from the inside of the stolen wool bale sack contained pollen that could only have come from soil or rocks greater than one million years old. This sample contained pollen of <hi rend="i">Casuarina</hi> (she-oak, a plant now growing in Australia and Polynesia), <hi rend="i">Nothofagus brassi</hi> beech (large leafed beech growing today in New Caledonia), and fossil Proteaceae (proteas). This distinct difference from the other samples could be explained by the fact that the wool bale sack would have been used a number of times and had in the past carried material containing mud or rock fragments containing extinct pollen types. These pollen types were of a different colour from the more recent grains, which were light in colour and better preserved.</p>
            <p>Another feature was the variety of liverwort spores identified from the stock yards and the mud/blood sample from the base of the antler found in possession of the suspect. Such a variety is unlikely from a sample taken from a clearing in bush or scrub. The plants involved suggested a permanently damp and muddy situation, such as stock pens usually are, although a similar situation would occur on muddy banks of streams. Inspection of the stock pens confirmed that they were muddy and that liverworts were growing around the fence lines. There was also a number of native and exotic plants growing in the area whose pollen was represented in the soil samples.</p>
            <p>Finally, pollen of a number of plants occurred that would be unexpected in an upland forest or bush situation. For instance, <hi rend="i">Salix</hi> (willow) is common around streams and on farms; <hi rend="i">Juglans</hi> (walnuts) is often found on abandoned farms and settlements now overgrown, but still is unlikely in upland areas. The pollen of native plants identified from the samples are wide ranging types that could well have come from nearby native forest, but the low abundance shows that the forest was a considerable distance away. These pollen types usually overwhelm pollen from herbaceous plants, which do not produce pollen in the abundance that forest trees do.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d3-d5" type="section">
            <head>The result</head>
            <p>After five hours of deliberation the jury found the suspect guilty of receiving the deer velvet, and since the police could not present any evidence as to who had committed the initial theft, that charge was dropped. The judge in his summing
<pb xml:id="n11" n="9"/>
up laid especial weight upon the forensic evidence that had indicated that the stolen antlers and wool bale sack had all come from a grassland environment and that no countering evidence had been produced to suggest that the source area of all soil samples examined was other than Ohinepaka Station.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d4" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Conclusion</hi>
          </head>
          <p>This is but one case in which palynology has assisted a jury in coming to a verdict in a criminal action in New Zealand. In most situations the evidence is circumstantial, either showing that a suspect's alibi is highly improbable, or showing that a suspect, or something connected with a suspect, came from an environment similar to that in which a crime had been committed (Mildenhall, in press). Not all the palynological evidence presented above is produced in court in the form of verbal testimony. Palynological data by their very volume present problems of presentation, and concentration on the environment that the samples come from, and on certain key plants, relieves the palynologist of having to explain insignificant differences between pollen assemblages examined. All data are, however, available to both defence and prosecution and this allows the material to be challenged, since data a palynologist thinks are insignificant, may turn out to have a significance not previously realised. The defence can also get alternative opinions based on the list of identifications and pollen counts. It should be realised that only the list of plants and the counts represent factual data; the rest is interpretation and opinion and as such can and should be challenged.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d5" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgments</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The various drafts of this paper were read by Geoff Gregory, Ian Raine, David Skinner and Graeme Wilson (New Zealand Geological Survey), to whom I am most grateful. Thanks are extended to Bruce Sampson (School of Biological Sciences, Victoria Univertsity of Wellington) for his encouragement in this project.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d1-d6" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Erdtman, G. 1969: <hi rend="i">Handbook of palynology. An introduction to the study of pollen grains and spores</hi>. Hafner Publishing Company, New York. 486 pp.</bibl>
            <bibl>Leroi-Gourhan, A. 1975: The flowers found with Shanidar IV, a Neanderthal burial in Iraq. <hi rend="i">Science 190:</hi> 443-451.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-111639">Mildenhall, D.C.</name> 1982: Forensic palynology, <hi rend="i">Geological Society of New Zealand newsletter 58:</hi> 25.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-111639">Mildenhall, D.C.</name> (in press): Forensic palynology in New Zealand. Proceedings of the 7th International Palynological Congress, Brisbane, 28 August-3 September, 1988.</bibl>
            <bibl>Skinner, D.N.B.; Challis, G.A.; <name type="person" key="name-111639">Mildenhall, D.C.</name> and Watters, W.A. 1988: Of Rainbow Warriors, deer antlers, platinum, and other things: forensic science in New Zealand Geological Survey. <hi rend="i">New Zealand Geological Survey report G130:</hi> 13 pp.</bibl>
            <bibl>Stead, I.M.; Bourke, J.B. and Brothwell, D. (eds) 1986: <hi rend="i">Lindow man: the body in the bog</hi>. British Museum Publications, London, 208 pp.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
          <pb xml:id="n12" n="10"/>
          <pb xml:id="n13" n="11"/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_011a">
              <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_011a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_011a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 1</hi></hi><hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Cannabis</hi></hi> (<hi rend="i">cannabis</hi>). <hi rend="i">These pollen grains are often found associated with hashish (cannabis oil and resin), in soils close to groves of flowering cannabis, and on the clothes of people cultivating cannabis plants. X 1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 2</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Artemisia</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(sage brush). The pollen grains are often found associated with imported hashish. X 1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 3</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Impatiens</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(balsam or water fuchsia). These pollen types suggest a tropical or northern hemisphere source for imported drugs. X1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 4</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Foeniculum</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(fennel). A pollen type found regularly in forensic palynological samples. X 1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 5</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Salix</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(willow). A pollen type found regularly in forensic palynological samples. X 1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 6</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Ribes</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(gooseberry). These pollen types were found in surface samples around and underneath a body, but were not found on mud on top of the body. This, along with other evidence, proved that the mud on the body came from some other source, and that the body, along with the mud, had been taken to the site after death. X 1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 7</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Alnus</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(alder). These pollen types are often found in drugs and other items imported from the northern hemisphere. X 1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 8</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Eucalyptus</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(eucalypt). These pollen types are very common in forensic samples. X 1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 9</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Acacia</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(wattle). These pollen types are thought to disperse only short distances from the parent plant. Therefore their presence in forensic palynological samples indicates that the tree occurs close by the source of the samples. Such evidence can assist towards sourcing items to particular sites, and this pollen type, along with other evidence, assisted in sourcing the stolen deer velvet to Ohinepaka Station. X 1000</hi>.<lb/>
<hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 10</hi>.</hi> <hi rend="i">Photomicrograph of</hi> <hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Juglans</hi></hi> <hi rend="i">(walnut). These pollen types have assisted towards sourcing forensic palynological samples by suggesting that sites lacking in walnut trees could not have been the source. This, along with other evidence, assisted in sourcing the stolen deer velvet to Ohinepaka Station. X 1000</hi>.</head>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n14" n="12"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d2" type="article" decls="#text-2-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Fossombronia Species in New Zealand</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>By <name type="person" key="name-101956">Ella O. Campbell</name><lb/>
Department of Botany &amp; Zoology, Massey University, Palmeston North, New Zealand.</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d1" type="section">
          <p><hi rend="b">Key words:</hi> Hepaticac, Metzgeriales, <hi rend="i">Fossombronia australis, Fossombronia pusilla, Fossombronia reticulata, Fossombronia wondraczekii</hi>.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The main features of the genus <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> are outlined. Taxonomy, morphology and distribution of <hi rend="i">F. reticulata, F. australis, F. wondraczekii</hi> and <hi rend="i">F. pusilla</hi> are reported. Notes are given on other species recorded for New Zealand.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Main Features of the Genus Fossombronia</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d1" type="section">
            <p><hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> Raddi is classified in the family Codoniaceae of the Metzgeriales (Grolle. 1983) which is a predominantly thalloid order of the Hepaticae. <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> is unusual in that is shows two rows of lateral thallus lobes which are leaf-like and are normally called leaves. These are, however, quite different from the leaves of the so-called leafy liverworts, Jungermanniales, so that despite its leafy habit <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> is unlikely to be confused with any member of that very large order. The prostrate fleshy stem, bearing reddish rhizoids, is also distinctive for most <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> species.</p>
            <p>The stem is more or less plane dorsally and convex ventrally. Internally the cells are uniformly thin-walled. The leaves are obliquely inserted with the antical margin decurrent. They tend to be crowded towards the stem apex and vary in shape even on a single stem, but are usually broader than long and have an irregularly undulate, lobed outline, with a few scattered mucilage papillae on the margin. In structure the leaves are for the most part unistratose but at the base become pluristratose. Individual cells are uniformly thin-walled and gradually increase in size, particularly in length, towards the base of the leaf. In all New Zealand species they contain chloroplasts and a variable number (4-40) of ellipsodial oil bodies, 1.8-2.6 × 4-4.8 μm. At a magnification of x100 the oil bodies appear smooth and glistening but at x500, using Nomarski interference microscopy, they appear botryoidal with a single eccentric large spherule. They resemble the oil bodies of <hi rend="i">Lophozia silvicola</hi> (Schuster, 1966; Fig. 13.9).</p>
            <p>As regards sexual reproduction the species are either monoicous or dioicous. The young sporophyte is enclosed by a thin calyptra and by a more conspicuous campanulate pseudoperianth. Further protection may be provided by the crowded terminal leaves. The capsule is spherical and has a bistratose wall with the inner layer strengthed by nodules and irregular incomplete rings of thickening.</p>
            <p>It is widely recognised (Scott, 1985) that, since species of <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> vary considerably in morphology, according to environmental conditions, reliance cannot be placed on vegetative characters for separating them, particularly if herbarium specimens only are available for examination. However, should spores be present, the size of these, together with the ornamentation pattern on the surface, has proved to be distinctive for most species, even though ripe spores have been found to undergo post-harvest shrinkage and so are slightly smaller than those freshly shed.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d2" type="section">
            <head>Key to the New Zealand species:</head>
            <p>
              <table cols="3">
                <row>
                  <cell>1.</cell>
                  <cell>Plant large, dioicous; spore diameter less than 40 μm; distal face of spore not prominently lamellate</cell>
                  <cell>2</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <pb xml:id="n15" n="13"/>
            <p>
              <table rows="5" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Plant small, monicous; spore diameter more than 40 μm; distal face of spore prominently lamellate</cell>
                  <cell>3</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>2.</cell>
                  <cell>Plants tending to grow as cushions; distal face of spore reticulate-lamellate</cell>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">F. reticulata</hi>
                  </cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Plants often elongated and partly submerged; distal face of spore verrucate or subpapillate</cell>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi>
                  </cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>3.</cell>
                  <cell>Spore lamellae many, appearing at the margin as ca. 30 projecting spines</cell>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">F. wondraczekii</hi>
                  </cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Spore lamellae few, appearing at the margin as 10-20 projecting spines</cell>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">F. pusilla</hi>
                  </cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d3" type="section">
            <head>Fossombronia reticulata Steph<lb/>
Distribution</head>
            <p>As far as is known <hi rend="i">F. reticulata</hi> is endemic to New Zealand. It is widely distributed throughout the country. Recent collections are from stream banks near Norsewood, roadside banks on Banks Peninsula and in the Akatarawa Range, and drain banks at Massey University. It also occurs as a weed in some bowling greens.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d4" type="section">
            <head>References and sources of material</head>
            <p><hi rend="i">F. reticulata</hi> was described in Latin by Stephani (1984; 1900) from a specimen collected near Auckland, New Zealand by T. Kirk and now housed in the Stephani Herbarium at Geneva. A syntype is at CHR. The type and syntype were examined as well as other specimens from the collections of E.A. Hodgson, <name type="person" key="name-170449">K.W. Allison</name> and <name type="person" key="name-207684">W. Colenso</name>.</p>
            <p>Plants from recent collections were cultured at Massey University on a sterilised clay soil in plastic containers and observed over three years.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d5" type="section">
            <head>Description of the plant</head>
            <p>Plants tend to grow in tufted, yellowish-green to green cushions, up to 20cm in diameter. Individual shoots, 1-5cm long, are terminally erect but basally prostrate and attached to the soil by numerous long crimson rhizoids. The breadth of the shoot including the leaves is up to 6mm. Branching is intercalary with new shoots arising in a supra-axillary position and usually from the basal part of the plant.</p>
            <p>The stem region, 0.9mm broad and 0.26mm deep, consists of the thin-walled cells of width 40-60 μm, depth 40-60 μm and length 120-230 μm. The leaves are of firm texture, 2-(3)mm long and 2-2.5(-4)mm broad, widely spreading to suberect, either distant or slightly imbrticate, execept where they are crowded near the stem apex, more or less crisped and rounded with 2 to 4 shallow lobes, which on the margin may show one or more angular projections, each terminated by a mucilage papilla. Except in very young plants the leaves tend to be opposite to subopposite with the antical margin long decurrent.</p>
            <p>Plants are dioicous. In male plants numerous antheridia occur on the upper surface of the stem amongst the terminal leaves (Fig. 1a). Each anteridium has a short stalk and a spherical head, 0.21mm in diameter, which is often conspicuous by its yellow colour but with age becomes whitish. In female plants (Fig. 1b)
<pb xml:id="n16" n="14"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_014a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_014a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_014a-g"/><head><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 1 Fossombronia reticulata</hi></hi><hi rend="i">A. Male shoot showing antheridia. b. Female shoot showing sporophyte and pseudoperianth. Drawing by C.A. Korndorffer</hi>.</head></figure>
archegonia arise on the stem near the apex. The pseudoperianth is campanulate, 3-4mm high and 3mm in diameter across the slightly crispate, lobed rim. Around it the crowded terminal leaves form an outer cup. The ripe capsule has a firm stalk, 1-2cm long and 0.4mm wide, and a spherical, dark brown head 1.1mm in diameter. The spores have a diameter of (24-) 26-29(-32) μm. The surface is finely ornamented with irregularly reticulate, sinuous, low lamellae which are more clearly defined on the distal face and appear as truncate projections around the rim (Fig. 3). The elaters are mostly 0.5-0.8 μm wide and 70-29 μm long, colourless except for two helical brown bands but in some populations a few are 3-banded at the middle where they are slightly wider (to 1.0 μm).</p>
            <p><hi rend="b">Note:</hi><hi rend="i">F. reticulata</hi> is proving to be a troublesome weed in some bowling greens and golf courses, apparently favoured in comparison to more desirable plants by some spray programmes. Research is currently being carried out in regard to this.</p>
            <p>It has been observed that, after the spraying of roadside banks on the Akatarawa Road with 2,4,5-T <hi rend="i">F. reticulata</hi> was one of the first plants to appear. The green cushions were very conspicuous on the bare clay soil. Investigation showed that, although the spray had killed the parts of the <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> with which it came in contact, it evidently was not translocated within the plant, for new shoots rapidly developed either from resistant apices or advenitiously from stems that were underneath the cover of dead leaves.</p>
            <pb xml:id="n17" n="15"/>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_015a">
                <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_015a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_015a-g"/>
                <head><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 2</hi></hi><hi rend="i">Spore of</hi><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">F. reticulata</hi>.</hi><lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Top:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">distal view</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Middle:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">side view</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Bottom:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">proximal view. Scanning electron micrographs by D. H. Hopcroft and <name type="person" key="name-131727">R. Bennett</name>. Scale bars = 10 μm</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 3</hi></hi><hi rend="i">Spore of</hi><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">F. australis. Top and Middle:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">distal view taken from different angles</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Bottom:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">proximal view. Scanning electron micrographs by D.H. Hopcroft and <name type="person" key="name-131727">R. Bennett</name>. Scale bars = 10 μm</hi>.</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div>
          <pb xml:id="n18" n="16"/>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d6" type="section">
            <head>Fossombronia australis Mitt<lb/>
Distribution</head>
            <p><hi rend="i">Fossombronia australis</hi> is known from Kerguelen Island and from New Zealand. The type came from Heard Island in the South Indian Ocean (Bonner, 1965). It may occur also in Australia, although records from that country require confirmation from a wider range of specimens. In New Zealand it grows either amongst other vegetation on wet, shady banks or as dense, partially submerged colonies in freshwater swamps and <hi rend="i">Sphagnum</hi> mires.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d7" type="section">
            <head>References and sources of material</head>
            <p>This species was described by Mitten in 1876 from specimens gathered in Heard Island by H.N. Moseley, naturalist to the Challenger Expedition. The specimens were without fruit (Mitten, 1876a). Further on in the same journal there is another description of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> by Mitten, this time from specimens with young capsules, which were collected in Kerguelen Island at Royal Sound, Vulcan Cove by A.E. Eaton (Mitten, 1876b). Three years later Mitten again described <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> (Mitten, 1879) and listed the distribution as Kerguelen Island, Moseley; Royal Sound, Vulcan Cove, with young capsules, Eaton; (Heard Island) Moseley.</p>
            <p>Stephani (1900) gave a description of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> and that the spores described by Mitten were spore mother cells; he questioned whether they belonged to this species. He gave what he considered to be a correct description of the spore, based on a few still retained in a capsule. They are said to be 32 μm in diameter and densely covered with short truncate papillae. However, his description of the leaf appears to be from a poorly preserved specimen. The distribution is given as Kerguelen (Eaton), New Zealand (Colenso). Stephani also made drawings of the spore, elater and leaf of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi>. The last of these shows the shape, vertical orientation and deep grooves typical of the species.</p>
            <p>Immediately following the description of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> and in the same subdivision of the genus, Stephani (1900) described <hi rend="i">F. gigantea</hi> n. sp. This name in my opinion is a synonym of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> (see later).</p>
            <p>Specimens in the Mitten Herbarium collected from Kerguelen Island by Eaton and by Moseley were examined at the Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden. No spores are present and all appear to be male plants. Specimens from New Zealand were identified in the collections of E.A. Hodgson and of <name type="person" key="name-170449">K.W. Allison</name>. Many of these are also male plants, but a few have sporangia. Fresh plants were collected from the trial plots at the Turf Research Institute. Palmerston North and some of these were cultured at Massey University.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d8" type="section">
            <head>Description of the plant</head>
            <p>Plants grow in colonies of a predominantly yellow-green colour, often merging into reddish at the bases of the leaves and into reddish-brown in the stems and older parts. At times the whole plant is reddish-brown. Individual shoots branch a few times and are large, being up to 5cm long and 13mm wide including the leaves. When growing on banks the shoots are prostrate and attached by reddish rhizoids, but when growing in mires the shoots are erect and apart from emergent tips are submerged, with rhizoids either very short or lacking. The stem is 1-1.5mm broad and 0.3-0.5mm deep. The older leaves are large, 2.5-4mm long and 5-8mm wide, alternate, closely imbricate, in overall shape reniform, distally deeply folded
<pb xml:id="n19" n="17"/>
lengthwise 2 or 3 times, of thin texture, crisped, usually entire but sometimes slightly angled or very shallowly crenately lobed. Orientation is vertical.</p>
            <p>Plants are dioicous. In male plants about 10 to 12 antheridia are found dorsally on the stem, arranged so that there are 1 to 4 in the vicinity of each leaf. The antheridium has a short stalk and a spherical head about 0.3mm in diameter. In female plants archegonia appear amongst the terminal leaves but due to continued growth of the stem the sporophytes become located dorsally. The campanulate pseudoperianth is large, up to 6mm long and 2mm across the shallowly lobed rim. It is partially enclosed by the adjacent leaves. The brown spherical capsule, of diameter 1mm is elevated on a firm stalk up to 11mm high. The golden-brown spores (Fig. 4) have a diameter of 29-37 μm. The distal face is described by Stephani (1900) as being densely muricate with low papillae, but when viewed from some angles the projections appear more as irregular short lamellae. On the proximal face the lamellae are lower and more crowded. The elaters are of two kinds. Most are slender. 5 × 145 - 225 μm, with 2 helical bands of thickening; others are shorter and wider, up to 13 × 100 μm, with 3 or 4 bands.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d9" type="section">
            <head>Fossombronia wondraczekii (Corda) Dum<lb/>
Distribution</head>
            <p>This species is widespread in Europe and North America and has been reported also from North Africa (Bonner, 1965) and from Australia (Scott, 1985). A taxon from Japan has been called <hi rend="i">F. wondraczekii</hi> var. <hi rend="i">loitlesbergii</hi> (Inoue, 1973). <hi rend="i">F. wondraczekii</hi> has not been recorded for New Zealand previously but has now been found in the Wairarapa, on banks in pasture country in Hawke's Bay, in the Kaingaroa State Forest, and in Northland.</p>
            <p>It is commonly found on bare soil, as in cultivated fields, on infrequently used paths and at the margins of drains.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d10" type="section">
            <head>References and sources of material</head>
            <p>Stephani (1900) provided a Latin description of the species under the name <hi rend="i">F. cristata</hi> Lindb. (misprinted as <hi rend="i">crispata</hi> in the text). A more recent description in English is given by Scott (1985) and earlier shorter ones by Mueller (1906-11) and by Frye and Clark (1937). They also provide illustrations, as does Landwehr (1980). The fresh material used in the present study was collected by D. Havell from small silty knobs on the edge of Lake Wairarapa on 15:1:1987. It was later maintained in culture at Massey University. Herbarium material was examined from the collections of E. A. Hodgson, from Botany Division, D.S.I.R., and from Europe.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d11" type="section">
            <head>Description of the plant</head>
            <p>The rather delicate, bright green plants occur singly or as small patches and are attached to the soil by violet rhizoids. Individual shoots may be simple or may branch once or twice; they are up to 2cm long and 2-3mm wide. The stem is up to 1mm wide and 0.7mm thick. The leaves are longitudinally inserted, opposite, or almost so, and crowded towards the tip of the stem, but alternate and varying further back. They range from 1 to 3mm in both length and breadth and vary in overall shape from oblong to quadrate. They may be either plain or crisped at the margin, entire or variously lobed, with the lobes frequently acute.</p>
            <p>This species is monoicous. Archegonia are scattered on the dorsal surface of the stem and whitish antheridia occur nearby among the apical leaves. The pseu-
<pb xml:id="n20" n="18"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_018a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_018a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_018a-g"/><head><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 4</hi></hi><hi rend="i">Spore of</hi><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">F. wondraczekii</hi>.</hi><lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Top:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">distal view</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Middle:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">side view</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Bottom:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">proximal view. Scanning electron micrographs by D.H. Hopcroft and <name type="person" key="name-131727">R. Bennett</name>. Scale bars = 10 μm</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig 5</hi>.</hi><hi rend="i">Spor of</hi><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">F. pusilla</hi>.</hi><lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Top:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">distal view</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Middle:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">side view</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Bottom:</hi></hi><hi rend="i">proximal view. Scanning electron micrographs by D.H. Hopcroft and <name type="person" key="name-131727">R. Bennett</name>. Scale bars = 10 μm</hi>.</head></figure>
<pb xml:id="n21" n="19"/>
doperianth is campanulate to turbinate, 1.5-4.0mm high and 1.0-3.5mm wide across the shallowly lobed rim. The sporophyte has a stalk 2-5mm high and a spherical brown capsule 0.5-0.6mm in diameter. The spores are lamellate (Fig. 5) with nearly parallel sinuous lamellae radiating out from the centre of the distal face and appearing in profile at the margin as about 30 (28-36) spines.</p>
            <p>Sometimes the lamellae show a tendency to merge into areolae at the centre of the distal face. The proximal face is papillate to feebly lamellate. Spore diameter is rather variable, the range being (40-) 45-47 (-52) μm. Elaters are simple or occasionally V-shaped or forked, 8-9 (-13) μm wide and 50-80 (-105) μm long, usually with 2 helical bands but occasionally with up to 4.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d12" type="section">
            <head>Fossombronia pusilla (L.) Nees<lb/>
Distribution</head>
            <p>This is a cosmopolitan species. It is found in similar sites to <hi rend="i">F. wondraczekii</hi> such as damp clay soils and the sides of drains. In New Zealand the two species may even be intermixed. It has been recorded for New Zealand by Gottsche, Lindenberg and Nees (1844-7), by Mitten (1855) and by Allison and Child (1975).</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d13" type="section">
            <head>References and sources of materials</head>
            <p>The species has been described and illustrated many times since Linnaeus (1753) called it <hi rend="i">Jungermannia pusilla</hi>. Recent treatments are by Scott (1985) based on Australian material, by Paton (1973) and Landwehr (1980) for European material and by Allison and Child (1975) for New Zealand material. Scott noted that there is a considerable degree of variation between populations. Paton (1973) recognised two varieties and these occur also in Australia (Scott, 1985). So far only var. pusilla has been found in New Zealand.</p>
            <p>Fresh material was collected and studied in Europe and from the sides of the drain opposite Woodville Reserve, New Zealand. Herbarium material was examined at the British Museum, the Senckenburg Herbarium, Frankfurt and in the collections of E. A. Hodgson, of Botany Division, D.S.I.R. and of the National Museum, New Zealand.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d14" type="section">
            <head>Description of the plant</head>
            <p>Plants grow singly, in scattered patches or in large colonies. The bright green, prostrate shoots are 1-1.5cm long, either simple or once to twice branched and attached to the soil by numerous violet rhizoids. The stem is slender, being 0.5-2mm wide and 0.4-0.7mm thick. The leaves are inserted obliquely and vary in orientation from transverse to longitudinal, and from plane to crisped at the margins. They also vary considerably in shape but in general are reniform, 0.8-2.6mm long and 0.8-4.4mm wide, and may be entire, emarginate or irregularly lobed and angled.</p>
            <p>Plants are monoicous. Antheridia appear first and are conspicuous on the upper surface of the stem by their yellowish colour. Later archegonia appear on the upper surfacce of the stem near the apex. Sporophytes are produced in abundance. Each has a short, fragile stalk about 3mm high and a brown spherical capsule of diameter 0.8mm. The companulate pseudoperianth is 2-3mm high and up to 3mm wide across the rim which is irregularly scalloped and often somewhat crisped. The spores (Figs. 5 and 6) have a diameter of about 50 μm (42-56). The distal face is ornamented with forking or radiating lamellae which sometimes join to form an ill-defined, or rarely a complete, network. They appear in profile at the
<pb xml:id="n22" n="20"/>
margin as 10 to 17 spines which are often connected by an incomplete perispore. The proximal face is ornamented with papillae and short, ill-defined lamellae. The elaters have a length of 190-230 μm and 2 or occasionally 3 helical bands of thickening.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d15" type="section">
            <head>Notes on other species listed for New Zealand by Hamlin (1972)</head>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d15-d1" type="section">
              <head>Fossombronia gigantea Steph.</head>
              <p>The type specimen (G. 22170) which was used by Stephani in drawing up the Latin description (Stephani, 1900) was collected in New Zealand by Knight. It is now housed in the Gottsche Herbarium which is part of the Stephani Herbarium at Geneva. Stephani also had available a specimen collected in Nelson by Kirk which previously had been regarded as a male plant of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> Mitt, for the label reads “<hi rend="i">Foss. gigantea</hi> St. n. sp., sub <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> Mitt. O” These specimens are accompanied by annotated drawings of the leaf, spore and two types of elaters - a narrow bispiral one and a shorter, wider trispiral one. The spore is said to be densely verrucate, often subpapillate and of diameter 46 μm.</p>
              <p>An examination of the specimens and drawings showed that they correspond with <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> except in the matter of the size and marking of the spore; the name <hi rend="i">F. gigantea</hi> in my opinion is a synonym of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi>. It seems likely that Stephani may not have had the correct spores but this cannot be checked, as there are no spores with the specimens and no scale with his drawing.</p>
            </div>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d15-d2" type="section">
              <head>Fossombronia integerrima Steph.</head>
              <p>This species was named by Stephani (1900) from male plants collected in New Zealand by Colenso, but even Stephani regarded the identification as uncertain. There is inadequate information for supporting the retention of this species of <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi>.</p>
            </div>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d15-d3" type="section">
              <head>Fossombronia intestinalis Tayl.</head>
              <p>This species has been listed for New Zealand by Gottsche, Lindenberg and Nees (1844-7), Mitten (1855), Stephani (1900) and Hamlin (1972). The type was collected by Drummond at Swan River, Australia (Bonner, 1965). A detailed treatment of the species accompanied by illustrations has been provided recently by Scott (1985). He gave the distribution as Australia and South Africa. No New Zealand plants have been found to correspond with the predominantly Australian <hi rend="i">F. intestinalis</hi>.</p>
            </div>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d15-d4" type="section">
              <head>Fossombronia microspora Herz.</head>
              <p>A Latin description of this species was published by Herzog (1935). It was based on a specimen, H 346, collected on 21:12:1930 by <name type="person" key="name-170449">K.W. Allison</name> on a stream bank in shade c. 3050 m near Atiamuri and now housed at Jena (JE). Isotypes are in the herbaria at Massey University (MPN 8999) and at Botany Division, D.S.I.R., Christchurch. No differences have been found between these specimens and <hi rend="i">F. reticulata</hi>, although Herzog reported the spore size as somewhat less (22-28 μm). It is concluded that <hi rend="i">F. microspora</hi> is a synonym of <hi rend="i">F. reticulata</hi> Steph.</p>
            </div>
            <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d15-d5" type="section">
              <head>Fossombronia perpusilla (Col.) Steph.</head>
              <p>Colenso (1885) described a new species <hi rend="i">Noteroclada perpusilla</hi> from plants
<pb xml:id="n23" n="21"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_021a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_021a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_021a-g"/><head><hi rend="i"><hi rend="b">Fig 6. Left:</hi> Distal view of the spore of <hi rend="b">F. pusilla</hi>. Scanning electron micrograph by D.H. Hopcroft and <name type="person" key="name-131727">R. Bennett</name> from the same capsule as Fig. 5</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="i"><hi rend="b">Right:</hi> Distal view of spore of <hi rend="b">F. perpusilla</hi>. Reproduced by permission of the Stephani Herbarium. Geneva. Scale bars = 10μm</hi>.</head></figure>
which he had found at Scinde Island, Napier. Later Stephani (1900) transferred the species to <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi>.</p>
              <p>The isotype used by Stephani and labelled “New Zealand, Colenso” was examined together with scanning electron micrographs of the spores, one of which is reproduced here (Fig. 6). It is most likely that the original plants are represented also by the packet, Colenso 6498, in the Herbarium of the National Museum of New Zealand (WELT) and labelled as collected at Scinde Island, Napier. Since the specimens correspond with <hi rend="i">F. pusilla</hi>, the name <hi rend="i">F. perpusilla</hi> considered to be a synonym.</p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d16" type="section">
            <head>Addendum</head>
            <p>Since this paper was submitted there has been an opportunity to examine the sheet of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> at the British Museum. It contains 6 smaller sheets of specimens. Three of these comprise male plants collected by Moseley from Heard Island; they were labelled as type material of <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> Mitt. by B.M. Thiers on July 13, 1982. The other three were collected by E.<name type="person" key="name-025517">A. Eaton</name> on Kerguelen Island, one from Royal Sound and the other two from the hill N.W. of Mt. Crozier. One of the latter shows a plant with capsules and another a plant with antheridia. The antheridia are situated along the stem in an arrangement quite different from the terminal cluster of antheridia in the Heard Island plants. There is also a scanning electron micrograph of the spores taken by Pike and Scott.</p>
            <p>Specimens labelled <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> in the Stephani Herbarium at Geneva were also examined. There were two from Kerguelen Island, collected by Eaton, but none from Heard Island. They were accompanied by a copy of Mitten's drawing of a pseudo-perianth, and of spore mother cells containing spores, with a comment on the latter by Stephani “These are from a fungus”.</p>
            <p>Since the name <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> was first given to the Heard Island plants, a new name must be found for the ones from Kerguelen Island. They appear to correspond
<pb xml:id="n24" n="22"/>
with <hi rend="i">F. naumanni</hi> Schiffn. which was named by Schiffner in 1889 from material collected by Naumann on Kerguelen Island (Bonner, 1965). A more recent description based on Australian plants and accompanied by illustrations is given by Scott (1985). The correct name for the New Zealand plants referred to as <hi rend="i">F. australis</hi> in the present paper would then be <hi rend="i">F. naumannii</hi>. The known distribution is Kerguelen Island, Macquarie Island, Australia and New Zealand. Scott (1985) gave no details regarding antheridia. He described a different type of elater from that occurring in New Zealand material but, since capsules are rarely found, it has not been possible to determine how widespread or significant this might be.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d17" type="section">
            <head>Acknowledgments</head>
            <p>The writer is indebted to the curators of the herbaria at the Stephani Herbarium Geneva, the Senckenberg Naturmuseum Frankfurt, the State University Utrecht, the New York Botanical Garden, the British Museum. Botany Division Christ-church and National Museum of New Zealand, Wellington, for the opportunity to study herbarium specimens; to D. Havell, H. Wilson and C. Meurk for providing fresh material and to the Assistant City Engineer (Works) for information regarding the spray programmes carried out by the Upper Hutt City Council on Akatarawa Road.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d2-d3-d18" type="section">
            <head>References</head>
            <listBibl>
              <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170449">Allison, K.W.</name>, and Child, J. 1975: <hi rend="i">The Liverworts of New Zealand</hi>. University of Otago Press, Dunedin.</bibl>
              <bibl>Bonner. C.E.B. 1965: <hi rend="i">Index hepaticarum 5</hi>. J. Cramer, Weinheim.</bibl>
              <bibl><name type="person" key="name-207684">Colenso, W.</name> 1885: A description of some newly-discovered and rare indigenuous plants: being a further contribution towards the making known the botany of New Zealand. <hi rend="i">Transactions of the New Zealand Institute 17</hi> : 237-263.</bibl>
              <bibl>Frye, T.C. and Clark, L. 1937: <hi rend="i">Hepaticae of North America 6</hi> : 151-161. University of Washington. Seattle.</bibl>
              <bibl>Gottsche, C.M.; Lindenberg, J.B. and Nees von Esenbeck, C.G. 1844-47: <hi rend="i">Synopsis Hepaticarum</hi>. Meissner, Hamburg.</bibl>
              <bibl>Grolle, R. 1983: Nomina generica Hepaticarum; references, types and synonymies. <hi rend="i">Acta Botanica Fennica 121</hi> : 1-62.</bibl>
              <bibl>Hamlin. 1972: Hepaticae of New Zealand Parts I and II. <hi rend="i">Records of the Dominion Museum 7</hi>: 243-366.</bibl>
              <bibl>Herzog, Th. 1935: Descriptions of new species of New Zealand Hepaticae. <hi rend="i">Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 65</hi> : 350-356.</bibl>
              <bibl>Inoue, H. 1973: The genus <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> Raddi in Japan. <hi rend="i">Journal Hattori Botanical Laboratory 37</hi> : 293-297.</bibl>
              <bibl>Landwehr, J. 1980: <hi rend="i">Atlas Nederlandse Levermossen</hi>. Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereiniging.</bibl>
              <bibl>Linnaeus, C. 1753: <hi rend="i">Species Plantarum</hi>. Holmiae.</bibl>
              <bibl>Mitten. W. 1855: Hepaticae. In J.D. Hooker. <hi rend="i">The Botany of the Antarctic Voyage of H.M. Discovery ships Erebus and Terror. II Flora Novae Zelandiae Part 2. Flowerless Plants</hi>. Reeve. London.</bibl>
              <bibl>Mitten, W. 1876a. The Musci and Hepaticae collected by H.N. Moseley. naturalist to H.M.S. Challenger. <hi rend="i">Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Botany) 15</hi> : 59-73.</bibl>
              <bibl>Mitten, W. 1876b: List of Musci and Hepaticae collected in Kerguelen's Island by the Rev. A.E. Eaton. <hi rend="i">Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Botany) 15</hi> : 193-197.</bibl>
              <bibl>Mitten, W. 1879: Hepaticae. In Account of the petrological, botanical and zoological collections made in Kerguelen's Land and Rodriguez during the Transit of Venus Expeditions carried out by order of Her Majesty's Government in the years 1874-1875. <hi rend="i">Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 168</hi> : 187-196.</bibl>
              <bibl>Mueller, K. 1906-11: Die Lebermoose Deutschlands. Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. In Rabenhorst's <hi rend="i">Kryptogamen-Flora 6</hi>, Leipzig.</bibl>
              <bibl>Paton, J.A. 1973: Taxonomic studies in the genus <hi rend="i">Fossombronia</hi> Raddi. <hi rend="i">Journal of Bryology 7</hi>: 243-252.</bibl>
              <bibl>Schuster, R.M. 1966: <hi rend="i">The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America</hi>. Columbia University Press, New York.</bibl>
              <bibl>Scott. G.A.M. 1985: <hi rend="i">Southern Australian Liverworts</hi>. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.</bibl>
              <bibl>Stephani, F. 1894: Hepaticarum species novae. <hi rend="i">Hedwigia 33</hi> : 9 Stephani. F. 1900: <hi rend="i">Species hepaticarum 1</hi> : 384.</bibl>
            </listBibl>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n25" n="23"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d3" type="article" decls="#text-3-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">A Comparison of the Prey of Three Common Web-Building Spiders of Open Country, Bush Fringe and Urban Areas</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>By <name type="person" key="name-170545">D. J. Laing</name><lb/>
119 Creswick Terrace, Wellington.</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The prey is examined of three species of web-building spiders which are commonly found in the open country, bush fringe and urban areas of Wellington, New Zealand. The species are: <hi rend="i">Achaearanea veruculata</hi>, F. Theridiidae (the small cobweb spider): <hi rend="i">Artaneus pustulosus</hi>, F. Araneidae (the garden orb web spider); and <hi rend="i">Ixeuticus martius</hi>. F. Dictynidae (the black house spider). Prey is compared numerically and from a biomass point-of-view. Web examinations revealed that <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> captures a wider range of prey than either of the other two species. A significant amount of its food comes from predation on other spiders. <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> feeds mainly on Diptera (62% of its prey) while <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> also feeds mainly on Diptera (57% of its prey). These two species are regarded as competing strongly for food, with a lesser degree of competition occurring between either of the two and <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>. Young spiders of all three species fed mainly on prey which was smaller than that captured by the adult spiders, but it was concluded that some food niche shift occurs in the life cycle of the three species. A comparison of clutch sizes and clutch production showed that <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> has a far higher natality rate than either of the other species. <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> also suffers from many more sources of mortality than the other two species.</p>
          <p><hi rend="b">Keywords:</hi><hi rend="i">Achaearanea veruculata, Araneus pustulosus</hi>, Araneidae, competition, Dictynidae, food selection. <hi rend="i">Ixeuticus martius</hi>, mortality, spiderling.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d2-d1" type="section">
            <p>This study was conducted to see if any marked overlap in prey occurred between three species of web-building spiders which commonly occupy the same part of the habitat in urban Wellington, and the fringe of nearby bush areas.</p>
            <p>The three species are:</p>
            <p><hi rend="i">Achaearanea veruculata</hi> (Theridiidae) - the small cobweb spider. (Fig. 1). This species, by far the smallest of the three, reaches to about 5mm body length. It is fawn to brown in colour and builds a cobweb of untidy threads in crevices of rocks or trees, also on dwellings, shrubs and fences. Its captured prey is wrapped up with a technique of throwing threads around the animals. This technique is shared with other theridiids such as <hi rend="i">Steatoda</hi> and <hi rend="i">Latrodectus</hi> (the katipo).</p>
            <p><hi rend="i">Araneus pustulosus</hi> (Araneidae) - the garden orb web spider. (Fig. 2). This species grows to 15mm body length, and shows a wide colour variation from cream through brown and green to near-black. It builds an orb web of radiating threads with a spiral thread laid on to the radials. The web may be found on bushes, dwellings, fences and on rock faces where projecting surfaces are available. Prey are wrapped up by rolling with the legs while silk is dispensed from the spinnerets.</p>
            <p><hi rend="i">Ixeuticus martius</hi> (Dictynidae) - the black house spider. (Fig. 3). This species grows to 15mm body length and while brownish when young, darkens with age until parts of the body are black. Other parts carry whitish hairs giving this species a greyish appearance. The web is a series of struts on which a zig-zag pattern is woven, but as the web ages it becomes disordered and the strut and zig-zag pattern is often hard to see. Prey are grabbed and dragged to the spider's retreat to be dealt with there.</p>
            <p><hi rend="i">Ixeuticus</hi> is the only one of these three species to construct a definite retreat of silken thread. <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> lies exposed on a surface while <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> hides in a crevice when possible.</p>
            <pb xml:id="n26" n="24"/>
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_024a">
                <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_024a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_024a-g"/>
                <head><hi rend="i"><hi rend="b">Fig. 1. Achaearanea veruculata</hi> shown in a typical posture. The dorsal surface faces to the ground</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="i"><hi rend="b">Fig. 2. Araneus pustulosus</hi> shown at the centre of its orb web. The spider normally faces head towards the ground. An insect prey can be seen above the spider, well wrapped in silk</hi>.<lb/><hi rend="i"><hi rend="b">Fig 3. Ixeuticus martius</hi> in a typical posture at night, waiting for prey to contact the web</hi>.</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d2-d2" type="section">
            <head>Localities Studied</head>
            <p>Four localities around Wellington were chosen for study. These were:
<list><label>1.</label><item><p>The fringe of Otari Reserve in Wilton, where <hi rend="i">A veruculata</hi> and <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> were present in large numbers, with <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> less common. This locality is exposed to both of Wellington's main winds - north-westerlies and southerlies. Insects are carried from farmland to the north and west, and from within the bush, which is mixed broadleaf with some podocarps. From the south insects will be carried from the slopes of Tinakori Hills and the urban areas.</p></item><label>2.</label><item><p>The south-eastern slopes of the Tinakori Hills adjacent to Wadestown. Here <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> and <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> were present on rock faces and trees, with some <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> as well. This location is adjacent to macrocarpa, pine and
<pb xml:id="n27" n="25"/>
smaller native trees such as mahoe, rangiora and various species of <hi rend="i">coprosma</hi>. Insects are carried here from farmland and the bush reserve at Otari.</p></item><label>3.</label><item><p>A crib-wall garden on a path running between Hill Street and Hawkestone Street in Thorndon. This faces north west and insects probably arrive here from Tinakori Hills, and further north from Otari and the farmland beyond. The spider webs here are mainly found on the ornamental plants of the crib-wall. These are the prostrate rosemary <hi rend="i">(Rosemarinus officinalis var. prostratus)</hi> and a yellow flowering succulent, <hi rend="i">Sedum</hi> sp. This urban area is rich in all three species of spider.</p></item><label>4.</label><item><p>A garden and roadside reserve at the author's home in suburban Northland. Here the exposure is to the north so insects could be carried from the farmland and bush remnants around Johnston Hill and further out. All three species were present here with webs on flowers, shrubs, house, fences, and rocky bank at the roadside.</p></item></list></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Method</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d3-d1" type="section">
            <p>A preliminary study provided the outline for a web-collecting programme in which 100 prey-containing webs were examined for each species in each of the four seasons. Thus a total of 400 webs were found for each species, accumulated at the rate of 10 per week spread over the four locations.</p>
            <p>The webs of the species studied do not always contain recognisable prey remains. It was found in the preliminary survey that for every usable web, between five and 10 webs need to be examined. This gave a figure of between 6,000 and 12,000 web examinations over the year in order to find the 1200 prey-containing webs required for the three species comparison. Only prey which were actively being fed on, or had recently been fed on by the spiders were counted in the study. Familiarisation with the collection sites and positions of webs ensured that double counting of remains was avoided. This is an important point because some prey (e.g. beetles) can persist in webs for many weeks after the spider has fed on them.</p>
            <p>The prey remains were identified to family level where possible and these data used to draw up results (Tables 1-7).</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d3-d2" type="section">
            <head>Spider Size and Prey Captured</head>
            <p>Where possible a measurement was made to the body length of spiders found with prey in order to relate the prey captured to the maturity of the spider.</p>
            <p>Spiders were placed into one of the folowing groups for this intraspecific comparison:</p>
            <list>
              <label>1.</label>
              <item>
                <p>Spiderlings - those spiders in the first 1-2 months of independent life.</p>
              </item>
              <label>2.</label>
              <item>
                <p>Immature spiders - those which had been in their own webs for at least two months but which had not yet reached sexual maturity.</p>
              </item>
              <label>3.</label>
              <item>
                <p>Mature spiders - those which had reached sexual maturity. Body length measurement of each species in relation to maturity is as follows:</p>
              </item>
            </list>
            <pb xml:id="n28" n="26"/>
            <p>
              <table rows="5" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Species</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">Body length in mm</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell rend="center">Spiderlings</cell>
                  <cell rend="center">immature spiders</cell>
                  <cell rend="center">mature spiders</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell rend="center">&lt;1.5</cell>
                  <cell rend="center">1.5-3.5</cell>
                  <cell rend="center">&gt;3.5</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell rend="center">&lt;4.0</cell>
                  <cell rend="center">4.0-8.0</cell>
                  <cell rend="center">&gt;8.0</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell rend="center">&lt;4.0</cell>
                  <cell rend="center">4.0-8.0</cell>
                  <cell rend="center">&gt;8.0</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <p>The dividing line between spiderlings and immature spiders is somewhat arbitrary, but that between immatures and matures was based on the body length of females found with egg sacs. The results of the survey are presented in Tables 1-7.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d4" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Prey Comparison Between Species</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d4-d1" type="section">
            <head>A. veruculata</head>
            <p>In this species, Diptera (35.4%) were numerically the largest prey group, but they were not nearly as significant as they were to the other two species. The Hymenoptera (18.2%) were the next most significant prey for <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>. Here ants (N = 74) were the single largest family. The web of this species seems well suited to the capture of walking insects and this would explain partly the high capture level of ants. Another feature of <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>'s feeding is its predation on spiders, particularly on <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>. Close observations of these two species on the side of the author's house showed that the captures of <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> were probably related to members of this species changing their web sites. The captured spiders in many instances having moved 30cm or more from their known web site. <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> quickly and readily wraps up other spiders with the silk-throwing technique mentioned earlier. The other unusual feature of this species prey is its feeding on slaters (Isopoda), millipedes (Diplopoda) and harvestmen (Opiliones), all prey groups which are either absent or found in minimal numbers in the webs of <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> and <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>.</p>
            <p>Table 2 shows some niche differentiation between the spiderlings and the mature spiders, with smaller prey such as psyllids and phorids being important to spiderlings, while mature spiders utilise other spiders as the most numerous prey item. There is thus a shift towards predation on other spiders as <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> matures. The importance of very large prey such as cicadas is discussed below. Seasonal prey differences were not especially marked in this species. Ants are most significant in summer (N = 28); craneflies (Tipulidae) in autumn (N = 21); and through the winter fungus gnats (Mycetophylidae) (N = 30) are an important food source.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d4-d2" type="section">
            <head>A. pustulosus</head>
            <p>Diptera (62%) were again by far the most numerous prey group, with Mycetophilidae (N = 351) being the most common item. Of the rest of the prey groups, only the Hemiptera (16%) and the Hymenoptera (14%) exceeded double figures as percent of prey caught. The orb web. which is strung in the flight path of insects, appears well suited to capturing Diptera. Because of its location in the habitat, it is less well suited for the capture of other prey groups which spend either all or most of their time walking. This was well illustrated by the capture of ants which were all winged forms in the orb-webs of <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> but walking ants in the cob-web traps of <hi rend="i">A. veruculata. A. pustulosus</hi> is definitely more restricted in its diet than <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>, as shown in the relative paucity of items in the “other” prey category.</p>
            <p>There is a clear niche shift in prey taken at different stages of development of <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi>. The spiderlings take a variety of small prey such as psyllids, aphids,
<pb xml:id="n29" n="27"/>
ants and psocopterans. The mature spiders capture much larger prey with bees featuring prominently along with larger types of dipterans such as blowflies (Calliphoridae) and cranefiles. The bees were nearly all honey bees (<hi rend="i">Apis mellifera</hi>) with an occasional bumble bee (<hi rend="i">Bombus</hi> sp.) being found. Bees are a problem prey item for <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi>; they yield a large amount of food for the spider and so are well worth capturing, but the hazards of being stung are always present and a number of adult spiders were observed misjudging the wrapping-up of either honey bees or bumble bees - and were seen to be stung. In all cases the spider died as a result (see Table 12).</p>
            <p>There were some seasonal differences apparent in this species, but these tended to be obscured by the predominance of mycetophylids in the prey count. In winter this group assumed even greater significance. 169 captures being found. In summer psyllids were numerically important but would be significant only for the small spiders. In autumn aphids and ants (N = 34 and 47 respectively) are important but mainly for smaller spiders.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d4-d3" type="section">
            <head>I. martius</head>
            <p>Like <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus, I. martius</hi> relies heavily on Diptera for its food intake. This order made up 57% of the total prey caught. The difference between these two spiders is the wider spread among the families within the Diptera by <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>. The Mycetophylidae are not the dominant item as in <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi>. Here Muscidae. Acalyptrata and Tipulidae are all very important with Calliphoridae and Stratiomyiidae being significant too. As in <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi>, flying ants were caught and formed a useful addition to the diet in summer and autumn. Cicadas form an important item in summer (N = 15) and because of their large size must be even more important than their numbers alone suggest. In winter prey are scarce and flies such as craneflies, fungus gnats, muscids and blowflies are particularly important for the continued growth and maturation of <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>. As the spider grows, smaller prey, like psyllids and ants which are present in significant numbers in the food of the spiderlings, become unimportant for mature spiders. The larger flies such as tipulids and stratiomyiids along with the cicadas are very important in the diet of the mature spiders.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d5" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Prey Size</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The numerical data given in Tables 1-7 give no indication of the volume of food the prey contains, or its biomass. It is clear that a small fungus gnat is not as valuable a catch as a honey bee or a cicada. An attempt was made to relate the prey groups to one another in terms of food volume. The standard used was a very common prey item: a mycetophylid fly of 5mm body length. It was estimated that with a body diameter of 1.5mm, such a fly would contain approximately 8.8mm<hi rend="sup">3</hi> volume of food. The food volumes of other prey were estimated in the same manner and were then converted to “mycetophilid equivalents”. For example, a honey bee with a volume of 150 mm<hi rend="sup">3</hi> is equal to 15 mycetophylid units. A list of mycetophylid equivalents follows in Table 8.</p>
          <p>Comparisons between the 12 major prey items for each spider species were made by multiplying the number of prey captured by the “mycetophilid equivalent”, (e.g. cicadas for <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>: 60 × 13 = 780). These figures are presented in Table 9. Here the following prey items become much more significant than they were on a numberical count:</p>
          <p><hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> - cicadas, bees, tipulids and slaters</p>
          <p><hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> - blowflies, bees and tipulids</p>
          <p><hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> - cicadas, bees and soldier flies
<pb xml:id="n30" n="28"/>
This approximate biomass measurement clearly shows how important large-sized prey items are in the diet of these three spiders.</p>
          <p>Cicadas could be particularly important for females of <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> and <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>. This is because egg sac production requires a substantial food input and without the addition of cicadas to the diet in summer and autumn it is probable that this activity would be curtailed in these two species.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d6" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Interspecific Predation</hi>
          </head>
          <p>This study revealed high levels of interspecific predation by the small <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> on <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> and to a lesser degree on <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> (Table 10). Predation on other spiders by <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> and <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> was less evident. The captures occurred in two ways. Firstly when the webs of two spiders were closely adjacent to one another and contact with the web of one was made by the other.</p>
          <p>Secondly when spiders wandered from an older web site. <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> was particularly prone to capture by <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> in the second of these circumstances.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d7" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Clutch Size and Clutch Production (Natality)</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Observations on egg sac production were made during the prey study. These showed that <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> was by far the most prolific species, in some individuals producing up to five sacs per year with more than 800 eggs per sac being counted. <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> and <hi rend="i">I martius</hi> had a lower natality rate, producing considerably fewer eggs per sac than <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> (see Table 11). In <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> the spiderlings appear 6 weeks after the early clutches are produced in August. Dispersal takes place any time from early spring in this species. A similar pattern is seen in <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi> but <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> egg sacs and spiderlings are not seen for almost a month later than those of the other two species in Wellington.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d8" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Mortality</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The prey study provides an opportunity to observe and record causes of mortality in known populations of the three spider species (Table 12). Although not a quantitative investigation, these data suggest that <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> appeared to suffer the highest mortality. Perhaps this is not surprising in view of its exposed web, without a protective retreat, and its much higher natality than the other two species. The spider has a bulky shape which makes it an easy target for bird and wasp attack. It also suffers more storm damage than the other spiders. <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi> is by far the best protected of these three spiders, with its woven silk retreat, but is also the most difficult to observe.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d9" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Conclusions</hi>
          </head>
          <p>These three spider species often live in the same habitat and could thus compete for web sites. Inter-specific predation, particularly on <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>, may well be an indication of this. The study has revealed considerable overlap between the spiders in their food items. In particular between <hi rend="i">Araneus pustulosus</hi> and <hi rend="i">Ixeuticus martius</hi>, both of which depend so heavily on the same types of Diptera. <hi rend="i">Achaearanea veruculata</hi> feeds on the widest range of prey diversity of the three species, partly due to its choice of web site and partly to its prey-capturing behaviour. <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi> had the distinction of capturing prey at about double the rate of the other two species. Although no attempt was made to determine growth rates, it appears from the natality and mortality data gathered in this study that this species has a
<pb xml:id="n31" n="29"/>
higher population turnover rate than either of the other spiders. Perhaps this is largely due to its exposed orb web which lacks a protective retreat.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d10" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgements</hi>
          </head>
          <p>My thanks to Mr R. Ordish, entomologist. National Museum, Wellington, for his help in identifying the prey items found in this study, and to <name type="person" key="name-170492">Dr R.R. Forster</name>. Otago Museum, for checking the identification of the three spider species.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d3-d11" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Bristowe, W.S., 1958: The Spider's World. Collins, London.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170492">Forster, R.R.</name> and Forster, L.M. 1973: New Zealand Spiders - an Introduction. Collins. Auckland.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
          <p>
            <table rows="65" cols="7">
              <head>
                <hi rend="c">Table 1: the Prey of <hi rend="i">Achaearanea Veruculata</hi></hi>
              </head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Prey taxon</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Summer</cell>
                <cell>Autumn</cell>
                <cell>Winter</cell>
                <cell>Spring</cell>
                <cell>Full year</cell>
                <cell>% of total</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Diptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell>39</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidac</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>30</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>59</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cecidiemyidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Chironomidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Simuliidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psychodidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Stratiomyidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Phoridae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Muscidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Calliphoridae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Anthomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tachinidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Acalyptrata</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>63</cell>
                <cell>51</cell>
                <cell>50</cell>
                <cell>179</cell>
                <cell>35.4</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Lepidoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Hepialidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tineidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tortricidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Crambidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Noctuidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Geometridae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>36</cell>
                <cell>7.1</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Hemiptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cixiidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Flatidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadidae</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadellidae</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psyllidae</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Aphididae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>25</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>46</cell>
                <cell>9.0</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Coleoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Carabidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cincindelidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Coccinellidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Anobiidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Elateridae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <pb xml:id="n32" n="30"/>
              <row>
                <cell>Tenebrionidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Scarabaeidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cerambycidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Curculionidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>52</cell>
                <cell>10.3</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Hymenoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Ichnemuonidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>28</cell>
                <cell>19</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>74</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Pompilidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Apidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>33</cell>
                <cell>28</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>42</cell>
                <cell>18.2</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Other groups</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Dermaptera</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Dictyoptera</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Blattidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Opilones</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Diplopoda</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Isopoda</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>22</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Amphipoda</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Gastropoda</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Araneae</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>36</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Total, Other group</cell>
                <cell>34</cell>
                <cell>25</cell>
                <cell>20</cell>
                <cell>22</cell>
                <cell>101</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Total prey taken by <hi rend="i">Achaeranea veruculata:</hi></cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>506</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <table rows="7">
              <head>Table 2. <hi rend="c"><hi rend="i">Achaearanea Veruculata: the Five Most Common Prey Taxa Taken by Different Sized Spiders</hi></hi></head>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>spider body length (mm)</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>&lt;1.5</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>1.5-3.5</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>&gt;3.5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>49</cell>
                <cell>Spiders</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Anthomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>26</cell>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psyllidac</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>Spiders</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Pheridae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Acalyptrata</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>Anthomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>Blattidae</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <table rows="65" cols="7">
              <head>
                <hi rend="c">Table 3. The Prey of <hi rend="i">Araneus Pustulosus</hi></hi>
              </head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Prey taxon</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Summer</cell>
                <cell>Autumn</cell>
                <cell>Winter</cell>
                <cell>Spring</cell>
                <cell>Full year</cell>
                <cell>%</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Diptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>24</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>44</cell>
                <cell>76</cell>
                <cell>169</cell>
                <cell>62</cell>
                <cell>351</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cecidemyidae</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>55</cell>
                <cell>29</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>112</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Chirenomidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Simuliidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Bibionidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psychodidae</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>31</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Stratiomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-3</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Empididae</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Dolichopodidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Phoridae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Syrphidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Muscidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Calliphoridae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>23</cell>
              </row>
              <pb xml:id="n33" n="31"/>
              <row>
                <cell>Anthomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tachinidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Acalyptrata</cell>
                <cell>20</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>37</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>104</cell>
                <cell>164</cell>
                <cell>231</cell>
                <cell>133</cell>
                <cell>632</cell>
                <cell>62</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Lepidoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tineidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tertricidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Crambidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Noctuidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Hemiptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cixiidae</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Flatidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadellidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psyllidae</cell>
                <cell>28</cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
                <cell>69</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Aphididae</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell>34</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>58</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Hetereptera</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>60</cell>
                <cell>59</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>29</cell>
                <cell>161</cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Coleoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Anabiidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Staphylinidae</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tenebrionidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Scarabaeidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cerambycidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Curculionidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>20</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Hymenoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Ichneumonidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
                <cell>47</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>66</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Pompilidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Vespidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Apidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
                <cell>35</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>29</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>26</cell>
                <cell>77</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
                <cell>25</cell>
                <cell>142</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Other groups</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Dermaptera</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Blattidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psocoptera</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Thysanoptera</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Collembola</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Amphipoda</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Araneae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>41</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Total prey taken by <hi rend="i">Araneus pustulosus:</hi></cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>1017</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <pb xml:id="n34" n="32"/>
            <table rows="7">
              <head><hi rend="c">Table 4. <hi rend="i">Araneus Pustulosus</hi>: the Five Most Common Prey Taxa Taken by Different Sized Spiders</hi>.</head>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">spider body length (mm)</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">&lt;4</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>4-8</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>&gt;8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psyllidae</cell>
                <cell>42</cell>
                <cell>Mycetephilidae</cell>
                <cell>212</cell>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>45</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>32</cell>
                <cell>Cecidomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>93</cell>
                <cell>Apidae</cell>
                <cell>25</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Aphididae</cell>
                <cell>30</cell>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>34</cell>
                <cell>Acalyptrata</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>26</cell>
                <cell>Psyllidae</cell>
                <cell>24</cell>
                <cell>Calliphoridae</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psocoptera</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>Aphididae</cell>
                <cell>19</cell>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <table rows="70" cols="7">
              <head>
                <hi rend="c">Table 5. The Prey of <hi rend="i">Ixeuticus Martius</hi></hi>
              </head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Prey taxon</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Summer</cell>
                <cell>Autumn</cell>
                <cell>Winter</cell>
                <cell>Spring</cell>
                <cell>Full year</cell>
                <cell>%</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Diptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>39</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>19</cell>
                <cell>53</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cecidomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Chironomidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Simuliidae</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psychodidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Stratiomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>29</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Asilidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Empididae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Pheridae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Delichopodidae</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Syrphidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Muscidae</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>20</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>54</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Calliphoridae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>19</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>27</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Anthemyiidae</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tachinidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Acalyptrata</cell>
                <cell>27</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>35</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>24</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>109</cell>
                <cell>69</cell>
                <cell>72</cell>
                <cell>68</cell>
                <cell>318</cell>
                <cell>57</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Lepidoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Hepialidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tineidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tortricidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Crambidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Noctuidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>20</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>39</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Hemiptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cixiidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Flatidae</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadidae</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadellidae</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psyllidae</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Aphididae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Homoptera</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Heteroptera</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>45</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell>70</cell>
                <cell>12.5</cell>
              </row>
              <pb xml:id="n35" n="33"/>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Coleoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicindelidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Coccinellidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Anobiidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Staphylinidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Elateridae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Scarabaeidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cerambycidae</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Curculionidae</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>26</cell>
                <cell>4.6</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Hymenoptera</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Ichneumonidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>22</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Pompilidae</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Vespidae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Apidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Unidentified</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>35</cell>
                <cell>24</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>78</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Other groups</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Dermaptera</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Dictyoptera</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Blattidae</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Opiliones</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Diplopoda</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Isopoda</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Thysanoptera</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>-</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Araneae</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>27</cell>
                <cell>4.9</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Total prey taken by <hi rend="i">Ixeuticus martius:</hi></cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>558</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <table rows="7">
              <head><hi rend="c">Table 6. <hi rend="i">Ixeuticus Martius:</hi> The Five Most Common Prey Taxa Taken by Different Sized Spiders</hi>.</head>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">spider body length (mm)</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">&lt;4</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>4-8</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>&gt;8</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Acalyptrata</cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
                <cell>Muscidae</cell>
                <cell>43</cell>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>23</cell>
                <cell>Stratiomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psyllidae</cell>
                <cell>10</cell>
                <cell>Calliphoridae</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
                <cell>Cicadidae</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>Ichneumonidae</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>Blattidae</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <table rows="12" cols="3">
              <head>
                <hi rend="c">Table 7. A Summary of Prey Taken by the Three Spider Species</hi>
              </head>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Achaearanea veruculate</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Araneus pustulosus</cell>
                <cell>Ixeuticus martius</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Prey Group</cell>
                <cell>number</cell>
                <cell>%</cell>
                <cell>number</cell>
                <cell>%</cell>
                <cell>number</cell>
                <cell>%</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Diptera</cell>
                <cell>179</cell>
                <cell>35.4</cell>
                <cell>632</cell>
                <cell>62</cell>
                <cell>318</cell>
                <cell>57</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Lepidoptera</cell>
                <cell>36</cell>
                <cell>7.1</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>39</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Hemiptera</cell>
                <cell>46</cell>
                <cell>9.0</cell>
                <cell>161</cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
                <cell>70</cell>
                <cell>12.5</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Coleoptera</cell>
                <cell>52</cell>
                <cell>10.3</cell>
                <cell>20</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>26</cell>
                <cell>4.6</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Hymenoptera</cell>
                <cell>92</cell>
                <cell>18.2</cell>
                <cell>142</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
                <cell>78</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psocoptera</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Isoptera</cell>
                <cell>22</cell>
                <cell>4.34</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Araneae</cell>
                <cell>36</cell>
                <cell>7.20</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Other prey</cell>
                <cell>43</cell>
                <cell>8.46</cell>
                <cell>20</cell>
                <cell>27</cell>
                <cell>4.9</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Totals</cell>
                <cell>506</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>1017</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>558</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
            </table>
            <pb xml:id="n36" n="34"/>
            <table rows="16" cols="4">
              <head><hi rend="c">Table 8. “Mycetophilid Equivalents” of Selected Prey Items</hi>.<lb/>
(see text for method of calculation)</head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">cicada</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>60</cell>
                <cell>tenebrionid beetle</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">calliphorid fly</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>30</cell>
                <cell>harvestman</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">noctuid moth</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>26</cell>
                <cell>ichneumon wasp</cell>
                <cell>2.75</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">scarab beetle</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>22</cell>
                <cell>anthomyiid fly</cell>
                <cell>2.5</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">click beetle</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
                <cell>flattid bug</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">syrphid fly</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
                <cell>cicadellid bug</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">vespid wasp</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
                <cell>millipede</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">honey bee</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>cixiid bug</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">cerambycid beetle</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
                <cell>weevil</cell>
                <cell>1.7</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">pompilid wasp</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
                <cell>acalypterate fly</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">staphylinid fly</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>ant</cell>
                <cell>.68</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">tipulid fly</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>6.5</cell>
                <cell>psyllid</cell>
                <cell>.25</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">cockroach</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>aphid</cell>
                <cell>.25</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">stratiomyid fly</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>6</cell>
                <cell>psocopteran</cell>
                <cell>.25</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">muscid fly</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>psychodid fly</cell>
                <cell>.05</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">gall midge</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>.04</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <table rows="40" cols="3">
              <head><hi rend="c">Table 9. Importance of Prey Groups in Terms of Biomass</hi><lb/>
(based on “mycetophilid equivalents” as described in text)</head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Prey</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Food intake in “mycetophilid-equivalent” units</cell>
                <cell>Food intake as biomass percentage of 12 listed prey groups</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Achaearanea veruculata</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadidae</cell>
                <cell>780</cell>
                <cell>38.5</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Araneae</cell>
                <cell>360</cell>
                <cell>17.7</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>234</cell>
                <cell>11.5</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Isopoda</cell>
                <cell>220</cell>
                <cell>10.8</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cerambycidae</cell>
                <cell>154</cell>
                <cell>7.6</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Stratiomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>72</cell>
                <cell>3.5</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>63</cell>
                <cell>3.1</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>59</cell>
                <cell>2.9</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tortricidae</cell>
                <cell>55</cell>
                <cell>2.7</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Anthomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>40</cell>
                <cell>2.0</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Diplopoda</cell>
                <cell>26</cell>
                <cell>1.3</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Curculionidae</cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
                <cell>0.8</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Araneus pustulosus</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Calliphoridae</cell>
                <cell>690</cell>
                <cell>37</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Apidae</cell>
                <cell>525</cell>
                <cell>28.1</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>351</cell>
                <cell>18.8</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>156</cell>
                <cell>8.37</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>44.8</cell>
                <cell>2.4</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Acalyptrata</cell>
                <cell>37</cell>
                <cell>2.0</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psyllidae</cell>
                <cell>17.25</cell>
                <cell>0.92</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Aphididae</cell>
                <cell>14.5</cell>
                <cell>0.77</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Small wasps</cell>
                <cell>14.5</cell>
                <cell>0.77</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psocoptera</cell>
                <cell>5.25</cell>
                <cell>0.28</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cecidomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>4.5</cell>
                <cell>0.24</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Pschodidae</cell>
                <cell>1.5</cell>
                <cell>0.08</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Ixeuticus martius</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadidae</cell>
                <cell>960</cell>
                <cell>63.67</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Apidae</cell>
                <cell>195</cell>
                <cell>12.93</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Stratiomyiidae</cell>
                <cell>90</cell>
                <cell>5.97</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Blattidae</cell>
                <cell>72</cell>
                <cell>4.77</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Tipulidae</cell>
                <cell>58.5</cell>
                <cell>3.88</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Ichneumonidae</cell>
                <cell>49.5</cell>
                <cell>3.28</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Mycetophilidae</cell>
                <cell>19</cell>
                <cell>1.26</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Cicadellidae</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
                <cell>1.20</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Flatidae</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
                <cell>1.20</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Formicidae</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
                <cell>1.00</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Small wasps</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>0.60</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Psyllidae</cell>
                <cell>4.25</cell>
                <cell>0.28</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <pb xml:id="n37" n="35"/>
            <table rows="5">
              <head>
                <hi rend="c">Table 10. Interspecific and Intraspecific Predation Among the Three Spider Species</hi>
              </head>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Prey species</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">Predator species</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>A. pustulosus</cell>
                <cell>I. martius</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>0</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <table rows="4" cols="5">
              <head>
                <hi rend="c">Table 11. Clutch Production and Clutch Size</hi>
              </head>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">date egg sacs found</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>No. sacs/spider</cell>
                <cell>mean No. eggs/sae</cell>
                <cell>Range</cell>
                <cell>No. egg sacs opened</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Aug.-Apr.</cell>
                <cell>up to 5</cell>
                <cell>72</cell>
                <cell>25-151</cell>
                <cell>18</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Sep.-Jun.</cell>
                <cell>up to 5</cell>
                <cell>607</cell>
                <cell>422-813</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Aug.-Mar.</cell>
                <cell>up to 3</cell>
                <cell>114</cell>
                <cell>30-179</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
            <table rows="20" cols="4">
              <head><hi rend="c">Table 12. Sources of Mortality Noted in the Three Spider Species</hi>.<lb/>
(some of this information was collected subsequent to the 12-month study)</head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="b">species</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>source of mortality</cell>
                <cell>No. of deaths</cell>
                <cell>effect on population</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Predation by sphecid wasp, <hi rend="i">Pison morosum</hi></cell>
                <cell>up to 25%</cell>
                <cell>heavy mortality in late spring to early autumn</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Intraspecific predation</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>moderate</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Predation by <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi></cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>minor</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Predation by salticid spiders</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
                <cell>minor</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Rain, wind, storms which remove spiders from web sites</cell>
                <cell>21</cell>
                <cell>moderate to heavy</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">A. pustulosus</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Predation by <hi rend="i">Pison spinolae</hi> (mason wasp)</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>few of this species active in study area</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Predation by <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi></cell>
                <cell>9</cell>
                <cell>moderate</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Predation by <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi></cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>slight</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Stung by <hi rend="i">Apis mellifera</hi> (honey bee) caught in web</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
                <cell>moderate</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Stung by <hi rend="i">Bombus</hi> spp (bumble bees) caught in web</cell>
                <cell>11</cell>
                <cell>moderate</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Stung by <hi rend="i">Vespula</hi> spp (European wasps) caught in web</cell>
                <cell>5</cell>
                <cell>slight</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Egg sacs parasitised by Ichneumonid wasp</cell>
                <cell>up to 30%</cell>
                <cell>heavy effect in some years</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Predation by <hi rend="i">Sphictostethus nitidus</hi> (hunting wasp)</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
                <cell>slighly</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Predation by <hi rend="i">Zosterops lateralis</hi> (silvereye)</cell>
                <cell>4</cell>
                <cell>slight</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Rain, wind, storms which remove spiders from web site</cell>
                <cell>34</cell>
                <cell>heavy</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Summer-autumn drought which dehydrates egg sacs and kills eggs</cell>
                <cell>13</cell>
                <cell>moderate</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">I. martius</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>Predation by <hi rend="i">A. veruculata</hi></cell>
                <cell>17</cell>
                <cell>heavy</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Intraspecific predation</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
                <cell>slight</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>stung by <hi rend="i">Vespula</hi> spp. caught in web</cell>
                <cell>7</cell>
                <cell>moderate</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n38" n="36"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d4" type="article" decls="#text-4-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Behaviour of Young Tuatara (<hi rend="i">Sphenodon Punctatus</hi>) in Total Darkness</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>By <name type="person" key="name-170546">V. B. Meyer-Rochow</name><lb/>
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Waikato, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d1" type="section">
          <p><hi rend="b">Key words:</hi> Reptilia, <hi rend="i">Sphenodon</hi>, tuatara, feeding, nocturnal, behaviour, vision, infra-red-radiation.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Observations and Discussion</hi>
          </head>
          <p>We have been keeping three young tuatara (<hi rend="i">Sphenodon punctatus</hi>) since May 1987 in the laboratory under natural light conditions for an investigation of tail regeneration and spinal cord ultrastructure (Alibardi &amp; Meyer-Rochow. in prep.). The animals have been developing very well since they hatched in April 1987 and have been putting on weight at the rate of approx. 0.9 g/month on a mixed diet of slaters (mostly <hi rend="i">Oniscus</hi> sp.). amphipods (<hi rend="i">Talitrus</hi> spp.), mealworms (<hi rend="i">Tenebrio molitor</hi>), beetles (<hi rend="i">Chaerodes</hi> sp.), and flies (<hi rend="i">Musca</hi> sp.).</p>
          <p>Because some reptiles e.g. crotalid snakes (Hartline et al. 1978) have infra-red perception and use it to locate prey in the dark, I tested whether tuatara react in any way to infra-red radiation and observed how they behave in an environment that is totally dark to the human eye. Conditions such as these can occur in the wild, e.g. deep underground burrows, caves etc.</p>
          <p>The observations were carried out in a photographic dark-room, equipped with Kodak Wratten 6B safety lights, using a “Find-R-Scope” infra-red emitter/viewer (Lindstrom and Meyer-Rochow 1987).</p>
          <p>Two test tuatara were not fed for three days, after which the cage containing the animals was placed in the photographic dark-room at 11.00 h. From then on all safety lights were switched off and it was totally dark. Two hours later the first test of the tuatara's reaction to the presentation of a mealworm under infra-red radiation was carried out. There was not the slightest reaction of either animal to either the beam of the infra-red light source striking them or the rapidly wriggling mealworm only 2cm in front of them. As the amount of visual pigment could possibly have been rather low at that time of day (prolonged dark adaptation results in greatly improved absolute sensitivity (Kleinschmidt &amp; Dowling, 1975), another presentation was made at approx. 19.00 h. Once again there was no reaction.</p>
          <p>These observations were repeated on the second and the third day of darkness - always with the same result - no reaction to the beam of the infra-red light and no reaction to the mealworm. The sound made by the mealworm when crawling in amongst dry leaves (audible to a human and no different from an illuminated worm), or its smell, were ineffective and there was no reaction to the approach of a human hand. When photographic safety lights were used instead of the infra-red light, the tuatara still did not react to the mealworm. When the cage was removed from the dark-room and exposed to ordinary daylight again, the two tuatara immediately seized and swallowed the mealworms.</p>
          <p>We conclude from these observations that young tuatara, in all likelihood, do not use acoustic or olfactory cues, but react purely visually to potential prey. A tuatara underground or in a dark cave, therefore, is not likely to take up food even in the presence of some. The absence of any reaction whatsoever to infra-red light agrees with observations on a single, male adult tuatara made in 1973 by Wojtusiak, but their seemingly low sensitivity to light of longer wave-lengths comes as a bit of a surprise, for tuatara are regarded as nocturnal and there is,
<pb xml:id="n39" n="37"/>
at night, relatively more light of longer (red and far-red) wavelengths around than in the daylight spectrum (McFarland and Munz, 1976). Furthermore, other reptiles like the turtle <hi rend="i">Geoclemys reevesii</hi> (Ohtsuka, 1985) show very good red sensitivity.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_037a">
              <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_037a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_037a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 1</hi>.</hi><hi rend="i">(from Lindstrom and Meyer-Rochow 1987) Filter characteristics as supplied by the manufacturer: the solid line and the top abscissa refer to Kodak Wratten filter 87 while the broken line and bottom abscissa describe the transmittance of the O'Hara RT-2 filter used in the “Find-R-Scope” infra-red viewer/emitter</hi>.</head>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>To some extent knowledge of the photoreceptor cell types in the retina of the tuatara could help to resolve the problem as to whether the eye of the tuatara is (a) primarily a rod-dominated receptor adapted to function as a black and white detector in dim light, or (b) a cone-dominated colour receptor originally for use in brighter light. On the basis of what <hi rend="i">is</hi> known about the tuatara retina, however, no consensus even on the cell types can be reached. Walls (1942) for example, calls a particular group of cells in the tuatara retina “rods”; Vilter (1951) calls the same cells “cones”, and Underwood (1970) after “careful scrutiny of Walls’ excellently fixed material” distinguishes major and minor single cells, double cells, and dwarf cones. The only way to solve this microanatomical riddle is by the use of an electron mcroscope, for then cones and rods can be identified without ambiguity.</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n40" n="38"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgements</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The support of the New Zealand UGC for making funds available towards the purchase of equipment is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also given to Dr M.<name type="person" key="name-209454">B. Thompson</name> of Victoria University of Wellington and the Department of Conservation for having made available the specimens used in this study.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d4-d4" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Alibardi L. and Meyer-Rochow V.B. 1988: Normal and regenerated spinal cord ultrastructure in the tuatara <hi rend="i">Sphenodon punctatus</hi>. In prep.</bibl>
            <bibl>Hartline P.H.; <hi rend="c">Kass</hi> L. and <hi rend="c">Loop</hi> M.S. 1978: Merging of modalities in the optic tectum: infrared and visual integration in rattlesnakes. <hi rend="i">Science 199</hi> : 1225-1229.</bibl>
            <bibl>Kleinschmidt J. and Dowling J.E. 1975: Intracellular recordings from gecko photoreceptors during light and dark adaptation. <hi rend="i">Journal of General Physiology 66</hi> : 617-648.</bibl>
            <bibl>McFarland W.N. and F.W. 1976: The visual spectrum at twilight and its implications to vision. Pp. 249-270 in Evans G.C., Bainbridge R. and Rackham O. (eds.) <hi rend="i">Light as an Ecological Factor</hi>, Blackwell Science Publications, Oxford.</bibl>
            <bibl>Lindstrom M. and Meyer-Rochow V.B. 1987: Near infra-red sensitivity of the eye of the crustacean <hi rend="i">Mysis relicta? Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 147</hi> : 747-752.</bibl>
            <bibl>Ohtsuka T. 1985: Spectral sensitivities of seven morphological types of photoreceptors in the retina of the turtle, <hi rend="i">Geoclemys reevesii. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 237</hi> : 145-154.</bibl>
            <bibl>Underwood G. 1970: The eye. Pp. 1-97 in Gans C. (ed.) <hi rend="i">Biology of the Reptilia</hi> volume 2. Academic Press, London.</bibl>
            <bibl>Vilter U. 1951: Valeur morphologique des photorecepteurs retiniens chez la hatterie <hi rend="i">(Sphenodon punctatus). Comptes Rendus des Seances de la Societe de Biologie et de ses Filiales 145</hi> : 20-23.</bibl>
            <bibl>Walls G.L. 1942: The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. <hi rend="i">Cranbook Institute of Science Bulletin. 19</hi> : 1-785.</bibl>
            <bibl>Wojtusiak R.J. 1973: Some ethological and biological observations on the tuatara in laboratory conditions. <hi rend="i">Tuatara 20</hi> : 97-109.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n41" n="39"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d5" type="article" decls="#text-5-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Reptiles and the Biogeographic Interpretation of New Caledonia</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-170547">Aaron M. Bauer</name><lb/>
Department of Zoology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A. 94720</byline>
        <note xml:id="fn1" n="1">
          <p><hi rend="i">Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4</hi>.</p>
        </note>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The terrestrial reptilian fauna of New Caledonia consits almost entirely of lizards of the families Gekkonidae and Scincidae. Despite low familial diversity, species and generic diversity are high and both the geckos and skinks are primarily endemic. Patterns of high herpetofaunal similarity that typify the central and eastern Pacific are generally absent in the southwest Pacific. Despite phylogenetic ties to the faunas of Australia and New Zealand and relatively small distances between New Caledonia and components of the Outer Melanesian Arc, species level similarities between New Caledonia and other island groups is extremely low. Misinterpretation of the systematics and basic biology of both geckos and skinks has led to prevailing, erroneous views that these reptiles are of little use in biogeographic analysis. Implications of this invalid conclusion, as illustrated by a recent biogeographic analysis of the western Pacific, are exposed and criticized.</p>
          <p><hi rend="b">Key words:</hi> New Caledonia, Pacific biogeography, Gekkonidae, Scincidae, systematics, vagility, herpetofauna.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction</hi>
          </head>
          <p>New Caledonia is a French territory located about 1500 km off the coast of Queensland. Along with the Loyalty Islands, it lies between the Coral Sea and the Vanuatu Trench. The islands have had a long geological history and occupy an area of over 19,00 km<hi rend="sup">2</hi> at the southern limits of the tropics.</p>
          <p>Living representatives of two families of reptiles, the Gekkonidae and the Scincidae, are native to New Caledonia. A third family, the Typhlopidae, is represented by the introduced parthenogenetic <hi rend="i">Ramphotyphlops braminus</hi> (Bauer, 1987). In addition, an archaic mesosuchian crocodile (Buffetaut, 1983) is known from the Pleistocene karstic deposits of the Baie de Kanumera on the Isle of Pines, and meiolaniid turtles have been recorded from Nepoui on the New Caledonian mainland (1700 ± 70 ybp), from Tiga in the Loyalty group (Gaffney <hi rend="i">et al</hi>., 1984), and from Walpole Island to the southeast of New Caledonia. Unidentified varanid remains also come from the Nepoui site (Gaffney <hi rend="i">et al</hi>., 1984).</p>
          <p>This herpetofauna has been considered improverished by some workers (e.g. Hedley, 1899; Buffetaut, 1983). Indeed, the vertebrate fauna of New Caledonia, with its lack of amphibians and non-volant mammals, has generally been regarded as rather uninteresting by zoologists (see Balgooy, 1969). Primary freshwater fish are lacking, with the exception of <hi rend="i">Nesogalaxias neocaledonicus</hi>, a member of a lineage of generally salt-tolerant fishes. The avifauna has also been sterotyped as unremarkable, with few endemic genera and only one endemic family (Diamond, 1984). Berlioz (1962), however, noted that only 26% of the avifauna was composed of passerines, in contrast to 50% for the world as a whole. Only relatively nonvagile invertebrate groups, such as land snails (which show 99% endemism on New Caledonia) (Tillier and Clarke, 1983) have generally been regarded as interesting from a broad zoological standpoint. This is in stark contrast to the flora of New Caledonia, which is characterized by high levels of endemism, especially in
<pb xml:id="n42" n="40"/>
montane forests and on serpentine soils (Guillaumin, 1921, 1964; Dawson, 1981; Thorne, 1965; Baumann-Bodenheim, 1956; Schmid, 1981; Morat <hi rend="i">et al</hi>., 1984), and has been considered to have “good claim to be considered the most remarkable in the world” (Good, 1974).</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">The Herpetofauna of New Caledonia in Relation to that of other Regions of the Pacific</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The number of reptile species in New Caledonia (38 terrestrial species) is low in absolute terms, but high relative to other areas of Oceania. Only New Guinea (total terrestrial herpetofauna 270 species), the Solomon Islands (87 species) and New Zealand (42 species) have more. Despite a general lack of interest among zoologists, a few workers (e.g. Bavay, 1869; Roux, 1913) have noted the high level of endemism among New Caledonian reptiles. The latter demonstrated the dissimilarity of the faunas of New Caledonia and neighbouring Vanuatu and suggested the Loyalty Islands as an area where elements of these two disparate faunas meet.</p>
          <p>The diversity and uniqueness of the New Caledonian herpetofauna can be appreciated by referring to a graphic representation of herpetofaunal similarity among island groups of the Pacific as a whole. The location of each group and the similarity of its terrestrial herpetofauna to that of its neighbours is illustrated in Figures 1-3. Similarity (at the species level) has been estimated using the formula: -
<seg rend="complex">% similarity = 2 (number of shared taxa)/sum of taxa of two areas x 100</seg>
<pb xml:id="n43" n="41"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_041a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_041a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_041a-g"/><head><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 1</hi></hi><hi rend="i">Herpetofaunal similarity coefficients for island groups in the South-central and Southeast Pacific (degrees in south latitude and west longitude). Abbreviations for Figs. 1-3 as follows:</hi></head></figure>
<list type="simple"><item><p><hi rend="i">AI - Austral Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">CA - Caroline Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">CI - Cook Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">EI - Easter Island</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">FI - Fiji</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">GM - Gambier Archipelago</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">HI - Hawaiian Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">KI - Kirbati</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">KP - Kapingamarangi Atoll</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">LH - Lord Howe Island</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">LI - Line Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">LO - Loyalty Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">MA - Marshall Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">MI - Marquesas Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">MR - Marianas islands (incl. Guam)</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">NA - Nauru</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">NC - New Caledonia</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">NF - Norfolk Island</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">NG - New Guinea</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">NI - Niue</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">NZ - New Zealand</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">OC - Ocean Island</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">PI - Pitcairn Island</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">PL - Palau</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">RB - Rennell and Bellona Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">SA - Samoa</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">SC - Santa Cruz and Duff Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">SI - Society Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">SL - Solomon Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">TA - Tuamotu Archipelago</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">TK - Tokelau Islands</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">TO - Tonga</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">TU - Tuvalu</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">VA - Vanuatu</hi></p></item><item><p><hi rend="i">WF - Wallis and Futuna Islands</hi></p></item></list>
<figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_041b"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_041b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_041b-g"/><head><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 2</hi></hi><hi rend="i">Herpetofaunal similarity coefficients for island groups in the northwestern tropical Pacific (degrees in north latitude and east longtitude). For abbreviations see Fig. 1</hi>.</head></figure>
<pb xml:id="n44" n="42"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_042a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_042a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_042a-g"/><head><hi rend="b"><hi rend="i">Fig. 3</hi></hi><hi rend="i">Herpetofaunal similarity coefficients for island groups in the Southwest Pacific (degrees in south latitude and east longitude). For abbreviations see Fig. 1</hi>.</head></figure></p>
          <p>Species lists (Bauer, 1986; W.C. Brown, MS) used as a basis for this analysis were prepared from museum data and an extensive literature review (see Bauer, 1986: 845-867). The similarity coefficient is heavily weighted by the absolute number of taxa occuring in the areas (thus Pitcairn Island, with only one species can have at most a 20% similarity with an island supporting nine species). In general, species diversity is low on the islands to the east of Fiji and decreases further to the east of Samoa. Likewise, areas to the north of Vanuatu and Samoa, and east of the Solomon Islands are also depauperate. Hawaii is anomalous with its relatively large lizard fauna, but this probably reflects the influence of Polynesian and European man (Stejneger, 1899; Hunsaker and Breese, 1967; Oliver and Shaw, 1953; McKeown, 1978). Small islands, no matter where they occur, are also poor in species diversity. These include Nauru, Ocean Island, the Line Islands (data only from Vostok and Caroline Atolls), Wallis and Futuna, Niue, Pitcairn Island and Easter Island. The last two islands also suffer from their extreme isolation. Despite this drawback, and the fact that it does not take into account the relatedness of congeners, the coefficient does give an overview of patterns of similarity between areas. Thus high percentages suggest a uniform fauna, both in size and composition, and very low percentages between islands of similar size suggest extreme faunal dissimilarity. Similarly, it may be extrapolated that islands
<pb xml:id="n45" n="43"/>
that share much of their fauna with surrounding areas were probably populated largely through over-water dispersal, and those with low coefficients were populated earlier by means of dispersal or former land links (McCoy and Heck, [1987] have considered the precise implications of both mathematical and probabilistic measures of similarity for biogeographic interpretaion). The similarity coefficients of Australia, New Zealand and New Guinea have not been indicated.</p>
          <p>Figure 1 shows faunal similarities in the southeast Pacific. The relative homogeneity in the eastern Pacific is indicated by coefficients of 71 to 92% among all groups of Polynesian islands excluding Easter Island and Pitcairn. The species present are chiefly pan-Pacific geckos and skinks and, as with Hawaii, many may have arrived through the agencies of man (Garman, 1908; Ineich. 1982). This high degree of relatedness generally persists as far west as Samoa and the Tokelaus and then gives way to a more complex pattern of relationships.</p>
          <p>Reasonably high similarities (39-67%) link the islands of Micronesia (Fig. 2). Palau, with a fauna of 28 species shows the influence of the Philippines (Brown, 1956) and this continues in attenuated form throughout the region. None of the northern islands shows a high similarity to the Tokelaus, although a similar coefficient characterized their relationship to the Marshall Islands to the north. The relatively isolated and small Kapingamarangi Atoll shares a surprisingly high coefficient (indicative of its relatively large fauna) when compared with the Caroline Islands as a whole. Kapingamarangi also possesses an endemic species of the gecko <hi rend="i">Perochirus</hi>.</p>
          <p>In the western and west central south Pacific (Fig. 3), several interesting trends are seen. All of the adjacent island groups to the east of the South Fiji Basin (except Wallis and Futuna) share herpetofaunal similarities of about 40% with Fiji, Tonga, Samoa and the Tokelau Islands have largely similar faunas and also have similarities to the Cook Islands and eastern Polynesia in general. The components of the Outer Melanesian Arc - the Solomons, Santa Cruz and Duff Islands, Rennell and Bellona. Vanuatu and Fiji share a similar herepetofauna, although there is a general diminution of species number and diversity with distance from the Solomons. The Santa Cruz Islands, Rennell and Bellona, and Vanuatu all share about 30% of their herpetofaunas with the Solomons. The similarity coefficient for the Fiji-Solomons comparison (not shown) is 19%. Even this figure is fairly high given the large geographical distance separating the areas and the discrepancy in faunal size. There is an interesting relationship among the faunas of Vanuatu and Fiji in that the former has fewer species than the latter, despite its proximity to the supposed source (the Solomons) (Bauer, submitted). Further, Vanuatu lacks the ranid frog <hi rend="i">Platymantis</hi> present in the Solomons and in Fiji. A possible geological explanation for this anomaly is that, prior to the Miocene, Vanuatu lay north of Fiji and Tonga (Chase, 1971), more distant from the Solomons than either of the latter. On the whole the Outer Arc is typified by the presence of the boid <hi rend="i">Candoia</hi> and many species of the scincid <hi rend="i">Emoia</hi>, as well as a variety of generally widespread gekkonine geckos.</p>
          <p>New Caledonia, on the other hand, is almost as distinct as New Zealand at the specific level. It shares only a 4% coefficient with the Solomons and 10% with Vanuatu, although the latter is only little more than 250 km distant. The Loyalty Islands, as Roux (1913) noted, are intermediate in character between New Caledonia and the Outer Arc. They share similarity coefficients of 41% with New Caledonia and 25% with Vanuatu. Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island have identical faunas of two species, neither of which occurs elsewhere.</p>
          <p>The low similarity of the New Caledonian herpetofauna to that of the Outer Arc, or in comparison with inter-Outer Arc elements, clearly suggests distinctness
<pb xml:id="n46" n="44"/>
at the species level. Examination of the taxa involved (Bauer, 1986) shows that the same applies at the generic level. Endemism is extremely high in New Caledonia, and virtually nil in most of Oceania. Since island size does not limit the species composition of New Caledonia, it appears that the long independent history of the island has accounted for the faunal composition. There is little evidence of “recent” immigration via dispersal, except in the case of the small pan-Pacific gecko and skink species. <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma atropunctatus</hi> is the only New Caledonian species that seems to have reached Vanuatu, and it is likely that this dispersal occurred via the Loyalty Islands in the Quaternary. That some New Caledonian forms (e.g. <hi rend="i">Bavayia and Phoboscincus</hi>) occur in the Loyalty Islands indicates that dispersal can take place, but either most New Caledonian forms have low vagility or the water gap prior to the rotation of Vanuatu and the emergence of the Loyalty Islands was too great a barrier to dispersal for this to occur.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d4" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">A Genus is a Genus, A Gecko is a Gecko, and other Fallacies</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Although the geckos and skinks of New Caledonia are primarily endemic, there is a general consensus that these animals are not particularly useful in terms of assessing biogeographical hypotheses. This assessment appears to stem from two misconceptions. The first is a problem that pervades biogeography and many other branches of biology and that stems from inadequate systematic analysis of the groups involved. While the geckos of New Caledonia have usually been placed in their own genera, the skinks have not, and it is the genus which is usually taken as the unit of analysis in biogeography. Indeed, because of the system of binomial nomenclature, the genus assumes more reality in the minds of many biologists than it has in nature. It is thus incumbent upon systematists to apply generic names in the most informative manner possible, maintaining as far as is possible phylogenetic information in the nomenclature (Greer, 1979). It must be remembered that for the physiologist or behaviorist working on representative animals in a familial taxon, with no direct access to systematic literature, any two genera will probably be taken as being as disparate as any other two, a phenomenon that can, and does, lead to incorrect generalizations and false predictions. While this situation should not apply to biogeographers, (see Nelson and Platnick, 1981), sadly it often does.</p>
          <p>In the case of the New Caledonian and New Zealand skinks, the application of the generic name <hi rend="i">Lygosoma</hi> until the middle of this century (Greer, 1977) obscured true relationships and suggested that much of the world was populated by a single genus which must have spread rapidly and recently. The high number of <hi rend="i">Lygosoma</hi> species in the Old World tropics reinforced or helped form Darlington's (1948, 1957) views of this area as the cradle of most reptilian groups. In New Zealand, additional problems resulted from the use of the generic name <hi rend="i">Sphenomorphus</hi> for certain scincids. As currently recognized (Greer, 1974), this genus occurs in New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Australia and parts of southeast Asia. Again, the association of New Zealand forms with these species suggested affinities similar to those of Outer Arc birds and downplayed the uniqueness of the fauna.</p>
          <p>Currently, the skinks of New Zealand are placed into two genera, <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma</hi> and <hi rend="i">Cyclodina</hi>, and, until recently, those of New Caledonia were placed into five, <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma, Anotis</hi> (a nomenclatoral and systematic tangle in itself), <hi rend="i">Cryptoblepharus, Eugongylus</hi> (recognized by Greer (1974) to be a paraphyletic) and <hi rend="i">Phoboscincus</hi> (regarded by Bohme (1976) as a derived <hi rend="i">Eugongylus</hi>). <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma</hi> accounts for most of these species. This genus is distributed in Australia, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Fiji and the Mascarene Islands (<hi rend="i">Leiolopisma lichengera</hi> of
<pb xml:id="n47" n="45"/>
Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island has recently been transferred to the genus <hi rend="i">Cyclodina</hi>). It is definitely paraphyletic (Greer, 1980; Zug, 1985). If one were ignorant of the systematic problems with the genus, its distribution might suggest an early Gondwanan origin for the group and subsequent vicariant splitting of lineages. However, current thought is that the group has achieved its present distribution at least in part by means of dispersal. This, in turn, leads us back to the problem of <hi rend="i">Lygosoma</hi>. However, Sadlier (1987) has divided the New Caledonian skinks into presumably monophyletic groupings which, by virtue of the binomial, erases nomenclatural evidence of broader relationships but increases the apparent level of endemicity in New Caledonia by creating taxa with generic names different from those found elsewhere in the southwest Pacific. Similarly, the reinstatement of <hi rend="i">Cyclodina</hi> by Hardy (1977) for certain New Zealand skinks formerly assigned to <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma</hi> successfully increased the apparent wealth of the herpetofauna, but still left <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma</hi> paraphyletic.</p>
          <p>The second factor leading to a de-emphasis of the uniqueness of the New Caledonian (and New Zealand) herpetofauna, and to the misinterpretation of historical biogeography, is the persistent myth that geckos, and to a lesser extent, skinks, are animals adapted to disperal. A glance through island species lists shows that skinks and geckos are the only reptiles present on many remote islands, and that on islands where other groups also occur, geckos and skinks are the most speciose. Thus, as a legacy of the school of dispersalism, these animals have been generally considered highly vagile.</p>
          <p>The vagility associated with geckos, in particular, has traditionally been predicted on the view that geckos and their eggs are particularly well suited to transoceanic travel and that they are likely to be transported (as evidenced by their commensalism with humans and subsequent accidental transport). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that geckos eggs are relatively more resistant to sea-water exposure than are the eggs of other reptiles, including skinks (Brown and Alcala, 1957; Dunson, 1982; Dunson and Bramham, 1981; Gardner, 1985) and eggs have been recovered from driftwood (Kew, 1983). This “transportability” and gekkonid commensalism with man is probably responsible for the huge ranges of such forms as <hi rend="i">Lepidodactylus lugubris</hi> (a species also possessing another quality condusive to dispersability - parthenogensis (Cuellar, 1977)) and <hi rend="i">Hemidactylus frenatus</hi>, these being found today on almost every island in the tropical Pacific. In fact, the range of the latter species is known to have increased as a result of the transport of men and equipment in the Pacific Theatre of World War II. Stejneger (1899), Oliver and Shaw (1953), Hunsaker and Breese (1967) and McKeown (1980) all agreed that most if not all of the Hawaiian herpetofauna could be accounted for by human activities. Ineich (1982) considered <hi rend="i">Lepidodactylus lugubris, Crytoblepharis boutonii poecilopleurus</hi> and <hi rend="i">Emoia cyanura</hi> as the only species likely to have inhabited the Society and neighboring islands in pre-Polynesian times.</p>
          <p>These features of dispersability do not, however, extend to all geckos (Pasteur, 1964). In fact, they probably apply to only a small number of species. Species of the gekkonidae subfamily Diplodactylinae, in particular, have low vagility. The calcareous egg-shell that permits gekkonine eggs to withstand exposure to sea water is absent in the Diplodactylinae, which have a leathery shell, typical of most squamates (Werner, 1972). Furthermore, no diplodactylines (with the possible exception of <hi rend="i">Hoplodactylus chrysosireticus</hi>) are commensal with man, although <hi rend="i">Phyllurus platurus</hi> may be associated with homes constructed in areas of suitable rocky habitat.</p>
          <p>McCann's (1953) analysis of gekkonid dispersal is flawed in its application of the qualities of vagility to the New Zealand species of carphodactylines. He further suggested
<pb xml:id="n48" n="46"/>
unlikely means of dispersal such as the transport of geckos or their eggs on twigs being used by birds for nest building. Support for McCann's claims of the dispersal abilities of geckos came from the widespread distributions of several polyphyletic (as then constituted) gekkonid genera incuding <hi rend="i">Gymnodactylus, Gonatodes</hi> (including <hi rend="i">Cnemaspis</hi>), and <hi rend="i">Phyllodactylus</hi> and thus ran into the nomenclatoral problem mentioned earlier.</p>
          <p>A glance at the ranges of the carphodactyline species (see Bauer, 1986; Cogger, 1986; Robb, 1986) shows that, with the exceptions of <hi rend="i">Bavayia</hi> on the Loyalty Islands and <hi rend="i">Hoplodactylus</hi> on the Three Kings and Poor Knights Islands, no species occur on islands that were not connected to the closest mainland during periods of Pleistocene glaciations.</p>
          <p>The general view of geckos as highly vagile organisms has become entrenched in the biogeographical literature, and geckos are frequently dismissed as having no utility as biogeographical indicators (e.g. Paulin, 1961). Authors have invariably highlighted the herpetofaunal poverty of New Caledonia and New Zealand by stressing that <hi rend="i">only</hi> geckos and skinks among squamates occur there (Thorne, 1965; Carlquist, 1965, 1974; Diamond, 1984). Undoubtedly, the acceptance of the vagility of the carphodactylines, even in the face of evidence of their ability to disperse, has influenced the writing of those who have continued to accept a Mid Tertiary radiation of the group into Tasmantis despite geological evidence to the contrary (see Bauer, 1986). Thus, our biogeographic explorations depend not only upon a clear understanding of historical geological phenomena, but also a willingness to take the time to perform adequate systematic studies of the groups that occupy the regions in which we are interested. Furthermore, the biological attributes of the taxa of the region of study should be evaluated in this systematic context and not merely be indirectly superimposed from the more generalized conception gleaned from “characterizing” the higher taxa to which they belong. Is a platypus any less of a mammal because it lays eggs?</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d5" type="section">
          <head><hi rend="c">The Uniqueness of New Caledonia: A Response to Diamond</hi> (1984)</head>
          <p>Diamond (1984) chose New Caledonia as an example to illustrate his views on speciation in Pacific vertebrates. He regarded many Pacific island biotas as mosaics. In contrast to the fauna of New Guinea, which he regarded as rich and diverse. Diamond stated “from the vertebrate fauna one could not guess that New Caledonia had existed prior to the Pleistocene”. Diamond's goal was to build a case for his hypothesis (Diamond, 1977) that the pattern of diversity of Pacific island faunas is largely a function of the ability of vertebrates to speciate into a radiation in some areas but not in others. This ability, Diamond argued, is related to the minimum size at which islands take on continental characteristics with respect to their faunas.</p>
          <p>Diamond's work (1977, 1984) is based primarily on data from birds, and for this group of vertebrates his hypothesis is well supported by patterns of distribution and diversity. However, there is little evidence to suggest that this hypothesis is applicable to all other vertebrates. In particular, Diamond's (1984) support for his theory gleaned from New Caledonian reptiles is based on misconceptions rooted in the fallacies discussed above. Reinterpretation of Diamond's arguments in light of this may or may not seriously weaken this hypothesis as a whole, but they do serve to point out the inherent differences between the study of the biogeography of birds and that of reptiles. They also illustrate the biological uniqueness of the New Caledonian region that has been neglected because of a
<pb xml:id="n49" n="47"/>
traditional emphasis on highly vagile organisms (i.e. birds and some insects) as biogeographical indicators in the southwest Pacific.</p>
          <p>Diamond characterized the reptile fauna of New Caledonia as rather depauperate, with only half of the genera endemic, no endemic families and no especially ancient lineages. These statements are either false or do not reflect the intimated poverty of the fauna. In the first case Diamond (1984) accepted nomenclature which does not reflect phylogeny; in the current view of the New Caledonian fauna (Sadlier, 1987) there are, in fact, a large number of endemic genera (while Sadlier's revision was not available to Diamond, the work of Greer [1974] was, and would have provided a suitable basis for analysis). Furthermore, the non-endemic gekkonine genera are represented by single species of wide-ranging forms. The discussion of endemic families belies Diamond's avian bias and is largely irrelevant to the distinctness of the New Caledonian faunas. Reptile families are few in number (20 are represented in Oceania compared with approximately 100 avian families) and are in no biological sense comparable in definition or extent to avian groups of the same nomenclatural rank. The only endemic lizard “family” in Oceania is the Pygopodidae, which is in fact a subgroup to the family Gekko-nidae (Kluge, 1987). In terms of the antiquity of the fauna, Diamond seems not even to have accepted Kluge's (1967a, 1967b) scenario for the group; this implied at least a Mioclene presence of geckos in New Caledonia. More recent work (Bauer, 1986) has indicated that a Paleocene or late Mesozoic presence is more likely.</p>
          <p>In arguing for relatively recent dispersal and subsequent radiation to account for certain facets of the New Caledonian biota Diamond (1984) posed the question “where are the frogs, lizards, birds and mammals of Gondowanan origin?” I shall address each group mentioned. Frogs are absent as far as is known, but if present would most likely be leiopelmatids. It is quite possible that frogs, if they had been present in New Caledonia, would not have survived the Eocene ultramafic over-thrusts, because these imposed dramatic changes on aquatic environments and vegetation. The kagu, <hi rend="i">Rhynchocetos jubatus</hi>, represents a monotypic family that may have pre-Oligocene ties to the rail-like birds of New Zealand. Mammals had not arrived in the eastern reaches of Gondwanaland prior to the opening of the Tasman Sea (Raven and Axelrod, 1974). The lizards are there! Geckos of Mesozoic origin outnumber the “modern” pan-tropical forms in all natural habitats (Bauer, 1986; Bauer and DeVaney, in press). Some skinks too may be of Gondwanan origin, but this is less likely (Greer, 1974). Although Diamond (1984) recognized the fact that there are many lizard species in New Caledonia, he regarded them as relatively recent arrivals that had not undergone significant divergence from their ancestral stock.</p>
          <p>Diamond (1984) thus used an incorrect evaluation of the age and diversity of the New Caledonian vertebrate fauna to support his (1977) view that successful radiations in continental (i.e. non archipelagic) situations are area-limited. Diamond (1984) claimed that New Caledonia, with “11 endemic <hi rend="i">Lygosoma</hi>” and 10 species of geckos in three endemic genera, is continental for lizards but not for birds. He further suggested that New Caledonia is the smallest area in which lizards can radiate and that the radiation there was not a major one. This claim is difficult to refute because few small islands in the tropics are “continental” in his sense. Indeed, all of the islands to the south and east of New Caledonia are basically archipelagic, while those to the north and west are either larger than New Caledonia or are also archipelagic.</p>
          <p>Although Diamond's (1984) hypothesis that the ability to radiate is area-limited cannot be falsified by data from reptiles, it would appear that any island with
<pb xml:id="n50" n="48"/>
sufficiently diverse habitats, appropriate climate and a long enough period of existence could support a lizard radiation. Most islands of the central and eastern Pacific have faunas composed largely or entirely of successful, wide-ranging “weedy” species of lizards, which are extreme generalists, and little likely to radiate in any environment. Unfortunately there are no examples of continental Pacific islands smaller than New Caledonia that are old enough to have received Gondwanan faunas, so the question of area is a limiting factor to lizard radiations is moot. Island size may play some role in determining the diversity of vertebrate faunas in the tropical Pacific. However, it seems likely that the key factors are island age and history, which determine what organisms will be present as raw materials for future evolution. Organismal vagility is also a major component in establishing the potentiality of island faunas. Most lizards have low vagility and can radiate only on old islands where they are already present (e.g. New Caledonia). Lizards with high vagility can colonize new islands but typically have the biology of “weedy” invaders (e.g. <hi rend="i">Lepidodactylus lugubris</hi>) and are not likely to speciate in their new island homes. Lizards of intermediate vagility, which have successfully colonized islands of intermediate age, have done so only in archipelagic situations and so do not shed light on the question at hand.</p>
          <p>Regardless of whether New Caledonia represents the minimal continental area for lizards, its herpetofauna is both old and diverse. Diamond's (1984) vision of New Caledonia as an uninteresting island cannot be maintained in light of the probable Mesozoic origin of its resident geckos. It seems appropriate that the evolutionary history of the groups present be interpreted in the context of paleo-geography before we accept <hi rend="i">ad hoc</hi> hypotheses of recent speciation in this geologically ancient area.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d6" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgements</hi>
          </head>
          <p>I would like to thank Drs K. Padian, A.<name type="person" key="name-124289">P. Russell</name>, D.B. Wake and M.H. Wake for their comments on various versions of the manuscript. J. Larson patiently typed several versions of the manuscript. This paper began as a portion of a chapter of a Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the Department of Zoology at the University of California, Berkely. I am indebted to the many people who contributed, both materially and intellectually to the development of my dissertation and I thank them for their roles in the formation of my own ideas expressed in this paper.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d5-d7" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Balgooy, M.M.J. van. 1969: A study on the diversity of island floras. <hi rend="i">Blumea 17</hi>: 139-178.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170547">Bauer, A.M.</name> 1986: The systematics, biogeography and evolutinary morphology of the Carphodactylinin (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation (University of California, Berkeley). 869 pp.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170547">Bauer, A.M.</name> 1987: <hi rend="i">Ramphotyphlops braminus</hi> (range extension). <hi rend="i">Herpetological Review: 18</hi>: 41.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170547">Bauer, A.M.</name> (submitted for publication): A geological basis for some herpetofaunal disjunctions in the southwest Pacific, with special reference to Vanuatu.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170547">Bauer, A.M.</name> and DeVaney, K.D. (in press): Comparative aspects of diet and habitat in some New Caledonian lizards. <hi rend="i">Amphibia-Reptilia</hi>.</bibl>
            <bibl>Baumann-Bodenheim, M.B. 1956: Uber die Beziehungen der Neu-Caledonischen Flora zu den tropischen und den sud-hemispharisch-subropischen bis-extra tropischen Floren and die gurtelmassige Gliederung der Vegetations von Neu-Caledonien. <hi rend="i">Berichte der Geobotanisches Institut Rubel, Zurich</hi>.</bibl>
            <bibl>Bavay, A. 1869: Catalogue des reptiles de la Nouvelle-Caledonie et description d'especes nouvelles <hi rend="i">Memoires de la Societe Linnaean de Normandie 15</hi>: 1-37.</bibl>
            <bibl>Berlioz, J. 1962: Les caracteres de la faune avienne en Nouvelle-Caledonie. <hi rend="i">Comptes Rendus de la Societe de Biogeographie 39</hi>: 65-69.</bibl>
            <bibl>Bohme, W. 1976: Uber die Gattung <hi rend="i">Eugonylus</hi> Fitzinger, mit Beschreibung einer neuen Art (Reptilia: Scincidae). <hi rend="i">Bonner Zoologische Beitrage 27</hi>: 245-251.</bibl>
            <bibl>Brown, W.C. 1956: The distribution of terrestrial reptiles in the islands of the Pacific Basin. <hi rend="i">Proceedings of the Eight Pacific Science Congress IIIA</hi>: 1479-1491.</bibl>
            <bibl>Brown, W.C. and Alcala, A.C. 1957: Viability of lizard eggs exposed to sea water. <hi rend="i">Copeia 1957</hi>: 39-41.</bibl>
            <bibl>Buffetaut, E. 1983: Sur la persistance tardive d' un crocodilien archaique dans le Pleistocene de l'lle des Pins (Nouvelle-Caledonie) et sa signification biogeographique. <hi rend="i">Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris 297</hi>: 89-92.</bibl>
            <bibl>Carlquist, S. 1965: <hi rend="i">Island Life</hi>. Natural History Press. New York.</bibl>
            <bibl>Carlquist, S. 1974: <hi rend="i">Island Biology</hi>. Columbia University Press, New York.</bibl>
            <bibl>Chase, C.G. 1971: Tectonic history of the Fiji Plateau. <hi rend="i">Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 82</hi>: 3087-3110.</bibl>
            <bibl>Cogger, H.G. 1986: <hi rend="i">Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia, 4th ed</hi>. Reed Books Pty. Ltd., Frenchs Forest, Sydney.</bibl>
            <bibl>Cuellar, O. 1977: Animal parthenogenesis. <hi rend="i">Science 197</hi>: 836-843.</bibl>
            <bibl>Darlington, P.J. 1948: The geographical distribution of cold-blodded vertebrates. <hi rend="i">Quarterly Review of Biology 23</hi>: 105-123.</bibl>
            <bibl>Darlington, P.J. 1957: <hi rend="i">Zoogeography, the Geographical Distribution of Animals</hi>. John Wiley &amp; Sons. London.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-102052">Dawson, J.W.</name> 1981: The species rich, highly endemic serpentine flora of New Caledonia. <hi rend="i">Tuatara 25</hi>: 1-6.</bibl>
            <bibl>Diamond, J. 1977: Continental and insular speciation in Pacific land birds. <hi rend="i">Systematic Zoology 26</hi>: 263-268.</bibl>
            <bibl>Diamond, J. 1984: Biogeographic mosaics in the Pacific. Pp. 1-14. In Radovsky, F.J.; Raven, P.H. and Schmer, S.H. (eds.) <hi rend="i">Biogeography of the Tropical Pacific</hi>. Bishop Museum Special Publication 72.</bibl>
            <bibl>Dunson, W.A. 1982: Low water vapor conductance of hard-shelled eggs of the gecko lizards <hi rend="i">Hemidactylus</hi> and <hi rend="i">Lepidodactylus. Journal of Experimental Zoology 219</hi>: 377-379.</bibl>
            <bibl>Dunson, W.A. and Braham, C.R. 1981: Evaporative water loss and oxygen consumption of three small lizards from the Florida Keys: Sphaerodactylus cinereus, S. notatus and <hi rend="i">Anolis sagrei. Physiological Zoology 54</hi>: 253-259.</bibl>
            <bibl>Gaffney, E.S., Balouet, J.C. and deBroin, F. 1984: New occurences of extinct meiolaniid turtles in New Caledonia. <hi rend="i">American Museum Novitates 2800</hi>: 1-6.</bibl>
            <bibl>Gardner, A.S. 1985: Viability of the eggs of the day-gecko <hi rend="i">Phelsuma sundbergi</hi> exposed to sea water. <hi rend="i">British Journal of Herpetology 6</hi>: 435-436.</bibl>
            <bibl>Garman, S. 1908: The reptiles of Easter Island. <hi rend="i">Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 52</hi>: 1-14.</bibl>
            <bibl>Good, R. 1974: The Geography of Flowering Plants, 4th ed. Longman, London.</bibl>
            <bibl>Greer, A.E. 1974: The generic relationships of the scincid lizard genus <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma</hi> and its relatives. <hi rend="i">Australian Journal of Zoology Supplementary Series 31</hi>: 1-67.</bibl>
            <bibl>Greer, A.E. 1977: The systematics and evolutionary relationships of the scincid lizard genus <hi rend="i">Lygosoma. Journal of Natural History 11</hi>: 515-540.</bibl>
            <bibl>Greer, A.E. 1979: <hi rend="i">Eremiascincus</hi>, a new generic name for some Australian sand swimming skinks (Lacertilia: Scincidae). <hi rend="i">Records of the Australian Museum 32</hi>: 321-338.</bibl>
            <bibl>Greer, A.E. 1980: A new species of <hi rend="i">Morethia</hi> (Lacertilia:Scincidae) from northern Australia, with comments on the biology and relationships of the genus. <hi rend="i">Records of the Australian Museum 33</hi>: 89-122.</bibl>
            <bibl>Guillaumin, A. 1921: Essai de geographie botanique de la Nouvelle-Caledonie. Pp. 256-293. In Sarasin, F. and Roux, J. (eds.) <hi rend="i">Nova Caledonia, Botanie, volume 3</hi>. C.W. Kreidels Verlag, Berlin.</bibl>
            <bibl>Guillaumin, A. 1964: L'endemisme en Nouvelle-Caledonia. <hi rend="i">Comptes Rendus de la Societe de Biogeographie 41</hi>: 67-75.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170436">Hardy, G.S.</name> 1977: The New Zealand Scincidae (Reptilia:Lacertilia); a taxonomic and zoogeographic study. <hi rend="i">New Zealand Journal of Zoology 4</hi>: 221-325.</bibl>
            <bibl>Hedley, C. 1899: A zoogeographic scheme for the mid-Pacific. <hi rend="i">Linnaean Society of New South Wales 24</hi>: 391-417.</bibl>
            <bibl>Hunsaker, D. and Breese, P. 1967: Herpetofauna of the Hawaiian Islands. <hi rend="i">Pacific Science 21</hi>: 423-428.</bibl>
            <bibl>Ineich, I. 1982: Contribution a l'etude des reptiles terrestres de Polynesie Francaise: taxonomie, ecologie et biogeographie. Unpublished Diplome thesis (Universite de Science et Techniques du Languedoc). 29 pp.</bibl>
            <bibl>Kew, H.W. 1983: <hi rend="i">The Dispersal of Shells, an Inquiry into the Means of Dispersal Possessed by Fresh-water and Land Mollusca</hi>. <name type="person" key="name-006073">K. Paul</name>, Trench, Trubner &amp; Co., Ltd., London.</bibl>
            <bibl>Kluge, A.G. 1987: Cladistic relationships in the Gekkonoidea (Squamata, Saunia). <hi rend="i">Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 173</hi>: 1-54.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170442">McCann, C.</name> 1953: Distribution of the Gekkonidae in the Pacific area. <hi rend="i">Proceedings of the Seventh Pacific Congress of the Pacific Science Association 4</hi>: 27-31.</bibl>
            <bibl>McCay, E.D. and Heck, K.L. 1987: Some observations on the use of taxonomic similarity in large-scale biogeography. <hi rend="i">Journal of Biogeography 14</hi>: 49-87.</bibl>
            <bibl>McKeown, S. 1978: <hi rend="i">Hawaiian Reptiles and Amphibians</hi>. Oriental Publishing Company, Honolulu.</bibl>
            <bibl>Morat, P., Veillon, J.M. and MacKee, H.S. 1984: Floristic relationships of New Caledonian rain forest phanerogams. Pp. 71-128. In Radovsky, F.J., Raven, P.H. and Sohmer. S.H. (eds) <hi rend="i">Biogeography of the Tropical Pacific</hi>. Bishop Museum Special Publication 72.</bibl>
            <bibl>Nelson, G.J. and Platnick N.I. 1981: <hi rend="i">Systematics and Biogeography</hi>. Columbia University Press, New York.</bibl>
            <bibl>Oliver, J.A. and Shaw, C.E. 1953: The amphibians and reptiles of the Hawaiian Islands. <hi rend="i">Zoologica (N.Y.) 38</hi>: 65-95.</bibl>
            <bibl>Pasteur, G. 1964: Recherches sur l'evolution des lygodactyles, lezarads afro-malgaches actuels. <hi rend="i">Travaux de l'Institut Scientifique Cherifien, Serie Zoologie 29</hi>: 1-132.</bibl>
            <bibl>Paulian, R. 1961: La zoogeographie de Madagascar et des iles voisines. <hi rend="i">Faune de Madagascar 13</hi>. Institute des Recherches Scientifiques, Tananarive.</bibl>
            <bibl>Raven, P.H. and Axelrod. D.I. 1972: Plate tectonics and Australian palebiogeography. <hi rend="i">Science 176</hi>: 1379-1386.</bibl>
            <bibl>Robb, J. 1986: <hi rend="i">New Zealand Amphibians in Colour, revised edition</hi>. Collins. Auckland.</bibl>
            <bibl>Roux, J. 1913: Les reptiles de la Nouvelle-Caledonie et des Iles Loyalty. Pp. 79-160. In Sarasin, F. and Roux, J. (eds.) <hi rend="i">Nova Caledonia, Zoologie, volume 1</hi>. C.W. Kreidels Verlag, Wiesbaden.</bibl>
            <bibl>Sadlier, R. 1987: A revision of the skinks of New Caledonia. <hi rend="i">Records of the Australian Museum</hi>.</bibl>
            <bibl>Schmid, M. 1981: Fleurs et Plants de Nouvelle-Caledonie. Editions du Pacifique, Papeete.</bibl>
            <bibl>Stejneger, L. 1899: The land reptiles of the Hawaiian Islands. <hi rend="i">Proceedings of the United States National Museum 21</hi>: 783-813.</bibl>
            <bibl>Thorne, R.F. 1965: Floristic relationships of New Caledonia. <hi rend="i">University of Iowa Studies in Natural History 20</hi>: 1-14.</bibl>
            <bibl>Tillier, S. and Clarke, B.C. 1983: Lutte biologique et destruction du patrimoine genetique: le ca des mollusques gasteropodes pulmones dans les territories francais du Pacifique. <hi rend="i">Gentique Selection Evolution 15</hi>: 93-100.</bibl>
            <bibl>Werner, Y.L. 1972: Observations on eggs of eublepharid lizards, with comments on the evolution of the Gekkonoidea. <hi rend="i">Zoologische Mededelingen 47</hi>: 211-244.</bibl>
            <bibl>Zug, G.R. 1985: A new skink (Reptilia: Sauria: <hi rend="i">Leiolopisma</hi>) from Fiji. <hi rend="i">Proceedings of the Biological society of Washington 98</hi>: 221-231.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n53" n="51"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d6" type="article" decls="#text-6-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">The use of increment cores for the analysis of tree ring chronologies for fijian kauri (<hi rend="i">Agathis Macrophylla</hi>)</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-170548">S.A. Weaver</name><lb/>
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d6-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Tree ring data was collected from Fijian Kauri (<hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla</hi>) trees in Northern Viti Levu, Fiji, during November and December 1986. The study was to test the validity of using single increment cores instead of entire trunk sections in growth rate and tree age studies for this species. One increment core per tree was sampled. The nature of the wood formation in this species led to problems in the analysis of the cores and poor statistical confidence in the results. The paper discusses the problems encountered during the study and suggests that alternative methodology should be used for this species in tree ring analysis.</p>
          <p><hi rend="b">Key words:</hi> Dendrochronology, Fiji, <hi rend="i">Agathis</hi>.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d6-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The study area lies on the north western slopes of Mt Lomalagi, near the Nadarivatu Government Station at the northern edge of the Nadarivatu plaeau in northern central Viti Levu (17° 35′ S, 177° 55′ E). The elevation of the study area lies between 900m and 990m.</p>
          <p>The climate of this area lies in zone D of the Fiji Forest Inventory, corresponding to a 2540-3300mm mean annual rainfall, with a moderate 3-5 month dry season having less than 150m rainfall in those months. There appears to be sufficient seasonality in this region for the formation of annual rings in the wood of forest trees.</p>
          <p>The basaltic parent materials have produced soils classified by Berry and Howard (1973) as Manosavu bouldery red brown clay, humic latosols, having a low base status and high acidity. These soils have a dark organic rich surface horizon that overlies brown to reddish brown sub-surface horizons which are moderately weathered. A more detailed description of the soils can be seen in the following paper (Weaver, 1988).</p>
          <p>The vegetation has been classified as sub-tropical lower montane rain forest by MacDonald (1987). Two adjacent study sites were chosen. One consisted of lush dense secondary forest dominated in the canopy by <hi rend="i">Homalium vitiense, Calophyllum vitiense, Podocarpus nerifolius, Syzygium sp</hi>., and <hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla</hi>. This site maintained an uneven 4-6m canopy and had a dense undergrowth of seedlings, grasses and herbaceous species. The <hi rend="i">A. macrophylla</hi> population on this site consisted of seedlings, saplings and pole-sized individuals having a basal trunk diameter of approximately 5-30cm. The other site was an old growth forest dominated by emergent <hi rend="i">A. macrophylla</hi> over a 12-16m canopy. The canopy dominants included <hi rend="i">P. nerifolius, C. vitiense, Syzygium sp., Arytera brackenridgeii</hi> and <hi rend="i">Dysoxylum richii</hi>. The <hi rend="i">Agathis</hi> population on this site consisted mostly of trees having basal trunk diameters of 30-130cm.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d6-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Methods</hi>
          </head>
          <p>In the field an increment corer was used to extract one 5mm diameter wood core per tree from a sample of forty five <hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla</hi> trees over a range of trunk diameters from both sites. Each core was taken perpendicular to the main axis of the tree and as low to the ground as possible. Each core was then labelled with the diameter at 1.4m height from the tree it was taken from. In the
<pb xml:id="n54" n="52"/>
laboratory each core was mounted and sanded. Distances between rings were measured where possible and the total ring count was calculated for those cores that had intercepted with the growth centre of the tree. Areas of indistinct ring formation on each core were measured and the average length of uncountable core sections was calculated.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d6-d4" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Results</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Ring expression was variable in most cases with some cores only showing distinct rings for part of their length (see Fig. 1). Only 1/3 of the cores sampled showed completely distinct ring formation along the entire length of the core. 40% of the cores sampled had zones where rings were indistinct. On average 35% of the length of these cores was uncountable. The remaining 26% of the cores sampled showed practically no distinguishable ring formation, or visible rings were so widely separated by zones of indistinct rings that ring counts and measurements would have been meaningless. Therefore, this data was considered unreliable and was not used for statistical analysis.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_052a">
              <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_052a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_052a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="i"><hi rend="b">Fig. 1</hi>. An example of variation and inconsistencies in ring expression in sanded cores traken from Fijian kauri trees at Nadarivatu. Each core has a 5mm diameter. <hi rend="b">Core ‘a’</hi> shows a zone of indistinct ring formation at left. To the right large variations in ring distances are seen causing difficulties in determining whether they are annually formed. Some rings are likely to be false (arrow). <hi rend="b">Core ‘b’</hi> shows no visible ring formation for this section of the core. <hi rend="b">Core ‘c’</hi> shows variation in the visibility of rings. <hi rend="b">Core ‘d’</hi> shows evidence of ring wedging and false ring formation (arrowed)</hi>.</head>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n55" n="53"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d6-d5" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Discussion</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Anomalous ring development can frequently cause problems for the dendrochro-nologist if they are not taken into account when constructing a data set from tree rings. False or double rings and the wedging out of rings can lead to very broad error variances in statistical analysis. Irregularities in ring formation can vary from one species to another and between different locations. For example, in New Zealand, studies of <hi rend="i">Libocedrus bidwillii</hi> have shown that false rings are virtually non-existent for this species. Dendrochronological studies of <hi rend="i">Agathis australis</hi> however, have revealed problems with ring wedging as well as a lack of ring pattern consistency around the trunk. Lobate growth in this species is also common as with <hi rend="i">Phyllocladus aspleniifolius var. alpinus</hi>. Dating of these two species may only be possible at some sites (Dunwiddie, 1979). Ash (1985) undertook a study on the tree rings of Fijian Kauri on the Mt Koravaturu plateau in western Viti Levu (alt. c. 800m) and at a site near Suva (alt. c. 150m). By examining trunk discs he found the seasonality sufficient for the formation of annual rings. Here the late wood consisted of smaller compressed xylem elements formed during the dry season in the months between April and October. Ash noted that late wood anatomy was variable with some distinct clearly differentiated bands, but other rings were represented by a gradual transition to late wood anatomy. On most of Ash's sections 5-10% of rings were not distinct. Some trees that were growing on rapidly draining sites produced false rings, and in general, compression wood development necessitated the examination of whole trunk sections to locate all the late wood rings.</p>
          <p>In the present study the core samples proved extremely variable and anamalous in ring expression. Because only one core was taken per tree it was impossible to establish the validity of each ring as truly annual. Understanding the nature of wood formation in Fijian kauri described by Ash (1985), growth rate data from a single core are not likely to be representative of the entire trunk even if ring clarity is good for those cores samples. Whitmore (1975) suggested that ring counts are inapplicable or unreliable in the tropics when attempting to determine tree ages.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d6-d6" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Conclusion</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The technique of sampling one core per tree to study growth rates and tree ages in <hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla</hi> in lower montane rain forest proved to be inadequate for confident statistical analysis of the data. Entire trunk discs should be used if possible. If entire trunk discs are not available then at least 3 cores per tree should be sampled to allow for anaomalies in ring formation such as eccentricity, ring wedging, lobate growth and locally absent rings.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d6-d7" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgements</hi>
          </head>
          <p>This paper forms part of a B.Sc. Honours project at Victoria University, Wellington. I am therefore grateful to the following people in the Botany Department: Dr. Ross McQueen for supervision of the project; Stephen Fuller for useful comments on the draft; Ian MacDonald for assistance in the field. The Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society and the Wellington Botanical Society provided financial assistance.</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n56" n="54"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d6-d8" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Ash, J. 1985, Growth rings and longevity of <hi rend="i">Agathis vitiensis</hi> (Seeman) in Fiji. <hi rend="i">Australian Journal of Botany 33</hi>: 81-88.</bibl>
            <bibl>Berry, M. J., and <name type="person" key="name-025537">Howard, W.J.</name> 1973. <hi rend="i">Fiji Forest Inventory</hi>. Vols. 1, 2 and 3. Overseas Development Authority: Surbiton, U.K.</bibl>
            <bibl>Dunwiddie, P.W. 1979. Dendrochronological studies of indigenous New Zealand trees. <hi rend="i">New Zealand Journal of Botany 17 (3): 251-66</hi>.</bibl>
            <bibl><hi rend="i">MacDonald, I. 1987. Observations on the forest dynamics and regeneration of Fijian Kauri</hi> (Agathis vitiensis) <hi rend="i">within old growth forest, Viti Levu, Fiji</hi>. Unpublished B.Sc. Honours project. Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170548">Weaver, S.A.</name> 1987. <hi rend="i">An introduction to the regeneration of Fijian Kauri following logging</hi>. Unpublished B.Sc. Honours dissertation. Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170548">Weaver, S.A.</name> 1988. Soil differences between secondary and old growth <hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla</hi> forest at Hadarivatu, Fiji. <hi rend="i">Tuatara 30</hi>: 55-61.</bibl>
            <bibl><hi rend="i">Whitmore, T.C. 1975: Tropical Rainforests of the Far East</hi>. 1st ed. Oxford University Press.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n57" n="55"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d7" type="article" decls="#text-7-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Soil differences between secondary and old growth <hi rend="i">Agathis Macrophylla</hi> forest at nadarivatu, FIJI</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-170548">S.A. Weaver</name><lb/>
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>A comparison was made between soils beneath second growth and mature Fijian kauri (<hi rend="i">Agathis macro-phylla</hi>) forest. It was assumed that there were no significant soil differences between these sites prior to the selective logging of part of this area. The soils beneath the second growth stand showed a higher degree of leaching in the upper two horizons and a thicker, yet less well defined, organic topsoil horizon compared with the soils of the mature stand. The lower horizons in both sites were similar. The differences observed are likely to have resulted from the logging activities and subsequent modification of the vegetation in the second growth stand.</p>
          <p><hi rend="b">Key words:</hi><hi rend="i">Agathis</hi>, Fiji, Soil, logging secondary succession.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The two sites being compared were once continuous sub-tropical rain forest dominated by emergent Fijian kauri (<hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla</hi>). During the logging exercises, commercial species including Fijian kauri, having a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 35cm or greater were removed. The logging is believed to have occurred between 1935 and 1960. The area that was logged now carries secondary re-growth containing regenerating Fijian kauri up to 30cm dbh. The soils were studied to determine whether differences exist between the soils of these two sites, and whether these differences were a result of logging.</p>
          <p>The study area was located on the North Western slopes of Mt Lamalagi, near the Nadarivatu Government station in Northern Central Viti Levu (17° 35′ S, 177° 55′ E) between 900 and 990m altitude. The mean annual rainfall of this area is 2540mm-3300mm with a 3-5 month dry season. Mean monthly maximum temperatures range from 25°C in December to 22°C in July, with mean maximum temperatures range wing the same pattern with 17 and 14 respectively. Mean relative humidity remains higher than 80% year round (Berry and Howard 1972). A more detailed vegetation description is summarised in a previous paper in this issue (Weaver 1988).</p>
          <p>The soils of the study area have been classified as humic latosols developing from basic parent materials including olivine basalt (Twyford and Wright 1965). These soils have developed on steep 25-40 degree slopes in a moist environment beneath sub-tropical lower montane rain forest. Humic latosols are commonly red or reddish soils having a clay texture but may be classified as loams in the field. They tend to exhibit a low base saturation, with moderate to high cation exchange capacity and are moderately to strongly acid. They are derived from parent materials ranging from olivine basalt lavas to acid-intermediate rocks such as acid agglomerate. Such soils are of widespread occurrence in Fiji and are found throughout the climatic range of the territory. Twyford and Wright (1965) have described the soils of the Nadarivatu area itself as being derived from olivine basalt.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Methods</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Soil profiles were described from 10 soil pits, carried out in both the mature forest and in the second growth stand. The soil pit sites corresponded to vegetation analysis plots that were randomly located within the two forest types. Soil profile descriptions included colour, texture, structure and horizon depth. Soil samples were collected for each horizon from 6 of the 10 sites for chemical analysis. The chemical
<pb xml:id="n58" n="56"/>
analysis of the soil samples was carried out by staff at the University of the South Pacific, Institute of Natural Resources, in Suva. The soil chemical properties that were measured are shown in Table 1.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d4" type="section">
          <head><hi rend="c">Results</hi><lb/>
Physical soil properties</head>
          <p>Soils beneath both vegetation types possessed similar structure. They were generally massive, with very friable, weakly developed, crumb structure. Boundaries were diffuse and colour change was slight down the profile except for the organic H1 horizon. Soil colour in the mature stand generally followed a brownish black 1-2cm humus, overlying a dark brown to brown 100-150cm sub-soil. Basement rock was not reached even at 150cm where the horizon at this depth corresponded to a B2 horizon (Gibbs 1980). In the soils beneath the secondary stand the organic horizon was thicker and of a lighter colour, generally following a dark brown to brownish black 1-14cm organic horizon, overlying a dark brown to reddish brown sub-soil.</p>
          <p>The thicker but less darkly stained organic horizon in the secondary stand may have resulted from different species compositions between the sites or from modification of the soil caused by logging. Higher soil surface temperatures are likely beneath this vegetation type, due to a lower degree of shading compared with the mature stand. This also allows a higher proportion of surface rooting herbaceous plants to contribute to top soil formation. Similarly the thin (1-2cm) carbon rich humus blanket, recorded in the mature forest, suggests that a cooler and wetter top soil micro-environment exists in this heavily shaded situation.</p>
          <p>The evidence of fire (charcoal fragments) seen in the modal profile for the second growth stand is likely to have been a result of localised fire caused by lightning strike. Trees scarred by lightning were a relatively common feature throughout the study area. This is not surprising considering the frequency of thunder storms in the region (Revel 1981). There was no evidence of fire in any other soil profile.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d5" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Modal Profile: Mature Forest</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d5-d1" type="section">
            <p>
              <table rows="8" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>Classification:</cell>
                  <cell>Humic latosol (Twyford and Wright. 1965).</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Location:</cell>
                  <cell>Mt Lomalagi, Nadarivatu</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Elevation:</cell>
                  <cell>1000m</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Landform:</cell>
                  <cell>N facing upper slope Mt Lomalagi</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Relief:</cell>
                  <cell>Steep overall but 15-20° at pit site</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Parent Material:</cell>
                  <cell>Basalt/Andesite</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Vegetation:</cell>
                  <cell>Mixed <hi rend="i">Agathis</hi> dominant mature forest <hi rend="i">Syzygium, Arytera</hi> dense understorey.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Drainage:</cell>
                  <cell>Good</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
          </div>
          <pb xml:id="n59" n="57"/>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d5-d2" type="section">
            <head>Profile Description</head>
            <p>
              <table rows="3" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>H1 0-1 cm:</cell>
                  <cell>moist; brownish black (7.5 YR 2/2) silt loam; weakly developed crumb structures; very friable; boulders 6-8%; fine root mat with mull humus; indistinct smooth boundary.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H2 1-94 cm:</cell>
                  <cell>moist; dark brown (7.5 YR 3/3) silt loam; weakly developed crumb structure; very friable; slightly sticky; weakly cemented in parts; mull humus; abundant roots; few boulders in horizon; generally massive horizon with little variation throughout; indistinct smooth boundary.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H3 94-123+cm:</cell>
                  <cell>moist; dark brown (7.5 YR 3/4) silt loam; weakly developed crumb structure; very friable; less roots, slightly more compact than H2; few stones or boulders</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d6" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Modal Profile: Secondary Stand</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d6-d1" type="section">
            <p>
              <table rows="8" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>Classification:</cell>
                  <cell>Humic latosol</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Location:</cell>
                  <cell>Mt Lomalagi, Nadarivatu</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Elevation:</cell>
                  <cell>930m</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Landform:</cell>
                  <cell>N facing mid-slope</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Relief:</cell>
                  <cell>Steep - 20°</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Parent Material:</cell>
                  <cell>Basalt/Andesite</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Vegetation:</cell>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Agathis, Syzygium</hi> mixed, secondary forest</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Drainage:</cell>
                  <cell>Good</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d6-d2" type="section">
            <head>Profile Description</head>
            <p>
              <table rows="4" cols="2">
                <row>
                  <cell>H1 0-8cm:</cell>
                  <cell>moist; brown (5YR 4/4) silt loam; strongly developed nut structure; friable; fine root mat; coarse fragments 10-20%; smooth diffuse boundary</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H2 8-19:</cell>
                  <cell>moist; reddish brown (5 YR 4/6) silt loam; moderately developed crumb structure; friable; roots abundant; small pieces of charcoal: &lt;10% coarse fragments; smooth diffuse boundary.</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H3 19-86+:</cell>
                  <cell>moist; reddish brown (5 YR 4/8) silty clay; moderately developed crumb structure; firm; slightly sticky and plastic; roots less abundant than above; very few coarse fragments; large concretions found at 74cm (7.5 YR 5/8); organic stained patches possibly decayed root remains (5 YR 3/3), diffuse boundary</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>General:</cell>
                  <cell>Soil very compact increasingly so with depth. Stones frequent in upper 50cm of profile. Lowest depth reached throughout was 1.5 M (no sign of basement rock).</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <pb xml:id="n60" n="58"/>
            <p>The mean values for soil chemical properties for both sites. A = mature stand values. B = secondary stand values.</p>
            <p>
              <table rows="12" cols="7">
                <head>Table 1</head>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="b">pH</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>%C</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>P</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Moisture</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>CEC</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>∼ Bases</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Ca</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="b">Retentions</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Factor</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>m.e.%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>m.e.%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>m.e.%</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H1 6.2</cell>
                  <cell>4.9</cell>
                  <cell>25.97</cell>
                  <cell>11.04</cell>
                  <cell>-</cell>
                  <cell>97</cell>
                  <cell>1.09</cell>
                  <cell>1.06</cell>
                  <cell>86.72</cell>
                  <cell>37.56</cell>
                  <cell>&gt;85</cell>
                  <cell>12.31</cell>
                  <cell>&gt;50</cell>
                  <cell>9.04</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H2 5.2</cell>
                  <cell>4.9</cell>
                  <cell>23.00</cell>
                  <cell>5.02</cell>
                  <cell>97</cell>
                  <cell>90.5</cell>
                  <cell>1.06</cell>
                  <cell>1.05</cell>
                  <cell>36.00</cell>
                  <cell>34.50</cell>
                  <cell>12.00</cell>
                  <cell>7.50</cell>
                  <cell>7.50</cell>
                  <cell>5.07</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H3 5.1</cell>
                  <cell>5.0</cell>
                  <cell>0.98</cell>
                  <cell>0.94</cell>
                  <cell>95</cell>
                  <cell>96.3</cell>
                  <cell>1.06</cell>
                  <cell>1.05</cell>
                  <cell>27.80</cell>
                  <cell>28.05</cell>
                  <cell>5.60</cell>
                  <cell>5.12</cell>
                  <cell>2.50</cell>
                  <cell>2.80</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="b">Mg</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>K</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Na</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Exchangeable acidity</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Tamm's Extract. (%)</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Tamm's Extract. (%)</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>15 Bar Water Retn.</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>m.e. %</cell>
                  <cell>m.e. %</cell>
                  <cell>m.e. %</cell>
                  <cell>m.e. %</cell>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>Al</cell>
                  <cell>Fe</cell>
                  <cell>(%)</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell>A</cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                  <cell/>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H1 11.24</cell>
                  <cell>2.43</cell>
                  <cell>0.11</cell>
                  <cell>0.70</cell>
                  <cell>0.42</cell>
                  <cell>0.14</cell>
                  <cell>41.60</cell>
                  <cell>43.40</cell>
                  <cell>0.49</cell>
                  <cell>0.63</cell>
                  <cell>0.60</cell>
                  <cell>0.54</cell>
                  <cell>68.30</cell>
                  <cell>38.90</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H2 3.50</cell>
                  <cell>2.35</cell>
                  <cell>0.19</cell>
                  <cell>0.41</cell>
                  <cell>0.31</cell>
                  <cell>0.16</cell>
                  <cell>37.50</cell>
                  <cell>38.63</cell>
                  <cell>0.71</cell>
                  <cell>0.65</cell>
                  <cell>1.05</cell>
                  <cell>0.59</cell>
                  <cell>30.40</cell>
                  <cell>31.60</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>H3 2.73</cell>
                  <cell>1.94</cell>
                  <cell>0.09</cell>
                  <cell>0.27</cell>
                  <cell>-</cell>
                  <cell>35.50</cell>
                  <cell>28.87</cell>
                  <cell>0.57</cell>
                  <cell>0.55</cell>
                  <cell>0.44</cell>
                  <cell>0.37</cell>
                  <cell>28.90</cell>
                  <cell>28.90</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
              <table rows="11" cols="3">
                <row>
                  <cell>%C</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Percent carbon</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>P</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Phosphorus</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>CEC</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Cation exchange capacity</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>∼ Bases</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Total exchangeable bases</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Ca</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Calcium</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Mg</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Magnesium</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>K</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Potassium</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Na</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Sodium</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>m.e. %</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Milliequivalent percent</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Al</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Aluminium</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Fe</cell>
                  <cell>=</cell>
                  <cell>Iron</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d6-d3" type="section">
            <head>Soil chemical properties (see Table 1)</head>
            <p>During leaching, water percolates down through the soil and mobilises soluble cations (base nutrients) to lower horizons, making them unavailable to plants. Calcium, sodium, magnesium and potassium occur as simple, highly mobile ions and are readily removed in this process. Once these cations are leached, their positions on the soil colloid particles are replaced by hydrogen ions. An increase in the number of hydrogen ions present, increases the acidity of the soil. Thus, acidity can be used as an indicator of the degree of leaching, with increasing acidity (lower pH values) tending to correlate with increased leaching.</p>
            <p>Soil acidity was consistently higher in the upper horizons of the successional stand. There is a correspondingly low value for bases in these horizons (see table 1). It would appear that the secondary stand soils are slightly more leached in these upper horizons than in the mature forest.</p>
            <p>Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) measures the ability of the soil to absorb cations (i.e. bases) to the colloid particles within the soil, thus indicating the ability to hold nutrients. In the organic H1 horizon of the mature forest site the value of 86.7 m.e. % is substantially higher than the equivalent reading for the secondary stand (i.e. 37.6 m.e.%). However readings become similar in the lower horizons.
<pb xml:id="n61" n="59"/>
Organic matter increases the CEC of a soil. The higher CEC observed in the topson of the mature forest is likely to relate to the higher values for organic matter. This is indicated by the higher reading for carbon content compared with the secondary stand.</p>
            <p>Total Exchangeable Bases (TEB) measures the base nutrients present within a soil at the time of sampling. A similar pattern is seen with TEB ratings between the sites. Again the lower horizons have similar values, whereas the H1 horizon has a considerably higher value of 85 m.e.% in the mature forest, compared with 12.3 m.e.% in the secondary stand.</p>
            <p>Percentage Base Saturation provides a valuable indicator of “base status’ which is often related to the amount of leaching. Lower Base Saturation values correspond with higher leaching. The Base Saturation values were only recorded for the mature stand. Characteristically the H1 horizon shows a high Base Saturation rating of &gt;98 m.e.% as a result of the corresponding CEC values and the TEB, of which calcium and magnesium make up the largest proportions (&gt;50 m.e.% and 11.2 m.e.% respectively). The lower horizons exhibit lower values with a mean Base Saturation of 26 m.e.%.</p>
            <p>Both the calcium and magnesium components continue the trend observed in the CEC and TEB readings. Values for sodium are lower for horizons in the secondary stand. Potassium values however are higher in the secondary stand for each horizon with high values in the H1 and lower values in the H3 horizon.</p>
            <p>Phosphate in New Zealand soils may be classified into 4 classes. These are Low (0-30%). Moderate (30-60%), High (60-90%) and Very High (90-100%). By these standards the soils in both sites studied here show very high phosphate retention. Phosphate rentention in acid soils is related to compounds of iron and aluminium (Saunders, 1968). Tamm's extractable iron and aluminium show high values and are possibly associated with the binding of phosphorus.</p>
            <p>Water retention in a soil increases as the clay content increases. High clay content correlates with high CEC by increasing the number of colloid particles that can absorb cations. 15 bar water retention values obtained for the lower horizons of both sties range from 27.5% to 38.9%. These values would seem to represent moderate retention of water and relatively high clay content. A comparison of soil water retention values between soils in this study area and soils studied by Gangaiya <hi rend="i">et al</hi> (1982) suggest that Nadarivatu soils in general have a relatively high clay content and concurrently moderate water retention status for Fijian soils. Another factor that influences water retention is organic matter. In this study the topsoil readings for 15 bar water retention also correlate with the pattern of carbon content between these two soils, with higher values in the organic rich H1 horizon of the mature forest stand.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d7" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Discussion</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The soils studied at Nadarivatu show features of both basaltic and andesitic origin. Exchangeable potassium values in the mature stand are more closely related to the range of exchangeable potassium characteristic of basalt soils (0.2-0.57 m.e.%). The exchangeable potassium of soils on this site do not exceed 0.2 m.e.%. The values recorded from the secondary stand are higher in the upper two horizons but do not fit completely into the potassium range characteristic of andesitic tuff soils (0.75-1.5 m.e.%). As the soils of the study area are located on slopes of &gt;25 degrees, the soil mantle is unstable causing a constant drift of soil particles down the slope. Evidence for unstable slopes was seen throughout the study area. Thus, the direct influences of parent materials are not easily discernable due to constant renewal and truncation of the soil mantle, at least in the zone near the soil surface.</p>
          <pb xml:id="n62" n="60"/>
          <p>Some <hi rend="i">Agathis</hi> species including <hi rend="i">A. australis</hi> in New Zealand (Eckroyd, 1982), <hi rend="i">A. borneensis</hi> and <hi rend="i">A. alba</hi> in Borneo (Whitmore, 1966) are known to podsolise soils. The nature of the soil parent material tends to influence the degree of podsolisation. In Borneo base poor parent materials combined with high leaching allows the mor-forming <hi rend="i">Agathis</hi> leaf litter to podsolise the soil. However, no evidence of podsolisation was seen in the Nadarivatu soils. The steep slopes of the study area contribute to soil rejuvenation through slipping and soil creep, thus masking any physical effects of podsolisation. Also a large proportion of the forest community present may be non-podsol formers. Whitmore (1966) found no evidence of podsolisation beneath <hi rend="i">A. macrophylla</hi> forests on Vanikoro Island in the Solomon group, where a similar situation exists.</p>
          <p>In general the soils of these two forests differed. However, differences were observed predominantly in the upper two horizon, particularly in the organic H1 horizon. This horizon was thicker in the second growth stand and had a lower carbon content than the equivalent horizon of the mature forest soil. There was also evidence of a higher degree of leaching in the upper horizons of the second growth stand with lower base values and higher acidity compared with the mature stand. Whitlock (1985) noticed similar patterns in a successional sequence of regenerating <hi rend="i">Agathis australis</hi> in New Zealand. Here the organic zone in the upper horizons increased in nutrients over successional time. The horizon boundary between organic H1 horizon and its underlying horizon tended to be more distinct in the soils of the mature forest. However, the lower soil horizons of the two sites showed no major differences.</p>
          <p>The differences observed in these soils must either pre-date the logging or, result from the logging activities. If these differences existed prior to logging, it may have resulted from a soil parent material disparity between the two sites, or there may have been significant differences in the species composition. The latter is unlikely, as the local area comprising the north western slopes of Mt Lomalagi at these altitudes maintains forest of the type present in the mature stand. Other indigenous vegetation in this area is second growth forest that maintains many similar species to that of the surrounding old growth forest (Weaver, 1987; MacDonald, 1987). If differences existed between the soil parent materials, evidence in the lower horizons would be expected. This was not observed in the present study.</p>
          <p>Logging is more likely to have been the determining factor of the soil differences seen in this study. The direct effects of logging would include soil scarification (mixing of humus and mineral soil) resulting from heavy machinery activity, and a large build up of litter from discarded branches, damaged trees and crown foliage of logged trees.</p>
          <p>A deeper organic topsoil horizon in the second growth stand would result from this process combined with scarification of the soil surface. The lower carbon content and base values in this soil may result from subsequent leaching and run off which would have increased following the removal of a large proportion of the protecting canopy.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d8" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgements</hi>
          </head>
          <p>This paper is the result of work carried out for part of a B.Sc. Honours thesis in Botany at Victoria University, Wellington. I would like to thank Ian McDonald for assistance in the field and a substantial contribution to the results. Dr Ross McQueen supervised the thesis and Stephen Fuller provided valuable discussion and useful comments on the draft. I would also like to thank Professor <name type="person" key="name-101528">J. Morrison</name> and Kamlish Chand for assistance with the soil chemical analysis.</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n63" n="61"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d7-d9" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Bibliography</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Berry, M.J., and <name type="person" key="name-025537">Howard, W.J.</name> 1973. <hi rend="i">Fiji Forest Inventory</hi>. Vols. 1, 2 and 3. Overseas Development Authority: Surbiton, U.K.</bibl>
            <bibl>Eckroyd, C.E. 1982. Biological flora of New Zealand 8: <hi rend="i">Agathis australis, New Zealand Journal of Botany 20 (1)</hi>: 17-36.</bibl>
            <bibl>Gangaiya, P., Singh, U., Morrison, R.J. 1982. The relationship between clay content and 15 bar moisture retention for some Fijian soils. <hi rend="i">New Zealand Journal of Science 25</hi>: 61-64.</bibl>
            <bibl>Gibbs, H.S. 1980. <hi rend="i">New Zealand Soils. An Introduction</hi>. Oxford University Press. Wellington, New Zealand.</bibl>
            <bibl>MacDonald, I. 1987. <hi rend="i">Observations on the forest dynamics and regeneration of Fijian kauri</hi> (Agathis vitiensis) <hi rend="i">within old growth forest, Viti Levu, Fiji</hi>. Unpublished B.Sc. Honours thesis. Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.</bibl>
            <bibl>Revel, C.G. 1981. <hi rend="i">Tropical Cyclones in the South West Pacific, November 1969 to April 1979</hi>. New Zealand Metrological Service. Miscellaneous Publication number 170. Wellington, New Zealand.</bibl>
            <bibl>Saunders, W.M. 1968. Iron and aluminium extracted by Tamm's reagent: Soils of New Zealand Part 2 <hi rend="i">New Zealand Soil Bureau Bulletin 26 (2)</hi>: 109-114.</bibl>
            <bibl>Twyford, I.T., and Wright, C.S. 1965. <hi rend="i">The Soil Resources of the Fiji Islands</hi>. Government Printer, Suva, Fiji.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170548">Weaver, S.A.</name> 1987. <hi rend="i">An introduction to the regeneration of Fijian kauri following logging</hi>. Unpublished B.Sc. Honours thesis. Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170548">Weaver, S.A.</name> 1988. The use of increment cores for the analysis of tree ring chronologies in Fijian kauri (<hi rend="i">Agathis macrophylla). Tuatara 30</hi>: 51-54.</bibl>
            <bibl>Whitlock J.S. 1985. <hi rend="i">Soil development in a kauri forest succession. Huapai scientific reserve</hi>. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis. University of Auckland, New Zealand.</bibl>
            <bibl>Whitmore, T.C. 1966. The social status of <hi rend="i">Agathis</hi> in a rain forest in Melanesia. <hi rend="i">Journal of Ecology 54</hi>: 285-301.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n64" n="62"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d8" type="article" decls="#text-8-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">The Waitoreki of New Zealand - Marsupial or Monotreme?</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-170549">Gunter G. Sehm</name><lb/>
Hamburg University P.O. Box 30 46 28 D-2000 HAMBURG 36 West Germany</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d8-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>For the first time, geological and palaeontological evidence is presented that makes the presence in New Zealand of a marsupial just possible and that of a platypus-like monotreme possible and likely. The latter alternative is preferable, so that the <hi rend="i">waitoreki</hi> a non-descript supposedly mammalian animal of New Zealand, could be an analogue of the Australian Duck-billed Platypus <hi rend="i">(Ornithorhynchus anatinus)</hi>, perhaps even more ancient than the platypus.</p>
          <p><hi rend="b">Key note:</hi><hi rend="i">Chronectes minimus</hi>, fossil monotreme, New Zealand otter, platypus, <hi rend="i">Steropodon galmani</hi>, Yapok.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d8-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Dedication</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Dedicated to <hi rend="i">Dr phil.habil., Dr. med</hi>. INGO KRUMBIEGEL (Hamelin, Germany), Nestor of Cryptozoology, on the occasion of his 85th birthday, 26th February, 1988.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d8-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Observations and Discussion</hi>
          </head>
          <p>It is generally understood, particularly in New Zealand, that at least some of the 19th century sightings of the mysterious otter-like waitoreki refer to the Australian Opossum or Phalanger (<hi rend="i">Trichosurus vulpecula</hi>), which was first liberated at Riverton, Southland, in 1858 “with the idea of starting a skin trade’ (McLintock, 1966). However, earlier reports, and the waitoreki's reported aquatic way of life, as well as its Maori names <hi rend="i">waitoreki</hi> and <hi rend="i">kaurehe</hi> point to the existence of a different animal, which must have reached and colonized the area of present-day New Zealand prior to its becoming islands in the course of the Cretaceous. This would rule out all mammals. Placentalia in particular are known to have diversified later in geological time. Likewise, neither monotremes nor marsupials are considered to have reached Australia when New Zealand was still part of that landmass. The limited aquatic ability of mammals in general and monotremes and marsupials in particular should have prevented trans-oceanic dispersal. As Watson (1960) aptly summarized the <hi rend="i">communis opinio</hi>, “The extreme improbability of this has caused most New Zealand biologists to dismiss all the reports [on the waitoreki] as illusory’. However, recent findings have changed the premises of this assumption, and the intriguing possibility has arisen that a monotreme or marsupial might in fact have reached early pre-New Zealand. In order to decide the question whether the waitoreki might thus actually constitute a mammal unknown to science, it is a necessary prerequisite to disentangle the palaeobiogeography of marsupials and monotremes.</p>
          <p>Marsupials are usually considered as having originated in South America. Biogeographers at first favoured dispersal route, with the early marsupials travelling from the Americas across Asia to Australia. Recently the first fossil marsupial from Asia has been reported from central-Asiatic U.S.S.R. (Benton, 1985). A southern dispersal route, from South America to Australia via Antarctica, was preferred by others influence by Wegener's theory of continential drift. The immigration, however, presumably took place too late in geological time to involve New Zealand, which had already drifted apart from Australia. By the end of the Cretaceous period, about 70 million years ago, connections with large land masses beyond New Zealand ceased to exist. This is the “official” explanation one will
<pb xml:id="n65" n="63"/>
encounter when asking “Why are there no mammals (bats excepted) indigenous to New Zealand?’ There is the above mentioned prerequisite for this explanation: the assumption that neither marsupials nor monotremes were able to survive or to stay alfoat on a natural vegetable raft, to say nothing of actively swimming. However, there is one recent genus of Marsupialia with one species (in Cretaceous times there should have been others) that has adopted an aquatic way of life, namely the otter-like Water Opposum or Yapok <hi rend="i">(Chronectes minimus)</hi>. It ranges today from S. Mexico to Brazil and NE Argentina, and frequents fresh-water streams and lakes; in some areas it is found “at considerable altitudes’ (Walker, 1964). Head-+-body length is <hi rend="i">c</hi>. 30cm, with an additional length of tail of <hi rend="i">c</hi>. 37.5cm. The dense pelage is pearl-grey with a pattern of blackish bands on the back; chin, chest and belly are creamy white. The tail is rat-like, furred only at the base. The hind feet are webbed. Yapoks are the only aquatic marsupials and are excellent swimmers and divers. They prey on crayfish, fresh-water shrimp and fish, with probably some additional plant material (Walker, 1964). Yapoks are nocturnal, they spend the daytime in subterranean dens tunnelled into river banks, with an exit just above the water-line and a tunnel diameter of <hi rend="i">c</hi>. 15cm. These animals will certainly not hesitate to enter any kind of vegetable “raft” afloat in a jungle bayou, and become involuntarily seaborne (by this method yapoks might have reached the island of Trinidad where they are said to occur. <hi rend="i">Cf</hi>. Walker, 1964). An early precursor of <hi rend="i">Chironectes</hi> might have crossed the gap between Australia-Antarctica and pre-New Zealand by means of a natural “raft”, thus braving a shallow sea of scattered islands and tidal reefs with the help of palaeo-winds and palaeo-currents during a few days' voyage. Six years ago. a South American marsupial (a polydolopid) was found in Eocene deposits (about 40 Myr ago) of Antarctica (Woodburne &amp; Zinsmeister, 1982), a find that suggests a similar “braving of open sea” between the southermost tip of South America and an ice-free Antarctica (situated in more northerly latitudes than today).</p>
          <p>Should the southern dispersal route to New Zealand prove valid (at least for animals with aquatic adaptations), the waitoreki might turn out to be akin to the yapok, and it should be worthwhile to have a closer look at the yapok's natural history and ecology in order to determine those of the waitoreki.</p>
          <p>On the other hand, new evidence suggests that the waitoreki may rather be a monotreme. Recently (1985), Australia's first fossil Mesozoic mammal, a platypus-like monotreme, was described (Archer <hi rend="i">et al</hi>., 1985). It was discovereed in early Cretaceous sediments in New South Wales and was named <hi rend="i">Steropodon galmani (n.gen</hi>. and <hi rend="i">sp.)</hi>. The fossil find represents an early ornithorhynchid-like (platypus-like) monotreme of rather large size. The fact that distinctive badger-sized monotremes were present in Australia in the early Cretaceous (when New Zealand was presumably still part of that landmass) indicates not only an antiquity of this group hitherto unheard of and certainly great enough to have settled New Zealand <hi rend="i">without</hi> having to brave an open sea, but also testifies to an evolutionary trend which obviously favoured this group of Monotremata. For contemporaneous dinosaurs of the same local fauna include very small forms (hysilophodontid dinosaurs) which were probably not at all larger than the sympatric monotremes.</p>
          <p>Should this theory hold true, the waitoreki might eventually prove to be a New Zealand analogue of the Australian platypus. Its natural history and ecology will perhaps be found to be similar to those of the Duck-billed Platypus <hi rend="i">(Ornithorhynchus anatinus)</hi>. The modern platypus has a head-body length of 30-45cm, with an additional tail length of 10-15cm. The flat tail is shaped like a beaver's although completely furred. The colour of the fur is deep amber or dark brown on the back, the belly is white to yellowish chestnut. They feed on crayfish, shrimp, snails, worms, tadpoles, insect larvae and small fish, which they gather from the bottom of
<pb xml:id="n66" n="64"/>
streams and ponds. As has been reported of the waitoreki, adult platypus males have “a musky, “almost fox-like” odor which is emitted from scent glands on the undersurface of the base of the neck' (Walker, 1964). As the modern platypus is known to hibernate for periods of a few days during the winter, a platypus-like animal might be predisposed to withstand cold. The waitoreki probably developed an even greater cold resistance as it must necessarily have survived the climatic deterioration of New Zealand associated with the latest phase of extended glaciation in South Island, which correlates with the last period of major extension of Northern Hemisphere ice sheets (Nelson <hi rend="i">et al</hi>., 1985). Of course, the waitoreki does not build dams, nor does it construct “houses like bee-hives’ (Taylor, 1855). This statement should be considered a wilful mystification on the part of a witness who admittedly had never seen a waitoreki and might therefore have tried to improve on his “meagre” knowledge. Rather, the waitoreki might live in burrows like those which the platypus is known to construct in banks along streams and ponds and which, contrary to those of the yapok, open below water level. Platypus burrows with holes opening below water-level are found in the Australian Alps, whereas on the plains, burrows are said to open mostly above water-level. Similarly, a hole below water-level was reported for the waitoreki. In <hi rend="i">c</hi>. 1918 an eye-witness saw an animal swimming in Waikiwi Creek, Grassmere (not far from Invercargill) “and later saw a hole like a rabbit-hole below the water-level not far away’ (Wall, 1926). Further, the waitoreki will possibly be found to have four webbed feet as the platypus has. Correspondingly, the waitoreki might possess a small bill (similar to that of the platypus) hidden in the fur and thus hardly discernible from some distance. An animal evolutionarily perhaps even more “old-fashioned” than the platypus, the waitoreki might feature well-developed teeth, the dental formula including three molars, the number evidently present in young <hi rend="i">Ornithorhynchus anatinus</hi> (which is the only known monotreme to retain even vestigial teeth). Lastly, the waitoreki might be found to lay eggs as the playtpus does, and nourish its young in the same way. In 1848, when <name type="person" key="name-208663">Walter Mantell</name> was travelling through coastal Canterbury and Otago on South Island, he passed on the following report: “Maopo, headman at Te Taumutu, states that the Kaurehe lays eggs as large as those of a duck!!’ (Mantell, 1851).</p>
          <p>As there is now fossil evidence for a flourishing platypus-like group in Australia which pre-dates the separation of New Zealand, the second alternative, <hi rend="i">i.e</hi>. the waitoreki a platypus-like monotreme, seems at present to have the highest degree of probability, should the waitoreki actually constitute a mammal unknown to science. Therefore the mysterious animal might, as <name type="person" key="name-121361">Charles Darwin</name> (1888) put it, “turn out something like the solenhofen bird’, <hi rend="i">i.e</hi>. the <hi rend="i">Archaeopteryx</hi> from Jurassic limestone quarries near Solenhofen, Bavaria, Germany. As Alfred Wallace wrote on the waitoreki, “it is to be hoped that this creature will not be allowed to become extinct without a determined effort being made to secure specimens in order to study its structure and its relationship to other animals’ Wallace, 1888). Due to the indifference of most New Zealand scientists, past and present, it could well be too late now.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d8-d4" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgements</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The author thanks Mrs Josie Laing, Canterbury Museum, Christchurch, New Zealand, and Ms. Christine Tuitubou, National Library of New Zealand, Wellington, for their kind help in providing reference material.</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n67" n="65"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d8-d5" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Archer, M., Flannery, T.F., Ritchie, A., and Molnar, R.E. 1985. First Mesozoic mammal from Australia - an early Cretaceous monotreme. <hi rend="i">Nature</hi> 318: 363-366 (+ cover).</bibl>
            <bibl>Benton, M.J. 1985. First marsupial from Asia. <hi rend="i">Nature</hi> 318: 313 (quoting the original Russian description: Gabunia, L.K. &amp; Shevyreva, N.S., <hi rend="i">Doklady Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R</hi>. 281 (1985): 684).</bibl>
            <bibl>Darwin, F. 1888. <hi rend="i">The Life and Letters of <name type="person" key="name-121361">Charles Darwin</name></hi>. London, 3 vols.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-208616">McLintock, A.H.</name> (Ed.) 1966. <hi rend="i">An Encyclopaedia of New Zealand</hi>. Wellington: NZ Government Printer, 3 vols.</bibl>
            <bibl>Mantell, G.A. 1851. <hi rend="i">Petrifactions and their Teachings; or a Handbook to the Gallery of Organic Remains of the British Museum</hi> (spine-title <hi rend="i">Mantell's Fossils of the British Museum</hi>). London: British Museum (National History).</bibl>
            <bibl>Nelson, C.S., Hendy, C.H., Jarrett, G.R., and Cuthberton, A.M. 1985. Near-sychroneity of New Zealand alpine glaciations and Northern Hemnisphere continental glaciations during the past 750 kyr. <hi rend="i">Nature</hi> 318: 361-363.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-209410">Taylor, R.</name> 1855. <title><name key="name-123773" type="work"><hi rend="i">TE IKA A MAUI, or, New Zealand and its inhabitants, illustrating the origin, manners, customs, mythology, religion, rites, songs, proverbs, fables, and language of the natives. Together with the geology, natural history, productions, and climate of the country; its state as regards Christianity; sketches of the Principal Chiefs, and their present position; with a map, and numerous illustrations</hi></name></title>. London: Wertheim &amp; MacIntosh.</bibl>
            <bibl>Walker, E.P. (Ed.) 1964. <hi rend="i">Mammals of the World</hi>. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 3 vols.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-209547">Wall, A.</name> 1926. The Mythic Otter of New Zealand. <hi rend="i">The Press</hi> (Christchurch, N.Z. 8th Sept., 1926).</bibl>
            <bibl>Wallace, A.R. (Ed.) 1888. <hi rend="i">Australasia</hi>. 5th ed. London: Stanford.</bibl>
            <bibl>Watson. J.S. 1960. The New Zealand “Otter’. <hi rend="i">Records of the Canterbury Museum 7</hi>: 175-183.</bibl>
            <bibl>Woodburne. M.O., and Zinsmeister, W.J. 1982. Fossil land mammal from Antarctic. <hi rend="i">Science</hi> 218: 284-287.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
          <p><hi rend="b">Additional references from the publications of ISC Honorary Member Dr. phil. habil, Dr. med. Ingo Krumbiegel, to whom this article is dedicated</hi>.</p>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Krumbiegel on the yapok: 1940. Die Saugetiere der Sudamerika-Expedition Prof. Dr. Kriegs, 5. Schwimmbeutler. <hi rend="i">Zoologischer Anzeiger</hi>, 132, 3/4: 63-72.</bibl>
            <bibl>1949. Unerfullte Wunsche aller Zoobesucher. <hi rend="i">Arche Noah</hi>, 1, 3: 44-45.</bibl>
            <bibl>1949 Anon. Auch Brehm hatte keine Ahnung. Wir wissen nicht viel vom seltenen Wasseroppossum. Jetzt wieder im Zoologischen Garten in New York. <hi rend="i">Arche Noah</hi>, 1, 5: 102.</bibl>
            <bibl>Krumbiegel on the waitoreki: 1949. Wunderinsel Neuseeland. <hi rend="i">Arche Noah</hi>, 1, 8: 170.</bibl>
            <bibl>1950. <hi rend="i">Von neuen and unentdeckten Tierarten</hi>. Kosmos. Stuttgart (pp. 70-75).</bibl>
            <bibl>1952. Das “Waitoreki”, ein angeblich neues Saugetier von Neuseeland. <hi rend="i">Zeitschrift fur Saugetierkunde</hi> (Berlin). 18: 110-115.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n68" n="66"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d9" type="article" decls="#text-9-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Cone and Seed Phenology in Several New Zealand Conifer Tree Species</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name key="name-102480" type="person">W. Mary McEwen</name><lb/>
Science and Research Directorate, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10 420, Wellington.</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The stages of development of male cones, ovules and seeds in six New Zealand coniferous trees are described and illustrated. In kahikatea (<hi rend="i">Dacrycarpus dacrydioides</hi>), totara <hi rend="i">(Podocarpus totara)</hi>, Hall's totara (<hi rend="i">P. hallii</hi>) and tanekaha (<hi rend="i">Phyllocladus trichomanoides</hi>) the visible stages are completed in one growing season, fertilisation occurring about 6 or 8 weeks after pollination. In miro (<hi rend="i">Prumnopitys ferruginea</hi>) and matai (<hi rend="i">P. taxifolia</hi>) the visible stages of ovule and seed development occupy two growing seasons and fertilisation occurs 12 months or more after pollination.</p>
          <p><hi rend="b">Key words:</hi> Podocarpaceae, <hi rend="i">Podocarpus, Dacrycarpus, Prumnopitys, Dacrydium, Phyllocladus</hi>, conifer. seed, ovule, male cone, phenology.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction</hi>
          </head>
          <p>There are distinct differences in the reproductive structures and in the timing of the sequence of events which leads to the production of ripe seed in six of New Zealand's tall forest coniferous trees. In this article the development of male cones and female ovules in kahikatea (<hi rend="i">Dacrycarpus dacrydioides</hi>), true totara (<hi rend="i">Podocarpus totara</hi>), Hall's totara (<hi rend="i">P. hallii</hi>), miro (<hi rend="i">Prumnopitys ferruginea</hi>), matai (<hi rend="i">P. taxifolia</hi>) and tanekaha (<hi rend="i">Phyllocladus trichomanoides</hi>) will be described. The development of these structures in rimu (<hi rend="i">Dacrydium cupressinum</hi>) has already been described (McEwen, 1983).</p>
          <p>The ovule-bearing structures of podocarp trees are modified, reduced female cones. In matai, in particular, the structure resembles a minute enlongated cone with several ovules borne spirally on a cone stalk, each in the axil of a bract scale or carpidium.</p>
          <p>In the Coniferales there are two types of reproductive cycles, a short and a long type, and both are represented among these New Zealand tree species. In the short type the whole reproductive cycle occupies approximately one year and the time between pollination and fertilisation is only 6 or 8 weeks; whereas in the long type the cycle occupies two years and the time between pollination and fertilisation is 12 months or more. The long reproductive cycle also occurs in rimu (<hi rend="i">Dacrydium cupressinum</hi>) (McEwen, 1983).</p>
          <p>The dates given in this article refer to the Rotorua district in 1977 and 1978 and the timing of events in other parts of the country are likely to vary somewhat, being earlier in the north and later in the south or at higher altitudes.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Materials and Methods</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Male and female sample trees of kahikatea, totara, Hall's totara, miro, matai and tanekaha were chosen with cone-bearing branches within reach from ground level or from a pruning ladder. All trees were within 30 km of Rotorua: miro trees were located in Dansey's Road, Hall's totara and matai on Fletcher's Road, tanekaha on Clinkard Road (all these being in the Mamaku area to the north-west of Rotorua); totara in the Forest Research Institute grounds, Whakarewarewa, Rotorua; and kahikatea at Te Ngae on the east of L. Rotorua.</p>
          <p>Certain branches on the sample trees were tagged so that the ovules and cones they carried could be examined during each visit. Similar ovules and cones were collected from nearby branches for study.</p>
          <p>Collecting visits were made on 18.11.77, 12.12.77, 21.3.78 and 14.8.78.</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n69" n="67"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d4" type="section">
          <head><hi rend="c">Results and Discussion</hi><lb/>
(Results are summarised in Table 1)</head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d4-d1" type="section">
            <p>
              <table rows="7" cols="10">
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="b">Species</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>Reproductive cytcle</cell>
                  <cell>Dioecious or Monoecious</cell>
                  <cell>Dates ovules appear</cell>
                  <cell>Position of ovules</cell>
                  <cell>Date male cones appear</cell>
                  <cell>Position of male cones</cell>
                  <cell>Date of Pollination</cell>
                  <cell>Time until fertilisation</cell>
                  <cell>Fruit are ripe</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Rimu</cell>
                  <cell>Long</cell>
                  <cell>D</cell>
                  <cell>Late spring (early Dec.)</cell>
                  <cell>Tips of existing shoots</cell>
                  <cell>Late spring (early Dec.)</cell>
                  <cell>Tips of existing shoots</cell>
                  <cell>January</cell>
                  <cell>± 12 months</cell>
                  <cell>March-May</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Kahikatea</cell>
                  <cell>Short</cell>
                  <cell>D</cell>
                  <cell>October</cell>
                  <cell>Tips of existing shoots</cell>
                  <cell>October</cell>
                  <cell>Tips of existing shoots</cell>
                  <cell>mid October to November</cell>
                  <cell>2-3 months</cell>
                  <cell>March-May</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Totara and Hall's totara</cell>
                  <cell>Short</cell>
                  <cell>D</cell>
                  <cell>October to November</cell>
                  <cell>Base of newly flushed shoot</cell>
                  <cell>End of previous season's growth (Break bud Oct-Nov)</cell>
                  <cell>On short lateral club-shaped shoot</cell>
                  <cell>November</cell>
                  <cell>2-3 months</cell>
                  <cell>March-May sometimes 2nd crop in spring</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Miro</cell>
                  <cell>Long</cell>
                  <cell>Usually D</cell>
                  <cell>November</cell>
                  <cell>On short lateral shoots (usually single)</cell>
                  <cell>Late summer (visible all winter)</cell>
                  <cell>As lateral shoots (single)</cell>
                  <cell>November</cell>
                  <cell>± 12 months</cell>
                  <cell>March-May or later</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Matai</cell>
                  <cell>Long</cell>
                  <cell>Usually D</cell>
                  <cell>November</cell>
                  <cell>In loose spikes with new spring</cell>
                  <cell>Late summer (visible all</cell>
                  <cell>In spikes</cell>
                  <cell>November to December</cell>
                  <cell>± 12 months</cell>
                  <cell>March-May</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell>Tanekaha</cell>
                  <cell>Short</cell>
                  <cell>Usually M</cell>
                  <cell>October to November</cell>
                  <cell>On modified phylloclades</cell>
                  <cell>October to November</cell>
                  <cell>In whorls in place of phylloclades</cell>
                  <cell>November</cell>
                  <cell>2-3 months</cell>
                  <cell>March-May</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <p>Table 1. Summary table of reproductive cycle of New Zealand tree podocarps. Rimu has been included in the table for completeness.</p>
          </div>
          <pb xml:id="n70" n="68"/>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d4-d2" type="section">
            <head>Kahikatea, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides</head>
            <p>Kahikatea has a short reproductive cycle with the visible stages of cone and ovule development being completed in one growing season. The species is dioecious, the trees being either male or female, and in certain seasons, in spring time, October and November, the difference between the sexes may be seen from a distance. Male trees bear brown cones in such abundance that the whole tree may appear brownish, whereas female trees carry numerous glaucous ovules which give the tree a bluish tint. Sterile trees and branches appear bright green in spring when the new shoots are flushing.</p>
            <p>Both male cones and ovules are produced terminally on the shoots. They develop rapidly in the spring and pollen is shed from mid October to November (Fig. 1).</p>
            <p>The ovules are borne either singly or in pairs or occasionally threes in a specialised receptacle formed from the upper 2 or 3 leaves only (Figs. 2 and 3). The micropyle in kahikatea is directed towards the base of the ovule as in the young rimu ovule (McEwan. 1983), but in kahikatea the ovule-bearing shoot-tip is not upturned so the pollen falls from above almost directly towards the micropyle. The micropyle remains at the base of the mature seed, unlike rimu in which the micropyle is near the top of the mature seed.</p>
            <p>During summer the ovule grows, fertilisation takes place (probably in January) and the seed expands and the surrounding epimatium (a modified ovuliferous scale) and carpidium (or bract-scale) ripen from March to May from a glaucous green to a dark purplish black, almost round seed, borne on a rounded red receptacle (Fig. 3 and 4).</p>
            <p>In kahikatea neither the receptacle nor the male cone are stalked. Where a single seed is borne on each receptacle, one or two undeveloped ovules also occur, appearing as small glaucous protuberances (Fig. 4).</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d4-d3" type="section">
            <head>
              <hi rend="b">Totara, <hi rend="i">Podocarpus totara and Hall's Totara, Podocarpus hallii</hi></hi>
            </head>
            <p>These two species are closely related and have similar short reproductive cycles. Both are dioecious with separate male and female trees. Whereas in rimu and kahikatea there is no visible sign in winter of where male cones will appear the following spring, in the totaras distinctive small club-shaped shoots can be found on male trees on the previous season's growth. These consist of a minute male cone enclosed in several bud-scales and terminating a short stalk. The stalks of Hall's totara male cones are longer than those in true totara.</p>
            <p>In spring the male cones break bud, expand rapidly and shed their pollen. In totara bud break occurs in late October and the male cone is somewhat elongated in shape. Pollen is shed in early November (Fig. 5).</p>
            <p>In Hall's totara, which usually grows at higher altitudes than totara, bud break is in early December and pollination a few weeks later. The young male cone in Hall's totara is rounded in shape (Fig. 6).</p>
            <p>Whereas the male cones develop as short specialised shoots at the end of summer and are visible in their buds throughout winter, the ovules in these species appear in the spring. They are situated towards the base of the new season's growth as it expands from the overwintering bud (Fig. 7). In both species the ovules are borne singly or in pairs on a specialised receptacle set on a short stalk. At the time of pollination the ovule plus receptacle and stalk is only about 3mm long in true totara (Fig. 8) and a little longer in <hi rend="i">P. hallii</hi>. The ovules are fully exposed and their micropyles are directed downwards towards the receptacle, as in kahikatea.</p>
            <p>Development in both totara species is rapid, fertilisation occurring within several months of pollination and the fruit ripening between about March and May. The</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n71" n="69"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d5" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Kahikatea</hi>
          </head>
          <p><figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_069a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_069a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_069a-g"/><head><hi rend="b">Fig. 1</hi> Male cones in kahikatea (mid October), shortly before pollination. Cones 5-8mm long. a. male cones.<lb/>
<hi rend="b">Fig. 2</hi>. Ovules in kahikatea shortly before pollination (mid October). Ovules 1-2mm long. a. small glaucous ovules.<lb/>
<hi rend="b">Fig. 3</hi>. Kahikatea ovule in mid October shortly before pollination. About 10 scale leaves surrounding the ovule have been removed. Whole structure 2mm long. The ovule is surrounded by the glaucous epimatium and half-covered by the carpidum which remains fused to it while the whole structure develops. a. bract, b. carpidium (green, slightly glaucous), c. epimatium surrounding ovule (glaucous), d. micropyle mouth (extension of integument).<lb/>
<hi rend="b">Fig. 4</hi>. Ripe kahikatea fruit in late March, a. carpidum, b. dark purplish epimatium surrounding seed, c. red fleshy receptacle like a small raspberry. Receptacle and seed approx. 8mm.</head></figure>
epimatium surrounding the ripe seed is green, while the rounded receptacle ripens through yellow, to orange or, more often, red. In totara the seed is rounded or oval (Fig. 9) whereas in Hall's totara the seed is distinctly enlongated and pointed (Fig. 10).</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n72" n="70"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d6" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Totara and Hall's Totara</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d6-d1" type="section">
            <p>
              <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_070a">
                <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_070a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_070a-g"/>
                <head><hi rend="b">Fig. 5</hi>. Male cones of true totara, two shedding pollen in early November. Note position of cones (indicated by arrow) in relation to the glaucous new spring growth.<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 6</hi>. Male cones of Hall's totara breaking bud in December. On the right specimen a club-shaped shoot can be seen below the right hand cone. Male cones look like this during the preceding winter. Note the longer cone stalks and rounder shaped cones than in the true totara and the position of the cones in relation to the new spring growth.<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 7</hi>. New ovules of true totara in mid October. Ovules occur on a receptacle set on a short stalk; they are found towards the base of the newly expanded new growth.<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 8</hi>. New ovule (in mid October), set on a receptacle on a cone stalk and partially surrounded by a free, soft, scale-like carpidium. a. carpidium, b. micropyle just visible, c. ovule, d. receptacle, e. cone stak. Whole 5mm long.</head>
              </figure>
              <pb xml:id="n73" n="71"/>
              <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_071a">
                <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_071a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_071a-g"/>
                <head><hi rend="b">Fig. 9</hi>. Ripe fruit of true totara (March). Note the rounded (green) seed and stalked receptacles, a. carpidium, b. green seed (4mm), c. red smooth succulent receptacle.<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 10</hi>. Ripe fruit of Hall's totara (March). Note the elongated (green) seed. a. carpidium, b. green seed (5-6mm), c. orange-red smooth succulent receptacle.</head>
              </figure>
            </p>
            <p>In both species there may be a second flushing of shoots in late summer or autumn and a second crop of new ovules may be produced by female trees.</p>
            <p>Club-shaped shoots may occasionally also burst into a second crop of male cones which pollinate the ovules. Such autumn pollinated ovules sometimes ripen in spring to produce seed with fleshy red receptacles (September-November).</p>
            <p>It is also possible for unpollinated (and therefore unfertilised) ovules to develop ripe red receptacles either in autumn from a normal spring flushing, or in spring from an autumn flushing.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d6-d2" type="section">
            <head>
              <hi rend="b">Miro, <hi rend="i">rumnopitys ferruginea (Podocarpus ferrugineus)</hi></hi>
            </head>
            <p>Miro, like rimu, has a long reproductive cycle (McEwen, 1983). The trees are usually dioecious but occasional trees are found which bear mostly ovules but have a few branches bearing male cones, and vice versa.</p>
            <p>The ovule in miro develops on the previous season's growth on a special short shoot which appears like a tiny pinkish flower in November. The stalk has minute spiralled scales while the ovule itself is entirely surrounded by a glaucous epimatium and has several larger petal-like scales at its base. The whole structure is about 12mm long when pollinated in November (Fig. 11).</p>
            <p>As in the totaras the male cones of miro are visible throughout winter (about 5mm long) (Fig. 12). They are carried on short stalks on the previous season's growth and appear like short waxy candles. These grow to about 15mm in the spring, before shedding pollen in November.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n74" n="72"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d7" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Miro</hi>
          </head>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_072a">
              <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_072a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_072a-g"/>
              <head>Fig. 11. Recently pollinated ovule of miro (December). Note the spiralled scales on the ovule stalk and the pinkish glaucous, petal-like scales (sterile carpidia) at the ovule base. a. ovule, b. scaled stalk (5mm).<lb/>
<hi rend="b">Fig. 12</hi>. Immature male cones of miro (September). The cones are visible throughout winter and shed pollen in about November.<lb/>
<hi rend="b">Fig. 13</hi>. Two stages of seed development in miro (March). The samll glaucous (green) ovule on the right is in its first season's growth, having been pollinated the previous November. The ripe (red) fruit on the left is a year older and fully developed.</head>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>After pollination the ovule begins to expand and its surrounding epimatium becomes a glaucous green. Most of the petal-like scales fall, leaving only one or two at the base of each ovule (Fig. 13). When it is about 5mm long the ovule ceases growth for a few months during winter, from about June to September. Fertilisation is thought to occur in December to January, more than 12 months after pollination.</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n75" n="73"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d8" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Matai</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d8-d1" type="section">
            <p><figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_073a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_073a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_073a-g"/><head><hi rend="b">Fig. 14</hi>. Two soft spikes of matai ovules, appearing like elongated cones (mid December).<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig 15</hi>. Male matai cones close to pollen shed in late November.<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 16</hi>. A spike of male cones of matai (April). These cones (1.5-2.5mm long) are visible throughout winter, a. cones (approx. 2mm long), b. subtending bract, c. leaf subtending male spike.<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 17</hi>. Spike of matai ovules in their first year of development (April, following pollination in November). Several of the original ovules have aborted since the spike first appeared in November, a. carpidium, b. ovule (3mm), c. bract of aborted ovule.<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 18</hi>. Two stages in seed development in matai (December). The two small ovules on the right were recently pollinated; the large (green) one on the left is in its second summer, pollinated over 12 months earlier and close to fertilisation. It will ripen to a dark purplish black seed in autumn. Note that most of the original 8 or so ouvles have aborted.</head></figure><pb xml:id="n76" n="74"/>
From about the end of February the fruit ripens from glaucous green through yellow or pink to red. The pigmented outer layer of the miro fruit is the epimatium which completely encloses the ovule in its hard seed coat. The ripe fruit is like a large drupe, approximately 15-20 × 5-7.5mm (Fig. 13). Fruit may remain on the tree throughout winter although miro fruit are a very popular food of the New Zealand pigeon <hi rend="i">(Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae</hi>.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d8-d2" type="section">
            <head>
              <hi rend="b">Matai, <hi rend="i">Prumnopitys taxifolia (Podocarpus spicatus)</hi></hi>
            </head>
            <p>Matai is closely related to miro and is similar in having a long reproductive cycle. Trees are usually either male or female but, as in miro, a few trees bear some reproductive organs of both sexes.</p>
            <p>The male cones of matai are very conspicuous. Towards the end of summer small spikes develop, consisting of up to 18 cones arranged spirally on a lateral shoot. Each cone has a small bract-like leaf at its base and the whole spike is terminated by a cone. During winter the cones are between 1 and 2mm long (Fig 14).</p>
            <p>The female structure is also spike-like and has up to 8 ovules, each borne in the axil of a small bract, arranged spirally on the axis. A pale green epimatium completely surrounds each ovule and the micropyle is directed downwards. These female structures, like elongated cones, appear in November as fragile new shoots (Fig. 15). Pollen is shed from the enlarged male cones in late November or early December (Fig. 16).</p>
            <p>During summer some of the ovules grow but many of them abort or cease development during their first year (Fig. 17). They are about 3-5mm long when growth stops in June for several winter months. During the second summer ovules continue to expand and round out; fertilisation occurs probably in December or January (Fig. 18). In Fig. 18, taken in mid December, the two small ovules on the right are in their first season of growth and have recently been pollinated whereas the larger single ovule on the left is in its second growing season at approximately the time of fertilisation and should ripen by the following March.</p>
            <p>Ripe matai fruits are about 8-10mm in diameter, rounded and dark purple or black. They are difficult to find, possibly because they are readily eaten by fruit eating birds such as New Zealand pigeons and tuis as soon as they are ripe.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d8-d3" type="section">
            <head><hi rend="b">Tanekaha</hi>, <hi rend="i">Phyllocladus trichomanoides</hi></head>
            <p>The reproductive cycle in tanekaha occupies only one year, as in kahikatea and the totaras. Tanekaha trees are usually monoecious, both male and female reproductive organs being borne on a single tree. However individual trees are often predominantly either male or female while also bearing a few cones of the opposite sex.</p>
            <p>New phylloclades expand from the overwintering buds in spring (October or November) and some bear six or eight glaucous ovules with micropyles directed upwards (Fig. 19).</p>
            <p>Groups of small purple male cones are produced at the same time in the place of groups of phylloclades (Fig. 20). Several weeks later pollen is shed from the expanded male cones and the ovules are pollinated by way of a pollination droplet (as is the case in the other podocarps). These droplets can be observed shining in the micropyles at the time of pollination. Fertilisation probably occurs in January and during the summer the ovule grows and develops into a shiny black seed. It is surrounded at the base by a cup-like structure, the aril (Fig. 21). When the seed ripens the aril becomes slightly swollen and white with a green frilly edge (Fig. 22).</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n77" n="75"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d9" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Tanekaha</hi>
          </head>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_075a">
              <graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_075a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_075a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="b">Fig. 19</hi>. Specialised ovule-bearing phylloclades of tanekaha breaking bud in spring (October).<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 20</hi>. Immature male cones of tanekaha having recently broken bud (October).<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 21</hi>. Developing tanekaha seed (March).<lb/><hi rend="b">Fig. 22</hi>. Close-up of two tanekaha fruits (March). The lower fruit is not quite mature and the white aril and dark seed has not fully emerged from the green receptacle whereas the upper fruit is fully ripe.</head>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>This attracts birds to eat and disperse the seed. A common feature of tanekaha however, is the large number of undeveloped or empty seeds and insect damage is common.</p>
        </div>
        <pb xml:id="n78" n="76"/>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d10" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgements</hi>
          </head>
          <p>I thank members of staff of the Forest Research Institute, Rotorua: Messrs A.E. Beveridge and M.C. Smale for assistance and advice, H. Hemming and J. Barran for the photography and J. Leathwick for commenting on the text. I am grateful to Dr R. Sadlier, Director, Science and Research Directorate, Department of Conservation, for allowing me time to complete this work and to Dr B.V. Sneddon. Victoria University, for his constructive comments.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d9-d11" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Reference</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>McEwen. W.M. 1983. Seed Production in Podocarp Trees. <hi rend="i">Forest and Bird 14:</hi> 23-24.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n79" n="77"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d10" type="article" decls="#text-10-bibl">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Geology and Revegetation of An 1855 Landslide, Ruamahanga River, Kopuaranga, Wairarapa</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-170551">Rodney H. Grapes</name><lb/>
Research School of Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington</byline>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d10-d1" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Abstract</hi>
          </head>
          <p>A combination of river undercutting and shaking during the 1855 earthquake caused a landslide of Pliocene mudstone and old river gravel/loess cover along the Ruamahanga River, Kopuaranga, northern Wairarapa. The landslide is roughly circular in plan and covers an area of about half a square kilometre. It consists of rotated blocks, swampy areas, hummocky topography and two lakes below a curved crown scarp situated some 100m above the Ruamahanga River. Except for one totara and some dead logs the original native forest was destroyed during the landslide. Growth ring ages indicate a minimum lag time of 30 years for the native forest trees that now colonise about one third of the landside. Breast-height circumferences of 132 trees range from 252cm to 40cm and indicate differences in the growth rate and colonisation history of the various species.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d10-d2" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Introduction And Historic Aspects</hi>
          </head>
          <p>The 1855 earthquake of January 23rd was the largest earthquake in New Zealand's written history with an isoseismal-estimated magnitude of about M8 (Eiby. 1965). The shock was felt over an area of some 579,000 square kilometres and permanent vertical movement raised about 7,400 square kilometres of the southern part of the North Island. The most visible and violent effects were in and around the Rimutaka Range (Fig. 1A), where about one third of the range was denuded by landslides and a maximum of 2.7m uplift took place at the coast (Lyell, 1868). Horizontal (around 12m dextral) and vertical (from 2 to 0.3m) displacement occurred along the Wairarapa Fault over a length of about 100km (Grapes and Wellman. unpublished data).</p>
          <p>An account of the 1855 earthquake faulting along the Wairarapa Fault by Ongley (1943) described landslides, subsidence features, and rents in hilly topography near Palliser Bay, southern Wairarapa, and 79km north of Palliser Bay, a large landslide along the Ruamahanga River less than 1km west of the Wairarapa Fault (Figs. 1A: 2). The landslide was first described by Vennell (1891) who was in the Wairarapa during the earthquake, and relates that a “mountain near Masterton was literally rent in twain, and remains to be seen this day,” An account of the Wairarapa Fault by Iorns (1932) refers to the fact that the landslide blocked the Ruamahanga River and that when the river broke through again “Maoris living in pas lower down (the river) had to climb into trees to save their lives.”</p>
          <p>A journey to the upper part of the Wairarapa Valley in November 1953 by <name type="person" key="name-209283">William Mein Smith</name>, chief surveyor of the Wellington Provincial Government, records the site of the landslide as a hill called Rerenga that “rises abruptly from the (Ruamahanga) river made of light blue clay”. The first recorded observation of the landslide was mae by J. Crawford, Provincial Government geologist, in early 1863 (Crawford, 1870) who attributed it to the 1855 event and described the landslide as “… a Tertiary hill having been split in two, and the western part having slipped down towards the river bed.” Crawford also mentions that “… on the Opaki Plain, and the adjoining hills, are very palpable marks of the earthquake of 1855 and perhaps of other shocks”.</p>
          <p>In 1866 the area of the landslide was purchased by Alexander Bruce and this transaction is shown on the Survey Office Plan (1866, s.o. 10799) where a high, steep scarp with a small hill in front of it are described as an “earthquake rent”. The
<pb xml:id="n80" n="78"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_078a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_078a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_078a-g"/><head><hi rend="b">Figs. 1A, B, C and D</hi>.<lb/>
(A) Map showing the location of the 1855 landslide, Ruamahanga River, Kopuaranga, northern Wairarapa, and the trace of the 1855 earthquake rupture along the Wairarapa Fault. Shaded area of southern part of the Rimutaka Range represents the area of extensive landslide caused by the 1855 earthquake. Dotted area represents Pliocene sediments.<lb/>
(B) Topgraphic and geomorphic map of the 1855 landslide area, 20 m contour interval, u = upthrown; d = downthrown side of the fault. Arrowed lines along fault indicate direction of horizontal movement. Ground slope between the fault strands is indicated by short arrowed lines.<lb/>
(C) Geologic map of the 1855 landslide.<lb/>
(D) Cross section of the 1855 landslide along line A-B in (C).</head></figure>
<pb xml:id="n81" n="79"/>
plan also shows that the river was further to the east just north of the landslide than at any time since, and that the river swung further towards its true right bank just downstream from the landslide than it does since the first aerial photos were taken of the area in 1943. The position of the river in 1866 just downstream from the landslide lends support to a temporary damming of the river which eventually broke through the lowest part of the slip, i.e. on the true right side of its course. Today, the westward and upstream facing sides of the landslide are being cliffed by the river. Upstream from the landslide vegetated scoops and hummocky topography show that there has been earlier landslides along the left bank of the Ruamahanga River (e.g. Vella, 1963).</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d10-d3" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Topography and Geology</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d10-d3-d1" type="section">
            <p>Geomorphic and geologic maps and a cross section of the landslide are shown in Figs. 1B, C and D. The landslide is roughly circular with an area of approximately half a square kilometre. It consists of a number of rotated blocks, swampy depressions, arcuate scarps, hummocky ground (debris flows and mudflows), and two lakes to the west of a single primary failure plane that forms a curved crown scarp 100m above the present day flood plain of the Ruamahanaga River (Fig. 1B; Fig. 2). The primary failure plan is in blue-grey marine mudstone with thin sandstone layers of Late Miocene to early Pliocene age (Late Tongaporutuan-Opoitian) that are capped by 1-4m of river gravels of the Porewan aggradation surface (80-60 kyrs) overlain by about 0.8m of loess (Fig. 1C). The rotated slump blocks of mudstone all have a mean slope angle for their west-facing sides of about 30° and a little less for the east-facing slopes. Swampy areas and the two lakes have formed on the eastern side of the rotated blocks (Fig. 1B and C). The backward (east-facing) tilted slopes of the rotational blocks are covered by a mixture of gravels and loess that is partly weathered to a yellow-grey earth about 0.7m thick with weakly developed A (10 YR 6/4 dry) and B (10 YR 7/4 dry) horizons. The west-facing slopes are composed of a soil (about 0.3m thick), again with weakly developed A (2.4 Y 4.2 dry) and B (5 Y6/1 dry) horizons that overlies mudstone. The thicker soil developed on loess is the same as that exposed along the top of the crown scarp and contrasts with the shallow soil developed on mudstone in the 135 years since the landslide.</p>
          </div>
          <div xml:id="t1-body-d10-d3-d2" type="section">
            <head>
              <hi rend="c">Vegetation</hi>
            </head>
            <p>The landslide is situated on the western edge of a former forest known as Forty-Mile Bush, which extended north to the junction of the Tauwera and Ruamahanga Rivers. The forest was mainly of totara, karaka, fuchsia, titoki, broadleaf, mahoe, hinau and ribbon-wood while the flat terraces west of the Ruamahanga River were covered by grasses together with short tussock, bracken, manuka and swamp vegetation (Smith, 1853). Smith noted that the southern and eastern slopes of the hill called Rerenga, and the site of the landslide, were covered in “excellent timber”. Today about a third of the landslide is covered with native trees and the rest is in grass and grazed (Fig. 2). It is presumed that the original forest, which occupied
<pb xml:id="n82" n="80"/>
<figure xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_080a"><graphic url="Bio30Tuat01_080a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="Bio30Tuat01_080a-g"/><head><hi rend="b">Fig. 2</hi>. Aerial photo showing site of 1855 landslide, Ruamahanga River. The trace of the Wairarapa Fault is indicated by the white arrow. (Reproduced with the permission of the Surveyor General. Department of Survey and Land Information).</head></figure>
<pb xml:id="n83" n="81"/>
that part of the hill which slipped during the landslide, was destroyed. There is only one tree, a totara, of sufficient girth (400cm) and height (<hi rend="i">c</hi>., 30m, that could represent part of the pre-1855 forest (cf. Table 2). Except for some large, dead tree trunks on the lower part of the landslide, there is no sign of any other original trees and it is probable that they rotted or have been burnt after the slip occurred, i.e. sometime after 1866 when the area was purchased by Alexander Bruce.</p>
            <p>Cores taken from 5 living trees (rimu, totara, white pine, beech and rewarewa) give growth ring ages of between about 90 and 100 years (Table 1). These ages indicate a lag-time for the beginning of reforestation of the landslide of between 30 and 40 years. Presumably, the first plans to have colonised the landslide would be such species as <hi rend="i">Coriaria</hi> (tutu), <hi rend="i">Cassinia</hi> and kanuka (e.g. Druce, 1957; Wassilieff, 1986). Growth ring ages of two felled kanuka are 82 and 88+ years suggesting that they are post-burning, second generation specimens. The kanuka are growing on the area of loess and boulders and are mainly situated at the edge of the forest trees and/or in canopy gaps. The average time lag for <hi rend="i">Melicytus ramiflorus</hi> (mahoe) colonisation of avalanche boulder terraces developed on one of the 1855 landslides from the western slope of the Orongorongo Valley, Rimutaka Range, and where there has been no subsequent burning, was estimated at 20 years by Robbins (1958).</p>
            <p>Table 2 gives breast-height circumferences for 132 trees that now colonise the landslide and presumably began growing since 30 years after the event. The smaller trunk circumferences of typical understory species such as pigeonwood, red matipo, and lophomyrtus, imply that they began growing after the forest trees had become established. The smallest circumference (and presumably the youngest) kanukas are growing near the forest tree-open grass boundary.</p>
            <p>
              <table rows="8" cols="3">
                <head>
                  <hi rend="c">Table 1. Tree Ring Counts, 1855 Landslide, Ruamahanga River, Wairarapa</hi>
                </head>
                <row>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="b">Species</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>Circumference (cm)</cell>
                  <cell>Tree Ring Count (years)</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Dacrydiumcupressinum</hi> Lamb. (Rimu)</cell>
                  <cell>175</cell>
                  <cell>96±5</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Podocarpus totara</hi> G. Benn. ex D. Don (Totara)</cell>
                  <cell>167</cell>
                  <cell>98±8</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Dacrycarpus dacrydioides</hi> (A. Rich) Laubenf. (White Pine)</cell>
                  <cell>164</cell>
                  <cell>84+ (no centre)</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Nothofagus fusca</hi> (Hook.f.) Oerst. (Red Beech)</cell>
                  <cell>208</cell>
                  <cell>89±3</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Knightia excelsa</hi> R.Br. (Rewarewa)</cell>
                  <cell>186</cell>
                  <cell>99±2</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Kunzea (Leptospermum) ericoides</hi> (A. Rich) (J. Thompson (Kanuka)</cell>
                  <cell>65</cell>
                  <cell>82±2</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>54</cell>
                  <cell>85±5 (dead)</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
              <pb xml:id="n84" n="82"/>
              <table rows="20" cols="2">
                <head>
                  <hi rend="c">Table 2. Circumferences of Post-Landslide Trees, 1855 Landslide, Ruamahanga River, Kopuaranga, Wairarapa</hi>
                </head>
                <row>
                  <cell/>
                  <cell>
                    <hi rend="b">A</hi>
                  </cell>
                  <cell>B</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Nothofagus fusca</hi> (Hook.f) Oerst. (Red Beech) 293, 212, 208</cell>
                  <cell>N = 3</cell>
                  <cell>251±42</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Elaeocarpus dentatus</hi> J.R. et G. Forst (<hi rend="i">Hinau</hi>)</cell>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">N</hi> = 1</cell>
                  <cell>214</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Carpodetus serratus</hi> J.R. et G.Forst (Putapuaweta)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 1</cell>
                  <cell>214</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Dacrydium cupressinum</hi> Lamb (Rimu)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 1</cell>
                  <cell>175</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Myoporum laetum</hi> Forst. (Ngaio) 205, 187, 174, 158, 150, 136 (dead), 119, (258, 104)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 9</cell>
                  <cell>166±44</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Alectryon excelsus</hi> Gaertn. (Titoki) 243, 204, 166 (dead), 104, 83, 77, 66</cell>
                  <cell>N = 9</cell>
                  <cell>161±77</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Podocarpus totara</hi> G.Benn ex D.,Don (Totara) 329, 286, 270, 219, 203, 195, 191, 188, 182, 144, 140, 138, 111, 108, 99, 88, (88, 184), (107, 102), (78, 55)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 22</cell>
                  <cell>153±77</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Prumnopitys taxifolia</hi> (D.,Don) Laubenf. (Matai)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 1</cell>
                  <cell>150</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Melicytus ramiflorus</hi> J.R. and G.Forst. (Mahoe)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 1</cell>
                  <cell>146</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Nestegis cunninghamii</hi> (Hook. f) L. Johnson (Black Maire) 150, 116</cell>
                  <cell>N = 2</cell>
                  <cell>133±17</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Knightia excelsa</hi> R.Br. (Rewarewa) 150, 110</cell>
                  <cell>N = 2</cell>
                  <cell>130±10</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Sophora microphylla</hi> Ait. (Kowhai) 173, 150, 145, 122, 106, 92, 91, 80, 64, 63</cell>
                  <cell>N = 10</cell>
                  <cell>119±43</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Pseudopanax crassifolius</hi> C. Koch (Lancewood)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 1</cell>
                  <cell>99</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Hoheria sexstylosa</hi> Col. (Ribbonwood)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 1</cell>
                  <cell>98</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Dacrycarpus dacrydioides</hi> (A. Rich) Laubenf. (White Pine) 82, 74, 71</cell>
                  <cell>N = 3</cell>
                  <cell>76±5</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Kunzea (Leptospermum) ericoides</hi> (A. Rich) J. Thompson (Kanuka) 108, 108, 97, 90, 88, 86, 85, 84, 83, 80, 79, 78, 73, 73, 73, 72, 71, 71, 68, 64, 62, 60, 54, 54, 52, 51, 51, 50, 49, 49, 48, 48, 45, 45, 29, 29, (88, 58), (83, 68), (66, 37, 47), (49, 39), (52, 42, 38, 28, 27), (96, 64)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 51</cell>
                  <cell>61±21</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Hedycarya arborea</hi> J.R. and G. Forst. (Pigeonwood) 62, 44, (100, 100), (44, 43, 35)</cell>
                  <cell>N = 7</cell>
                  <cell>61±26</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Myrsine australis</hi> A. Rich (Red Matipo) 73, 72, 57, 42, 33</cell>
                  <cell>N = 5</cell>
                  <cell>55±6</cell>
                </row>
                <row>
                  <cell><hi rend="i">Lophomyrtus obcordata</hi> (Raoul) Burret. (No popular name) 48, 37, 34</cell>
                  <cell>N = 3</cell>
                  <cell>40±6</cell>
                </row>
              </table>
            </p>
            <p>Column A - Number of trees measured; Column B - Breast-height circumference (cm). Multiple trunks for single trees are enclosed in brackets and are averaged as if single trees. The measurements sample about one fifth of the total trees present and are considered to be representative. Nomenclature follows Connor and Edgar (1987).</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d10-d4" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Conclusion</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Reference to the landslide site in 1853 by the Government Surveyor Smith when there was no landslide, and by the Government Geologist Crawford in 1863 when there had been a landslide, make it certain that the landslide took place sometime between November 1853 and February 1863, and almost certainly during the 1855 earthquake. The observatin of Smith in 1853, that the true left bank of the Ruamahanga River was a high cliff, indicates that the landslide probably resulted from a combination of the undercutting of this cliff and earthquake shaking. The similar angle of repose of the large rotated blocks within the landslide implies that all of the blocks slid at the same time and as a result of short-term failure along a single arcuate crown scarp.</p>
          <p>It is assumed that the native forest cover mentioned by Smith in 1853 was destroyed during the landslide. Only one living totara and several dead trunks of
<pb xml:id="n85" n="83"/>
the pre-landslide forest remain. Native forest tree ring counts give a maximum age of about 100 years indicating a minimum lag time of regeneration on the landslide of about 3 years. Younger (&lt;90 year) ages for kanuka, usually an early colonising species, imply that they are a post-burning, second generation growth. Circumference measurements of 132 post-landslide trees vary from 252 cm to 40 cm and indicate differences in growth rate and colonisation history of the various species that now inhabit the landslide.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d10-d5" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">Acknowledgements</hi>
          </head>
          <p>Many thanks are due to Professor Harold and Mrs Joan Wellman, Mrs Diane Kelly, Janet and Peter Kelly for a pleasant day's outing on the landslide site measuring the circunmferences and identifying the trees. <name type="person" key="name-209590">Harold Wellman</name> provided some critical comments on the manuscript and Dr Maggie Wassilieff provided valuable botanic advice. Dr Ross McQueen, Botany Department, Victoria University of Wellington, is thanked for his helpful suggestions and for supplying the tree borer, most of which now remains in the last tree to be cored.</p>
        </div>
        <div xml:id="t1-body-d10-d6" type="section">
          <head>
            <hi rend="c">References</hi>
          </head>
          <listBibl>
            <bibl>Connor, H.E. and Edgar, E. (1987). Name changes in the indigenous New Zealand flora. 1960-1986 and Nomina Nova IV 1983-1986. <hi rend="i">New Zealand Journal of Botany 25:</hi> 115-170.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-207742">Crawford, J.C.</name> (1870). On the geology of the Province of Wellington. <hi rend="i">Transactions of the New Zealand Institute 2:</hi> 345-363.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-170529">Druce, A.P.</name> (1957). Botanical Survey of an experimental catchment, Taita, New Zealand. <hi rend="i">New Zealand Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Bulletin, 124</hi>.</bibl>
            <bibl>Eiby, G.A. (1968),. An annotated list of New Zealand earthquakes, 1460-1965. <hi rend="i">New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 11:</hi> 630-647.</bibl>
            <bibl>Iorns, B. (1932). Old Wairarapa: an early earthquake. <hi rend="i">The Wairarapa Times Age</hi>, 24th September 1932.</bibl>
            <bibl>Lyell, C. (1868). <hi rend="i">Principles of Geology</hi>, Vol. 2, pp. 82-89. London, <name type="person" key="name-102641">John Murray</name>.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-208881">Ongley, M.</name> (1943). The trace of the 1855 earthquake. <hi rend="i">Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 73:</hi> 84-89.</bibl>
            <bibl>Robbins, R.G. (1958). Direct effect of the 1855 earthquake on the vegetation of the Orongorongo Valley. Wellington. <hi rend="i">Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 85:</hi> 205-212.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-209283">Smith, W.M.</name> (1853). Ms Report of a journey from the upper part of the Wairarapa Valley, through the valley of the Kopuarange to the River Mangatainoka, and back through part of the Forty Mile Bush into Wairarapa. 10th November 1853. Addressed to <name type="person" key="name-208610">Donald McLean</name>. In <name type="person" key="name-209503">Alexander Turnbull</name> Library, Wellington.</bibl>
            <bibl><name type="person" key="name-202689">Vella, P.</name> (1963). Upper Pleistocene succession in the inland part of the Wairarapa valley. <hi rend="i">Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand. Geology 2:</hi> 63-78.</bibl>
            <bibl>Vennell, S. (1891). Earthquakes in New Zealand. Letter in <hi rend="i">Third Report of the Australasian Association for the Advancement of Science 3:</hi> 531-532.</bibl>
            <bibl>Wassiiieff, M.C. (1986). Vegetation survey of “The Hanger”. Tutira Station, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand. <hi rend="i">Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 16:</hi> 229-244.</bibl>
          </listBibl>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n86" n="84"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d11" type="article">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Book Review:</hi>
            <lb/>
            <hi rend="c"><name type="person" key="name-102150">William Swainson</name> of Fern Grove, F.R.S., F.L.S., &amp; c - The Anatomy of a Nineteenth-Century Naturalist</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-170543">Sheila Natusch</name> and <name key="name-102481" type="person">Geoffrey Swainson</name><lb/>
3rd Edition (revised). Published by the authors, 1987</byline>
        <p>It is hard to explain exactly what it is about the English naturalist <name type="person" key="name-102150">William Swainson</name> that makes him such an attractive subject for biographers, historians and biologists. By some measures he was not a great success, either scientifically or financially. He was the ardent supporter of a long ago defunct system of classification and had a personal life dotted with adversity and occasional tragedy. His retreat in late 1840 to Lower Hutt, New Zealand and virtual obscurity, could be seen as bordering on failure.</p>
        <p>However there was more to Swainson than this introduction suggests. He was one of those who pioneered the use of lithography for natural history ilustrations, a medium that was cheaper and more flexible than engraving, and he was an accomplished naturalist with a string of species descriptions to his credit. As an author he was prolific, although not always as careful as he should have been. He was a colourful, if sometimes quarrelsome figure, inhabiting a period that constituted the heyday of natural history in Britain.</p>
        <p>There were few amateur naturalists living in the Wellington area at the time of Swainson's arrival here, but those that were might have been forgiven for thinking that someone with his background would help nourish and sustain a local forum for natural history. But such hopes, if they existed, were ultimately dashed. There were initially promising signs: his contact with <name type="person" key="name-208663">Walter Mantell</name>, the expedition on the <hi rend="i">Acheron</hi>, the exsiccatum of ferns-but the flicker of interest in natural history matters was virtually extinguished with an intemperate letter to Mantell declining honorary membership of the New Zealand Society. Swainson's energies were largely directed at maintaining himself and his family in a testing environment. Such spare time as was available was spent in executing a large number of sketches of New Zealand bush scenes, mostly in the Wellington district.</p>
        <p>We are fortunate, in New Zealand, in having a large amount of Swainson material in public collections or in the hands of his descendant <name key="name-102481" type="person">Geoffrey Swainson</name> who co-authored this volume with <name type="person" key="name-170543">Sheila Natusch</name>. Examination of the New Zealand material with that held overseas has produced a lively account, providing numerous insights into the personality of this irascible naturalist.</p>
        <p>This privately published work will be a useful addition to an increasing list of Swainson biographies and evaluations of his scientific and personal life, but one shares with the authors their regret in not being able to provide a more attrative setting for all their hard work. The illustrations in particular have suffered from the reprographic process employed, and some are barely discernible. Their more selective use and exclusion from such places as the Sources and Summaries section might have provided a tidier result. It is not clear what the value is of reprinting the working documents from microfiche in a form that is almost illegible; a less cumbersome means of identifying source material could perhaps be found. These, and other idiosyncracies of design can occasionally be disconcerting, but do not detract too greatly from the work as a whole. The authors, in their plight of inadequate publication resources, invite our tolerance. This is gladly given.</p>
        <p>
          <hi rend="b">
            <name type="person" key="name-111643">J.R.H. Andrews</name>
          </hi>
        </p>
        <p>School of Biological Sciences. Victoria University of Wellington.</p>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n87" n="85"/>
      <div xml:id="t1-body-d12" type="article">
        <head>
          <title level="a">
            <hi rend="c">Book Review:</hi>
            <lb/>
            <hi rend="c">Forest Vines to Snow Tussocks: The Story of New Zaland Plants</hi>
          </title>
        </head>
        <byline>by <name type="person" key="name-102052">John Dawson</name><lb/>
Published by Victoria University Press, Wellington, 1988 ($45)</byline>
        <p>New Zealand's biota attracts a lot of interest. It features prominently in world literature and is the basis for our strong conservation movement. Much is written about the plants and animals but few authors directly confront the question of why the biota is of such interest. This new addition to the prolific natural history literature is an attempt to shed some light on the “story of New Zealand's plants” from this point-of-view. And, very appropriately, it has been done by the former editor of <hi rend="i">Tuatara</hi> for many years. John Dawson has spent his professional life researching certain groups of plants that occur in New Zealand (especially Umbelliferae and Myrtaceae) and has developed undergraduate and postgraduate courses in advanced Botany which explore the origins and special features of our flora. The book has grown from these courses.</p>
        <p>It also owes much to <name type="person" key="name-207678">Leonard Cockayne</name>'s <hi rend="i">New Zealand Plants and their Story</hi> which was the first attempt to review the distinctive features of native plants and which is now 60 years out-of-date. John Dawson set out to build very closely on Cockayne's model by reviewing the increase in knowledge gained over the past 60 years. It is not a guide book to plant identification but aims to use a representative selection of the larger and more conspicuous vascular plants to illustrate the special features of our flora.</p>
        <p>The book is easy to use and enjoyable to browse. Although we are conditioned to colour illustrations in most modern natural history books, this one's reliance on monochrome photographs certainly does not detract from its purpose. The illustrations are copiously spaced throughout the text and very nicely reproduced with good clarity and tonal range. In fact, several now historic photographs from Cockayne's earlier book are reproduced with greater clarity than the originals. The printing layout gives a remarkably wide outer margin, some might say wasteful, but it is utilised to bring variety to each page with figure captions and photo overlaps. The author's style is straightforward, certainly not exuberant and the text is well referenced.</p>
        <p>John Dawson's version of the story of New Zealand plants is organised into 12 Chapters, mainly based on a habitat or community approach. Forests, which dominated the New Zealand landscape prior to the arrival of humans, also dominate the book with 4 chapters devoted to the structural features of the plants themselves (roots, flower forms, leaf features) and their associated vines and epiphytes (“the first thing that strikes the overseas botanist”). Characteristics of the major forest types in New Zealand are reviewed with brief notes on specialised communities such as coastal forest, kauri forest, mangroves and swamps.</p>
        <p>A particularly interesting chapter discusses the recent debate over possible causal factors behind the divaricating growth habit of so many low shrubs in this country. These impenetrable twiggy shrubs and juvenile trees are a significant feature of our flora and have been variously attributed to harsh climatic factors or the browsing effect of moas. John Dawson provides an intriguing appraisal of these views which should stimulate the non-specialist reader to take an added interest.</p>
        <p>Plants of open habitats are segregated into lowland and alpine. A glimpse of the dynamic, ever-changing patterns of vegetation is given in Chapter 7 where the origins
<pb xml:id="n88" n="86"/>
of the drier grasslands and shrublands on the eastern sides of both Islands are discussed. Many New Zealand biologists are probably still unaware that these areas were largely forested in pre-human times. Natural fires and repeated Maori burning, to encourage bracken or flush out moas, allowed invasion by tussocks which created, for instance, the central Otago landscapes we now tend to regard as “natural”. Vegetation of river-beds, cliffs and dunes are presented under the lowland open habitat, as are the specialised plants of serpentine soils.</p>
        <p>The section on the alpine flora surveys the main features and highlights some dominant plant types, especially those of scree and rock areas, before considering the strange debate about where the alpine plants came from. I say “strange” because surely most of our plants evolved nowhere else but in New Zealand. The problem is that geologists have told us that New Zealand's present mountains are quite new, only a few million years old and prior to their formation, the land was low-lying for much of its history, with a warmer climate than now. So we are faced with the problem of explaining how a specialised alpine flora, richer in species than the forests, came into being in such a short time. Were the ancestors of the plants already here? Did they reach New Zealand mountains by migrating from Antarctica? Did they get blown here from the mountains of SE Asia, possibly via Australia? A discussion of the views of various authors is presented within a predominantly migrationary framework. Whilst I agree that we cannot rule out the possibility of some immigrants, I must say I prefer Cockayne's whimsical statement, made 61 years earlier, that if the plants could speak “we might learn from some of them that their very remote ancestors were born on New Zealand soil”. In my view, the “alpine problem” will never be resolved by prolonging the discussion of ad hoc explanations, only by adopting a rigorous scientific approach to biogeography.</p>
        <p>Two chapters review plants of the outlying islands (subantarctic islands, Chatham, Kermadec, Lord Howe and Norfolk Islands) and comment on the flora of other southern lands. These descriptive accounts focus on genera and species which are of interest to New Zealand. Many readers will be surprised to learn that certain plants are so widely distributed over the islands and lands of the southern oceans and, for example, that tiny Lord Howe Island supports an endemic species of <hi rend="i">Carmichaelia</hi>, the only member of this genus occurring outside New Zealand. The origins and significance of some of these widespread southern plants are discussed in terms of both long-term land continuity and long distance dispersal.</p>
        <p>The final chapter, devoted to plant fossils from New Zealand, reveals the wealth of discovery in this field since the time of Cockayne. The botanical history, as told by plant fossils (largely pollen) in New Zealand and its surrounding lands, pieces together a picture very different from today but steadily evolving to the modern pattern. Changes are particularly notable in the distribution of <hi rend="i">Nothofagus</hi> species-groups, the genus <hi rend="i">Casuarina</hi> and the podocarps. In his concluding remarks, John Dawson draws attention to the significance of New Caledonia as a place where the Gondwana biota has survived better than in either Australia (with its aridity) or New Zealand (with its more severe Pleistocene climate), a view with which I agree.</p>
        <p>A book which aims to be as comprehensive as this one but is produced with a student budget in mind, cannot fulfil everyone's expectations. Thus, one reviewer has said it leaves untouched the human side of plants, another that it fails to do justice to the functioning and dynamics of plant communities. My own bias is towards historical biogeography so I can add that I would have appreciated more emphasis on recent progress in this field with maps showing evolutionary hypotheses for some of the key plant genera such as <hi rend="i">Nothofagus</hi>. However, John Dawson could never write the perfect book to suit all readers and their particular viewpoints. The fact remains that he has produced a worthy successor to Cockayne's earlier volume
<pb xml:id="n89" n="87"/>
and that its strength lies in the author's own bias towards plant structural features and the floristics of different communities. There is no doubt that it will be an extremely useful reference book for botany and natural history students to gain an overview of our flora. I hope someday we will have an animal book to match it.</p>
        <p>
          <hi rend="b">
            <name type="person" key="name-111627">G.W. Gibbs</name>
          </hi>
        </p>
      </div>
      <pb xml:id="n90"/>
      <pb xml:id="n91"/>
    </body>
  </text>
</TEI>