<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0 nzetc-p5.xsd" xml:id="WH2Econ" xml:lang="en">
  <teiHeader type="text">
    <fileDesc xml:id="fileDesc-0001">
      <titleStmt>
        <title type="marc245">War Economy</title>
        <title type="gmd">[electronic resource]</title>
        <author>
          <name key="name-110143" type="person">Baker, J. V. T.</name>
        </author>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0001">
          <resp>Creation of machine-readable version</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0002">
          <resp>Creation of digital images</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
        <respStmt xml:id="respStmt-0003">
          <resp>Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup</resp>
          <name key="name-121582" type="organisation">TechBooks, Inc.</name>
        </respStmt>
      </titleStmt>
      <extent>ca. 2000 kilobytes</extent>
      <publicationStmt>
        <publisher>New Zealand Electronic Text Centre</publisher>
        <pubPlace>Wellington, New Zealand</pubPlace>
        <idno type="etc">Modern English, WH2Econ</idno>
        <availability status="unknown">
          <p>Publicly accessible</p>
          <p n="public">URL: http://www.nzetc.org/collections.html</p>
          <p>copyright <date when="2003">2003</date>, by Victoria University of Wellington</p>
        </availability>
        <date when="2003">2003</date>
      <idno type="vuw-bbid">713699</idno></publicationStmt>
      <seriesStmt xml:id="seriesStmt-0001">
        <title type="marc245">Official History of New Zealand in the
	  Second World War <date from="1939" to="1945">1939–45</date></title>
      </seriesStmt>
      <notesStmt xml:id="notesStmt-0001">
        <note xml:id="note-0001">Illustrations have been included from the original
          source.</note>
      </notesStmt>
      <sourceDesc xml:id="sourceDesc-0001">
        <biblFull>
          <titleStmt>
            <title level="m">
              <name key="name-110059" type="work">War Economy</name>
            </title>
            <author>
              <name key="name-110143" type="person">Baker, J. V. T.</name>
            </author>
          </titleStmt>
          <editionStmt>
            <p/>
          </editionStmt>
          <publicationStmt>
            <publisher>
              <name key="name-110027" type="organisation">Historical Publications Branch, Department Of
	      Internal Affairs</name>
            </publisher>
            <pubPlace>
              <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington, New Zealand</name>
            </pubPlace>
            <date when="1965">1965</date>
            <idno type="callno">Source copy consulted: VUW Library</idno>
          </publicationStmt>
          <seriesStmt xml:id="seriesStmt-0002">
            <title type="marc245">
              <name key="name-110576" type="work">Official History of New Zealand in the
	      Second World War <date from="1939" to="1945">1939–45</date></name>
            </title>
          </seriesStmt>
        </biblFull>
      </sourceDesc>
    </fileDesc>
    <encodingDesc>
      <projectDesc xml:id="projectDesc-0001">
        <p>Prepared for the New Zealand Electronic Text Centre as part
          of the <ref target="http://www.nzetc.org/projects/wh2/">Official War
          History project</ref>.</p>
      </projectDesc>
      <editorialDecl>
        <p>All unambiguous end-of-line hyphens have been removed, and
          the trailing part of a word has been joined to the preceding
          line. Every effort has been made to preserve the Māori macron
          using unicode.</p>
        <p xml:id="ETC">Some keywords in the header are a local Electronic
          Text Centre scheme to aid in establishing analytical
          groupings.</p>
      </editorialDecl>
      <classDecl>
        <taxonomy xml:id="nzetc-subjects">
          <bibl>
            <title>NZETC Subject Headings</title>
          </bibl>
        </taxonomy>
      </classDecl>
    </encodingDesc>
    <profileDesc xml:id="profileDesc-0001">
      <creation>
        <date when="1965">1965</date>
      </creation>
      <langUsage>
        <language ident="en">English</language>
      </langUsage>
      <textClass>
        <keywords scheme="http://www.nzetc.org/nzetc-subjects">
          <list>
            <item>
              <rs key="subject-000004" type="subject">New Zealand World War II History</rs>
            </item>
          </list>
        </keywords>
        <keywords scheme="http://www.example.org/folksonomy">
          <term>nonfiction</term>
          <term>prose</term>
          <term>masculine/feminine</term>
          <term>New Zealand/ History/ WWII</term>
        </keywords>
      </textClass>
    </profileDesc>
    <revisionDesc xml:id="revisionDesc-0001">
      <change xml:id="change-0001"><date when="2004-11-12">12 November 2004</date><label>corrector</label><name key="name-110032" type="person">Jamie Norrish</name>Added name markup for many names in the body of the text.</change>
      <change xml:id="change-0002"><date when="2004-08-31">31 August 2004</date><label>corrector</label><name key="name-110032" type="person">Jamie Norrish</name>Added link markup for project in TEI header.</change>
      <change xml:id="change-0003"><date when="2004-06-04">4 June 2004</date><label>corrector</label><name key="name-110032" type="person">Jamie Norrish</name>Split title into title and series title.</change>
      <change xml:id="change-0004"><date when="2004-02-12">12 February 2004</date><label>corrector</label><name key="name-110032" type="person">Jamie Norrish</name>Added cover images section and declarations.</change>
      <change xml:id="change-0005"><date when="2004-02">February 2004</date><label>corrector</label><name key="name-121573" type="person">Rob George</name>Added figure descriptions</change>
      <change xml:id="change-0006"><date when="2003-12-15">15 December 2003</date><label>corrector</label><name key="name-110032" type="person">Jamie Norrish</name>Added TEI header</change>
      <change n="quickProof"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:07">21:19:07, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Text-proofing of a sample of the text</change>
      <change n="teiMarkup"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:07">21:19:07, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Conversion to TEI.2-conformat markup</change>
      <change n="scriptedMarkup"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:07">21:19:07, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Adding scripted markup</change>
      <change n="encodingDesc"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:07">21:19:07, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of encodingDesc</change>
      <change n="addBibls"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:07">21:19:07, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of bibls</change>
      <change n="assembleImages"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:07">21:19:07, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Assembled all images</change>
      <change n="derivativeCreation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Creation of derivative images</change>
      <change n="teiValidation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Validation of TEI</change>
      <change n="nameValidation"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Validation of names</change>
      <change n="utf8Conversion"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Conversion to Unicode (utf-8)</change>
      <change n="makeProduction"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Promotion to production</change>
      <change n="drmAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to access control</change>
      <change n="harvestTopicMap"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Harvest into Topic Map</change>
      <change n="browserCheck"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Checking of text using browser</change>
      <change n="corpusAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to corpus</change>
      <change n="catalogueAddition"><date when="2007-08-07T21:19:08">21:19:08, Tuesday 7 August 2007</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Addition of text to Library Catalogue<!-- BBID=713699 --></change>
      <change n="live"><date when="2008-09-23T14:50:21">14:50:21, Tuesday 23 September 2008</date><label>editorial</label><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Make text available on NZETC website</change>
    <change n="epubPreparation"><date when="2009-08-28T16:19:16">16:19:16, Friday 28 August 2009</date><name type="organisation" key="name-121602">NZETC</name>Preparation of EPUB (and other formats such as DaisyBook)</change></revisionDesc>
  </teiHeader>
  <text xml:id="t1">
    <front xml:id="t1-front">
      <div type="covers" xml:id="_N65932">
        <p>
          <figure xml:id="WH2EcoFCo">
            <graphic url="WH2EcoFCo.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2EcoFCo-g"/>
            <figDesc>Front Cover</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </p>
        <p>
          <figure xml:id="WH2EcoSpi">
            <graphic url="WH2EcoSpi.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2EcoSpi-g"/>
            <figDesc>Spine</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </p>
        <p>
          <figure xml:id="WH2EcoBCo">
            <graphic url="WH2EcoBCo.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2EcoBCo-g"/>
            <figDesc>Back Cover</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div>
      <div type="halftitle" xml:id="_N65982">
        <head>
          <hi rend="i">Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–45</hi>
        </head>
        <p/>
      </div>
      <pb/>
      <pb/>
      <div type="frontispiece" xml:id="_N66006">
        <p>
          <figure xml:id="WH2Eco001a">
            <graphic url="WH2Eco001a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco001a-g"/>
            <head>
              <hi rend="sc">food for britain</hi>
            </head>
            <p rend="center">— <hi rend="i">from a painting by C. M. S. Beans</hi></p>
            <p rend="indent">A 37-ship convoy under attack, <date when="1940-11">November 1940</date>. In the foreground is the <hi rend="i">Rangitiki</hi> carrying New Zealand produce.</p>
            <p rend="indent">The escort ship, <hi rend="i">Jervis Bay</hi>, hopelessly outgunned, turns and steams at full speed towards the raider, a sacrifice which saved most of the convoy.</p>
            <figDesc>supply ships</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </p>
      </div>
      <pb/>
      <titlePage xml:id="_N66066" rend="center">
        <titlePart type="illustration">
          <figure xml:id="WH2EcoTit">
            <graphic url="WH2EcoTit.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2EcoTit-g"/>
            <figDesc>Title page</figDesc>
          </figure>
        </titlePart>
        <docTitle>
          <titlePart type="main"><hi rend="i">Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War <date from="1939" to="1945">1939–45</date></hi><lb/>
THE NEW ZEALAND PEOPLE AT WAR<lb/>
<hi rend="i">WAR ECONOMY</hi></titlePart>
        </docTitle>
        <byline>
          <docAuthor rend="center">
            <name key="name-110143" type="person">J. V. T. BAKER</name>
          </docAuthor>
        </byline>
        <docImprint rend="center">
          <publisher><name key="name-110027" type="organisation">HISTORICAL PUBLICATIONS BRANCH</name><lb/>
DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS</publisher>
          <pubPlace><name key="name-008844" type="place">WELLINGTON</name>, NEW ZEALAND</pubPlace>
          <docDate>
            <date when="1965">1965</date>
          </docDate>
        </docImprint>
      </titlePage>
      <pb/>
      <pb n="v" xml:id="nv"/>
      <div type="preface" xml:id="_N66143">
        <head>Preface</head>
        <p>I HAVE enjoyed writing this book. World War II, which is central to it, is unique in New Zealand's economic history because of a massive diversion of resources to war purposes. This in itself was a challenge. But in setting the stage, the book has had to span wider. It takes in thirty of the most momentous years in New Zealand's development from a predominantly farming community to a mixed economy. Moreover, these were the years when New Zealand emerged as a welfare state. The nature of the war effort was influenced significantly by these economic changes. It, in its turn, influenced them.</p>
        <p rend="indent">Outstanding among those who have assisted me has been Mr S. G. Elmer, whose painstaking research has extended over more than four years. The enthusiasm and thoroughness with which he has gone about this work have been a tremendous encouragement to me in completing a task which has been much more difficult, and has extended over a far longer period, than any of us anticipated. Mr Elmer has also prepared most of the statistical tables and helped me with planning the charts, chronologies and illustrations. I am grateful also to Mr L. G. Melville, who drew the charts, and to Mrs L. S. Aitken who typed the manuscript and frequently gave me valuable advice on presentation and layout. Mr Elmer, Mr Melville, and Mrs Aitken are all colleagues in the Department of Statistics.</p>
        <p rend="indent">Valuable assistance and advice on portions of the manuscript have been received from Mr H. G. Lang of the Treasury, Mr W. D. Rose, until recently on the staff of the Department of Statistics, the late Mr V. G. Boivin of the Marine Department, the Rev. A. A. Ross of Papatoetoe, Mr C. W. G. Bearman of the State Electricity Department, Mr P. W. Smallfield, until recently Director-General of Agriculture, Mr A. T. Fussell of the Railways Department, Mr R. J. Polaschek, Commissioner of Transport, and Mr J. F. Robertson of the State Services Commission. I acknowledge also the unfailing courtesy of the Editor and staff of the <name key="name-110027" type="organisation">War History Branch</name>, now the Historical Publications Branch of the Department of Internal Affairs.</p>
        <p rend="indent">I have been fortunate to have the advice of Professor F. W. Holmes as technical editor. Through his guidance many improvements have been made.</p>
        <pb n="vi" xml:id="nvi"/>
        <p rend="indent">To all these people I am most grateful; but I have not always followed their advice, and I take full responsibility for any shortcomings in this book. Except where otherwise stated, all opinions expressed are my own.</p>
        <closer>
          <signed rend="right">
            <hi rend="sc">
              <name key="name-110143" type="person">J. V. T. Baker</name>
            </hi>
          </signed>
          <lb/>
          <mentioned>
            <address>
              <addrLine>
                <name type="place">WELLINGTON</name>
              </addrLine>
            </address>
            <date when="1964-08">AUGUST 1964</date>
          </mentioned>
        </closer>
      </div>
      <div xml:id="_N66211">
        <head>CHRONOLOGIES</head>
        <p rend="indent">Each of the four chronologies follows the chapters to which it relates. For easy reference while reading, their top corners are marked in black.</p>
      </div>
      <div xml:id="_N66227">
        <head>ROUNDING</head>
        <p rend="indent">On occasions figures are rounded off to the nearest thousand or some other convenient unit. This may result in a total disagreeing slightly with the sum of the individual items as shown.</p>
      </div>
      <div xml:id="_N66243">
        <head>CURRENCY</head>
        <p rend="indent">Unless otherwise indicated, values are expressed in New Zealand pounds, which were valued at approximately £125 NZ = £100 sterling from January 1933 until August 1948, and thereafter at parity with sterling.</p>
      </div>
      <pb n="vii" xml:id="nvii"/>
      <div type="contents" xml:id="_N66264">
        <head>Contents</head>
        <p>
          <table rows="31" cols="3">
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Page</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>PREFACE</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#nv">v</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>PRELUDE: THE WAR EFFORT</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n1">1</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">1</cell>
              <cell>PRE-WAR ECONOMY</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n4">4</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">2</cell>
              <cell>PREPARATION FOR WAR</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n27">27</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>SOME NOTEWORTHY PRE-WAR EVENTS</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n51">51</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">3</cell>
              <cell>FROM PEACE TO WAR</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n54">54</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">4</cell>
              <cell>THE DEMANDS OF WAR</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n70">70</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">5</cell>
              <cell>INCREASING PRESSURE ON MANPOWER</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n81">81</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">6</cell>
              <cell>PROBLEMS OF SUPPLY</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n105">105</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">7</cell>
              <cell>MANUFACTURING UNDER WAR CONDITIONS</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n147">147</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">8</cell>
              <cell>WARTIME FARMING</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n181">181</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">9</cell>
              <cell>DEFENCE CONSTRUCTION</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n220">220</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">10</cell>
              <cell>THE FINANCIAL COST OF WAR</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n251">251</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">11</cell>
              <cell>THE QUEST FOR FINANCIAL STABILITY</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n278">278</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>NOTEWORTHY EVENTS IN THE FIRST THREE YEARS OF WAR</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n293">293</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">12</cell>
              <cell>ECONOMIC STABILISATION</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n298">298</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">13</cell>
              <cell>WAR CONTRACTS</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n341">341</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">14</cell>
              <cell>TRADE AND THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n366">366</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">15</cell>
              <cell>TRANSPORT DIFFICULTIES</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n391">391</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">16</cell>
              <cell>FUEL, POWER, AND SERVICES FOR PRODUCTION</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n423">423</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">17</cell>
              <cell>LIVING AND WORKING IN A WAR ECONOMY</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n443">443</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">18</cell>
              <cell>EASING THE STRAIN</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n481">481</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>NOTEWORTHY EVENTS IN THE LAST THREE YEARS OF WAR</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n499">499</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">19</cell>
              <cell>FROM WAR TO PEACE</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n502">502</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">20</cell>
              <cell>RECOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n532">532</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>NOTEWORTHY EVENTS SINCE THE WAR</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n574">574</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>APPENDIX I: Statistical Tables</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n581">581</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>APPENDIX II: Items in the Wartime Prices Index</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n639">639</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>BIBLIOGRAPHY</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n644">644</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell>INDEX</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n651">651</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
          </table>
        </p>
      </div>
      <pb n="viii" xml:id="nviii"/>
      <div type="illustration" xml:id="_N67289">
        <head>List of Illustrations</head>
        <p>
          <table rows="74" cols="2">
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Frontispiece</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Food for <name key="name-005976" type="place">Britain</name>: a convoy under attack, <date when="1940-11">November 1940</date></cell>
              <cell/>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Following page <ref type="page" target="#n72">72</ref></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>A typical scene at mustering time on a <name key="name-006540" type="place">Canterbury</name> station</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Modern dairy farming methods</cell>
              <cell/>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>State housing, <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Tourist and Publicity Department</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Construction of the Ngahauranga Gorge road in 1938–39</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Public Works Department</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Plant assembled for levelling work at RNZAF Station, <name key="name-021602" type="place">Whenuapai</name>, <date when="1939-01">January 1939</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Public Works Department</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Enlisting for the <name key="name-000814" type="organisation">First Echelon</name>, 2 NZEF, at <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">C. P. S. Boyer</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Construction work at <name key="name-026686" type="place">Trentham</name> in the early weeks of war</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">C. P. S. Boyer</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>The first troops leave New Zealand, <date when="1940-01">January 1940</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Weekly News, <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Following page <ref type="page" target="#n152">152</ref></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Levelling the site at <name key="name-002857" type="place">Waiouru Camp</name> in <date when="1940-08">August 1940</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Weekly News</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Carpenters at work on a dormitory at <name key="name-021590" type="place">Waiouru</name> in <date when="1940-09">September 1940</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Weekly News</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Assembling engines for training aircraft</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">C. P. S. Boyer</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Assembling de Havilland training aircraft in a <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name> factory</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Director of Publicity</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Modern small-arms were produced in considerable quantities</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Government Film Studios</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Production of Bren carriers in a motor-car assembly plant</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Government Film Studios</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <pb n="ix" xml:id="nix"/>
            <row>
              <cell>Stamping out steel helmets for the Home Guard and E.P.S.</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Government Film Studios</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Trailer fire pumps for the <name key="name-005851" type="place">Far East</name> forces</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Government Film Studios</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Following page <ref type="page" target="#n184">184</ref></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Fertiliser loading installations, Nauru Island</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-206364" type="work">New Zealand Geographer</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Processing fertiliser in New Zealand</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Sparrow Industrial Pictures Ltd., <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>The phosphate quarries at <name key="name-024534" type="place">Clarendon</name>, Otago</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-024450" type="organisation">Department of Agriculture</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>A Maori girl ready to start milking</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Servicemen help with the harvest</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Government Film Studios</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Services vegetable production scheme, <name key="name-021302" type="place">Levin</name></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Women at a <name key="name-036368" type="place">Pukekohe</name> factory coring cabbages for dehydration</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Weekly News</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Processing linen-flax fibre, <name key="name-000439" type="place">Foxton</name></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Following page <ref type="page" target="#n232">232</ref></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Arrival of <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> forces, <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name>, <date when="1942-06">June 1942</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">G. Silk, Australian Ministry of Information</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>A United States Marine makes friends with a City Milk Department horse on the <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name> wharves</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">C. P. S. Boyer</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Marine Corps camp at McKay's Crossing, near <name key="name-401547" type="place">Paekakariki</name></cell>
              <cell/>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Installing power at the New Zealand built camp for United States Marines at Anderson Park, <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>A United States Marine takes delivery of bacon</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell><name key="name-025195" type="organisation">United States Joint Purchasing Board</name> warehouses at Gracefield, Hutt Valley</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Public Works Department</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Constructing a shipyard at <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name> for the United States Navy</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Brides for the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Weekly News</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Following page <ref type="page" target="#n368">368</ref></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Loading butter for export</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Director of Publicity</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Telescoping lamb carcasses to make the best use of refrigerated shipping space</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-024450" type="organisation">Department of Agriculture</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <pb n="x" xml:id="nx"/>
            <row>
              <cell>Unshipped wool, <date when="1944-11">November 1944</date></cell>
              <cell/>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>The <hi rend="i">Port Bowen</hi> aground near <name key="name-008123" type="place">Wanganui</name>, <date when="1940">1940</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Tesea Studios, <name key="name-008123" type="place">Wanganui</name></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>The barque <hi rend="i">Pamir</hi>, a valuable addition to New Zealand's depleted shipping</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Signing the reciprocal aid agreement, <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> - New Zealand, at <name key="name-202800" type="place">Washington</name></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i"><name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> official photograph</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Wellington Harbour Board's floating crane <hi rend="i">Hikitea</hi> unloading a tank from the <hi rend="i"><name key="name-029602" type="place">Akaroa</name></hi></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Troops unloading New Zealand prefabricated buildings ‘somewhere in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name>’</cell>
              <cell rend="right">3 <hi rend="i">NZ Division official photograph</hi></cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Following page <ref type="page" target="#n432">432</ref></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>The Controller of Shipbuilding (Mr James Fletcher) speaks at a launching</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>A coastal scow delivers a cargo of kauri and other New Zealand timber</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Prefabricated keels of tow-boats ready for transport to an <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name> shipyard</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Launching New Zealand built tow-boats, <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name>, <date when="1943-08">August 1943</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Plugging the manpower gaps. An 83-year-old cutting metal for Army buckets</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Government Film Studios</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Women in men's jobs: operating a lathe</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Weekly News</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Wartime hydro-electric development, Karapiro Station</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Tourist and Publicity Department</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Fund-raising campaigns for war purposes—‘Liberty Corner’, <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Following page <ref type="page" target="#n448">448</ref></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Free fruit in schools</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>A collier leaves Westport</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Open-cast coal mining</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Director of Publicity</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Wartime racing, <name key="name-026686" type="place">Trentham</name>, <date when="1943-03">March 1943</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Food rationing. Clipping ration coupons in a restaurant</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Weekly News</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Coal shortages affect the housewife: cooking over a primus</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Weekly News</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <pb n="xi" xml:id="nxi"/>
            <row>
              <cell>Women tramway employees, <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name>, <date when="1944">1944</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">C. P. S. Boyer</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>A goods train crosses a viaduct on the <name key="name-120029" type="place">North Island</name> main trunk railway</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">New Zealand Government Railways</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Following page <ref type="page" target="#n544">544</ref></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Revival of State house construction, <date when="1944-10">October 1944</date></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">
                  <name key="name-120246" type="organisation">Department of Internal Affairs</name>
                </hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Rehabilitation. Disabled ex-soldiers making surgical boots</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Sparrow Industrial Pictures Ltd.</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>War assets realisation. Surplus trucks for disposal</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">G. T. Gillies</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Post-war power development. The Maraetai hydro-electric power scheme</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Tourist and Publicity Department</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Part of the Kaingaroa forest</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">New Zealand Forest Service</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Beef production, Molesworth Station</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Robin Smith Photography Ltd., <name key="name-007584" type="place">Christchurch</name></hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Rail-air service between North and South Islands</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">New Zealand Government Railways</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell>Roll-on ferry, the m.v. <hi rend="i">Aramoana</hi></cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">New Zealand Government Railways</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
          </table>
        </p>
      </div>
      <pb n="xii" xml:id="nxii"/>
      <div type="charts" xml:id="_N69075">
        <head>List of Charts</head>
        <p>
          <table rows="90" cols="4">
            <row>
              <cell rend="center">
                <hi rend="i">Chart No.</hi>
              </cell>
              <cell rend="center">
                <hi rend="i">Title</hi>
              </cell>
              <cell rend="center">
                <hi rend="i">Years Covered</hi>
              </cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <hi rend="i">Page</hi>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">1</cell>
              <cell>Unemployment and Assisted Employment—Males</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1931–39</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n6">6</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">2</cell>
              <cell>Public Works Employment</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1935–40</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n8">8</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">3</cell>
              <cell>Social Security Benefits and Pensions</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1931–40</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n12">12</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">4</cell>
              <cell>Changes in Farm Mechanisation</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1929–40</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n15">15</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">5</cell>
              <cell>Imports and Exports (£ <hi rend="i">million</hi>)</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1929–40</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n17">17</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">6</cell>
              <cell>Net Overseas Assets of the Banks</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1934–39</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n18">18</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">7</cell>
              <cell>Volume of Manufacturing Production</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1928–29 to 1939–40</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n19">19</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">8</cell>
              <cell>Reserve Bank Advances to the State</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–39</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n21">21</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">9</cell>
              <cell>Retail Prices—All Groups (Base: First Quarter <date when="1949">1949</date> = 1000)</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1920–39</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n23">23</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">10</cell>
              <cell>Changes in Volume of Goods Available (in 1938–39 prices)</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1928–29 to 1939–40</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n24">24</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">11</cell>
              <cell>Exports of Apples and Pears</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–51</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n66">66</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">12</cell>
              <cell>Men in the Armed Forces</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n71">71</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">13</cell>
              <cell>Numbers in New Zealand Armed Forces (including women)</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n72">72</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">14</cell>
              <cell><name key="name-023372" type="organisation">United States Forces</name> in New Zealand</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1942–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n74">74</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">15</cell>
              <cell>New Zealand and <name key="name-023372" type="organisation">United States Forces</name> in New Zealand</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n75">75</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">16</cell>
              <cell>Expenditure through War Expenses Account</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–40 to 1949–50</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n76">76</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">17</cell>
              <cell>Numbers Unemployed or in Subsidised Employment</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n86">86</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">18</cell>
              <cell>Numbers of Women per Hundred Men Employed in Factory Production</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1934–35 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n91">91</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">19</cell>
              <cell>Manpower Changes affecting Civilian Employment</cell>
              <cell rend="center">Sep 1939 to Sep 1942</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n104">104</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">20</cell>
              <cell>Volume of Imports (1936–38=100)</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–41</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n106">106</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">21</cell>
              <cell>Terms of Trade (1936–38=100)</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–50</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n107">107</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">22</cell>
              <cell>Imports and Reserve Stocks—Corrugated Iron</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–41</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n113">113</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">23</cell>
              <cell>Imports and Reserve Stocks—Gypsum</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–41</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n114">114</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <pb n="xiii" xml:id="nxiii"/>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">24</cell>
              <cell>Imports and Reserve Stocks—Raw Sugar</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–41</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n115">115</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">25</cell>
              <cell>Imports and Reserve Stocks—Rock Phosphate</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–41</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n116">116</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">26</cell>
              <cell>Imports and Reserve Stocks—Motor Spirits</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–41</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n118">118</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">27</cell>
              <cell>Goods Available for Use in New Zealand</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–37 to 1949–50</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n122">122</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">28</cell>
              <cell>Lend-Lease and Reciprocal Aid</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1941–42 to 1946–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n126">126</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">29</cell>
              <cell>Imports from Principal Supplying Countries</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1937–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n127">127</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">30</cell>
              <cell>Imports Classified by Purpose</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1937–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n130">130</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">31</cell>
              <cell>Supplies of Rubber and Tyres</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n141">141</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">32</cell>
              <cell>Wheat Supplies</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n143">143</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">33</cell>
              <cell>Persons Engaged in Manufacturing</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1929–30 to 1946–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n150">150</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">34</cell>
              <cell>Changes in the Manufacturing Labour Force</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1938–39 to 1945–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n155">155</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">35</cell>
              <cell>Overtime Worked in Factories</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1934–35 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n157">157</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">36</cell>
              <cell>Numbers engaged in Woollen Mills</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–37 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n162">162</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">37</cell>
              <cell>Numbers engaged in Clothing Factories</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–37 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n164">164</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">38</cell>
              <cell>Numbers engaged in Footwear Manufacture</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–37 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n165">165</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">39</cell>
              <cell>Textiles, Clothing and Footwear Manufacture (Volume of Production of Selected Items)</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–40 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n166">166</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">40</cell>
              <cell>Volume of Manufacturing Production (Base 1938–39=100)</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–37 to 1948–49</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n179">179</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">41</cell>
              <cell>Areas Topdressed</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1935–49</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n197">197</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">42</cell>
              <cell>Number of Sheep for Each Dairy Cow in Milk</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n198">198</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <pb n="xiv" xml:id="nxiv"/>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">43</cell>
              <cell>Butter and Cheese Production</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–37 to 1946–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n202">202</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">44</cell>
              <cell>Livestock Slaughterings</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–40 to 1946–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n207">207</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">45</cell>
              <cell>Production and Exports of Meat</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–40 to 1945–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n208">208</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">46</cell>
              <cell>Breeding Ewes, Other Sheep and Dairy Cows</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1940–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n214">214</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">47</cell>
              <cell>Lambs Tailed and Lambs Slaughtered</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–37 to 1944–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n215">215</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">48</cell>
              <cell>Output of Principal Farm Products</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–40 to 1945–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n219">219</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">49</cell>
              <cell>Supplies of Selected Building Materials</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1937–39</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n222">222</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">50</cell>
              <cell>Defence Construction Expenditure</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–40 to 1945–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n230">230</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">51</cell>
              <cell>Number of Permits issued for New Dwellings</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1937–38 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n243">243</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">52</cell>
              <cell>Numbers engaged on Defence Construction Work</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n245">245</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">53</cell>
              <cell>Production of Sawn Timber</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1934–35 to 1948–49</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n247">247</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">54</cell>
              <cell>Demands of War on the National Output</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1938–39 to 1946–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n256">256</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">55</cell>
              <cell>Revenue from Taxation</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1935–36 to 1945–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n264">264</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">56</cell>
              <cell>Changes in the Public Debt</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n266">266</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">57</cell>
              <cell>How the National Output of goods and services was used</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1938–39 to 1946–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n276">276</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">58</cell>
              <cell>Price and Wage changes before Economic Stabilisation</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–42</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n286">286</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <pb n="xv" xml:id="nxv"/>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">59</cell>
              <cell>Aggregate Private Income and Goods available</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1931–32 to 1945–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n291">291</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">60</cell>
              <cell>Price changes after Stabilisation</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1942–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n315">315</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">61</cell>
              <cell>Price and Wage changes after Stabilisation</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1942–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n323">323</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">62</cell>
              <cell>The Gap between Incomes and Goods available</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1938–39 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n335">335</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">63</cell>
              <cell/>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n336">336</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">64</cell>
              <cell/>
              <cell/>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n339">339</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">65</cell>
              <cell>Volume of Exports</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n369">369</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">66</cell>
              <cell>Volume of Imports</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–45</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n372">372</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">67</cell>
              <cell>Net overseas assets of the Banking System</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1934–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n385">385</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">68</cell>
              <cell>Turn-round of Overseas Vessels</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–49</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n402">402</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">69</cell>
              <cell>Railways Operations</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1938–39 to 1948–49</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n408">408</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">70</cell>
              <cell>Output of Coal</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–49</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n413">413</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">71</cell>
              <cell>Imports of Motor Spirits</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1934–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n418">418</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">72</cell>
              <cell>Electricity and Gas generated</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1927–28 to 1962–63</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n426">426</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">73</cell>
              <cell>Sales of Electric Power</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1938–39 to 1945–46</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n433">433</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">74</cell>
              <cell>Employment in Local Authorities</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1937–38 to 1947–48</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n439">439</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">75</cell>
              <cell>Volume of Production</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1938–39 to 1946–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n441">441</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">76</cell>
              <cell>Marriage and Birth Rates</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1927–63</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n445">445</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">77</cell>
              <cell>Labour Force Changes in Industrial Groups: Males at Census Dates</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1936–56</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n494">494</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">78</cell>
              <cell>Progress of Demobilisation</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1940–47</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n503">503</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">79</cell>
              <cell>Annual Expenditure on Rehabilitation</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1944–63</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n511">511</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">80</cell>
              <cell>Retail Prices</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1914–63</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n537">537</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">81</cell>
              <cell>Age Groups as a Percentage of Total Population</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1923–62</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n541">541</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">82</cell>
              <cell>Social Security Benefits and Pensions as a Percentage of National Income</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1940–63</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n545">545</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">83</cell>
              <cell>Trading Bank Advances</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1939–63</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n547">547</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">84</cell>
              <cell>Imports and Exports</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1940–63</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n552">552</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <pb n="xvi" xml:id="nxvi"/>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">85</cell>
              <cell>Net Cost of Invisibles as a percentage of Export Earnings</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1950–51 to 1962–63</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n553">553</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">86</cell>
              <cell>Direction of Trade</cell>
              <cell rend="center">Pre-War<lb/>
Post-War<lb/>
1960s</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n557">557</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">87</cell>
              <cell>Changes in Farming and Manufacturing</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1951–61</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n560">560</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">88</cell>
              <cell>Labour Force Changes</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1947–64</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n564">564</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
            <row>
              <cell rend="right">89</cell>
              <cell>Value added in Manufacturing as a percentage of Value of Imports</cell>
              <cell rend="center">1923–24 to 1963–64</cell>
              <cell rend="right">
                <ref type="page" target="#n572">572</ref>
              </cell>
            </row>
          </table>
        </p>
      </div>
      <pb n="1" xml:id="n1"/>
      <div type="prelude" xml:id="_N72825">
        <head>Prelude: The War Effort</head>
        <p>THIS volume is concerned with the economic effects of New Zealand's participation in the Second World War.</p>
        <p rend="indent">Predominantly this is a story of effort—intensive sustained effort leading often to overstrain. The manpower record is a perfect illustration. In war, New Zealand willingly shouldered a manpower load which ultimately proved too great for her population to bear. She committed herself to supply fighting forces on two fronts, and this alone was a formidable undertaking for a small country. But she was also called upon increasingly, as a major food supplier, to expand her production. Despite mechanisation and improvements in methods, it became impossible to find sufficient men for both. In the endeavour to keep faith on the battlefield as well as on the farms and in the factories, truly Herculean tasks were performed.</p>
        <p rend="indent">This type of war effort must have been motivated as much by patriotism as by economic motives. But there are also in the pages of this volume examples of waste of materials and effort, of traders who took advantage of shortages of goods to charge exorbitant prices, of producers who took advantage of lack of competition to make excessive profits, and of workers who took advantage of shortage of manpower to make outlandish claims for rewards. In these cases one may well speculate as to the relative importance of patriotism and personal gain in motivating their efforts.</p>
        <p rend="indent">However, when all is weighed up, patriotic effort predominates over the war years. The profiteers, strikers and loafers stand out as the exceptions. Should the historian ignore them? In all honesty he should not—they are part of the story he must tell. But there is a better reason for giving them their proper place in the narrative. These are some of the difficulties which occurred in a time of national stress. They may occur again in another time of stress. Warning of them may well result in more effective effort in the future.</p>
        <p rend="indent">Can the warning be given without conveying, incorrectly, an impression of widespread disorder? It is to be hoped it can, for New Zealand's war effort is indeed a record of achievement of which she can be justly proud.</p>
        <pb n="2" xml:id="n2"/>
        <p rend="indent">As a history this volume is probably typical in that it contains a number of strange and apparently contradictory happenings. For example, through the most difficult war years, when the need for extra production was leading to many and varied industries being declared essential, New Zealand's most essential industry—farming—was not declared essential. Again it took a rather disastrous nine months for those who had signed the Reverse Lend-Lease Agreement<note xml:id="ftn1-2" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper A-7, <date when="1942">1942</date>, <hi rend="i"><name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> – New Zealand Mutual Aid Agreement</hi>.</p></note> on New Zealand's behalf to discover that what they had signed meant that New Zealand labour used by <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> forces in New Zealand, and rewarded often at rates which were excessive by prevailing New Zealand standards, was being paid for by New Zealand.</p>
        <p rend="indent">All the economic events discussed in this volume are directly or indirectly connected with the war, but it is often difficult to say whether or not particular wartime events are effects of the war. For example, the need for stricter economic control was an inevitable part of the war effort, but the tendency to expand Government controls over the economy was already well advanced by <date when="1939">1939</date>; the war merely gave it impetus.</p>
        <p rend="indent">The war can be regarded as having created a state of economic emergency. But this was no new thing for New Zealand. The years 1938 and 1939 had already seen financial difficulties amounting to economic emergency as a result of the falling away of overseas reserves in <date when="1938">1938</date>. In fact the New Zealand economy tended to proceed from one state of economic emergency to another. No sooner was it well on the way to recovery from the depression of the early 1930s than it was faced with the <date when="1938">1938</date> crisis in overseas reserves. The war came as the third crisis in a single decade.</p>
        <p rend="indent">In wartime the need for maximum supplies of foodstuffs to <name key="name-005976" type="place">Britain</name> and their orderly marketing was to require control or supervision of marketing arrangements by the Government. But New Zealand's guaranteed price arrangements for dairy products had already provided valuable experience in Government control of overseas marketing.</p>
        <p rend="indent">The financial strains which were to be imposed on the economy by the war were different only in degree from those imposed by the then Government's welfare policies, and by its extensive public works programme. It is interesting to notice that, though the war caused public works effort to be largely diverted to military construction work, the Government's welfare programme was slowed down rather than halted by the strains of wartime finance. The first steps towards a truly universal superannuation scheme were taken pre-war, but various extensions to the Social Security programme
<pb n="3" xml:id="n3"/>
were made during the war years. The next major step, the introduction of the universal family benefit, did not take place until <date when="1946">1946</date>.</p>
        <p rend="indent">The Government's policy of improving working conditions was also slowed down rather than halted during the war years, in spite of the fact that some steps in the programme clashed with the need for more intensive use of labour in the interests of the war effort. However, the decision, in the interests of the war effort, to conscript men for armed service and to direct labour into essential industries represented one of the most drastic reversals of a firmly held policy any Government has been called upon to make.</p>
        <p rend="indent">Much of the Government's handling of wartime economic problems was influenced by its pre-war experiences. The fact that the extensive burden of wartime finance was carried with virtually no overseas borrowing was no doubt attributable in no small part to the depression experiences, when drastic falls in prices for New Zealand's products increased the relative burden of overseas debt servicing until it absorbed a quarter of all export earnings.<note xml:id="ftn1-3" n="1"><p>Based on information in <hi rend="i">New Zealand Official Yearbook</hi>, <date when="1933">1933</date>, p. 209.</p></note> Perhaps equally influential was the firm and almost unfriendly attitude which Finance Minister Walter Nash met on his visit to the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> in <date when="1939">1939</date> to renew an existing loan.</p>
        <p rend="indent">Probably the major economic achievement of the war was the success of the Government's stabilisation policy. This policy was assisted considerably by the decision to finance the war by taxation and internal borrowing in preference to overseas borrowing. The stabilisation programme extended well into the post-war years.</p>
        <p rend="indent">A major surprise was the persistence of full employment after the war. Entering the war with a pool of 19,000 unemployed or in subsidised employment, New Zealand had a temporary cushion against the shock of extra wartime demands for manpower for the forces and for increased production;<note xml:id="ftn2-3" n="2"><p>See also Table 1, <ref type="page" target="#n581">p. 581</ref>, which gives details of unemployment, etc., up to <date when="1939-03">March 1939</date>.</p></note> but these men were soon drawn into normal employment, and the last few years of the war were marked by acute labour shortage. The fact of full employment in war encouraged Governments to believe in the practicability of full employment in peace and the <name key="name-022826" type="organisation">New Zealand Government</name>, amongst others, made provision for maintenance of full employment in the post-war years. In New Zealand this provision proved to be unnecessary. Whether or not it was caused by the war, the economy had been influenced during these years towards the employment of a larger proportion of its population. Full employment, to the extent of acute labour shortage, seemed now to be built into the economy and was to remain a characteristic of it for two decades after the war finished.</p>
      </div>
    </front>
    <body xml:id="t1-body">
      <pb n="4" xml:id="n4"/>
      <div type="chapter" n="1" xml:id="c1">
        <head>CHAPTER 1<lb/>
Pre-war Economy</head>
        <div n="1" xml:id="c1-1">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Men Not Wanted</hi>
          </head>
          <p>WHEN Prime Minister Michael Joseph Savage attended the <date when="1937">1937</date> Imperial Conference and declared that the causes of war were economic, New Zealand was hardly out of the throes of bitterness generated by the great economic depression of the thirties.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It is probable that memory of the depression was the strongest influence leading to the overthrow of the Coalition Government at the <date when="1935">1935</date> general election and its replacement by Savage's Labour Government.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Even in <date when="1935">1935</date>, two years after the worst year of the depression, the economy was unable without Government assistance to employ more than eighty-nine out of every hundred men. Eleven in every hundred in the labour force were wholly or partly a charge on the Unemployment Fund. Against this background Savage's <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> offered a forceful policy for expansion of production. It was a strongly socialistic policy containing much which was repulsive to many in a predominantly private enterprise economy; but it convincingly promised a determined attack on the sickening spectacle of continued large-scale unemployment. It swept the party into power.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Actually, unemployment had shown quite a strong falling tendency before Labour took office, but this tendency was accelerated in the following two years. The numbers of men wholly or partly a charge on the Fund had fallen from an average of fourteen in every hundred of the labour force in <date when="1933">1933</date> to twelve in <date when="1934">1934</date> and to eleven in <date when="1935">1935</date>. In December of that year the Government changed
<pb n="5" xml:id="n5"/>
and, in the first two years of Labour administration, the fall continued, to reach nine in every hundred in <date when="1936">1936</date>.<note xml:id="ftn1-5" n="1"><p>Answering a question about the number on unemployment relief, Minister of Labour H. T. Armstrong said in <date when="1936-04">April 1936</date>:</p><p>‘These are the latest available figures up to the 14th March last: Under Scheme Number 5, rationed relief, 15,704; on sustenance, 14,443; gold prospecting, 2,328; afforestation, 1,005; farm subsidy schemes, 3,117; Public Works - roads, aerodromes, etc. - 8,435; local bodies - subsidised employment - 2,831; small farms development, 1,257; miscellaneous, 3,537; a total of 52,657.’</p><p><hi rend="i">New Zealand Parliamentary Debates</hi> (subsequently <hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>), Vol. 244, pp. 360–1, <date when="1936-04-16">16 April 1936</date>.</p></note> By <date when="1937">1937</date> it was nearly as low as six.</p>
          <p rend="indent">This was the position when Savage went to the Imperial Conference in <date when="1937">1937</date>—rather more than 6 per cent of unemployment or assisted employment, well under half of the <date when="1933">1933</date> level, but still considerably above the New Zealand long-term average.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the next two years there was a distinct danger that the tide of improvement would ebb. In <date when="1938">1938</date> the numbers who were wholly or partly a charge on the Employment Promotion Fund decreased only insignificantly. There was, however, a considerable increase in the proportion who were working full time in industry with assistance from the Fund, accompanied by a corresponding decrease in numbers on rationed work or sustenance without work.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1936">1936</date> the new Labour Government had emphasised its more positive outlook on employment problems by passing the Employment Promotion Act <date when="1936">1936</date>, to supersede the Unemployment Act <date when="1930">1930</date>. Administration passed from the Unemployment Board to the Employment Division of the Department of Labour which was, in time of war, to become the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>. Emphasis was to be on the permanent extension of employment avenues rather than on temporary relief.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1939">1939</date> a further major step was taken with the merging of the Employment Promotion Fund into the Social Security Fund, in terms of the Social Security Act <date when="1938">1938</date>. This was illustrative of the central place which Labour gave to welfare policy and the tendency to bring together as far as possible for co-ordinated attention the widening range of Government provisions for people with special needs or responsibilities.</p>
          <p rend="indent">With the <date when="1939">1939</date> change the nature of unemployment benefits also changed and the sequence in these statistics was lost. The new series of information showed comparative stability into <date when="1940">1940</date>, but in <date when="1939-09">September 1939</date> war came. Its demands for men for the armed forces were soon to alter the whole outlook on manpower. According to the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>,<note xml:id="ftn2-5" n="2"><p>H-11A, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 74.</p></note> New Zealand entered the war with 19,000 men on unemployment benefit or in subsidised work.</p>
          <pb n="6" xml:id="n6"/>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 1 shows changes in numbers receiving various types of unemployment assistance.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart1">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco002a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart1-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 1</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">UNEMPLOYMENT AND ASSISTED EMPLOYMENT - MALES</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of employment statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div n="2" xml:id="c1-2">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Employment Promotion</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">The keys to Labour's employment promotion policy were higher personal incomes and expenditure, together with extended public works and housing programmes. The Finance Act <date when="1936">1936</date> restored public service salaries and the wage rates payable under awards to those prevailing before <date when="1931-05">May 1931</date>, when the first 10 per cent cut on wages had been made under depression conditions. Other wages were to follow suit. By <date when="1937">1937</date> wage rates, as measured by the Nominal Wage Rates Index, were 21 per cent above the <date when="1935">1935</date> average.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Various types of monetary provision made by the State were also increased and the range of benefits extended. Pension payments increased steadily from £3·3 million in the year ended <date when="1935-03">March 1935</date> to £6·8 million in the year ended <date when="1939-03">March 1939</date>. In the following year, augmented by new Social Security provisions, the total of
<pb n="7" xml:id="n7"/>
pensions and Social Security payments moved to £12·3 million and in 1940–41 was to reach £14·3 million, which was well over four times the <date when="1935">1935</date> level.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The numbers of men engaged on public works projects increased rapidly from under fourteen thousand in <date when="1936-01">January 1936</date> to over nineteen thousand in <date when="1937-01">January 1937</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It is true that, in the early stages, the Labour Government concentrated on transferring men from subsidised employment and part-time employment to full-time public works jobs. For example, highways and road works being carried on at the instigation of the Unemployment Board were transferred to the Public Works Department as from <date when="1936-04-01">1 April 1936</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">An interesting sidelight on this is thrown by remarks made in <date when="1936-09">September 1936</date> by Minister of Works Robert Semple:<note xml:id="ftn1-7" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 247, p. 198.</p></note></p>
          <p>‘I was quite prepared to find, owing to several years of financial depression, that there might not be a settled policy and I make due allowance for such difficulties, but I was not prepared to find that the whole of the public works activities had been converted into a system for relief of unemployment.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Earlier Mr Semple had given a more detailed report. He said:<note xml:id="ftn2-7" n="2"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 245, p. 144, <date when="1936-05-14">14 May 1936</date>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘When I assumed office approximately twelve thousand men were employed, the majority of them being relief workers. The complement today is sixteen thousand men, and when the full programme is in active operation I anticipate considerably increasing the number, even with the introduction of much more plant than is now in use. The existing practice of men for public works being sent direct to the Public Works Department by unemployment bureaux in the different centres, and without any regard whatever to their fitness for the work or their capabilities, will cease; in fact, a reclassification on the existing jobs must be done.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘…Practically all of the works which have been carried out by the Department for several years have been classified as relief works, and the basic rates of pay have been 12/- per day for married and 9/- for single men. Under the new agreement all works will in future be classed as standard works, and the basic rate of pay for labourers will be 16/- per day and single men will receive the same rate of pay as married men.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">In spite of the prominence given to these transfers of status, often amounting to a reversal of what had been done in depression years, much of the expansion represented a genuine extension of works activity. Moreover, it was associated with mechanisation and
<pb n="8" xml:id="n8"/>
labour-saving methods, so that more than ever before was being achieved by the use of labour. In the next two years there was a further steady rise in numbers employed, to reach 22,800 in <date when="1939-01">January 1939</date>, but then a slight fall took the figures back to 21,200 in <date when="1940-01">January 1940</date>, four months after the outbreak of war.</p>
          <p rend="indent">While the Labour Government placed reduction of unemployment high on its programme, the employment promotion aspect of public works was, in the immediate pre-war years, overshadowed by a vigorous policy of improvement of highways, land development, school buildings, aerodromes and other works using the best available equipment.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 2 shows public works employment from 1935 to 1940.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart2">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco003a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart2-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 2</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYMENT</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of employment statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">Public works expenditure which, under depression conditions, had fallen from a level of about £8 million a year to under £2 million in the worst depression year, 1932–33, showed no notable recovery until 1936–37 when it increased to over £4 million. It moved to £7 million in the following year and to over £10 million in 1938–39, taking it above pre-depression levels for the first time. Not unnaturally the Government's public works programme
<pb n="9" xml:id="n9"/>
required considerable administrative planning and could not be accelerated rapidly. The housing programme took even longer to gain momentum.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Economic recovery was assisted in the first two years of Labour's term of office by increases of £10 million a year in export earnings. The next two years were not so satisfactory. Export earnings fell and, for 1938 and 1939, stayed £8 million below their <date when="1937">1937</date> level. Though still £12 million above what they were in <date when="1935">1935</date> when Labour took office, they were inadequate to pay for the rising cost of imports. The depressive influence on farm incomes was alleviated to some extent by the fact that guaranteed prices held up dairy incomes in 1938–39. This was the first year when guaranteed prices acted as an appreciable offset to the effect of overseas price falls.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Employment Promotion Fund, after paying out about £4 million a year for each year from 1932–33 to 1937–38, spent over £6 million in 1938–39 and it was not until the first year of war that payments fell below £3 million. Employment promotion was necessary and costly up to and after the outbreak of war.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="3" xml:id="c1-3">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">State Housing</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Provision of state-owned rental dwellings was an important plank in Labour's election platform. In the year ended <date when="1938-03">March 1938</date> the first four hundred units became available under the scheme.</p>
          <p rend="indent">This housing construction was financed largely by <name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> credit, a use of bank credit which provided extra ammunition for the inevitable cross-fire of criticism of any state housing scheme.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The dwellings were let at low rentals, admission being subject to a means test. Strictly uneconomic,<note xml:id="ftn1-9" n="1"><p>And to become more uneconomic as rentals remained fixed while costs rose.</p></note> these rentals were given a semblance of relationship to costs by charging only a nominal rate of interest on bank loans to the Government for housing purposes.<note xml:id="ftn2-9" n="2"><p>Later there was considerable controversy over the actual method of financing state housing (see for example <hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 291, p. 2691 and onwards). Loan money, once borrowed, becomes available with other monies for a variety of uses and it is difficult, if not impossible, with most state borrowing to say that the money was raised for any particular purpose, or to distinguish the uses to which it was actually put, but the above paragraphs give a reasonable indication of what was done. The rate of interest charged averaged about 1 1/4 per cent.</p></note> Needless to say this concealed form of subsidy did not escape the attention of the critics.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The programme for construction of state housing was stepped up rapidly and, by the outbreak of war, about three thousand of these dwellings were becoming available each year.</p>
          <pb n="10" xml:id="n10"/>
          <p rend="indent">Besides providing housing for the more needy members of the population, the state housing scheme added to the total demand for construction work and, with the augmented public works programme, helped to absorb unemployed labour.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="4" xml:id="c1-4">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Towards the Welfare State</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Some of the public works projects inaugurated by the Labour Government in the late 1930s were spectacular, and several, notably the Ngauranga Gorge road and the coast road from Plimmerton to <name key="name-401547" type="place">Paekakariki</name>, are still outstanding as monuments to New Zealand's most colourful Minister of Works, Robert Semple. However, in these four pre-war years of Labour government probably the greatest influence on the New Zealand economy was the Social Security Act <date when="1938">1938</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Coming into force in <date when="1939-04">April 1939</date>, this Act provided for a system of monetary benefits on a contributory basis and introduced medical, hospital and maternity benefits. Contributions were to be made at a flat rate on virtually all income. Benefits were payable to those with specific needs or commitments, irrespective of the amount of their previous contribution. The most spectacular change was that medical, hospital and maternity benefits were not to be subject to means test and that superannuation benefits, initially at a low rate, were also universal. The universal superannuation benefits were to co-exist with the more liberal age benefits which were still subject to means test; but they would gradually approach the age benefits in value and ultimately supersede them. Family benefits at this stage remained subject to means test, but in <date when="1940">1940</date> were extended to an extra child so as to be payable for each child after the first, where the income was under £5 a week.<note xml:id="ftn1-10" n="1"><p>Previously payable to each child after the second.</p></note> The Act also extended the range of other types of benefit with the express purposes of providing for all persons who, through youth or age or misfortune, were not able to share adequately in the national output.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Social Security Act aroused widespread controversy. As we have seen, its immediate effect was to increase the cost of benefits from £6·8 million in 1938–39 to £12·3 million in 1939–40; but the promise of an increasing rate of universal superannuation gave a warning of considerably heavier commitments to come. There were many who thought that the scheme must break down under its own weight, especially in times of unfavourable overseas trading conditions.</p>
          <pb n="11" xml:id="n11"/>
          <p rend="indent">Many interesting comments are recorded in <hi rend="i">Hansard</hi> where, for example, reference is made to statements by the Farmers' Union:<note xml:id="ftn1-11" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 252, p. 371. Quoted by Hon. Mr Cobbe.</p></note></p>
          <p>‘The Union is rightly concerned respecting the large addition to the imposts of the Government and their possible effect upon the already seriously depleted sterling funds in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name>. The Union also directs attention to the effect it may have upon New Zealand's credit in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name>; especially so as £17 million of loan money will fall due in the first year the proposed scheme comes into operation.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Farmers' Union said, further:</p>
          <p>‘We would emphasise that in our opinion to proceed with the scheme along the lines of the present proposals is imprudent financially. The prospect of a possible £15 million increase in general taxation at some future time is a possibility which cannot be viewed other than with the gravest misgivings.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Associated Chambers of Commerce were no less condemnatory. They said:<note xml:id="ftn2-11" n="2"><p>Ibid. Quoted by Hon. Mr Cobbe.</p></note></p>
          <p>‘The Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance put forward the hypothesis that maintenance of the same rate of increase in the exports of New Zealand in the next 40 years as in the last 40, would enable the growing costs to be met. We consider that to place any reliance on such a supposition, as a basis for maintaining the scheme, would be reckless.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The possible future increase of £15 million in general taxation was to prove to be a masterpiece of under-estimation. Twenty years later social security benefits were to cost an extra £68 million a year. On the other hand the volume of exports was to increase by well over 50 per cent in the same twenty years, justifying the confidence of Michael Savage and Walter Nash.<note xml:id="ftn3-11" n="3"><p>In this 20-year period, export prices were to rise by 208 per cent and consumer prices in New Zealand by 119 per cent. The £ in <date when="1959">1959</date> would have less than half its <date when="1939">1939</date> purchasing power.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 3 gives some impression of the impact of Labour's social security policy on the cost of benefits and pensions.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Apart from the fact that they raised average living standards by providing for those with extra needs or commitments, probably the most important economic influence of the new social security provisions was their very considerable redistribution of income from saving to spending groups and the resulting initial tendency for a higher national total of spending and a smaller national total of
<pb n="12" xml:id="n12"/>
saving. However, it did not take very long to become apparent that this boost to spending led to an expansion of the New Zealand domestic market and was an encouragement to productive effort.<note xml:id="ftn1-12" n="1"><p>This encouragement to production tended, while there were unused resources, to offset inflationary aspects of the scheme.</p></note> In fact there tended to be a secondary redistribution of income back to selling and producing groups, but with a considerable fillip to economic activity in the process. This secondary redistribution was to saving groups, but often to people who, by ploughing back profits, helped to finance development. There were quite strong links between social security and economic development.<note xml:id="ftn2-12" n="2"><p>See also ‘Social Services and Economic Development’ by <name key="name-110143" type="person">J. V. T. Baker</name> in <hi rend="i">Welfare in New Zealand</hi>, edited by K. J. Scott.</p></note></p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart3">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco004a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart3-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 3</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS AND PENSIONS</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of social security statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">Unfortunately this internal effect was not the only effect of welfare provisions. The resulting higher national total of spending also raised the propensity to spend on imports, and tended to create overseas exchange difficulties in years when export prices were unfavourable.</p>
          <pb n="13" xml:id="n13"/>
          <p rend="indent">Savage himself was the driving force towards the expansion of social security benefits, just as Robert Semple was the spearhead of public works expansion. However, behind the scenes, as Minister of Finance, Walter Nash—to become Prime Minister two decades later—was effecting a dramatic change in Government financing and financial control in order to make all these changes in works and social security policy possible.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand entered the war with her welfare provisions leading the world and being rapidly expanded. Wartime changes were to be minor, but generally in an upward direction.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="5" xml:id="c1-5">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Changes in Farming</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">For the farmers, crisis had followed crisis in the 1930s. No sooner were they free of depression conditions than there was a threat to the continuance of the free market for their products in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>. It was only after very strong protests from New Zealand farmers that the United Kingdom Government in <date when="1934">1934</date> abandoned a proposal for an import quota on butter and cheese, and instead decided to subsidise <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> milk production. Imports of meat were not so lucky. A compromise system of short-term quotas operated from <date when="1935">1935</date> until it was superseded by wartime bulk purchase arrangements.<note xml:id="ftn1-13" n="1"><p>New Zealand's allocations under the short-term quota system were not unduly restrictive.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Meanwhile the economic depression had had its influence on many facets of <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> policy. It was the income-reducing effect of overseas price falls, perhaps more than their effect on overseas funds, which had enabled the world depression of the early 1930s to communicate itself so fully and disastrously to New Zealand. The <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> pledged itself to protect farmers against instability in their incomes.</p>
          <p rend="indent">As part of its policy of insulation, it offered the farmers a guaranteed price for their products which would make them, in the short run, independent of price fluctuations in overseas markets. As it turned out, producers of meat and wool preferred to be without the guaranteed price, and the system applied only to dairy products.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The guaranteed price for dairy products, introduced in <date when="1936-08">August 1936</date>, very quickly came under pressure when, in 1937–38, rising overseas prices led to a surplus in the account and the farmers promptly demanded a higher payout. They got it.</p>
          <pb n="14" xml:id="n14"/>
          <p rend="indent">In the following year prices fell and the guaranteed price protected dairy farmers against the fall, so to some extent insulating the internal economy. But this insulation did nothing to protect New Zealand's overseas reserves; in fact it may well have been one of many influences leading to continued high importing and to an exchange crisis towards the end of <date when="1938">1938</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Meantime a more lasting change had been taking place in farming—a change which was to have a material influence on its manpower requirements under war conditions. The industry was being very rapidly mechanised and, stimulated by research work by the <name key="name-024450" type="organisation">Department of Agriculture</name><!-- Agriculture, Department of --> and the <name key="name-025082" type="organisation">Department of Scientific and Industrial Research</name><!-- Scientific and Industrial Research, Department of -->, very considerable improvements in methods were being made.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Between 1936 and 1939 the number of agricultural tractors increased by 69 per cent, and in <date when="1940">1940</date> there were almost twice as many tractors in use as in <date when="1936">1936</date>. This was an amazing transition in only a four-year period. The number of electric motors on farms increased by 60 per cent between 1936 and 1940. Milking machines had been in quite widespread use by <date when="1930">1930</date>, and after <date when="1933">1933</date> their numbers increased some 770 a year until there were nearly 29,000 by <date when="1939">1939</date>. But, more important, hand stripping, which had always been regarded as an integral part of machine milking, was being eliminated on some farms. The Dairy Board reported:<note xml:id="ftn1-14" n="1"><p>Annual Report of <name key="name-024931" type="organisation">New Zealand Dairy Board</name> for year ended <date when="1944-07">July 1944</date>, p. 49.</p></note></p>
          <p>‘In November and December, 1941, a survey was made of approximately thirty herds where no hand stripping had been carried out for one or more years…. The production data indicated very little, if any, fall in output per cow as a result of no hand stripping, whether analysed on the basis of the same cows before and after the introduction of non-stripping or on a herd basis.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Because of these changes, farming, which had in earlier years steadily increased its labour force, was now able to maintain ever-increasing production with a comparatively stable labour force. The change in rate of growth of labour requirements for farming was apparently not widely recognised until after the war and this misunderstanding was to have a major effect on wartime manpower planning.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 4 shows changes in farm mechanisation between 1929 and 1940.</p>
          <pb n="15" xml:id="n15"/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart4">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco005a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart4-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 4</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">CHANGES IN FARM MECHANISATION</hi><lb/>
INDEX NUMBERS - CONVERTED TO BASE <date when="1929">1929</date> (= 1000)</head>
              <figDesc>chart of farm statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div n="6" xml:id="c1-6">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Dependent or Independent Economy?</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">In pre-war years the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> was taking four-fifths of New Zealand's exports and supplying nearly half of her imports. Nearly another quarter of New Zealand's imports came from other Commonwealth countries. Commonwealth trading arrangements had been formalised in <date when="1932">1932</date> in the Ottawa Agreement, and for New Zealand this meant, in the main, the exchange of tariff and quota preferences with the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>. In effect it gave New Zealand an assurance that the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> would continue to absorb the bulk of her exports free of duty and quantitative restrictions, while New Zealand agreed to maintain a 20 per cent tariff preference on most imports from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">These arrangements, while ensuring a market for farm products, gave New Zealand no protection against price changes on a <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> market which was from time to time affected by over-supply.</p>
          <pb n="16" xml:id="n16"/>
          <p rend="indent">In its <date when="1935">1935</date> election campaign the <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> had promised to insulate the New Zealand economy against external economic fluctuations. In the first two years of Labour administration, insulation would have involved siphoning off increases in export earnings. The Coalition Government had left the country with substantial overseas reserves. Then in Labour's first year of office export prices rose 14 per cent, and by a further 15 per cent in the second year—truly a most favourable start for any Government's term of office. But in these years the only steps towards insulation were some diversification of the economy and the accumulation of £0·6 million in the special account set up under the guaranteed price scheme for dairy produce.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Between 1936–37 and 1937–38 export prices fell by more than 5 per cent, and Labour's promise was put to the test. The fall in export prices continued into 1938–39, with a further reduction of 3 per cent. These falls were serious but still left export prices at 19 per cent above their level in <date when="1935">1935</date> when Labour took office. In 1938–39 the dairy farmers' guaranteed price insulated their incomes against the fall, the Dairy Produce Account going into deficit by £1·9 million for the purpose. But the most serious price fall was in wool, which in 1938–39 realised 35 per cent less than the peak prices of 1936–37. Here there was no insulation.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Government carried on with its expansion policy as if the economy were in fact insulated.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Fortunately import prices were still below their pre-depression levels and the purchasing power of a given quantity of exports increased by 23 per cent between 1935 and 1937. Between 1937 and 1939 this purchasing power, or terms of trade, decreased by 8 per cent, but this still left it 13 per cent above the <date when="1935">1935</date> level.</p>
          <p rend="indent">However, it was soon to become apparent that insulation would require either unlimited overseas funds or irksome internal restraints.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1936">1936</date> the value of exports had moved above the <date when="1929">1929</date> level for the first time, when £57 million was earned. The next year earnings increased to £67 million but fell away again to £58 million in 1938 and 1939. Meantime imports, stimulated by increased internal purchasing power and augumented by extra orders of heavy equipment for the public works programme, had increased rapidly up to <date when="1937">1937</date>. The rapid mechanisation of farming also added to the expansion of import requirements.</p>
          <pb n="17" xml:id="n17"/>
          <p rend="indent">Imports and exports are shown in <ref type="chart" target="#chart5">Chart 5</ref>. Export receipts have to pay for a substantial unfavourable balance of invisible items, such as debt servicing, as well as to meet the cost of imports.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart5">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco006a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart5-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 5</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">IMPORTS AND EXPORTS</hi><lb/>
(EXCLUDING SPECIE)</head>
              <figDesc>chart of import and export</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">When export earnings fell in <date when="1938">1938</date>, imports remained high, leading to successive falls in the overseas reserves of the banks. This influence, combined with some flight of capital as a result of a loss of public confidence, resulted in the overseas reserves in <date when="1938-12">December 1938</date> falling to the dangerously low level of under £7 million. The <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name>'s promise to insulate the New Zealand economy was now under a most exacting test. Disaster was avoided by resort to exchange and import controls at the end of <date when="1938">1938</date>, but, even so, New Zealand entered the war with overseas reserves still at an extremely low level. They were only £16 million in <date when="1938-12">December 1938</date>, £20 million below their <date when="1935-12">December 1935</date> level. Changes in net overseas assets of the banks are shown in <ref type="chart" target="#chart6">Chart 6</ref>.</p>
          <pb n="18" xml:id="n18"/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart6">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco007a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart6-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 6</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">NET OVERSEAS ASSETS OF THE BANKS</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of bank assets</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">Import controls were a direct restriction on the freedom of action of a considerable economic group and must have seemed a high price for them to pay for the attempt at insulation. But the <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> seems to have been tolerant to this form of control.<note xml:id="ftn1-18" n="1"><p>Some members had advocated it for many years.</p></note> It offered secure protection for the rapid expansion of manufacturing which would be essential if the production base of the economy was to become broad enough to make insulation practicable.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Whether the electors would have tolerated import controls was not really put to the test at this stage. Before there was another election, import controls, along with many other controls, were to become necessary to protect the war economy.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Insulation against overseas economic disturbances had not proved so easy. The country had been subjected to import restrictions and, even with these restrictions, there was still considerable danger of financial disaster in New Zealand's external relations. It may not be fair to say, as some have said,<note xml:id="ftn2-18" n="2"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 256, p. 446.</p></note> that the war saved the Labour Government from financial disaster externally, but it is certain that a very crucial testing period was avoided when war came and completely changed the influences on the external economy.</p>
          <pb n="19" xml:id="n19"/>
        </div>
        <div n="7" xml:id="c1-7">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Diversification of the Economy</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">In the depression, factory production had fallen by 19 per cent while farm production remained comparatively stable. In fact 1932–33, which in many respects was the worst year of the depression, saw a sharp rise in farm production. Nevertheless there was, in the 1930s, a definite indication that it might not be too long before manufacturing overtook farming as New Zealand's major producer.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Manufacturing output made its first major recovery in 1934–35 when there was a 14 per cent increase over the previous year. In 1935–36 there was a further 9 per cent increase and in 1936–37 a 14 per cent increase. This brought the level of factory production to 53 per cent above 1931–32, which had been the lowest year in the depression, and to 30 per cent above the pre-depression level of 1928–29. After 1936–37 the rate of increase tapered off, with a 7 per cent rise in 1937–38 and 5 per cent rise in 1938–39. In the following year, aided no doubt by the exchange restrictions, which became effective in <date when="1938-12">December 1938</date>, and the supporting quota restrictions on imports, the increase in manufacturing production was 10 per cent.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 7 shows changes in the volume of manufacturing output from pre-depression to pre-war years.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart7">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco008a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart7-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 7</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">VOLUME OF MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of manufacturing production</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="20" xml:id="n20"/>
          <p rend="indent">In accordance with the Labour Government's declared policy of expanding production, a <name key="name-024513" type="organisation">Bureau of Industry</name> had been set up in <date when="1937">1937</date> to plan new industry. The Bureau discussed and was interested in varying degree in the establishment of a number of new industries. However, it is likely that the shelter given, from <date when="1938">1938</date>, by import restrictions did much more than the Bureau towards the diversification of industry. It was Labour's intention to expand industries other than farming, in order to make New Zealand less dependent on overseas sales of a narrow range of farm products. Quantitative control of imports gave the opportunity for considerable direct influence in this direction.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Import controls were to give fertilisers and other farm requirements first priority, then capital equipment and raw materials for industry. However, there were many major consumer goods such as tea, sugar and petrol which it was politically inexpedient to cut back in time of peace. Thus the range of preferred items was very wide, and considerable cuts were necessary in less favoured items. Industry in New Zealand tended to fill the gaps. The result was certainly diversification, but often in a rather haphazard way.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Even before import controls, manufacturing was gathering strength and, in spite of the depression, output increased well over 50 per cent in the decade preceding the war. The rapid upward movement of factory production in the late thirties—an increase of 36 per cent in the four years from 1935–36 to 1939–40—was no doubt assisted by other Labour policy measures which increased consumer spending and also made direct demands on the economy through the expansion of public works.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand entered the war with a wide range of manufacturing industries. Some were still in the embryo stage, but, faced with extra wartime demands, they were to fill many gaps left by the preoccupation of overseas suppliers with their own war requirements.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="8" xml:id="c1-8">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Financial Difficulties</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">On the financial side, one of the outstanding influences of the pre-war period was the very sharp lesson which had been given during the depression on the pitfalls of allowing overseas indebtedness to rise too high. Falling export earnings in the depression years had resulted in overseas debt servicing absorbing well over a quarter of all export earnings. What remained was quite inadequate to pay for imports. Relief came in due course with rising export prices, assisted perhaps by depreciation of the currency in <date when="1933">1933</date>. Borrowing continued on a reduced scale until <date when="1933">1933</date> and, in <date when="1934">1934</date>, there were some repayments of overseas debt.</p>
          <pb n="21" xml:id="n21"/>
          <p rend="indent">The lesson was that it was obviously bad policy for any Minister of Finance to allow overseas debt servicing to loom relatively so large again. This made a profound impression on the <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name>, which was to show a marked reluctance to borrow overseas, even under stress of war conditions. Some economists and others have not taken the same lesson from the depression and there has been pressure for renewed overseas borrowing and quite sharp criticism, on occasions, when overseas indebtedness has been reduced.<note xml:id="ftn1-21" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 273, p. 337. Also Vol. 282, p. <date when="1686">1686</date>, and Vol. 292, p. 2108. As time passed and export prices rose, repetition of depression difficulties would naturally seem much more remote.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">In accordance with its declared policy, the Labour Government nationalised the <name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> in <date when="1936">1936</date>, but there was not very much use of <name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> credit until <date when="1938-06">June 1938</date>. Government net indebtedness to the banking system as a whole increased by less than £4 million between March 1935 and March 1938. However, in 1938–39, advances to the Government began to rise and Government indebtedness increased by nearly £18 million between March 1938 and March 1939.<note xml:id="ftn2-21" n="2"><p><name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> of New Zealand Bulletin, <date when="1959-11">November 1959</date>, p. 173.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 8 shows Reserve Bank advances to the State and emphasises the rapid upsurge after the second quarter of <date when="1938">1938</date>. Government securities held by trading banks were also increasing.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco009a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco009a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco009a-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 8</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">RESERVE BANK ADVANCES TO THE STATE</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of reserve bank advances</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="22" xml:id="n22"/>
          <p rend="indent">As might have been expected, there was very considerable public criticism at the increasing use of bank credit by the Government.<note xml:id="ftn1-22" n="1"><p>For some of the more sober criticism see <hi rend="i"><name key="name-202082" type="work">Evening Post</name></hi> second leader, <date when="1939-03-13">13 March 1939</date>, third leader, <date when="1939-03-31">31 March 1939</date>, second leader, <date when="1939-04-26">26 April 1939</date>, and leader of <date when="1939-05-01">1 May 1939</date>.</p></note> All sorts of national disasters were foretold. Some loss of public confidence certainly resulted, aided no doubt by the evidence of overseas difficulties offered by falling overseas reserves. There was some flight of capital from New Zealand, aggravating the overseas reserve situation. To bring the results nearer home, Post Office Savings Bank deposits fell sharply, cutting at an alternative source of government funds. In the two years from March 1938 to March 1940, withdrawals exceeded deposits by £8 million.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In 1939–40 Government indebtedness to the banking system increased by a further £12 million, but part of this sum was required for war purposes.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="9" xml:id="c1-9">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Rising Retail Prices</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">At the outbreak of war, retail prices were 25 per cent above their <date when="1933">1933</date> level and had been increasing steadily. After a first tentative increase of a little over 1 ½ per cent in <date when="1934">1934</date>, annual price increases had been around 3 or 4 per cent, except for the increase of nearly 7 per cent in <date when="1937">1937</date> which was probably attributable in part to the general wage increases of the previous year. The rate of price increase was fast.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There were considerable inflationary influences on the economy, especially after the Labour Government commenced its legislative programme in <date when="1936">1936</date>, but unemployment was being steadily reduced and New Zealand's production was expanding. In other words, a considerable portion of the extra spending potential was being absorbed by extra production and reduced unemployment, so it is a little surprising that the rate of price increase was so rapid.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In this context, however, it should be noted that, in <date when="1939">1939</date>, retail prices had still not reached the level of the highest pre-depression year. In the 1920s prices had been relatively stable, fluctuating by only 4 per cent upwards or downwards, but between 1929 and 1933 they had dropped by a fifth. By <date when="1939">1939</date>, after six successive years of rises, prices were still just a little below the average for the 1920s.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 9 shows price changes between 1920 and 1939.</p>
          <pb n="23" xml:id="n23"/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart9">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco010a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart9-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 9</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">RETAIL PRICES - ALL GROUPS</hi><lb/>
INDEX NUMBERS - BASE FIRST QUARTER <date when="1949">1949</date> (= 1000)</head>
              <figDesc>chart of retail prices</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div n="10" xml:id="c1-10">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Living Standards Rise and Fall</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">What was happening to living standards while these momentous influences were changing the economy? Goods available increased steadily from 1931–32 to 1937–38 but then fell slightly under the influence of falling overseas earnings and import restrictions. However, goods supply part only of people's needs.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There is no comprehensive measure of living standards; all the statistician can provide is an approximate measure of the physical things which people use. These figures, taken on a per head basis, give some indication of potential living standards. The depression year 1931–32 stands out as a low point in the series and a good deal of the immediately following increase represents post-depression recovery.</p>
          <p rend="indent">One of the features of the depression period was that at the very time when overseas price changes were reducing the ability of New Zealand exports to purchase overseas manufactures, New Zealand's own production of manufactured goods was also drastically reduced. Expressed in 1938–39 prices, goods to the value of £116 million were available for use in New Zealand in the June
<pb n="24" xml:id="n24"/>
year 1929–30.<note xml:id="ftn1-24" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">New Zealand Official Yearbook</hi>, <date when="1945">1945</date>, p. 598.</p></note> This was made up of £69 million which remained from local production after allowing for exports, together with £47 million worth of imported goods. Imports (again valued at 1938–39 prices) fell to £27 million in 1931–32 and, partly as a result of an £8 million fall in local production, goods remaining from local production after exports fell to £57 million. Thus a fall of £20 million from imports was accompanied by a fall from local production, and the volume of goods available for use in New Zealand fell staggeringly by 27 per cent in these two years.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Thereafter the volume of goods available for use in New Zealand increased slowly until 1933–34 and then rapidly until 1937–38. In the next two years it fell once more, as a result of declining imports.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 10 shows changes in the volume of goods available and also in goods available per head of population, and throws some light on the more material aspects of living standards. It is of interest that the 1929–30 volume available per head was not again reached until 1936–37.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart10">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco011a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart10-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 10</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">CHANGES IN VOLUME OF GOODS AVAILABLE</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="25" xml:id="n25"/>
          <p rend="indent">Goods available per head reached a low point in 1931–32 and then increased yearly, accelerating in the period 1934–35 to 1936–37, with a more moderate increase in 1937–38. However, overseas prices fell, and there was not sufficient insulation to prevent falling export earnings from pulling down living standards by 2 per cent in the following year. This was only a forerunner of more drastic cuts in living standards which would become necessary under war conditions.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="11" xml:id="c1-11">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Pre-war Economic Crisis?</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">In forming judgments about the pre-war situation, proper weight must be given to the fall in export earnings in <date when="1938">1938</date>, which was one of the causes leading to import restrictions. It is equally important not to overweight this influence. Export earnings averaged £57 million a year for the years 1935 to 1939 as compared with £41 million a year in the preceding five years, 1930 to 1934. This is hardly a fair comparison, as the latter five years included the depression. However, in the pre-depression years 1925 to 1929, export earnings had averaged £52 million. The average for the immediate pre-war period 1935 to 1939 was 10 per cent above this level and, in the conditions of the time, this cannot be regarded as an unsatisfactory result.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The year <date when="1937">1937</date>, when export earnings reached nearly £67 million, was in fact an all-time record up to that point, and the year <date when="1938">1938</date>, to whose waywardness the imposition of import controls has been attributed, was then the highest year of any on record, except <date when="1937">1937</date>. Looking back, therefore, it is difficult to see how New Zealand could have got herself into such financial difficulty externally, unless she was pushing her internal resources too hard or building up an excessive money demand which was spilling over into importing.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The internal economy was not under extreme upward pressure. Numbers unemployed and in assisted employment were still as high as 19,000 at the outbreak of war. Although some economists at the time referred to this as full employment, war and post-war experience was to show quite clearly that full employment in New Zealand could bring the unemployment level down to hundreds rather than thousands.<note xml:id="ftn1-25" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="chapter" target="#c20">Chapter 20</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Certainly the economy was developing at an unaccustomed pace and lack of money was not being allowed to delay welfare provisions, public works or housing. Naturally the resulting pressure of internal demand spread to imports. Then came the fall in export prices and the run down in reserves. If one is entitled
<pb n="26" xml:id="n26"/>
to distinguish between the two blades of a pair of shears, it was the extra importing rather than the level of export prices which caused the overseas exchange crisis.</p>
          <p rend="indent">With bank credit being extensively used internally, those who believed in more orthodox financial methods not unnaturally lost confidence in New Zealand's ability to remain solvent. This was brought sharply home to the Government by the flight of capital from New Zealand, and later by the difficulties Mr Nash had in <date when="1939">1939</date> in finding suitable funds in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name> to repay a maturing loan. So stringent were the repayment conditions Mr Nash was forced to accept that there was some doubt whether New Zealand would be able to meet them. A <hi rend="i">Round Table</hi> article said:<note xml:id="ftn1-26" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">Round Table</hi>, Vol. 117, <date when="1939-12">December 1939</date>, p. 226.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘The Minister of Finance (Mr Nash) during his recent visit to <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name>, arranged that the £17,000,000 which falls due on <date when="1940-01-01">January 1, 1940</date>, would be reduced to £16,000,000 on due date, and the balance repaid in half-yearly sums amounting to £2,000,000 in 1940–41 and £3,500,000 in each of the four succeeding years, less any amounts the bond holders elect to convert. He also arranged a loan of £5,000,000 from the United Kingdom Government for defence and other public purposes; also an export credit of £4,000,000.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Although expressions of gratitude for the assistance given by the United Kingdom Government have been made in many quarters, serious doubts have been raised as to whether the temporary relief afforded will enable New Zealand to weather the financial storm into which she has sailed.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘It is generally recognised that unless there is a sharp rise in the price of primary products, New Zealand will have to make a stern effort of national self-denial in order to meet the capital repayments and also find the £12,000,000 annually required to pay overseas interest, freights and other obligations….’</p>
          <p rend="indent">This chastening experience stiffened Labour's determination not to become further dependent on overseas capital and may have been in large measure responsible for the almost complete reliance on internal sources to finance New Zealand's war effort.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In its domestic policy the Labour Government had drawn extensively on bank credit, but, in terms of welfare provisions, new public works, extra housing and increases in production and employment, a very great deal had been done. These achievements justified, indeed required, some expansion in the monetary base of the economy, but the expansion seems to have been overdone. Even so, it is possible that New Zealand could have weathered the resulting financial storm. This was never really put to the test. War was declared the day before Mr Nash returned from his mission.</p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb n="27" xml:id="n27"/>
      <div type="chapter" n="2" xml:id="c2">
        <head>CHAPTER 2<lb/>
Preparation for War</head>
        <div n="1" xml:id="c2-1">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">The Need to Prepare</hi>
          </head>
          <p>THE outbreak of war, in <date when="1939-09">September 1939</date>, can hardly be said to have come as a surprise, nor was there very much doubt about the effects of a global war on the economy; but, when war was declared, New Zealand's economic preparations were very patchy indeed.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By <date when="1935">1935</date> <name key="name-006503" type="person">Hitler</name> had ceased to make any pretence of accepting the limits on rearmament imposed by the Treaty of <name key="name-032512" type="place">Versailles</name>. From then until <date when="1939">1939</date> the dictators of <name key="name-008008" type="place">Europe</name> needed to make only minor diplomatic gestures to other European powers in order to be able to do pretty much what they liked. The Rhineland was gobbled up in <date when="1936">1936</date>, <name key="name-007106" type="place">Austria</name> in <date when="1938">1938</date>, parts of <name key="name-034836" type="place">Czechoslovakia</name> in 1938 and 1939, <name key="name-020121" type="place">Albania</name> in <date when="1939">1939</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The allied nations, weakened by disarmament and by strong antimilitary feelings among their citizens, could protest, but without offering any effective resistance. Even at <name key="name-008557" type="place">Munich</name>, in <date when="1938-09">September 1938</date>, defiance, which was after all the only alternative to appeasement, could not have been backed by arms.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The appeasement at <name key="name-008557" type="place">Munich</name> stiffened the backs of the Allies and gave time to prepare for the final gesture of defiance to the aggressors when it was provoked by the invasion of <name key="name-034869" type="place">Poland</name> on <date when="1939-09-01">1 September 1939</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The writing was on the wall in <date when="1935">1935</date>. It was there in great red letters in <date when="1938">1938</date>. The Allies must ultimately stand firm or be trampled underfoot. Yet, in New Zealand, economic preparation still hung back.</p>
          <p rend="indent">For New Zealand, the threat of war came much closer than in <date when="1914">1914</date>. <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> might support <name key="name-008556" type="place">Germany</name> and <name key="name-001383" type="place">Italy</name>. In that event New Zealand did not share <name key="name-005976" type="place">Britain</name>'s confidence that there would still be no immediate danger of attack on <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and New Zealand.
<pb n="28" xml:id="n28"/>
Moreover there was a strongly held view in New Zealand that war against <name key="name-008556" type="place">Germany</name> and <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> would entail a six months' break in overseas communications.<note xml:id="ftn1-28" n="1"><p>Wood, <hi rend="i"><name key="name-110071" type="work">Political and External Affairs</name></hi>, pp. 73–4.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">How should New Zealand prepare her economy for war? She would continue to be the foremost supplier of food to the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>; in fact New Zealand supplies would become much more important to the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> if other sources were denied to her. If New Zealand were to join in the fighting, the needs of the armed services would make considerable demands on manpower and would probably leave industry with insufficient labour at a time when many branches of industry were required to expand production to sustain her allies. Allocation of labour to industry and the maintenance of a proper balance between production and military needs would require very careful planning.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Shipping and international trade seemed almost certain to be disrupted. This might be drastic and immediate in its effects on New Zealand if <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> entered the war, as she was expected to do. Nearly all New Zealand industries were dependent to varying degrees on supplies of materials and equipment from overseas, and a wide range of essential consumer goods had to be imported. Road transport and much industrial and farm equipment were powered by petrol or oil, which was available only from overseas sources. Reserve stocks should be accumulated.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Interference with shipping would also make it difficult for New Zealand to maintain the outward flow of her export commodities and a large portion of these commodities was perishable. Preparation for war should therefore make special arrangements for storage of these perishable commodities.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By <date when="1938">1938</date> it became apparent also that, even if communications were not cut, New Zealand could not depend upon <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> suppliers for military equipment. New industries would have to be developed to fill the gap.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Everything pointed to the fact that economic planning for modern warfare would have to be far-reaching and comprehensive. In a prolonged war the overall strain on manpower resources and finance would be unbearably heavy. Planning would have to visualise establishing new industries to fill supply gaps, diverting construction endeavours to military works and stepping up food production. To man these industries and to protect other essential industries, precautions would have to be taken against excessive depletion of manpower for military purposes. It might even be necessary to restrict the movement of the labour which remained.</p>
          <pb n="29" xml:id="n29"/>
          <p rend="indent">The adequacy of reserves of raw materials and equipment might easily determine the length of time many industries could continue to operate, while perishable exports might go to waste if storage facilities were not considerably extended.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The magnitude and urgency of the economic tasks called for immediate-and decisive action.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="2" xml:id="c2-2">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Failure to Prepare</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Decisive action in the pre-war years was directed to welfare provisions, public works and housing, rather than to preparation for war.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In fairness to the Labour Government, it should be said that, in its ranks, the view was strongly held that improvements in the welfare of the peoples of the world would remove a major cause of war. Those who were convinced of the rightness of this point of view and of the wrongness of military aggression, no doubt felt justified in delaying the diversion of New Zealand's efforts from provisions for welfare to preparations for war. Less sympathetically one might observe that a large number of members of the <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> were pacifists by inclination and did not take sufficiently seriously the mounting evidence of planned aggression by <name key="name-008556" type="place">Germany</name>, <name key="name-001383" type="place">Italy</name>, and <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name>. Be that as it may, the net effect was that suggestions to prepare met with a marked lack of Government enthusiasm.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Combine this with the fact that New Zealanders in the early 1930s had their full share of the anti-military feelings<note xml:id="ftn1-29" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">Round Table</hi>, Vol. 20, pp. 913–14 (<date when="1930">1930</date>); <hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 225, p. 303 (<date when="1930">1930</date>); <hi rend="i">Round Table</hi>, Vol. 25, p. 215 (<date when="1934">1934</date>).</p></note> which had done so much to weaken <name key="name-008008" type="place">Europe</name> in its resistance to <name key="name-006503" type="person">Hitler</name>, and it is not surprising that active war preparations were delayed.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By the time <name key="name-008557" type="place">Munich</name> had brought home the inevitability of war as the only alternative to ultimate submission to the aggressor, there was a new barrier in the way of New Zealand's preparation for war. In 1938 and 1939 shortage of overseas funds made it inexpedient to build up adequate stocks of imported materials and equipment or to extend refrigerated storage space. By this time, also, <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> firms were having difficulty in filling New Zealand orders for military equipment, because of the urgency of their own government's needs. The supply side of economic preparation had been left too late.</p>
          <p rend="indent">On the manpower side more thinking had been done, but here frustrations were even greater. Pre-war official thinking tended to the view that some form of registration of manpower was essential.
<pb n="30" xml:id="n30"/>
But registration seemed inevitably to lead to compulsion and here long-established <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> policy stood in the way. The keynote of Labour policy on manpower requirements for war was that conscription of wealth would precede any conscription of men. It is not difficult to see that manpower planning would proceed haltingly when faced with this very determined viewpoint and, in fact, in spite of searching investigations and recommendations by the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> of the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name>, little positive action had been taken up to the outbreak of war.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1939-03">March 1939</date> the Prime Minister, Mr Savage, had warned of the need to ‘prepare for the worst, not only in defence along ordinary lines but in industrial development upon which the defence of the country will largely depend’,<note xml:id="ftn1-30" n="1"><p><name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name><hi rend="i">Star</hi>, <date when="1939-03-22">22 March 1939</date>.</p></note> yet even in <date when="1939-04">April 1939</date>, after the Pacific Defence Conference in <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name>, he seems to have had little idea of the manpower strain war would bring. Probably he still thought of a small voluntary expeditionary force only. His ideas on home defence visualised a citizen army of men who would be citizens and soldiers at the same time<note xml:id="ftn2-30" n="2"><p>Wood, op. cit., p. 81.</p></note>—in marked contrast to the thousands of men who were in fact to be held in uniform in the armed forces in New Zealand while industry cried out for labour.</p>
          <p rend="indent">On a voluntary basis, the Territorial army was built up from 7100 in May 1938 to 10,400 a year later, and further increases were provided for, to bring it ‘within reasonable reach of its war establishment’,<note xml:id="ftn3-30" n="3"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-19, Annual Report of the Chief of the General Staff, p. 1.</p></note> but in spite of repeated recommendations from the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> the Government would make no decision affecting labour for industry until after the outbreak of war.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Economic preparation for war left much to be desired. On the three vital issues of supplies of equipment and materials, refrigerated space for perishable exports and civilian manpower planning, there was considerable discussion and a flow of official recommendations, but no adequate government action was taken before war was declared. Yet the need for planning and action had been foreseen.</p>
          <p rend="indent">A <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> had been set up as an offshoot of the New Zealand Committee of Imperial Defence as early as <date when="1934">1934</date>. In <date when="1936-08">August 1936</date>, in the debate in Parliament, Minister of Defence F. Jones said:<note xml:id="ftn4-30" n="4"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 246, p. 559.</p></note></p>
          <pb n="31" xml:id="n31"/>
          <p rend="indent">‘… A committee on which some twenty Government Departments are represented is investigating the problem of supplies in war—that is to say, supplies for the community at large, and not merely for armed forces. Some examples of their problems are supply of oil fuel and lubricants in war, including a rationing scheme and the provision of refrigerated space in the event of the interruption of export trade. If our export trade is disorganised, so far as beef, mutton, and lamb are concerned, we can stop killing for meat supplies; but we cannot stop the supply of butter. For this reason, a survey is being made of the refrigerating space, to see to what extent we could store butter until such time as trade was resumed between this country and the countries with which we trade. Other committees are being set up to deal with communications, cables, and wireless; another committee, to deal with manpower, and another with shipping and meteorological services. Provision is being made in the Defence estimates for meteorological service, and we are trying to cooperate with <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and another country in connection with this service….’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The pre-war period was characterised by awareness, discussion and recommendations for action but very little action. Yet in spite of Government inactivity, consideration of these matters in committee had been of value. Discussion and study had brought an awareness of problems which stood officials in good stead when war broke out, while Labour's policy of development and diversification of the economy, though not part of any plan for war, probably put New Zealand in a better condition to cope with problems of wartime production.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="3" xml:id="c2-3">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Facilities for Pre-war Planning</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand had received the first reminder about the need for pre-war planning at the Imperial Conference in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name> in <date when="1930-10">October 1930</date>. Perhaps planning can be said to have started in <date when="1933-10">October 1933</date> when the Prime Minister, George Forbes, announced a decision to form a New Zealand section of the Committee of Imperial Defence. The New Zealand committee had its first meeting in <date when="1933-11">November 1933</date>, but time passed without real action, and as late as <date when="1937-03">March 1937</date> nothing had been achieved. At this stage a general scheme was approved and in <date when="1937-05">May 1937</date> three bodies, the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name>, the <name key="name-024575" type="organisation">Council of Defence</name> and the <name key="name-020068" type="organisation">Chiefs of Staff Committee</name>, being, respectively, the secretariat for co-ordinating preparations for war, the Cabinet sub-committee advising on those preparations, and the committee responsible for
<pb n="32" xml:id="n32"/>
military co-ordination, were given a common secretary and the means were available for planning. Nevertheless there was still no great encouragement from the Government and certainly very little indication of its views on manpower or other problems in war.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the course of <date when="1938">1938</date> the secretarial work connected with planning for war was gradually taken over by the departments likely to be concerned, but until <date when="1939">1939</date> the Government does not seem to have faced up to the necessity to prepare actively for war. Even then it was not willing to give any guide to policy on what would be the major wartime problem, the use of manpower.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Plans for action by all Government departments in the transition from war to peace were to be embodied in the War Book. As early as the Imperial Conference of <date when="1930">1930</date>, attention was drawn to the fact that New Zealand had achieved nothing towards its War Book. The position became more pointed at the <date when="1937">1937</date> Imperial Conference. By this time a number of Commonwealth countries had made progress, but New Zealand still lagged.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There were occasional Government statements of intention and calls for action, but, even by <date when="1938">1938</date>, almost nothing had been accomplished. The first really effective work on the War Book was done in <date when="1938-09">September 1938</date>, the month of <name key="name-008557" type="place">Munich</name>. But tension eased a little and the work slowed up again. It was not until <date when="1939-07">July 1939</date> that the War Book was complete.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="4" xml:id="c2-4">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Pre-war Manpower Planning</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Pre-war manpower planning was associated with the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name>. This Committee was an offshoot of the New Zealand Committee of Imperial Defence, which was formed in <date when="1933-11">November 1933</date> and was to change its name to <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name> in <date when="1936-08">August 1936</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> first met in <date when="1934-06">June 1934</date>, but does not appear to have worked under any pressure until <date when="1939">1939</date>. There were in fact only twelve meetings of the Committee in the five years 1934 to 1938, compared with nineteen meetings in the first ten months of <date when="1939">1939</date>, up to the time the Committee ceased to function in October.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Primarily the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> was a channel for pre-war thinking about defence demands and industrial requirements for manpower in times of war. It was inter-departmental, with no direct representation of outside interests. The Committee was very conscious of the conflicts and shortages which would arise in the manpower field in the event of war. Many of its discussions and proposals envisaged far-reaching measures which would involve
<pb n="33" xml:id="n33"/>
a major loss of freedom of choice for individuals in the labour force. Quite a substantial loss of freedom is inevitable under the demands of war, but the thinking of the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> seems at times to have gone further than in fact proved necessary. In a report dated <date when="1939-01-30">30 January 1939</date> it said:<note xml:id="ftn1-33" n="1"><p>ONS 115, para. 5.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘It is the opinion of the Committee that a state of affairs must be envisaged in which the Government controls the Manpower of the Dominion, allotting men either to industries which have become more essential and which demand additional staff, or to the armed services for home defence (not for service overseas, which would be dealt with as an entirely separate problem). The Committee submit that the only point which is really at issue is the time at which this control is applied.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The <name key="name-024575" type="organisation">Council of Defence</name> was, however, not prepared to take so extreme a view at that time, and at no stage of the war did controls extend to all manpower.<note xml:id="ftn2-33" n="2"><p>Registration for work of national importance was ultimately required up to age 40 for women and 59 for men. See also <ref type="page" target="#n99">pp. 99</ref>–<ref type="page" target="#n101">101</ref>.</p></note></p>
        </div>
        <div n="5" xml:id="c2-5">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Proposals for a National Register</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">The idea of complete and detailed Government direction of manpower led to consideration of a National Register. Here again thinking at times was fairly extreme, involving registration of every member of the population. Actually, by <date when="1939">1939</date>, a fairly full listing of the population was involved in the issuing of Social Security levy books,<note xml:id="ftn3-33" n="3"><p>The Social Security Act <date when="1938">1938</date> provided for payment of a registration fee of 5s. on <date when="1939-04-01">1 April 1939</date>, and thereafter quarterly for men over 20 years of age and annually for all others over 16 years of age. The registration fee was abolished in <date when="1946-04">April 1946</date>.</p></note> although the information obtained for this purpose was not comprehensive enough to form a National Register as a basis for manpower direction. If there was to be a National Register it would therefore require an extension of the information obtained in the Social Security levy books,<note xml:id="ftn4-33" n="4"><p>As was eventually done in <date when="1940-03">March 1940</date>.</p></note> unless it was done as a separate undertaking. However, none of the Committee's suggestions received Government support, and it was driven to consider a voluntary register as an alternative, with a view to having any sort of register under way before war broke out.<note xml:id="ftn5-33" n="5"><p>Reiterated in ONS 120 of <date when="1939-02">February 1939</date>.</p></note> The Committee wanted this register to be started without delay, but in <date when="1939-02">February 1939</date> the <name key="name-024575" type="organisation">Council of Defence</name> directed that no form of special register was required in peace.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Labour Government's view was that, if conscription did turn out to be necessary, conscription of wealth should precede
<pb n="34" xml:id="n34"/>
conscription of manpower. Suggestions that plans be prepared for direction of manpower or for a national register, which led to the same end, could make little or no progress against this firm stand.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By <date when="1939-07">July 1939</date> the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> had drafted a National Registration Act which, in the event of war, would provide for the registration of all males between the ages of 17 and 60 years and of all females between the ages of 17 and 55. This draft Act had been sent to the Law Draftsman by <date when="1939-08">August 1939</date>, but on the outbreak of war no action was taken to institute a system of national registration, and it was not until <date when="1940-03">March 1940</date> that provision was made to extend the information obtained from Social Security registrations in an attempt to provide the basis for a National Register.<note xml:id="ftn1-34" n="1"><p>Social Security Supplementary Regulations <date when="1940">1940</date>.</p></note></p>
        </div>
        <div n="6" xml:id="c2-6">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Reserved Occupations and Essential Industries</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">The <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> also concerned itself with the important precaution of working out a schedule of reserved occupations where, in the event of large-scale recruitment for the armed forces, men should be retained to protect the more essential industries against manpower depletion. While the needs of the fighting services would be paramount in times of war, it would also be essential that production be maintained at the highest possible level. The problem of scheduling reserved occupations was approached from this point of view.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It was realised that even in the early stages of a war, when enlistments might be entirely voluntary, there should be some protection against manpower depletion in key industries. After considerable discussion, the Committee recommended in <date when="1939-02">February 1939</date> that the only form of control required in the initial stages of a war would be to indicate to a minimum of key occupations that men in these occupations would be best serving the national interest by remaining at work.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By <date when="1939-05">May 1939</date> a list of the factories considered necessary for the production of essential commodities had been completed and, between May and August 1939, a schedule of reserved occupations was prepared. It was adopted by the <name key="name-024575" type="organisation">Council of Defence</name> in <date when="1939-08">August 1939</date> with a view to its being communicated to recruiting officers. This schedule was effective. In the first month of war the classes of men included in the reserve list were not being accepted for service in any of the armed forces. Some early difficulties arose because the list of reserved occupations was treated as confidential, a requirement which made it impossible to advise physically fit men who
<pb n="35" xml:id="n35"/>
were not accepted for service that they had been reserved for work in essential industries. However, the position was cleared to some extent in mid-September when the Prime Minister stated that physically fit men who were not accepted for service could assume that they were regarded as being essential in their normal occupations.<note xml:id="ftn1-35" n="1"><p><name key="name-110027" type="organisation">War History Branch</name> narrative No. 48, p. 37.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">On the outbreak of war the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> was for a short period reconstituted to include representation from secondary industries and local bodies. However, in <date when="1939-10">October 1939</date> it held its last meeting and was superseded by the <name key="name-024529" type="organisation">Central Advisory Labour Council</name>. On the new <name key="name-024529" type="organisation">Central Advisory Labour Council</name> were representatives of three major organisations which were established by Cabinet to deal with war conditions, namely the <name key="name-017304" type="organisation">Industrial Emergency Council</name>, the <name key="name-025006" type="organisation">Primary Production Council</name> and the Factory Advisory Committee.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Minister of Manpower<!-- Manpower, Minister of -->, referring to the <name key="name-024529" type="organisation">Central Advisory Labour Council</name>, said:<note xml:id="ftn2-35" n="2"><p>Parlimentary Paper H-19<hi rend="sc">b</hi>, <hi rend="i">Utilization of the Manpower of the Dominion</hi>, statement by the Minister of Manpower, <date when="1940">1940</date>, p. 1.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘The functions of the organisation are to inquire into and report to the Government on all matters affecting the utilization of man-power in the Dominion, with a view to expanding national resources to the full. An important part of the work will be to review constantly the possible effect of recruiting on industry, so that as the war progresses production can be maintained.’</p>
        </div>
        <div n="7" xml:id="c2-7">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">The Manpower Committee's Achievements</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">The <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> served a useful purpose prior to the outbreak of war by providing facilities for thinking and discussion on the manpower problems which would arise under war conditions. Thus manpower problems could be handled more efficiently when they actually arose; but it is a sobering thought that comparatively few of the recommendations of the Committee were in fact implemented prior to or on the outbreak of war. The list of essential occupations and some draft acts seem to have been the only material products of the Committee's work which survived into the war period.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It is interesting to note that the rather drastic original recommendations of the Committee for a national register involving the registration of the entire population were whittled down in the actual event to the registration of particular occupations and age
<pb n="36" xml:id="n36"/>
groups as required.<note xml:id="ftn1-36" n="1"><p>When compulsion came, it was based initially on Social Security registration, but those in specified groups who did not receive a notice of registration were required to register. See also <ref type="page" target="#n100">p. 100</ref>.</p></note> The main reasons which seem to have emerged at the time were the difficulty in providing staff for a full-scale national register and the large amount of work which would be involved in keeping the register up to date because of population movements.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="8" xml:id="c2-8">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Supply Uncertainties</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">The possibility of disruption in overseas communications required urgent attention to questions of continuity of supply in war. Retail sales to consumers, materials for manufacturing, equipment for industry and construction materials, all had a high import content and could be seriously affected by any impediment to the flow of imported supplies. Twenty-seven per cent of all New Zealand consumption of goods and services was imported and 40 per cent of capital formation. Many manufacturing industries were entirely dependent on imports for their continual operation and the average import content of New Zealand manufactured goods was nearly one-third. Even farming was over 3 per cent directly dependent on imports, and this dependence rose as high as 10 per cent when the import requirements of those who serviced farming were taken into account.<note xml:id="ftn2-36" n="2"><p>These are actually post-war estimates for 1952–53 (<name key="name-110143" type="person">Baker</name> ‘Patterns and Relationships in the N.Z. Economy’, <hi rend="i">Accountants' Journal</hi>, <date when="1959-01">January 1959</date>). Because of the increasing relative importance of domestic manufacturing, they probably give low estimates of import contents in the pre-war years.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">As far back as <date when="1933">1933</date> the New Zealand Committee of Imperial Defence had recognised the importance of early planning for supply in wartime and had formed various supply sub-committees. In <date when="1936">1936</date>, when the Committee of Imperial Defence became the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name>, a <name key="name-024925" type="organisation">National Supply Council</name> was set up. This Council and its sub-committees made reports on specific commodities, and tabulated information resulting from a questionnaire sent to major factories. Responses to the questionnaire were, however, not good enough to provide really reliable information. The special staff engaged on this work also maintained contact with manufacturers and others, encouraging them to use substitutes and to stockpile essential raw materials.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By the time of the <name key="name-008557" type="place">Munich</name> crisis, in <date when="1938-09">September 1938</date>, recommendations had been made for the necessary controls over supply in the event of war, and draft regulations had been prepared. The Department of Industries and Commerce, which had been represented on all the Supply Committees, was given the job of
<pb n="37" xml:id="n37"/>
organising and co-ordinating a larger scale investigation of the supply position. A further questionnaire was sent to specific industries and produced a rather better range of information, though once again the response does not seem to have been sufficient to give a really comprehensive view of requirements.<note xml:id="ftn1-37" n="1"><p>War History narrative 90/1, Ministry of Supply, Vol. 1, p. 21.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1939-04">April 1939</date> the Pacific Defence Conference was held in <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name>, attended by representatives of the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and New Zealand. All aspects of co-ordination in the event of war and co-operation in defence problems in peacetime were fully discussed.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By this time the main impediment to the accumulation of reserve stocks was the critically low level of New Zealand's overseas funds. In <date when="1938">1938</date> the effects of lower export earnings, high imports and some flight of capital had run down overseas reserves rapidly, leading to the imposition of import controls and a very tight rein on the use of overseas funds.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1939-05">May 1939</date> Cabinet decided that funds and special import licences should be made available to certain firms and Government departments to enable them to purchase and hold stocks as a reserve in case of war. A sum of £512,000 was earmarked for this purpose. It was pitifully inadequate, but, in agreeing to the proposition, the <name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> added, ‘owing however to the possibility of an acute shortage of sterling I must request that the <name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> be consulted before any further large purchases are sanctioned involving the remittance of funds overseas.’<note xml:id="ftn2-37" n="2"><p>Reply of Governor of <name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> of <date when="1939-06-28">28 June 1939</date> to application by the acting Minister of Finance of 28 June—on Industries and Commerce file 55/7. See also <ref type="page" target="#n44">p. 44</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">It is possible that any major commitment of overseas funds would have been similarly tagged, but it is still surprising that such a small sum for war preparations did not have a higher priority by <date when="1939-05">May 1939</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Recognition of the need for effective action came too late to enable reserves to be greatly expanded, for the war was only a few months away. Mr <name key="name-025080" type="person">L. J. Schmitt</name><!-- Schmitt, L. J. -->, Secretary of Supply, wrote later to the Minister, ‘… the outbreak of war on <date when="1939-09-03">September 3rd 1939</date> caught us in the middle of a steady expansion of reserve stocks of many items, which would have been purchased in September and October but were never imported because of the outbreak of war.’<note xml:id="ftn3-37" n="3"><p>Secretary of Supply to Minister of Supply, <date when="1940-08-22">22 August 1940</date>. On Industries and Commerce file 55/7.</p></note></p>
          <pb n="38" xml:id="n38"/>
        </div>
        <div n="9" xml:id="c2-9">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Stocks at the Outbreak of War</hi>
            <note xml:id="ftn1-38" n="1">
              <p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n111">pp. 111</ref>–<ref type="page" target="#n17">17</ref>.</p>
            </note>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">In spite of all the delays and hindrances, stocks of some vital raw materials sufficient to last for several months had arrived in New Zealand when war broke out and had been taken into reserve.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Among the major items in reserve were <date when="2000">2000</date> tons of corrugated roofing iron valued at £60,000. This was imported by the <name key="name-024898" type="organisation">Ministry of Works</name> and specially stored at <name key="name-026686" type="place">Trentham</name>. A similar quantity of other stocks was in the country, but the total was below normal holdings.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The import of woolpacks, corn sacks and other jute goods was facilitated by waiving import licences and by specially arranged sterling funds. As a result the stock position was good when war began.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Fertilisers in a primary producing country are vital items in peace or war. Some reserves were laid down. About 80,000 tons of rock phosphate was stored at the eight phosphate works, equivalent to about a quarter of a year's supply. Sulphur and other chemicals to the value of £100,000 were also stored at works throughout the country, and probably represented on average rather less than a quarter's supply.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In anticipation of difficulties in obtaining supplies of cream of tartar<note xml:id="ftn2-38" n="2"><p>The raw materials came from <name key="name-008556" type="place">Germany</name>, <name key="name-008009" type="place">France</name>, <name key="name-001383" type="place">Italy</name> and <name key="name-007594" type="place">Spain</name>.</p></note> the principle importers were encouraged to import 200 tons at a cost of £20,000. Arrangements were also made to import and store 15,000 tons of raw sugar valued at £150,000.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The importing of 7000 tons of gypsum rock, essential in the manufacture of cement and plaster, was financed by several cement companies. This was equivalent to about six months' requirements.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Government arranged that a reserve of rubber and associated chemicals to the value of £35,000 should be laid down, the Government meeting the cost of interest on £25,000. However, because of high ruling prices just prior to the war, only half the reserve had been established before war began and no further purchases were made until about mid-<date when="1940">1940</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the year prior to the outbreak of war the <name key="name-025248" type="organisation">Wheat Committee</name>, on the advice of the <name key="name-024924" type="organisation">National Supply Committee</name>, took precautions to ensure the maintenance of milling and baking facilities in the event of emergency. Arrangements were made with the flour millers to carry additional stocks of wheat at no cost to the Government. Wheat could be bought in <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> during <date when="1939">1939</date> at the low
<pb n="39" xml:id="n39"/>
price of 2s. 4d. per bushel<note xml:id="ftn1-39" n="1"><p>The price of 2s. 4d. per bushel is taken from War History narrative 90/2. The section on wheat and flour control was ‘written in <name key="name-110027" type="organisation">War History Branch</name> and corrected and supplemented by <name key="name-024833" type="person">R. McPherson</name>, General Manager, <name key="name-025248" type="organisation">Wheat Committee</name> ….’ The price of wheat from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> was 4s. 4d. per bushel from November 1937 to March 1938, but then fell progressively to 2s. 6d. in <date when="1938-11">November 1938</date> and by <date when="1939-08">August 1939</date> had receded to 2s. 1d. per bushel.—<hi rend="i">Commonwealth of Australia Official Yearbook</hi>, <date when="1940">1940</date>, p. 365.</p></note> and it was intended to import as much as could be shipped and handled. This programme was almost completed when war broke out, with the result that the millers had sufficient wheat in store until the end of <date when="1940-05">May 1940</date> without using any of the <date when="1940">1940</date> crop.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand was completely dependent on overseas sources for petrol. Moreover, at the outbreak of war her supplies depended partly on cargoes carried in foreign-owned tankers, the British tanker fleet being unable to supply all New Zealand's needs and meet other requirements.</p>
          <p rend="indent">From 1934 to 1939 the annual consumption of petrol in New Zealand had risen by nearly two-thirds from 64 million gallons to just on 100 million gallons, due mainly to the rapid increase in the number of private motor cars. Requirements for private cars accounted for approximately 53 per cent of all petrol imports in <date when="1939">1939</date>. Because of this high demand it was normal to carry fairly substantial stocks, ranging between 25 and 30 million gallons.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Stocks at the outbreak of war totalled 28 million gallons, equivalent to 31/2 months' usage, which was not much more than a normal stockholding. With expected extra war demands and future supplies uncertain, it is therefore not surprising that petrol was the first commodity to be rationed, control coming into force on the day war was declared.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It must not be imagined from these special arrangements that stocks generally were adequate when war broke out. Shortages of overseas funds had more probably brought the overall level of stocks to well below normal requirements, which for many industries would be a quarter or more of annual usage.</p>
          <p rend="indent">For the most part any specific precautions against a break in supplies were made by importers or manufacturers themselves acting in their own interests and often fighting against the effect of the Government's import controls. Many of the above items are just interesting exceptions and, even where special arrangements were made, they were not always sufficient to bring stocks back to normal levels after they had been run down by importing difficulties.</p>
          <pb n="40" xml:id="n40"/>
        </div>
        <div n="10" xml:id="c2-10">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">The Need for New Industries</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">To meet the needs for war production, it would not be enough to safeguard supplies to existing industries. Wartime pressures would require the rapid emergence of new industries. Most important was the possibility that New Zealand, in the event of war, might have to manufacture her own munitions, because of the preoccupation of traditional suppliers with their own country's requirements. Even in <date when="1938">1938</date>, British manufacturers were in some cases not able to fulfil New Zealand orders for war materials.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The manufacture of munitions in New Zealand would however require the accumulation of reserves of iron and steel, while suitable equipment would have to be purchased and installed. Not much was accomplished before the outbreak of war, even though it had become apparent by early <date when="1939">1939</date> that military equipment in New Zealand was inadequate for mobilisation and that the deficiency could not be made good from overseas.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Defence Conference in <date when="1939-04">April 1939</date> recommended that New Zealand's capacity to make military equipment should be explored,<note xml:id="ftn1-40" n="1"><p>Wood, op. cit., p. 87.</p></note> but still no direct action was taken.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To meet wartime changes in demand, new methods might be necessary in the processing of New Zealand exports. The possibility of a sudden order for canned foods for the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> or for forces serving overseas was visualised, and tinplate to the value of £42,000, together with a smaller quantity of lead, was purchased and stored for this purpose.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New industries would also be necessary to provide essential civilian requirements in cases where overseas supplies might be cut back in time of war. This would apply particularly to metal-working industries which, overseas, were likely to be preoccupied with war supplies. Little direct action was taken, though the Government's policy was to encourage manufacturing, and New Zealand industry probably became more versatile under the influence of diversification brought about by pre-war import restrictions.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="11" xml:id="c2-11">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Perishable Exports</hi>
          </head>
          <div xml:id="c2-11-0" type="section">
            <p rend="indent">Three problems would arise with regard to perishable commodities in the event of war: the need to secure maximum supplies for the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, the need for more orderly marketing<note xml:id="ftn2-40" n="2"><p>Except for dairy products, where bulk purchase arrangements already existed as part of the guaranteed price scheme.</p></note> to secure equitable distribution of food which would probably be in short
<pb n="41" xml:id="n41"/>
supply in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, and the need for extra storage capacity in New Zealand against the possibility of shipping delays.</p>
            <p rend="indent">Preparations for bulk purchasing by the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> of exportable surpluses of food were well advanced when war broke out. The steps which were taken are conveniently summarised in a report by Walter Nash as Minister of Marketing:<note xml:id="ftn1-41" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-30<hi rend="sc">b</hi>, <date when="1940">1940</date>, p. 2.</p></note></p>
          </div>
          <div n="1" xml:id="c2-11-1">
            <head>
              <hi rend="i">‘Pre-war action in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name></hi>
            </head>
            <p rend="indent">‘In the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> the Food (Defence Plans) Department, then a Department of the Board of Trade (but later on to become the Ministry of Food), was set up in <date when="1936">1936</date>. In June of that year,<note xml:id="ftn2-41" n="2"><p><hi rend="i">Sic</hi>. <date when="1937">1937</date>. The Imperial Conference was in May and June 1937.</p></note> Dominion Ministers then being present in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name> for the Imperial Conference, the opportunity was taken by the United Kingdom Government to make a first approach to the question of possible war-time purchases of supplies from New Zealand. It was indicated that, in the event of war, the United Kingdom Government might become the sole purchaser of imported foodstuffs, and in this connection meat and dairy produce was specifically mentioned.</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘At this time it was also indicated that fresh fruit would not be especially controlled, and would therefore have to take its chance in the ordinary way.</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘Again, in <date when="1938-08">August of 1938</date>, at which time the crisis over <name key="name-034836" type="place">Czechoslovakia</name> was developing, the United Kingdom Government submitted through the New Zealand High Commissioner a more detailed memorandum outlining plans for food control in the event of war—this envisaged the bulk purchase of meat and dairy produce on long term contracts. This memorandum also stated (with special reference to New Zealand) that “since the <name key="name-022826" type="organisation">New Zealand Government</name> now acts as the sole exporter of butter and cheese and the New Zealand Meat Producers' Board regulates the shipments of meat, it would be a simple matter to inaugurate both contracts in the event of war”.</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘Again, as in the case of the preliminary discussions at the time of the Imperial Conference, questions of prices and quantities were left for detailed negotiation should hostilities actually commence.</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘This <date when="1938-08">August 1938</date> memorandum, having been examined by the <name key="name-022826" type="organisation">New Zealand Government</name>, was accepted in principle by the Prime Minister on the <date when="1939-02-28">28th February 1939</date>, and the United Kingdom Government was advised to this effect.</p>
            <pb n="42" xml:id="n42"/>
            <p rend="indent">‘In <date when="1939-06">June 1939</date>, early after the arrival of the Minister of Finance in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name> and when the European situation was again deteriorating, discussions were resumed at the instance of the Food (Defence Plans) Department in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>. On this occasion it was again reiterated that dairy produce and meat must take priority in any direct purchase from New Zealand, whilst fresh fruit could be exported as long as shipping space was available. Tentative discussions were also held between Board of Trade Officials and the Minister concerning the possible purchase of New Zealand's wool clip, although this subject could only be broadly discussed as a possibility at that time.</p>
          </div>
          <div n="2" xml:id="c2-11-2">
            <head>
              <hi rend="i">‘Pre-war action in New Zealand</hi>
            </head>
            <p rend="indent">‘Simultaneously with these various pre-war conferences which were taking place in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name>, general plans were under discussion in New Zealand for the purpose of ensuring the efficient and prompt export of the Dominion's exportable surplus of primary products to the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> in the event of war. These discussions were commenced as far back as <date when="1937">1937</date> within the general framework of the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name>, which had been set up by this time. It was agreed that the Marketing Department could well form the nucleus of whatever organisation would be required in the event of an outbreak of war and the bulk purchase of primary products by the United Kingdom Government. The Dominion was therefore already well equipped to meet the emergency and to commence detailed negotiations immediately war did commence on 3rd September.</p>
          </div>
          <div n="3" xml:id="c2-11-3">
            <head>
              <hi rend="i">‘Commencement of Negotiations</hi>
            </head>
            <p rend="indent">‘Pre-war discussions between the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> and the New Zealand Governments by way of exchange of cables and by personal conferences in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name> between the Minister of Marketing and the Ministry of Food had already prepared the ground for such immediate action as would be necessary to take in regard to the acquisition of New Zealand products by the United Kingdom Government in the event of war being declared. After the outbreak of war the United Kingdom Government cabled through the New Zealand High Commissioner (on the <date when="1939-09-05">5th September 1939</date>, in the case of meat, and on the 6th September in the case of dairy-produce) stating that they were prepared to buy New Zealand's “entire exportable surplus for twelve months of frozen beef, mutton, lamb, and edible offals” and “export surplus, being shipments up to the <date when="1940-07-31">31st July 1940</date>”
<pb n="43" xml:id="n43"/>
of butter and cheese. In reply the <name key="name-022826" type="organisation">New Zealand Government</name> cabled within twenty-four hours stating their willingness to consider an f.o.b. purchase of the total surplus of these products by the United Kingdom Government.’</p>
            <p rend="indent">This was an example of pre-war economic planning which was immediately effective when war broke out. The state of preparations for extra storage of perishable produce to meet possible shipping delays was in marked contrast.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div n="12" xml:id="c2-12">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Cool Storage Inadequate</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">The most urgent need, in the event of shipping delays, would be for refrigerated storage, and this was fully realised when Defence Minister <name key="name-208355" type="person">Hon. F. Jones</name><!-- Jones, Hon. F. --> made his statement in Parliament in <date when="1936-08">August 1936</date>.<note xml:id="ftn1-43" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 246, p. 553. See also extract on <ref type="page" target="#n31">p. 31</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Very little was achieved before the war to increase storage facilities for perishable exports. Surveys were made and a subcommittee of the Supply Committee of the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name> went so far as to recommend that meat companies be compelled to increase their refrigerated space to provide for at least 60 per cent of their annual kill, and that the Government should import equipment to enable still further increases to be made. It appears however that, apart from some discussions with companies which may have led to very limited extensions of storage space, no further action was taken before war broke out.</p>
          <p rend="indent">One writer, A. A. Ross, throws an interesting slant on the reasons for inactivity in extending cool-storage facilities.<note xml:id="ftn2-43" n="2"><p>A. A. Ross, in <hi rend="i">Wartime Agriculture in <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and New Zealand, 1939–50</hi>, Crawford <hi rend="i">et al</hi>. and Ross, p. 253. Ross, previously Research Officer in the New Zealand <name key="name-024450" type="organisation">Department of Agriculture</name>, wrote as one of a team of authors, by arrangement with the Food Research Institute of <name key="name-036262" type="organisation">Stanford University</name>.</p></note> He says:</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Preparations were made for some years before <date when="1939">1939</date> to safeguard the country in the event of war. An organisation known as the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name> (O.N.S.) was established to make all necessary preparations against any contingency arising out of a war. Some sections (the term used here to describe committees and sub-committees) of this organisation performed very valuable work indeed, such as the expansion of cool-storage and cold-storage facilities. Separate sections were in charge of separate industries and groups of industries…. To some extent the work of O.N.S. was stultified by a natural reluctance on the part of the Government to undertake any preparations which called for heavy expenditure, and most
<pb n="44" xml:id="n44"/>
preparations sooner or later involved this. This reluctance may have been due to the difficult financial position of New Zealand shortly before the war, when the sterling balances in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> were at a very low level. Any preparations would have involved spending some of these low reserve funds. There is evidence too that the possibility of a war was heavily discounted, and on this account very few people were prepared to co-operate in making preparations.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Some have challenged the allegation that the Government discounted the possibility of war particularly after the <name key="name-008557" type="place">Munich</name> crisis of <date when="1938-09">September 1938</date>. The reason for stating here that war was not officially considered to be imminent is that a large number of very sensible suggestions and recommendations went forward from the Primary Industries Section of O.N.S. (a section which dealt with food and agricultural planning), but the majority of these recommendations were rejected outright. It was claimed that the proposals, if carried out, involved the expenditure of overseas funds (which was correct) and that such expenditure was not considered to be both essential and immediate. For instance, such commodities as cork and piping for additional refrigerated storage space could not be imported because the necessary permits could not be obtained from the Exchange Control authorities. The recommendations of many other sections of O.N.S. besides the Primary Industries section were also treated in this manner.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Ross's work has been criticised, but there is no doubt a good deal of truth in what he writes. Certainly some quite independent information points in the same direction: for example, we have noted that, even as late as <date when="1939-05">May 1939</date>, when a sum of only a little over half a million pounds was earmarked for special import funds to build up reserve stocks, the <name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> took alarm and asked to be consulted ‘before any further large purchases are sanctioned involving the remittance of funds overseas.’<note xml:id="ftn1-44" n="1"><p>See <ref type="page" target="#n37">p. 37</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">If the Government was aware of the danger of war, as it seems to have been, it is surprising that economic preparation for war ranked so low amongst import priorities. Or was this a case of political expedience triumphing over prudence?</p>
          <p rend="indent">Whatever the reasons, very little had been done to expand cool storage facilities by the outbreak of war. Discussions with meat companies have already been mentioned.<note xml:id="ftn2-44" n="2"><p><ref type="page" target="#n43">p. 43</ref>.</p></note> They were largely ineffective. By <date when="1939-08-23">23 August 1939</date>, the following circular letter to
<pb n="45" xml:id="n45"/>
companies had been drafted. It would, no doubt, be effective if followed up, but instructions to circulate it were dated 30 August, four days before New Zealand declared war.</p>
          <p rend="right">Office of the Minister of Agriculture,<lb/>
<name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name>, N.Z.<lb/>
<date when="1939-08-23">23rd August 1939</date></p>
          <p>Dear Sirs,</p>
          <p rend="center">
            <hi rend="sc">Cool Storage Space: Meat Export<lb/>Slaughterhouses</hi>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">For some time past the position of cool storage at Meat Export slaughterhouses has been giving me some concern. At the beginning of this year my Department carried out a survey of available storage space, and the analysis of this information shows wide variation of cool storage efficiency as between works. As you are aware, the Slaughtering and Inspection Act, <date when="1908">1908</date>, gives me power to refuse the renewal of a meat export slaughterhouse licence if I am of the opinion that the business of the meat export slaughterhouse is being carried out in a manner contrary to the public interest. I considered the position so grave that I have conferred with my colleagues in Cabinet to ascertain whether I should exercise my powers in the direction of requiring a minimum capacity at each works, or at each group of works owned by one company, where such works are reasonably contiguous to one another. After full consideration of the position Cabinet passed the following resolution:</p>
          <p>‘Meat companies to be notified immediately that a condition of their meat export licence shall be the provision of cool storage space of a minimum of 60%, this capacity being based on the measurement factors used by the <name key="name-024450" type="organisation">Department of Agriculture</name><!-- Agriculture, Department of -->. Where a company owns more than one works in one locality, space may be counted over all works as a unit. The provision of storage space must carry with it the obligation to provide efficient freezing equipment: provision of this space and of the necessary equipment to be the obligation of the company concerned.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">In terms of this resolution I wish to notify you that the renewal of your meat export slaughterhouse licence is to be determined in conformity with the terms of Cabinet resolution.</p>
          <p rend="indent">On the 18th of May you were supplied with an analysis of cool storage space at your works. You will therefore be in a position
<pb n="46" xml:id="n46"/>
to judge whether this condition requires any action on your part. If such is the case I would be glad of your immediate cooperation in the direction of formulating plans for submission to my Department so that as far as possible the cool storage position for the forthcoming season will be brought up to a satisfactory state. It is recognised that certain alterations may have taken place since the collection of information at the beginning of the year, or that certain adjustments may be required in respect thereof, and where any doubt exists you should immediately communicate with the Director General of the <name key="name-024450" type="organisation">Department of Agriculture</name><!-- Agriculture, Department of --> so that the position may be reviewed and your obligations defined. In other words, it is intended that each company's position shall be treated on its merits in the light of the present situation.</p>
          <p rend="indent">I might state that the question of sterling funds required to enable you to import piping, condensors, insulations, etc. has been given consideration, and wherever possible the aim should be to indent through <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> firms so that the minimum of inconvenience will be occasioned in the earmarking of sterling funds.</p>
          <p rend="indent">I shall be glad if you will acknowledge receipt of this advice, and indicate the steps which you are taking to meet the requirements thereof.</p>
          <p rend="right">
            <hi rend="sc">Minister of Agriculture</hi>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">The circular letter to meat companies was presumably signed and despatched in this form.<note xml:id="ftn1-46" n="1"><p>This copy appears on Industries and Commerce file 54/15/1.</p></note> The extra storage space became available for the 1940–41 season.<note xml:id="ftn2-46" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n185">p.185</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">It was very fortunate that there was no serious stoppage of shipping in the early months of the war.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="13" xml:id="c2-13">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Power Development Neglected</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Another obvious difficulty in war would be to maintain an adequate supply of power to industry, especially if the inflow of petrol and oil were restricted. In spite of this, the development of New Zealand's considerable potential of hydro-electric power proceeded very slowly in the pre-war period and in fact, up to <date when="1938">1938</date>, expenditure on hydro-electric development was below what it had been during the depression. This lack of foresight may have been in large measure due to over-optimistic reports on the capacity of the existing equipment to meet expected electric power requirements.</p>
          <pb n="47" xml:id="n47"/>
          <p rend="indent">The first offender seems to have been the <name key="name-024914" type="organisation">National Expenditure Commission</name> of the depression, which said in <date when="1932-07">July 1932</date>:</p>
          <p>‘…we are definitely of opinion that the present stage of development in the matter of hydro-electric power is sufficient for the needs of the Dominion for many years to come; and, moreover, in view of the uncertainty as to what will prove to be the cheapest form of power development in the future, any move for the commencement of further works, whether by the State or by local authorities, should be strenuously opposed.’<note xml:id="ftn1-47" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper B-4<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Final Report of the <name key="name-024914" type="organisation">National Expenditure Commission</name>, <date when="1932">1932</date>, p. 164.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Even as late as <date when="1936">1936</date> the <name key="name-024638" type="organisation">Electric Power Board and Supply Authorities Association</name> said, ‘…it appears that the necessity for developing an entirely new (hydro-electric) scheme is remote’.<note xml:id="ftn2-47" n="2"><p>Quoted in Parliament, <hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 273, p. 55. See also <ref type="page" target="#n428">p. 428</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">It is not surprising that only £500,000 was spent on hydro-electric development in 1936–37 and £700,000 in 1937–38. The following year expenditure rose to over £1 million, but it was already too late for new developments to be ready for the early war years.</p>
          <p rend="indent">As a result of this delayed action New Zealand had electric power restrictions for about two-thirds of the war period. Because wartime and immediate post-war development was hampered by shortages of equipment, she accumulated a backlog of unsatisfied power requirements which she could not overtake and satisfy in full until <date when="1959">1959</date>. This was a major blot on New Zealand's record of pre-war preparations.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="14" xml:id="c2-14">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Earthmoving Equipment</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">In the pre-war years the Labour Government expanded public works as a means of boosting the economy and providing full-time work for those previously unemployed; but it would be quite wrong to imagine that public works expansion, as spearheaded by Minister of Works Robert Semple, had the absorption of spare labour as its only objective. On the contrary, expansion of public works in this period was characterised by the extensive use of labour-saving equipment. Heavy earthmoving equipment was imported and extensively used on public works projects. In fact Government imports of mechanical equipment contributed to pre-war shortages of overseas funds.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the event, these imports, though not motivated by the threat of war, proved to be one of the most effective war preparations which could have been made. Without this heavy earthmoving
<pb n="48" xml:id="n48"/>
equipment, wartime construction of airports, military camps and other defence works would have been seriously hampered.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Even pre-war, defence works were competing with highway construction for the use of heavy equipment. A speech by Semple in Parliament in <date when="1939-07">July 1939</date><note xml:id="ftn1-48" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 254, pp. 202–4.</p></note> lists some of the projects and gives an impression of the vitality he had by that time instilled into public works:</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘…I am going to show tonight that we have saved the Dominion tens of thousands of pounds, and that we are giving services that would not have been available for many years to come had we clung to the old method of construction. I shall name one or two of those jobs and I shall ask honourable gentlemen opposite whether they would stop those jobs. We are building a military aerodrome at <name key="name-021602" type="place">Whenuapai</name>, near <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name>, and it is being constructed under military advice given us by Wing-Commander Cochrane,<note xml:id="ftn2-48" n="2"><p>Later Air Chief Marshal Sir Ralph Cochrane.</p></note> who was on loan to the <name key="name-022826" type="organisation">New Zealand Government</name> from the British Government for two years. He is an expert at his job. The job covers one square mile and involves the shifting of 1,100,000 yards of material. The essence of the contract is speed. The job has to be completed as quickly as possible, and the task has fallen to my lot. With the use of machines it will take eight months and a half, and will cost £81,700. Under the old method it would have taken two hundred and fifty men four years to do the job, and the cost would have been £272,000.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘… Next year we shall be holding our centennial celebrations, and we are hoping that thousands of people will visit this city. Of the two approaches to this city one was a positive death-trap—forty-six dangerous bends on a narrow road leading to the Capital city of New Zealand….This Government is engaged on the job of making it safer, and it is a mighty big job to construct a 60 foot highway through the hills, some of them 160 feet high. The shifting of 450,000 yards of rock is no small undertaking. Under the old fashioned methods it would have taken four years to accomplish, at a cost of £225,000. I have undertaken to do the work in nine months, and at the present time we are well up to schedule, so the job will be completed and the road will be paved before Christmas. There will be a highway 60 foot wide where six months ago there were hills from 130 to 160 ft. high, and the total cost of the road will amount to no more than £80,000. At Paraparaumu we are to build an emergency-landing ground for aeroplanes, both military
<pb n="49" xml:id="n49"/>
and civil. Rongotai Aerodrome is not always a first class aerodrome, and so it is necessary to have this emergency landing ground adjacent to the city.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘… At Paraparaumu there are 403,000 yards of earth to be shifted, and this will be done by machines in three months, at a cost of £25,000. By hand labour it would take two hundred and fifty men fourteen months, and would cost £101,000….</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘…Let me give some idea of the <name key="name-207163" type="ship">Rangitata</name> scheme, and of the smaller schemes, and the results obtained. The Rangitata Race is 50 ft. wide, 10 ft. deep, and forty-two miles long. It is designed to irrigate 420,000 acres, and also to generate 30,000 horse-power of electric energy during the winter months. At the end of the canal we are building a hydro-electric station that will generate that amount of current, so that in winter, when the load is at its peak in the <name key="name-036461" type="place">South Island</name> and the farmers do not need the water, we will be able to use that water to generate power for the whole of the <name key="name-036461" type="place">South Island</name> because it will be coupled up with the whole of our main supplies. Had that job been undertaken under the old system it would have taken the same number of men that we employ now seventy-five years to do the job! The existing generation of farmers would be dead, and the new generation would have dropped dead when they got their first water bill….We are shifting upwards of 7,000 yards a day digging that canal with machines. There is no record in Australasia or in any other part of the world that can surpass that. If the Ngahauranga Gorge is completed in nine months, that, too, will constitute a world record….’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Truly stirring words. The Gorge road and the coastal road from Paremata to <name key="name-401547" type="place">Paekakariki</name> were both opened in <date when="1939-11">November 1939</date>, vastly improving access to the capital city in time for the Wellington Centennial Exhibition and, incidentally, in time to ease the burden of wartime transport.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="15" xml:id="c2-15">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Assessment of Pre-war Economic Planning</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand's pre-war economic planning was characterised by considerable discussion and many recommendations but very little action. However, in the event no great economic harm resulted from this lack of preparedness.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The greatest barriers to action were shortages of overseas funds on the supply side and the Labour Government's refusal to consider any form of compulsion, or anything which might lead to compulsion, on the manpower side.</p>
          <pb n="50" xml:id="n50"/>
          <p rend="indent">In the event, the supply situation was saved by the fact that the threatened entry of <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> did not immediately eventuate. There was no long break in overseas communications. If there had been, many industries would have come to a standstill for lack of materials, and storage would have been quite inadequate to cope with supplies of perishable foodstuffs which would have piled up in New Zealand. In the short run, fortune had favoured the inactive. In the longer run, most of the preparations which had not been made under peace conditions now had to be made under the more difficult conditions of war.</p>
          <p rend="indent">On the other hand, some pre-war plans went smoothly into action on the outbreak of war. Petrol rationing and the bulk purchase arrangements for foodstuffs for the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> were outstanding examples.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It was fortunate that, in the few years preceding the war, public works expenditure had been stepped up. This extra pre-war capital formation no doubt left the country in a better situation to carry on later when the demands of war made it impossible to concentrate on normal public works programmes. The possession of heavy earthmoving equipment, imported for public works projects, also speeded completion of defence works.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Labour's pre-war tendency towards direct economic controls helped to ease the economic change from peace to war. There were in existence at the outbreak of war a number of organisations which were used, or which could easily be used, to keep the economy under control during circumstances which must put a considerable strain upon it. For example, the <name key="name-025000" type="organisation">Price Investigation Tribunal</name> was available to watch and fix prices, import selection was in operation and the Internal and External Marketing Departments were well-established, if much-criticised, organisations.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Import controls, which would be necessary to secure priority of transport for scarce supplies in war, were, for other reasons, already in existence. Moreover, industry had branched into new activities under the protection of import restrictions and, though perhaps no more economically sound overall as a result, was more diversified and better able to readjust to cope with the wide variety of new demands which war was to bring.</p>
          <pb n="51" xml:id="n51"/>
          <p>
            <table rows="35" cols="4">
              <head>
                <hi rend="sc">Some Noteworthy pre-war Events</hi>
              </head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Year</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Overseas</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Economic and Political Events in New Zealand</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">New Zealand Preparation for a possible War Effort</hi>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1930">1930</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>Imperial Conference, in October, gives reminder of need for defence planning.</cell>
                <cell>Substantial fall in export earnings.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1931">1931</date>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Depressed economy — general reduction of 10 per cent in wages and salaries.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1932">1932</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>Ottawa Conference on Commonwealth trade, in July.</cell>
                <cell><name key="name-024914" type="organisation">National Expenditure Commission</name> appointed, in January.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>National Expenditure Adjustment Act makes reductions in pensions, salaries of State employees, and in rents, interest rates and other fixed charges.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Most difficult year of depression.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1933">1933</date>
                </cell>
                <cell><name key="name-006503" type="person">Hitler</name> becomes German Chancellor, in January.</cell>
                <cell>Exchange rate changed to £NZ125 = £100 sterling, in January.</cell>
                <cell>Decision in October to form NZ Committee of Imperial Defence.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell><name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name> of NZ Act passed in November.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1934">1934</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>UK Government puts quotas on certain meat imports.</cell>
                <cell>Best prices for wool since 1929–30. Partial restoration of wage and pension cuts.</cell>
                <cell><name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> set up as off-shoot of NZ Committee of Imperial Defence.</cell>
              </row>
              <pb n="52" xml:id="n52"/>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1935">1935</date>
                </cell>
                <cell><name key="name-006503" type="person">Hitler</name> repudiates the Treaty of <name key="name-032512" type="place">Versailles</name>, in March.</cell>
                <cell>Substantial increase in manufacturing activity.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Italians invade <name key="name-020117" type="place">Abyssinia</name>, in October.</cell>
                <cell>Partial restoration of salaries and wage cuts of public servants.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Agreement between <name key="name-029547" type="place">UK</name> and NZ on meat exports.</cell>
                <cell>Labour Government elected, in November.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1936">1936</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>German and Italian intervention in Spanish Civil war.</cell>
                <cell>Expansion of public works undertakings.</cell>
                <cell>NZ Committee of Imperial Defence becomes <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name>. <name key="name-024924" type="organisation">National Supply Committee</name> set up.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell><name key="name-008556" type="place">Germany</name> reoccupies the Rhineland, in March.</cell>
                <cell>Restoration of cuts in pensions and State employees' salaries.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Guaranteed price for dairy produce announced in Budget statement.</cell>
                <cell>In Defence debate in the House, Defence Minister Jones outlines need to prepare for possibility of war.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Forty-hour week becomes operative.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Comprehensive Government housing scheme announced.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1937">1937</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>Imperial Conference in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name>, in June, points the need to prepare for war.</cell>
                <cell>First State housing units become available.</cell>
                <cell>Discussions with UK Government on bulk purchase in event of war.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Record year for export earnings.</cell>
                <cell><name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name>, <name key="name-024575" type="organisation">Council of Defence</name>, and <name key="name-020068" type="organisation">Chiefs of Staff Committee</name> given a common secretary.</cell>
              </row>
              <pb n="53" xml:id="n53"/>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1938">1938</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>German take-over of <name key="name-007106" type="place">Austria</name>, in March.</cell>
                <cell>Extensive imports of heavy earth-moving machinery.</cell>
                <cell>UK Government memorandum on bulk purchases in event of war.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>German demands on <name key="name-034836" type="place">Czechoslovakia</name>.</cell>
                <cell>Social Security Act passed in September.</cell>
                <cell>Spurt in preparation of War Book in September.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>The Munich Agreement, in September.</cell>
                <cell><name key="name-029547" type="place">UK</name> manufacturers unable to fulfil NZ orders for military equipment.</cell>
                <cell>Use of heavy earthmoving equipment for aerodrome construction.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Falls in prices of NZ exports.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Import and exchange controls in December.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Overseas assets fall to £NZ6.8 million.</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1939">1939</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>British and French ‘guarantee’ to <name key="name-034869" type="place">Poland</name>, in March.</cell>
                <cell>Commencement of benefits under the Social Security Act in April.</cell>
                <cell>Savage in March warns of need to ‘prepare for the worst’.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Germans complete the occupation of <name key="name-034836" type="place">Czechoslovakia</name>.</cell>
                <cell>Nash visits <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name> to discuss difficult loan conversions.</cell>
                <cell>Military equipment inadequate for mobilisation.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell><name key="name-025000" type="organisation">Price Investigation Tribunal</name> set up in June.</cell>
                <cell>Aerodrome construction speeded up.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Pacific Defence Conference held in <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name>, in April. Warning of need for reserve supplies.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Government decision, in May, to make import licences available for purchase of reserve stocks of strategic commodities.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell><name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name>, in June, unsuccessfully asks for a Manpower Register.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>National Service Registration Act drafted, in July.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Schedule of Reserved Occupations prepared, in August.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Germans invade <name key="name-034869" type="place">Poland</name>, 1 September.</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>First effective action to increase cool storage capacity initiated, in August.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Declaration of war, 3 September.</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb n="54" xml:id="n54"/>
      <div type="chapter" n="3" xml:id="c3">
        <head>CHAPTER 3<lb/>
From Peace to War</head>
        <div n="16" xml:id="c3-16">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">The First Few Days of War</hi>
          </head>
          <p>NEW ZEALAND declared war just before midnight on <date when="1939-09-03">3 September 1939</date> and ‘in the early hours of Monday morning, 4 September, the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name> and its associates had the strenuous, but rather satisfying, task of operating the newly finished War Book’.<note xml:id="ftn1-54" n="1"><p>Wood, <hi rend="i"><name key="name-110071" type="work">Political and External Affairs</name></hi>, p. 97.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Already a state of emergency had been proclaimed on 1 September and the first group of emergency regulations had been made on 1 and 2 September. Included with the most urgent military and security powers were economic measures to prevent profiteering.<note xml:id="ftn2-54" n="2"><p>The Price Stabilisation Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">A quick succession of regulations followed, giving the Government wide powers of economic control. Emphasis is placed in this volume on regulations of particular economic significance. A more general picture of the flush of emergency regulations is given by Professor <name key="name-209690" type="person">F. L. W. Wood</name><!-- Wood, F. L. W. --> in a companion volume.<note xml:id="ftn3-54" n="3"><p><hi rend="i">The New Zealand People at War: Political and External Affairs</hi>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Of the War Book and its use, Wood writes: ‘Under test the machine worked well. There were enough loose ends to provide a moral for the future: contingencies inadequately provided for on the one hand, and on the other, the inveterate tendency of Ministers and departments to work independently of one another and to appeal direct to cabinet, thus imperilling a hard-won co-ordination.’<note xml:id="ftn4-54" n="4"><p>Ibid., p. 97.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">While pre-war economic action was, in many directions, inadequate, the very short time needed to make a wide range of regulations affecting the whole economy was a measure of the
<pb n="55" xml:id="n55"/>
effectiveness of pre-war economic thinking. In fact some excellent inter-departmental committee work had been done in assessing economic requirements in the event of war, but pre-war action was held back, particularly on the manpower and supply sides, by the Government's failure to give any decisive lead.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It has been said that, ‘In its simplest and most abstract terms the general economic problem of war is one of securing the necessary supplies’.<note xml:id="ftn1-55" n="1"><p>Elliott and Hall, <hi rend="i">The British Commonwealth at War</hi>, p. 257.</p></note> This applied with particular emphasis to New Zealand, where wartime disruption of shipping might easily accentuate supply difficulties. If there was to be a complete shipping blockage, as many people expected, the measures taken to safeguard existing stocks of vital materials would determine the number of weeks the economy could continue to function without a major disruption. Control of supply was, therefore, a very high priority, and on 4 September it received attention.<note xml:id="ftn2-55" n="2"><p>The Supply Control Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date>.</p></note> Provision was made for Controllers, under a Minister of Supply, with wide powers to restrict or direct the movement of goods. On the same date oil fuel, one of the most vital commodities in war or peace, was rationed,<note xml:id="ftn3-55" n="3"><p>The Oil Fuel Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date>.</p></note> while detailed supply arrangements were made for sugar, wheat and flour.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Powers over supply and use of materials were also to be given to other Controllers, whose primary interest was in production in specified groups of industries—a dual control of supply which was inevitably to lead at times to confusion and clashes.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand was to suffer wartime shortages which were in many cases aggravated by failure to make early or adequate provision before the war for the accumulation of vital reserves. On the other hand, in those cases where stocks had been built up, the relief provided by their judicious wartime use amply justified any pre-war sacrifices involved.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="17" xml:id="c3-17">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Controls over Production</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">It was correctly anticipated that, in war, New Zealand production would have an increasingly important part to play, both in supplying a larger proportion of New Zealand needs and in meeting the increasing demand of the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> for New Zealand food supplies. Moreover, government orders for war materials and war construction would require precedence over civilian needs. This precedence could not, without runaway inflation, be obtained by attempting to outbid civilian demand. More direct measures would be necessary.</p>
          <pb n="56" xml:id="n56"/>
          <p rend="indent">Sweeping powers to control manufacturing production were taken in the Factory Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date>, and, on 12 September, overall control of building work was passed to a Building Controller.<note xml:id="ftn1-56" n="1"><p>The Building Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date>.</p></note> Three days later, provision was made for control of primary industries by a Primary Industries Controller.<note xml:id="ftn2-56" n="2"><p>The Primary Industries Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Thus, within two weeks of the outbreak of war, the Government had most of the administrative powers it needed to put production on to a war footing.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="18" xml:id="c3-18">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Manpower</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Recruitment of men for the armed services was, at this stage, voluntary. On 8 September plans were announced for a special force of men prepared to serve in any part of the world. ‘Recruiting for the first batch of 6600 men began on 12 September, and within a week almost 12,000 men had volunteered.’<note xml:id="ftn3-56" n="3"><p>Wood, p. 98.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">The only interference with voluntary enlistment was the use of the list of reserved occupations which had been compiled by the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> before the war. This list was supplied to recruiting officers, with the intention that men engaged in these reserved occupations should not be accepted for the armed forces.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the early stages, withdrawal of men for military service did not require other than voluntary measures of adjustment in civilian employment. Men could be replaced without too much difficulty. Unemployed persons were taken back into production, some less urgent work was cut out, and more overtime was worked. Women were used to an increasing extent in industry.</p>
          <p rend="indent">While unemployed labour and other unused resources were available, the need for extra output for war purposes could be met largely by drawing them into production. There was, as yet, no call for any serious sacrifice of civilian consumption to make extra resources available for war purposes, and no need for the Government to be too restrictive about the use of labour for civilian production.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The process of voluntary adjustments continued throughout the first two years of the war, but by the end of <date when="1941">1941</date> the cumulative withdrawal of some 30 per cent of the total male working population had exhausted unused labour reserves. It was becoming increasingly difficult to replace men recruited for the armed services or to divert further manpower and resources to war production.</p>
          <pb n="57" xml:id="n57"/>
        </div>
        <div n="19" xml:id="c3-19">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">The Need for Co-ordination</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">The first flush of wartime regulations was made under the Public Safety Conservation Act <date when="1932">1932</date>, which had been passed as a direct result of the Hawke's Bay earthquake in <date when="1931">1931</date>. This act was not entirely adequate for a war emergency and the Emergency Regulations Act <date when="1939">1939</date> was passed on 14 September as a wartime measure to provide the authority for further regulations. This act, as amended, was to be the basis for a host of wartime regulations, and would then remain in force and be used long after the emergency which gave rise to it had passed.<note xml:id="ftn1-57" n="1"><p>Amending regulations were still being made in <date when="1956">1956</date> (<date when="1956">1956</date>/137). It was still being re-enacted to protect existing regulations as late as <date when="1959">1959</date>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">The regulations were intended primarily to give Controllers and Departments ample powers to act in the interests of the war effort. However, the more power individuals had the more difficult it became to prevent them from acting at cross purposes. It was soon apparent that a strong co-ordinating authority was needed.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To meet this need, a <name key="name-016917" type="organisation">War Cabinet</name> was proposed. There was considerable disagreement over the form it should take. In spite of the obvious need for better co-ordination of military and economic policies, questions of production, finance and manpower were to be excluded from the functions of the <name key="name-016917" type="organisation">War Cabinet</name> as it was originally envisaged.<note xml:id="ftn2-57" n="2"><p>Wood, p. 140.</p></note> However, under pressure of considerable criticism, and no doubt moved by military disasters in <name key="name-008009" type="place">France</name> to seek more effective measures, the Government extended the scope of <name key="name-016917" type="organisation">War Cabinet</name>'s functions. Peter Fraser,<note xml:id="ftn3-57" n="3"><p>Savage died on <date when="1940-03-27">27 March 1940</date> and Fraser became Prime Minister.</p></note> in <date when="1940-07">July 1940</date>, when he announced its formation, said that the scope of the <name key="name-016917" type="organisation">War Cabinet</name> ‘was not to be restricted to the services but it was also to make decisions concerning “production for war purposes, war finance requirements, emergency regulations so far as they apply to the war effort and generally to implement the policy of Parliament in relation to New Zealand's participation in the war”.’<note xml:id="ftn4-57" n="4"><p>Wood, p. 141.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">The <name key="name-016917" type="organisation">War Cabinet</name> included two members of the Opposition, Gordon Coates and Adam Hamilton, with Defence Minister Fred Jones, Finance Minister Walter Nash and Prime Minister Peter Fraser. It was to co-exist with Cabinet and with an advisory body, the War Council.<note xml:id="ftn5-57" n="5"><p>The War Council was to include the Prime Minister and five other ministers, with nine members representing employers, workers, farmers, returned servicemen, and other groups. The Opposition did not accept an invitation to nominate three members.</p></note></p>
          <pb n="58" xml:id="n58"/>
        </div>
        <div n="20" xml:id="c3-20">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Powers to Control Individuals</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">However strong the patriotism of the people, it would obviously have been impossible to meet the extensive wartime demands on the New Zealand economy without some degree of overall economic planning, leading to various forms of direct control. Wartime controls followed closely on the heels of the very definite pre-war statements of the Labour Government stressing its intention to conscript wealth before men. It is interesting to see whether this had any effect on the form they took.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Considering the Government's attitude to conscription, it was only to be expected that the early regulations would not contemplate direction of men or women. When the time for such action came, the Emergency Regulations Act of <date when="1939-09">September 1939</date>, though very sweeping in its powers, was not found powerful enough to enable the Government to conscript men. It was not until <date when="1940-05">May 1940</date> that it was strengthened by the Emergency Regulations Amendment Act, which gave complete powers to control the individual as well as his property as ‘necessary or expedient’ for the war effort.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name>'s opposition to conscription was deep-rooted and, even when this amending act was under discussion in Parliament, some members still hoped it would not be necessary to conscript men. But ultimately men were conscripted and wealth was not, except to the extent that much of the cost of war was met by taxation, and owners of productive resources could be required to undertake defence work.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Full control of manpower would involve the completion of a national register. The national register itself was seen as a possible threat to the freedom of the individual. The Government had refused to authorise it before the war and was still most reluctant to do so. Even when it became essential to have some form of register for specified age groups as they became eligible for conscription, the job was done piecemeal. Registration was, for the most part, restricted to those age groups which were immediately required.<note xml:id="ftn1-58" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n99">pp. 99</ref>–<ref type="page" target="#n101">101</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">This rather halting approach to the problem was no doubt made workable by the fact that registration had been required for Social Security purposes since <date when="1938-09">September 1938</date>. The Social Security registration could be used as a check on those responding to wartime registration orders.<note xml:id="ftn2-58" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n100">p. 100</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <pb n="59" xml:id="n59"/>
          <p rend="indent">The powers necessary to impose conscription for the armed services were taken under the National Service Emergency Regulations in <date when="1940-06">June 1940</date> and the first ballot was held in <date when="1940-10">October 1940</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The same regulations made it possible for the Minister of National Service to direct any person over 16 years of age to perform any non-military service necessary for the war effort. However, this latter power was still not used, and it needed the outbreak of war with <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name>, in <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>, to enforce action on industrial mobilisation. Manpower direction into industry commenced in <date when="1942-01">January 1942</date>.<note xml:id="ftn1-59" n="1"><p>Power was taken in an amendment to the National Service Emergency Regulations dated <date when="1942-01-13">13 January 1942</date>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">There is no doubt whatever that the Labour Government had been very firm in its intention to conscript wealth before men, but in the circumstances as they emerged, such a policy would probably have been quite impossible to administer. Conscription of men was doggedly resisted, but ultimately was forced on the Government, partly because of the obvious unfairness of allowing men in New Zealand to please themselves whether they contributed to the war effort while large numbers of their fellow New Zealanders were engaged in actual fighting overseas, and partly because it became quite impossible, without conscription, to find sufficient men for the forces and for essential industries.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Failure to conscript wealth before conscripting men was probably a bitter disappointment to many Labour supporters. Some drew comfort from the measures the Government did take; for example, Mr James Roberts, President of the <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name>, said at the <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> Conference in <date when="1940-06">June 1940</date>:<note xml:id="ftn2-59" n="2"><p><hi rend="i">Standard</hi>, <date when="1940-06-06">6 June 1940</date>.</p></note> ‘The only objection they<note xml:id="ftn3-59" n="3"><p>‘The Labour and Socialist Movements of the world’.</p></note> ever had to conscription was when they were called upon to defend their country and the economic agency and the property of the country were not being utilized in the interests of the nation. In New Zealand the Government had now taken control of all property and it must be used in the interests of the country. The Government had given a pledge that no profits must be made out of the extra efforts of the people of New Zealand.’ The Government by no means took control of all property. Legally it did take intensive powers to direct the use of most productive resources. Some impression of the extent to which these powers were used, and of the possibilities of making high rates of profit from war contracts and other work, are discussed in following chapters, particularly in <ref type="chapter" target="#c13">Chapter 13</ref>. The reader may prefer to suspend judgment as to whether wealth was conscripted until he has read <ref type="chapter" target="#c13">Chapter 13</ref>.</p>
          <pb n="60" xml:id="n60"/>
          <p rend="indent">There is no doubt that the Government considered the full implications of conscription of wealth before abandoning it. Conscription of wealth would, if carried as far as some of its advocates wanted, mean Government ownership, or at least control, of all the means of production. Wartime experience was to show that, in some industries, higher outputs could be obtained without Government ownership. Achievement of wartime production targets often involved using new methods and working under high pressure. Many state employees were capable, given the opportunity, of rising to such heights, but usually the detailed and rigid controls associated with state employment restricted them so much that they were unable to do so.<note xml:id="ftn1-60" n="1"><p>For example, some of the difficulties associated with the linen flax industry were of this nature. (See <ref type="page" target="#n217">p. 217</ref>.)</p></note> The fact of the matter was that, where achievement of difficult targets was absolutely vital to the war effort, cost-plus arrangements and other systems of stimulating private enterprise, inequitable as they were, probably offered the only hope of success.<note xml:id="ftn2-60" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="chapter" target="#c13">Chapter 13</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Even presupposing that there was a strong body of opinion within the Labour Government in favour of ownership of the means of production, this was politically an extremely controversial issue and one which it was not desirable to fight out during the course of a major war. Later experience has shown the New Zealand <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> to be moderate in its intentions to nationalise the economy and quite willing to concede that, for a wide range of industrial undertakings, private enterprise can often get better results, given a reasonable measure of competition.</p>
          <p rend="indent"><name key="name-025098" type="person">Keith Sinclair</name><!-- Sinclair, Keith --> sums up very well when he says:</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Slumps and wars alike have led to further centralization of power. The Second World War, as in many other countries, encouraged what was already the chief tendency of the Labour Government, and speeded the progress towards a “planned economy” via “price control” and “stabilization”. Broadcasting, internal airways, the linen flax industry, were added to the long list of state monopolies; but, in general, the Government contented itself with control over credit and marketing and made no attempt to nationalize production.’<note xml:id="ftn3-60" n="3"><p>Sinclair, <hi rend="i"><name key="name-204309" type="work">A History of New Zealand</name></hi>, p. 267.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Though some changes to state ownership were made, private ownership and the profit motive remained predominant throughout the war, and in fact were given extra emphasis, in many cases, as the only means to get difficult and urgent assignments completed in time.</p>
          <pb n="61" xml:id="n61"/>
        </div>
        <div n="21" xml:id="c3-21">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Import Controls</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">One of the strongest weapons to control the use of resources and the direction of expansion of industry was already available to the Government before war broke out, and could easily be used to encourage war industry or to discourage non-essential industry under war conditions. This was the system of quantitative controls over imports which had been introduced in <date when="1938">1938</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Import Control Regulations <date when="1938">1938</date> were designed primarily to conserve overseas funds; but if imports were to be restricted, choices had to be made. For example, it was decided to make special provisions for imports of essential raw materials, so that the effort to reduce expenditure on overseas purchases would not adversely affect New Zealand industry. A special committee was set up within the <name key="name-024766" type="organisation">Industries and Commerce Department</name> to recommend to the Comptroller of Customs the action to be taken on applications for import licences relating to supplies of equipment and materials for New Zealand industry.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The committee was in a unique position to implement the Government's industrial policy, having as one of its aims the promotion of manufacture in New Zealand, where this would save overseas funds and where it was considered that the expansion of local industry could be carried out on an efficient basis. A general indication of the committee's functions as seen through Industries and Commerce eyes is given in the following extract:<note xml:id="ftn1-61" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-44, Department of Industries and Commerce, Report for <date when="1939">1939</date>, p. 20.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘… In <date when="1938-12">December, 1938</date>, there were gazetted regulations providing for the control of importations into New Zealand. Apart from the question of limiting the importations of various commodities for general economic reasons, the operation of these regulations was intended to enable scientific selection of imports in order to provide for a balanced development and expansion of manufacturing industries in New Zealand. The system under the import-control policy provided for the making of application for import licences by manufacturers and general importers.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘To ensure that manufacturers would be able to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials and new and additional forms of plant, machinery, and equipment, etc., the <name key="name-024767" type="organisation">Industries Committee</name> was constituted to examine and make recommendations regarding the applications lodged in respect of manufacturing industries in our Dominion, and to act generally in this regard in an advisory capacity to the Customs Department. The
<pb n="62" xml:id="n62"/>
<name key="name-024767" type="organisation">Industries Committee</name> met representative groups covering over one hundred industries and divisions of industries, and the general scope for economic development and expansion in manufacturing industries was closely investigated. As a result of the Committee's efforts, considerable assistance has been given to enable manufacturers in New Zealand to increase the production required to meet the market demands for various commodities in respect of which the importations of finished products were reduced or prohibited.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘In addition, proposals were examined for the establishment in New Zealand of manufacturing units representing large overseas manufacturers whose products were previously available to the public only through import channels. The prospects for the success of the policy have been very bright, and already a number of new industries have been established or are in the process of being established in New Zealand; and considerable expansion has occurred in industries already in existence in New Zealand. Apart from the development of their production in lines already manufactured here, they have in many cases engaged in the manufacture of new lines previously imported.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">After the outbreak of war and when the supply position deteriorated, some change in emphasis naturally occurred. When goods were available for the ordering, control over imports could be used as a means of developing industries making munitions and other war supplies and discouraging industries not regarded as essential to the war effort. But imports of many essential materials were soon restricted by their scarcity rather than by shortage of funds. The emphasis then changed to procurement at all costs rather than to an examination of the sterling position and its effects on ability to import. In the circumstances the initiative changed to some extent and the Commissioner of Supply, rather than the Comptroller of Customs or the <name key="name-024767" type="organisation">Industries Committee</name>, tended to make decisions on the importation of goods.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="22" xml:id="c3-22">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Influences on the Direction of Industrial Development</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">As early as <date when="1936">1936</date> an Industrial Efficiency Act had been passed to give the Government power to guide the development of industry. However, until quantitative controls over imports became effective in <date when="1938">1938</date>, there was in fact little the Government could do to change the direction of industrial expansion. At this stage it became possible to influence the direction of expansion by keeping a tighter restriction on imports of materials used by industries whose expansion it was desired to discourage, and by making it
<pb n="63" xml:id="n63"/>
easier to import materials used by industries it was desired to encourage. In the same way, development of a manufacturing industry could be encouraged by making it difficult to import finished goods of that industry but easy to import its raw materials. This sort of influence on the direction of expansion has always been associated to a greater or less degree with the use of import controls.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Under war conditions, emergency regulations gave powers to controllers to guide the rate and direction of expansion of manufacturing, and of primary production and building. There was also some selective protection of industries in the lists of reserved occupations which were issued to recruiting officers in the first weeks of war. The intention was that persons in essential industries should not be accepted for the armed forces.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the early years of war this latter was a rather negative kind of control. Losses to the armed forces could often be made good if the industry was strong enough to compete on the labour market.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The powers given to industry controllers were seldom used to apply controls directly to the production targets of firms, and it was supply which soon became the controlling influence for nonessential industries. This type of control intensified as shipping difficulties and the diversion of overseas production to the making of war equipment led to serious shortages of materials. As supplies became inadequate to meet the demands of essential industries, complete restrictions were placed on the use of materials for some specified purposes. Controls over the use of building materials in particular became very stringent, and severely restricted private construction or even maintenance work.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Controls over supply remained the only really effective means of influencing the rate and direction of growth of industry until the time came for the Government to take power to direct industrial labour. At that stage, control over manpower gave another powerful influence over production.</p>
          <p rend="indent">These types of influence were not always sufficient to free resources for essential works. The Government itself tended to face supply and labour difficulties. To get certain Government work done for war purposes it was necessary to divert considerable resources from other uses. This could be done either by taking direct controls sufficient to forbid the use of resources for certain purposes, or by offering a higher reward for the use of resources than could be paid by non-essential users. This latter process tended
<pb n="64" xml:id="n64"/>
to be inflationary, but we find it used, along with direct restrictions on the non-essential use of resources. It was not sufficient just to free resources for essential uses. Adequate incentives were also necessary if war production was to meet difficult targets.<note xml:id="ftn1-64" n="1"><p>Not to mention the need for a supporting fiscal and monetary policy.</p></note></p>
        </div>
        <div n="23" xml:id="c3-23">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Rationing of Consumption Goods</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">There was very little rationing of consumption goods in the first two years of war. Motorists' supplies were an exception. Petrol was rationed from the outbreak of war. After a brief period of confusion in which some people tried to circumvent the rationing and lay in reserve supplies, coupons were issued to petrol users a fortnight after the outbreak of war. The distribution of rubber tyres was controlled from <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>, most going to essential users.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Food rationing was avoided until <date when="1942-04">April 1942</date>.<note xml:id="ftn2-64" n="2"><p>Sugar was the first item to be rationed, on <date when="1942-04-27">27 April 1942</date>.</p></note> There had been some panic buying of groceries in the early days of war. The following report from <name key="name-007584" type="place">Christchurch</name> appeared in a <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name> daily:<note xml:id="ftn3-64" n="3"><p><hi rend="i"><name key="name-122303" type="work">Dominion</name></hi>, <date when="1939-09-08">8 September 1939</date>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘People who have been buying groceries well in excess of their normal requirements have led city grocers to adopt restrictions. In future they will sell only four pounds of sugar, one pound of tea, seven pounds of flour at a time. To avoid multiple purchases at different shops, many stores will serve only their regular customers. To counter requests for twenty-five pound or fifty pound bags of flour, they will in future buy 200 pound sacks and pre-packet in seven pound containers.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘A city grocer told a reporter this morning that his business this week had been about double the normal. The main requirements by some customers was sugar, tea and flour, and big orders were being put in for tinned fish and fruit. Shop attendants who attempted to restrain customers were bullied into accepting orders, he declared. He pointed out that hoarding was both unnecessary and unfair to other customers who bought normally and the trade was forced to make restrictions.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The grocers' reaction was sufficient to save the day at this stage. Most people behaved sensibly, though there were some cases of hoarding of a few non-perishable lines. As various groceries became short, many retailers went to the trouble to distribute them as fairly as possible and the need for ration coupons was postponed until <date when="1942">1942</date>.</p>
          <pb n="65" xml:id="n65"/>
        </div>
        <div n="24" xml:id="c3-24">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Marketing</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Arrangements by the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> to buy New Zealand farm produce in bulk and wartime plans for more orderly marketing of scarce commodities in New Zealand were facilitated by the existence at the outbreak of war of an experienced Marketing Department.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The introduction of the guaranteed price for dairy products would not have been feasible without controlled marketing arrangements. The Government had decided to achieve this by itself entering into the field of marketing, and accordingly the Primary Products Marketing Act <date when="1936">1936</date> had made provision for the Government to buy in these products at fixed prices and to control their sale and distribution. The Primary Products Marketing Department was set up for this purpose.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Act gave power to the Department to market any primary product, but in the early years its function was limited to the control of marketing of dairy produce so that the guaranteed price scheme could be put into effect.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Within a few days of the outbreak of war, agreement was reached on the arrangements, which had already been discussed, for the United Kingdom Government to purchase New Zealand's exportable surplus of meat, wool, butter and cheese. A special New Zealand purchasing agency was needed and the Marketing Amendment Act <date when="1939">1939</date><note xml:id="ftn1-65" n="1"><p>Issued <date when="1939-10-07">7 October 1939</date>.</p></note> provided the necessary machinery for the Department to deal with meat and wool and other products on similar lines to those already in operation for dairy produce. The Act changed the Department's name to the Marketing Department, and its functions were extended so that it could deal with any specified goods instead of with primary products only.</p>
          <p rend="indent">No bulk purchase arrangement was made for fruits. The United Kingdom Government regarded these as comparatively low priority food items, which could be done without when shipping was scarce. It became apparent that war conditions would probably lead to the loss of most of the overseas market for apples and pears. In the circumstances the <name key="name-022826" type="organisation">New Zealand Government</name> undertook to purchase the entire crop of graded fruit for the 1939–40 season at agreed prices. As anticipated, available shipping space had to be conserved for more essential commodities and very little fruit could be sent overseas.</p>
          <pb n="66" xml:id="n66"/>
          <p rend="indent">There was a short postponement of the full impact of the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>'s decision in the first wartime season and, in <date when="1940">1940</date>, rather more than half the normal quantity of fruit was exported. However, from 1941 to 1945 less than one per cent of normal exports could be sent. The disposal of crops of apples and pears within New Zealand became a major internal marketing undertaking.<note xml:id="ftn1-66" n="1"><p>See <ref type="chapter" target="#c8">Chapter 8</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 11 gives an impression of the effect of the United Kingdom Government's decision to treat fruits as a low priority food item.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart11">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco012a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart11-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 11</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">EXPORTS OF APPLES AND PEARS</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of fruit statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">Just as the bulk purchasing arrangements with the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> were dealt with by an organisation already experienced in handling dairy produce, so too experience was not lacking in internal marketing.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1937">1937</date> the Government had taken over the business of one of the largest distributing houses engaged in marketing butter, cheese, eggs, ham, bacon and similar products within New Zealand.<note xml:id="ftn2-66" n="2"><p>The Primary Products Marketing Amendment Act <date when="1937">1937</date>.</p></note> Powers were now given to extend the activities of the
<pb n="67" xml:id="n67"/>
Department to the marketing in New Zealand of other types of primary produce, and the machinery was available for wartime internal marketing. The enlarged organisation became known as the <name key="name-024771" type="organisation">Internal Marketing Division</name> of the Marketing Department.<note xml:id="ftn1-67" n="1"><p>Internal marketing is discussed more fully in <ref type="chapter" target="#c17">Chapter 17</ref>.</p></note> One of its first wartime jobs was to dispose of the surplus of apples and pears remaining in New Zealand.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="25" xml:id="c3-25">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Financial Controls—Stabilisation</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Behind all these controls, and in many ways more important than any of them, was the overall control of finance. The change from peace to war more than quadrupled annual Government expenditure in the five years from 1938–39 to 1943–44. It was characteristic of war that, if goods and services were ordered, their delivery had to be quick and certain. The urgency and size of war needs, and the massive diversion of productive resources they required, tended, unless there was a comprehensive and balanced financial policy, to generate rapid rises in prices, costs and incomes.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To find money to finance the war was only the first objective of financial policy. It had also to prevent inflation from curtailing the purchasing power of war expenditures. To this end, and to reduce fierceness of competition between defence and private orders for scarce resources, it had to take purchasing power away from the private sector of the economy. Consistent with all this, it had to leave the private sector with adequate incentives to provide increases in production from its depleted resources. For increases in production were essential, if there was to be a sufficient volume of supplies available to meet war needs in addition to such normal requirements as could not be postponed.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In short, financial policy had to make war expenditures possible, to reduce the pressure of competing expenditures and to avoid inflation, but must still not interfere with incentives to provide maximum production. It would have been difficult enough to do all these things at once had revenue collection in war not needed to be on such an unprecedented scale.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Direct controls were often necessary to ensure that the war effort was most effectively directed. They would have been inadequate to divert resources on the necessary scale had financial policy failed in any of its major objectives. Price control and stabilisation generally had to be much more than a means of protecting the purchasing power of the people. They were to become cogs in an overall financial policy aimed at providing the climate for maximum production and maintaining the effectiveness of war expenditure in its command over goods and services.</p>
          <pb n="68" xml:id="n68"/>
          <p rend="indent">The Government, by the Reserve Bank Amendment Act <date when="1936">1936</date>, already had a substantial measure of control over the <name key="name-025055" type="organisation">Reserve Bank</name>, while the <name key="name-025000" type="organisation">Price Investigation Tribunal</name> provided an institutional structure for price control. Government controls and influences over financial transactions were to become very widespread indeed, as had to be the case if the Government was to succeed in its intention of financing an extensive war effort primarily from internal sources.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the early war years, the fact that there was unemployment at the outbreak of war to some extent countered the inflationary effect of wartime spending. Extra expenditure tended to be absorbed and the extra need for resources met by drawing in unemployed labour. Until this pool of unused labour was largely removed, there was no immediate danger of runaway inflation.</p>
          <p rend="indent">However, financial strains soon started to appear, and in the ultimate, when it became too difficult to hold wages and prices, the Government resorted to a comprehensive stabilisation programme, in <date when="1942-12">December 1942</date>, with an <name key="name-024628" type="organisation">Economic Stabilisation Commission</name> examining almost every economic proposal to determine whether it was likely to interfere with the programme. The Government's measures, which held a surprising degree of financial stability throughout the war, in spite of excessive physical strains on the economy, must rank among the most successful of its wartime policies.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="26" xml:id="c3-26">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Geared for War Production</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">All these changes took place with remarkably little friction. A recent writer said:<note xml:id="ftn1-68" n="1"><p>Polaschek in <hi rend="i">Government Administration in New Zealand</hi>, p. 47.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘The smooth change-over from peace to war was assisted by the import and export, marketing, and banking controls that the government had introduced already, and also by the fact that the government had a large works agency and owned or controlled much of the internal transport and communications system. Existing procedures served as a framework on which to build a more comprehensive regulatory system, much of which had been planned by the Organisation for National Service.<note xml:id="ftn2-68" n="2"><p><hi rend="i">Sic</hi>. Actually the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name>.</p></note> A Minister of Supply, assisted by a small group of officials and a network of committees, investigated what should be done to stimulate and direct industry, and kept a continuous watch over supply and production. The government appointed ten controllers to regulate key commodities and services—sugar, wheat and
<pb n="69" xml:id="n69"/>
flour, oil fuel, factories, timber, building, electricity, food, medical supplies, and mining. These men were public servants and worked under the general control of Ministers. A new <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> undertook the complex work of directing and controlling manpower as the country introduced compulsory military service, and geared itself to war production.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">It should perhaps be added that the switch to a war economy was assisted by the willingness of most New Zealanders, under stress, to give extra effort and make sacrifices, and by the fact that the <name key="name-017696" type="organisation">Public Service</name> was at its soundest after a quarter of a century of good recruitment, much of it by competitive entry.</p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb n="70" xml:id="n70"/>
      <div type="chapter" n="4" xml:id="c4">
        <head>CHAPTER 4<lb/>
The Demands of War</head>
        <div n="1" xml:id="c4-1">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Men for the Armed Forces</hi>
            <note xml:id="ftn1-70" n="1">
              <p>Armed forces strengths given here are taken from Parliamentary Paper H–11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 122. They differ from those given in H–19<hi rend="sc">b</hi>, <hi rend="i">Statement of Strengths and Losses in the Armed Services and Mercantile Marine in the 1939–45 War</hi> (<date when="1948">1948</date>). The latter figures exclude troops in transit, prisoners of war, etc., but include part-time Territorials.</p>
            </note>
          </head>
          <p>OF all the impacts of war on the New Zealand economy, probably the most momentous was the withdrawal of men and women from industry for the armed forces. At peak mobilisation, in <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>, over half of all New Zealand males in the age group from 18 to 45 were in uniform. This peak recruitment lasted for a comparatively short period, but a high level of manpower participation characterised New Zealand war's effort. For some two and a half years, from early <date when="1942">1942</date> to the second half of <date when="1944">1944</date>, one third or more of the 18 to 45 age group was serving.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The effect on the civilian labour force was drastic. For over five years, from the second half of <date when="1940">1940</date> right through to late <date when="1945">1945</date>, at least one in ten of the male labour force was in the armed forces. The most difficult period was from early <date when="1942">1942</date> until late <date when="1943">1943</date>, when over a quarter of all males available for work were serving. At the peak of recruitment, in <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>, the proportion in the forces reached 30 per cent of the male labour force.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Virtually all these men would have been available for work in New Zealand industries had they not joined the forces.<note xml:id="ftn2-70" n="2"><p>As would a large proportion of the women who joined the forces.</p></note> Industry had thus, for a period, to release well over a quarter of its labour to the armed forces. Even with production curtailed in many non-essential industries, this was a staggering demand. It might well have proved insuperable had it not been possible to draw into industry considerable numbers of married women, older people and others who would not normally have formed part of the labour
<pb n="71" xml:id="n71"/>
force, together with most of the initial pool of unemployed. There was still a drastic reduction of labour in industry, and the struggle to meet increasing demands for production with a dwindling labour force placed a considerable strain on many industries.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 12 shows changes in the proportion of the male labour force who were in the armed forces.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart12">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco013a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart12-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 12</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">MEN IN ARMED FORCES</hi><lb/>
PERCENTAGE OF MALE LABOUR FORCE</head>
              <figDesc>chart of labour force demographics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div n="2" xml:id="c4-2">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Overseas Service</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Early in <date when="1941">1941</date> some thirty thousand New Zealanders were serving overseas. By the middle of the year there were forty thousand, and this number was to be considerably exceeded for the rest of the war. <name key="name-020840" type="place">Pearl Harbour</name>, in <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>, renewed the danger of Japanese invasion and led to a rapid strengthening of the home army; but still the numbers serving overseas continued to increase.</p>
          <p rend="indent">At the peak of recruitment New Zealand had 50,000 men and women serving overseas and well over 100,000 serving in New Zealand. This was in <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>, but it was not until <date when="1943-11">November 1943</date> that the highest point was reached for men and women serving outside New Zealand. There were then 70,000 serving overseas and nearly 66,000 in New Zealand.</p>
          <pb n="72" xml:id="n72"/>
          <p rend="indent">Wherever they were serving, men in the armed forces had to be fed, clothed, equipped and sheltered, while their services were withheld from their usual contribution to production. But the financial effects differed. The men serving in New Zealand added the financial impact of their pay to the demands on the New Zealand economy in the same way as if they had been producing. This expenditure, without any accompanying production reaching the market, aggravated the tendency to an excess of money demand for goods and services.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 13 shows relationships between New Zealand's overseas and home forces over the war years.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart13">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco014a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart13-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 13</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">NEW ZEALAND ARMED FORCES</hi><lb/>
(INCLUDING WOMEN)</head>
              <figDesc>chart of army statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">To the extent that those serving overseas allotted portions of their pay to dependants in New Zealand they, also, added to the potential money demand on the New Zealand market. However, the more significant financial impact of overseas service was the expenditure of overseas funds which had to be found to equip, pay and maintain the forces. Unless this extra expenditure was to be matched by overseas borrowing, funds had to come out of export earnings at a time when shortages of overseas funds had
<pb/>
<pb/>
<pb/>
<pb/>
<pb n="73" xml:id="n73"/>
already led to restrictions on imports. As we have seen,<note xml:id="ftn1-73" n="1"><p><ref type="page" target="#n21">p. 21</ref>. There is also a fuller discussion in <ref type="chapter" target="#c10">Chapter 10</ref>.</p></note> the Labour Government had decided against raising money for war by overseas borrowing. New Zealand would pay for the war as it went along. In so far as the war led to overseas payments, this meant, in the main, that New Zealanders would do without a corresponding <hi rend="i">quantum</hi> of imported goods.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco015a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco015a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco015a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">high-country sheep farming</hi><lb/>
A typical scene at mustering time on a <name key="name-006540" type="place">Canterbury</name> station</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of New Zealand farm</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco015b">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco015b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco015b-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">modern dairy farming methods</hi><lb/>
New Zealand has been among the world leaders in the development</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of milking cows</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco016a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco016a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco016a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">state housing</hi><lb/>
Road planning on a pre-war state housing scheme at <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name></head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of road work</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco016b">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco016b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco016b-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">heavy earthmoving equipment, pre-war</hi><lb/>
Construction of the Ngahauranga Gorge road in 1938-39</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of road works</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco017a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco017a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco017a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">pre-war defence construction</hi><lb/>
Plant assembled for levelling work at RNZAF Station, <name key="name-021602" type="place">Whenuapai</name>, <date when="1939-01">January 1939</date></head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of air field construction</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco017b">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco017b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco017b-g"/>
              <p><hi rend="sc">manpower for the services</hi><lb/>
Enlisting for the <name key="name-000814" type="organisation">First Echelon</name>, 2 NZEF, at <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name>. Within three weeks of the declaration of war nearly 12,000 men had volunteered</p>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of enlisting recruits</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco018a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco018a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco018a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">mobilisation camps</hi><lb/>
Construction work at <name key="name-026686" type="place">Trentham</name> in the early weeks of war. Mobilisation camps were completed in record time</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of construction workers</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco018b">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco018b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco018b-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="sc">overseas service</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of troop ship</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div n="3" xml:id="c4-3">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Women for the Armed Forces</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Recruitment of women for the armed forces did not reach substantial numbers until <date when="1941-08">August 1941</date>, when six hundred women were serving. The numbers then gradually increased until a peak figure of 8700 was reached in <date when="1943-08">August 1943</date>. Thereafter women were gradually released, but in <date when="1945-11">November 1945</date> three and a half thousand women were still serving.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Participation of women in the services released men for more active armed service, just as the entry of women into industry released men for tougher industrial assignments and for the armed forces. In the main, those women whose home ties were light enough to permit them to participate actively in the war effort did so by voluntarily replacing men in paid jobs which had been depleted of labour by recruitment for the forces.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="4" xml:id="c4-4">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i"><name key="name-023372" type="organisation">United States Forces</name> in New Zealand</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">With the war in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name> came the garrisoning in New Zealand of <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> forces and the need to build camps and hospitals for them. In <date when="1942-06">June 1942</date>, 17,000 men arrived and there were to be substantial numbers in New Zealand from then until <date when="1944-07">July 1944</date>. Construction work for these allied forces was undertaken by the <name key="name-022826" type="organisation">New Zealand Government</name> using New Zealand labour. The work was an offset to American Lend-Lease supplies reaching New Zealand, but there was nothing to relieve the strain it placed on manpower. Moreover, the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> authorities in New Zealand, in need of men to load and unload vessels, to maintain camps and provide transport and a variety of other services, entered into competition for the already scarce labour supply. <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> servicemen on liberty added to the demand for the limited supply of goods and services. With adequate funds and high rates of pay, the visitors were at a considerable advantage. New Zealand
<pb n="74" xml:id="n74"/>
employers and New Zealand consumers found themselves unable to compete. The extra injection of freely available money added to the Government's stabilisation problems, but, from the point of view of the balance of payments, there was considerable advantage to New Zealand in the inflow of foreign exchange to enable <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> servicemen to be paid.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the second half of <date when="1942">1942</date> there were usually from fifteen to twenty thousand <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> servicemen stationed in New Zealand. Then, in the first quarter of <date when="1943">1943</date> the numbers were built up to over forty thousand, where they remained until a peak of 48,200 was reached in <date when="1943-07">July 1943</date>. There was a substantial reduction in August, but it was <date when="1943-11">November 1943</date> before the numbers fell below thirty thousand.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 14 shows changes in numbers of <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> servicemen in New Zealand.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart14">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco019a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart14-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 14</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">UNITED STATES FORCES IN NEW ZEALAND</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of US troop statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="75" xml:id="n75"/>
          <p rend="indent">From the military viewpoint, the presence of <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> forces on this scale in New Zealand was of strategic significance, and must have reduced considerably the risk of Japanese attack. Indeed it is surprising that New Zealand's own armed forces serving at home continued to outnumber those serving overseas until as late as <date when="1943-09">September 1943</date>.<note xml:id="ftn1-75" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="chart" target="#chart13">Chart 13</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">From the economic viewpoint, the presence of <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> as well as New Zealand armed forces in New Zealand meant so many more persons who made demands on consumer goods and services available in New Zealand without assisting in their production.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 15 shows the numbers of servicemen in New Zealand, including those of both countries.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart15">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco020a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart15-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 15</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">NEW ZEALAND AND UNITED STATES FORCES IN NEW ZEALAND</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of US troop statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="76" xml:id="n76"/>
        </div>
        <div n="5" xml:id="c4-5">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Finance: Two and a half Years of National Income Diverted to War Purposes</hi>
            <note xml:id="ftn1-76" n="1">
              <p>The War Expenses Account as a measure of the cost of war is examined more fully in <ref type="chapter" target="#c10">Chapter 10</ref>. Comparison against National Income gives the best indication of the burden of the cost of war. When considering diversion of resources, comparison against Gross National Product is better, as is done in <ref type="chapter" target="#c10">Chapter 10</ref>. Note, however, that pay and allowances of special wartime forces were included in National Income, but were not liable for taxes on income.</p>
            </note>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">With up to 30 per cent of the labour force serving in the forces, it was inevitable that the financial cost of war to New Zealand would take a very high proportion of available funds. In fact, expenditure on the Navy, Army and Air Force reached nearly 12 per cent of the national income in 1940–41, rising to 19 per cent in 1941–42, and to nearly 42 per cent in 1942–43. With all costs incidental to the conduct of war included, as measured by expenditure through the War Expenses Account, the proportion of the national income going to war purposes reached 50 per cent for each of the years 1942–43 and 1943–44.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 16 shows the costs of war expressed as percentages of national income.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart16">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco021a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart16-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 16</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">EXPENDITURE THROUGH WAR EXPENSES ACCOUNT EXPRESSED AS A PERCENTAGE OF NATIONAL INCOME</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of expenditure statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="77" xml:id="n77"/>
          <p rend="indent">The full costs of war over the six years 1939–40 to 1945–46 have been estimated at close to £700 million, which was equivalent to the entire national income for two and a half years, diverted to war purposes.</p>
          <p rend="indent">War expenditure on this scale was naturally not possible without very drastic curtailment of other expenditure, both for consumption and for capital formation. Even allowing for wartime restraints on other types of expenditure, the pressure on available resources was to make it most difficult to maintain reasonable stability or balance in the economy. It was fortunate that the Government was able to win a measure of support from all sections of the community for its stabilisation policy; otherwise, wartime financial pressures on a consumer market depleted of goods and on a labour market depleted of manpower would have led to rapid inflation.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Part of the costs of war had to be met in foreign exchange. Nearly £61 million was paid overseas to meet the costs of the 2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force. This was a drain on New Zealand's overseas exchange earnings, taking foreign exchange which would otherwise have been available to pay for imports.<note xml:id="ftn1-77" n="1"><p>Often in the war years it was supply shortages rather than funds shortages which restricted imports.</p></note> The cost was equivalent to the value of about one full year's imports at that time.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Under Reverse Lend-Lease<!-- Lend-Lease, Reverse -->, New Zealand supplied the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> with goods and services which, for accounting purposes, have been set down at £82 million. A similar quantity<note xml:id="ftn2-77" n="2"><p>The value for accounting purposes was set higher, but New Zealand kept a tighter control over costs and prices.</p></note> of goods and services for war purposes was received from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> under Lend-Lease. Nevertheless the sacrifice for New Zealand was high. All these transactions were concerned with the war effort and a very considerable proportion of the £82 million supplied by New Zealand, and, in effect, exchanged for war supplies, was in the form of goods which would have been available to earn foreign exchange had it not been for the war. In fact, the largescale diversion of foreign-exchange-earning exports to become non-earning supplies to allies in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name> was to cause considerable alarm in <date when="1942">1942</date> and later, when it was feared that New Zealand would be left with quite inadequate funds to pay for needed imports.<note xml:id="ftn3-77" n="3"><p>See also <ref type="chapter" target="#c10">Chapter 10</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">The overall requirements of foreign exchange to meet war commitments probably reached close to £150 million,<note xml:id="ftn4-77" n="4"><p>Only a rough approximation can be made. Information on overseas exchange transactions for the war years is quite inadequate. See also <ref type="chapter" target="#c14">Chapter 14</ref>.</p></note> equivalent to New Zealand's export earnings for about two years. Because of
<pb n="78" xml:id="n78"/>
the comparatively fixed nature of export earnings, this external impact was just as great a strain on the New Zealand economy as was the much larger sum of money used for war purposes in New Zealand. Without restriction of private imports, for which machinery had already been provided in <date when="1938">1938</date>, aided by the fact that many of the goods New Zealanders would have liked to import were not available at the time, it might well have proved impossible to find overseas funds to meet so large a commitment. As it turned out, overseas assets, which had been dangerously low in <date when="1930">1930</date>, were to reach quite a healthy level in the later war years.<note xml:id="ftn1-78" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="chapter" target="#c14">Chapter 14</ref>.</p></note></p>
        </div>
        <div n="6" xml:id="c4-6">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Demands on New Zealand Farming</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Supply is vital in war, and it is no reflection on New Zealand fighting men to say that New Zealand's function of providing food for her allies was possibly just as important to the ultimate course of the war as her contribution to the actual fighting. War demanded an outstanding effort in both directions.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Throughout the war there was considerable pressure on New Zealand farming to produce more and more food and to supply it to an increasing range of users. <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> needs increased as alternative sources of supply were successively shut off, and with the increasing Allied initiative in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name> from the second half of <date when="1942">1942</date> came the need to supply food to forces operating in this theatre of war. Foodstuffs to the value of £38 million, equivalent to a full year's supply to the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, were diverted to the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To some extent any food supplied to <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> forces in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name> represented a sacrifice by the people of the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, whose food was already in short supply. But with increasing mechanisation of New Zealand farms it was possible to provide large quantities of food for the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> forces without serious depletion of supplies to the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>. The output of farm produce was stepped up by farmers whose numerical strength had suffered considerably by losses to the armed forces; this in spite of the fact that there were shortages of fertilisers and of some types of equipment for farming.</p>
          <p rend="indent">A contribution to the continuance of supplies to the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, while exceptional demands for food for forces in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name> were being met, was made by the New Zealand consumer, whose consumption of farm products was rationed from <date when="1943">1943</date>.<note xml:id="ftn2-78" n="2"><p>Fresh pork from <date when="1943-05">May 1943</date>, butter from <date when="1943-10">October 1943</date>, other meat from <date when="1944-03">March 1944</date>.</p></note> In this and many other ways the demands of war made a direct impact on the New Zealand consumer.</p>
          <pb n="79" xml:id="n79"/>
          <p rend="indent">Not only was an increased output expected of the New Zealand farmer but he was required to make quite drastic switches in his production to meet the changing demands of the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, as other sources of supply were cut off or became available. Twice there was a substantial change in emphasis between butter and cheese production, involving frustrating and expensive re-planning and re-equipping of dairy factories.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Other new demands emerged and were met. Production of dehydrated meat was a special war industry to meet a <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> demand which lasted from 1942 to 1944. Medicinal plants were grown to meet wartime shortages and, from the beginning of <date when="1943">1943</date>, a very considerable expansion in vegetable growing was necessary to meet requirements of <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> forces in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name>. Supporting industries were established to dehydrate or quick-freeze vegetables.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Superimposed on all this were anxieties about shipping for perishable foodstuffs and the desirability of extra cool storage, for butter at least, to provide against stoppages or irregularities.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="7" xml:id="c4-7">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Demands on Other Industries</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">Even before the war, <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> manufacturers had been unable to meet all New Zealand demands for war equipment. Australian industries could not do very much towards filling the gap, and purchases from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> and <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> were, in the early years, restricted by shortage of hard currencies. It became increasingly necessary for New Zealand industries to turn to the manufacture of munitions, if her armed forces were to be properly equipped. By normal standards, most munitions production in New Zealand was probably uneconomic and, in practice, it was spread through hundreds of small units throughout the country. Much of the equipment required had to be adapted or improvised; and staff had to be trained to use new types of machinery. This was a diversion of manufacturing effort to meet a war need. In spite of the difficulty in importing proper equipment, a high degree of precision in manufacture was attained. The value of war equipment and munitions produced in New Zealand during the war has been estimated at £42 million, equivalent to about a quarter of a full year's output from all manufacturing industries.<note xml:id="ftn1-79" n="1"><p>Based on average output of manufacturing industries for the war years.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">To meet war needs, a considerable proportion of the resources in the building and construction industry had to be diverted from dwelling construction and industrial buildings to the construction of military camps, airports and other defence requirements. This work was facilitated by the fact that there had been considerable
<pb n="80" xml:id="n80"/>
imports of heavy earthmoving equipment for public works purposes in the years immediately preceding the outbreak of war. Defence construction work during the war totalled £47 million in value. While it was being done, a forbidding total of deferred dwelling construction and other capital work accumulated.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Industrial effort in New Zealand was also diverted to step up shipbuilding. More than 500 small ships were built, including minesweepers, submarine chasers, tugs and barges. Ship repair work was important throughout the war, but became increasingly so as the centre of war shifted to the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Coal mining, which had had a slack period prior to the war, was called on to increase production as the Australian imports of coal which had been available before the war became difficult to obtain.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand depended largely on her own resources to clothe her armed forces and, increasingly, the efforts of clothing factories, woollen mills, and footwear factories were diverted from civilian production for this purpose. Employment of women in these industries was considerably expanded, but demand increased faster. In <date when="1942-05">May 1942</date>, clothing joined other commodities which were rationed to the New Zealand consumer.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The general picture is of a very considerable diversion of industrial effort from peacetime supplies to war requirements, frequently involving considerable structural change in New Zealand industry, with new equipment and re-training of personnel to meet new demands. Not only were new types of munitions made, but many essential civilian commodities had to be made in place of supplies which could no longer be imported. This work, in many cases, had to be done with substitute materials and improvised equipment. New Zealand's productive capacity was put to the test as never before.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="8" xml:id="c4-8">
          <head>
            <hi rend="i">Economic Impacts of War</hi>
          </head>
          <p rend="indent">The main economic impacts of the war on New Zealand were the call for manpower for the forces, the heavy financial cost of war, the demands on overseas funds, the need for extra food production and the realignment of industries to provide military construction and equipment instead of peacetime requirements. These demands on New Zealand were all on a large scale. She escaped the serious physical destruction incurred by those countries which actually became battlefields but the impact on her economy in other ways was very considerable. A major purpose of the chapters which follow is to show how the New Zealand economy was reorganised to meet these demands and how they were in fact met.</p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb n="81" xml:id="n81"/>
      <div type="chapter" n="5" xml:id="c5">
        <head>CHAPTER 5<lb/>
Increasing Pressure on Manpower</head>
        <div n="9" xml:id="c5-9">
          <head>Manpower for the Armed Forces<note xml:id="ftn1-81" n="1"><p>See p. 70, <ref target="#ftn1-70">note 1</ref>.</p></note></head>
          <p rend="indent">MONTH by month over the first three years of war, industry had to yield up ever-increasing numbers of men for the armed forces. Beginning with what was, by comparison, a mere trickle, this transfer of men accelerated after each major crisis in the progress of the war.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Initially men were recruited voluntarily, in moderate numbers, to be trained in New Zealand for fighting overseas, but the disasters culminating in the fall of <name key="name-008009" type="place">France</name>, in <date when="1940-06">June 1940</date>, led to changes in recruiting methods designed to speed up the intake into the armed forces. Conscription of men for the forces began in <date when="1940-10">October 1940</date> under powers taken in June.<note xml:id="ftn2-81" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n58">pp. 58</ref>–<ref type="page" target="#n60">60</ref>, where the Labour Government's attitude to conscription is discussed.</p></note> By <date when="1941-11">November 1941</date> over 81,000 men were serving, more than half of them overseas, and over 1000 women had been recruited. With the entry of <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> into the war, in <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>, recruitment for the armed forces was again accelerated, and the emphasis shifted to strengthening the forces in New Zealand to meet the possibility of invasion. Within a month another 25,000 men were mobilised and, by <date when="1942-02">February 1942</date>, armed forces strengths exceeded 125,000, of whom nearly 77,000 were in New Zealand. By <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>, numbers in the forces had reached 157,000, which was to be the peak strength, and of these the home strength, also at its peak, was 107,000.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In terms of economic impact, leaving aside at this stage the question of financial costs, this meant that about one-tenth of all men normally working in industry had entered the armed services
<pb n="82" xml:id="n82"/>
by the end of <date when="1940">1940</date>. A year later the proportion had increased to about a fifth and, at peak mobilisation in <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>, industry had lost nearly one-third of its usual male labour force to the armed services.<note xml:id="ftn1-82" n="1"><p>3400 women were also in the forces by this time.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">This direct transfer of resources to military purposes inevitably required major industrial readjustments, which had to be made at a time when industry had an extra load to bear in maintaining supplies to New Zealand's allies and in feeding, clothing, and even to some extent munitioning New Zealand forces.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The increase in armed services strengths and the impact on the civilian labour force is summarised in the following table:</p>
          <p>
            <table rows="18" cols="5">
              <head><hi rend="sc">Men and Women for the Armed Services</hi><lb/>
Changes in Armed Forces Strengths from the Outbreak of War until Peak Mobilisation<note xml:id="ftn2-82" n="2"><p>Adapted from Table 4 in Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>. See also <ref type="table" target="#table12">Table 12</ref> and footnote on <ref type="page" target="#n70">p. 70</ref>. The numbers given for <date when="1939-11">November 1939</date> may be too low. The Special Force (<name key="name-000814" type="organisation">First Echelon</name>) was in mobilisation camps by November. It sailed at strength 6500 in <date when="1940-01">January 1940</date>.</p></note></head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Date</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Men</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Women</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Total</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Men as a Percentage of the Male Labour Force</hi>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">War with <name key="name-008556" type="place">Germany</name>, <date when="1939-09-03">3 September 1939</date></hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Per cent</hi>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1939-09">September 1939</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>2,600</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>2,600</cell>
                <cell>½</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1939-11">November 1939</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>4,100</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>4,100</cell>
                <cell>1</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1940-02">February 1940</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>12,300</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>12,300</cell>
                <cell>2</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1940-05">May 1940</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>13,500</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>13,500</cell>
                <cell>3</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Fall of <name key="name-008009" type="place">France</name>, <date when="1940-06">June 1940</date></hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1940-08">August 1940</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>43,300</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>43,300</cell>
                <cell>8</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1940-11">November 1940</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>60,500</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>60,500</cell>
                <cell>12</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1941-02">February 1941</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>70,700</cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell>70,700</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1941-05">May 1941</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>71,000</cell>
                <cell>100</cell>
                <cell>71,100</cell>
                <cell>14</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1941-08">August 1941</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>75,200</cell>
                <cell>600</cell>
                <cell>75,800</cell>
                <cell>15</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1941-11">November 1941</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>81,200</cell>
                <cell>1,100</cell>
                <cell>82,300</cell>
                <cell>16</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">War with <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name>, <date when="1941-12-07">7 December 1941</date></hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1942-02">February 1942</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>123,900</cell>
                <cell>1,500</cell>
                <cell>125,400</cell>
                <cell>24</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1942-05">May 1942</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>141,100</cell>
                <cell>2,100</cell>
                <cell>143,200</cell>
                <cell>27</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Peak Mobilisation</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>
                </cell>
                <cell>153,600</cell>
                <cell>3,400</cell>
                <cell>157,000</cell>
                <cell>30</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
        </div>
        <pb n="83" xml:id="n83"/>
        <div n="10" xml:id="c5-10">
          <head>Reserved Occupations</head>
          <div xml:id="c5-10-0" type="section">
            <p rend="indent">In the first few months of war, the effect on industry of armed forces recruitments was not too severe. There was a pool of unemployed labour from which some of the gaps in the civilian labour force could be filled, and an attempt had been made to minimise losses from the more essential industries. The schedule of reserved occupations prepared by the <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name> and adopted by the <name key="name-024575" type="organisation">Council of Defence</name> in <date when="1939-08">August 1939</date> was circulated to recruiting officers. From the outset, men in the scheduled occupations were not to be accepted for service in any of the armed forces.<note xml:id="ftn1-83" n="1"><p>In <date when="1939-11">November 1939</date> this screening of voluntary enlistments passed to the Placement Officers of the <name key="name-024793" type="organisation">Labour Department</name>.</p></note></p>
            <p rend="indent">Farming was not at this stage regarded as a reserved occupation and persons working on farms were accepted by recruiting officers. There were very soon complaints of shortage of labour on farms. Within six weeks of the outbreak of war these complaints became vociferous, but the Minister of Labour was not convinced.</p>
            <p rend="indent">A <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name> daily reported:<note xml:id="ftn2-83" n="2"><p><hi rend="i"><name key="name-122303" type="work">Dominion</name></hi>. <date when="1939-10-21">21 October 1939</date>.</p></note></p>
            <p rend="indent">‘The existence of a general shortage of farm labour was denied by the Minister of Labour, Mr. Webb, in an interview last evening.</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘He said that on October 13 there were 180 recorded vacancies for experienced farm workers, while the men available numbered 203. The number of recorded vacancies for inexperienced workers was 16 and the number of men available was 865.</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘“Farmers requiring labour should avail themselves of the facilities offered by the State Placement Service,” said Mr Webb. “The service has a very comprehensive organisation and operates through the Social Security Department in all country districts. Competent officers will deal with every demand for farm labour of all kinds. Where experienced labour is available every effort is made immediately to supply the demand. When experienced labour is not available, the Department is prepared to subsidise labour for a period sufficient to enable the worker and the farmer to make a success of the job. Every demand for farm labour will receive urgent attention, but I must have the cooperation of the farmers. I can assure them that, given this cooperation, their labour requirements will be met.”</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘Mr Webb said there had been criticism from various sources concerning an alleged shortage of farm labour, but when investigations had been made these charges could not be substantiated. “I want the farmers to know that any demand for labour of
<pb n="84" xml:id="n84"/>
any kind will be attended to at once,” added the Minister, “but I do urge them to state their requirements and difficulties to the appropriate Departmental officers. I am prepared to arrange the transfer of suitable men from one locality to another as in the past. Farmers themselves realise that lack of adequate accommodation and facilities in many cases increases the difficulty of obtaining suitable labour, but whatever the difficulties may be the first step would be to inform the Department of their labour requirements.”’</p>
            <p rend="indent">Perhaps this was not an answer which would give complete satisfaction to farmers, but they certainly seem to have complained too soon. At this stage fewer than four thousand men in all had been recruited and there was still a pool of some fourteen thousand men unemployed or in subsidised employment.</p>
            <p rend="indent">Nevertheless the fact that a number of persons engaged in farming and other apparently essential industries were accepted seems to have thrown doubt on the system of screening. The list of reserved occupations was kept secret, and physically fit men who were held back because they were in reserved occupations were not advised of the reason for their rejection. Widespread misunderstandings resulted, and on <date when="1940-01-25">25 January 1940</date> the <hi rend="i"><name key="name-122303" type="work">Dominion</name></hi> second leader picked up the complaints:</p>
          </div>
          <div n="1" xml:id="c5-10-1">
            <head>
              <hi rend="sc">Reserved Occupations</hi>
            </head>
            <p rend="indent">‘Protests have been made in various parts of the Dominion against the secrecy observed by the Government regarding the reserved occupations from which volunteers for the Forces must not be enlisted. It is not suggested that the reserved occupations decided on by the authorities have been unwisely selected, but in order to remove any doubt or uncertainty it is desirable that the public should be fully informed as to what is going on and the reasons for the decisions reached. A great deal has been heard about the necessity for maintaining farm production at the highest possible level as an important part of our war effort. Yet in spite of the admitted shortage of experienced farm labour recruits are being sought among farm workers. There appears to be something inconsistent in this. It is true that there has been talk about filling the gaps on farms with men from relief works, but how many of these stop-gap workers are skilled farm hands? Probably very few indeed.</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘There was some trouble a few days ago among slaughtermen in the north who wished to enlist, and were rejected on the ground that they were engaged in a reserved occupation. Their work as slaughtermen was regarded as more important to the
<pb n="85" xml:id="n85"/>
country than their service in the fighting forces. In given circumstances this view might be the correct one, but apparently there was room for difference of opinion on the point. How is a sound judgment to be formed by the public if they are kept in the dark as to the policy which is being pursued, and the reasons for it?</p>
            <p rend="indent">‘On the face of things there can be no good grounds for making a mystery of the occupations from which men cannot be spared for military service. On the other hand, the very fact that secrecy is observed over such a matter is bound to give rise to comment and is liable to occasion doubts and distrust not at all helpful to recruiting.’</p>
            <p rend="indent">But the Government refused to be drawn, and the list of reserved occupations remained secret. On 14 February Deputy Prime Minister Peter Fraser was reported as saying that enlistments ‘were treated on merit, and men who occupied key positions in industry would be told that they could not go away till they could be replaced. There was to be no exempted industry, but men might have to be told that if the fate of industry depended on them, they could not be spared.’<note xml:id="ftn1-85" n="1"><p><hi rend="i"><name key="name-122303" type="work">Dominion</name></hi>, <date when="1940-02-14">14 February 1940</date>.</p></note> With this the public had to be content.</p>
            <p rend="indent">No doubt the lists of reserved occupations served a useful purpose by giving some protection to essential industries in the early stages of war. However, it was a little absurd that, while a worker in a reserved occupation could not join the armed forces, there was nothing at this stage to prevent him from taking a new job in a non-essential industry.<note xml:id="ftn2-85" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n96">p. 96</ref>.</p></note> While the list of reserved occupations was in use, it resulted in postponement of service for some 3000 men, mainly farm, engineering and factory workers.<note xml:id="ftn3-85" n="3"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1945">1945</date>, p. 4. See also <ref type="page" target="#n93">p. 93</ref> regarding holding back farm workers.</p></note></p>
            <p rend="indent">With the appointment, in <date when="1940-09">September 1940</date>, of <name key="name-024610" type="organisation">District Advisory Manpower Committees</name> for hearing appeals against military service, the list of reserved occupations was dropped. A list of ‘highly important occupations and industries’ was substituted, but each case was to be treated on its merits. The onus was now on the employer to lodge an appeal where it appeared that a man should not be withdrawn from industry. The Director of National Service could also appeal in the public interest.</p>
            <p rend="indent">Armed forces requirements still increased and the number of men held on appeal in important industries grew larger. More attention had to be given to finding replacements for fit men who were in key positions in industry, but who were required for the armed forces.</p>
            <pb n="86" xml:id="n86"/>
            <p rend="indent">As the forces took more men, protests from industry mounted. The Government was put under increasing pressure to give a blanket protection to specific industries or occupations. Whether the requests came from employers or from workers, it returned the same reply. No industry or occupation would be permanently reserved; each case would be dealt with on its merits. This position continued until early in <date when="1942">1942</date>.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div n="11" xml:id="c5-11">
          <head>Civilian Labour Reserves Melt Away</head>
          <p rend="indent">The <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> estimated that numbers unemployed or on subsidised employment schemes fell from 19,000 at the outbreak of war to 13,000 by the end of <date when="1940">1940</date> and 6000 by the end of <date when="1941">1941</date>. By <date when="1942-12">December 1942</date> this figure had fallen to the then unbelievably low level of <date when="2000">2000</date>. It was to be reduced still further before the end of the war and, more astonishingly still, to continue to fall in the post-war decade. <ref type="chart" target="#chart17">Chart 17</ref> shows wartime changes in unemployment or subsidised employment.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart17">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco022a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart17-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 17</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">NUMBERS UNEMPLOYED OR IN SUBSIDISED EMPLOYMENT</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of employment statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">Thus, from the outbreak of war until peak mobilisation in <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>, some sixteen thousand men, previously unemployed or in subsidised employment, were absorbed into the armed
<pb n="87" xml:id="n87"/>
forces or into industry. To this extent the impact on industry of the armed forces build-up from 3000 to 157,000 men and women was reduced.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It will be noticed that, in this volume, most of those in subsidised employment, as well as the unemployed, have been treated as a labour pool. Such a treatment for the former group may be questioned, but is considered to be reasonable. Most of those in subsidised employment were in jobs which would not have been done without the subsidy from the Employment Promotion Fund.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Of Scheme 13, one of the more important forms of subsidised employment, the Employment Division of the <name key="name-024793" type="organisation">Labour Department</name> had written in <date when="1939">1939</date>:<note xml:id="ftn1-87" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, <date when="1939">1939</date>, p. 4.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘In order to give effect to the policy of placing all fit unemployed men in full-time work, subsidies are made available to local authorities—City and Borough Councils, County Councils, River and Drainage Boards, School Committees, sports bodies, and other social institutions not established for profit—for the full-time employment of registered and eligible labour at award rates of pay on developmental works which would not be put in hand without State assistance. The works undertaken include the formation, widening, metalling, etc., of streets and roads; footpath construction, kerbing, and channelling; local-body water-supply and sewerage schemes; land-drainage, river-clearing, river-protection, etc., afforestation; formation, levelling, improvements, etc., to parks, reserves, domains, school-grounds, hospital-grounds, etc.; flood-damage restoration.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Subsidies approved under the scheme range from £1 10s. and £2 5s. per man-week for single and married men respectively to, in some cases, the full wages cost. The men are employed under ordinary industrial conditions, and are paid in terms of the award to which the employing authority is a party. In cases where an employer is not cited as a party to an award the work is carried out under the conditions and at the rates of pay prescribed by the Public Works Workers’ agreement, <date when="1936">1936</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘It has always been an essential condition of employment on full-time subsidised work under Scheme 13 that the applicant must be registered and eligible to receive unemployment relief.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The most important words in this quotation seem to be, ‘which would not be put in hand without State assistance’, although it must be conceded that this test would be difficult to apply to existing subsidised work.</p>
          <pb n="88" xml:id="n88"/>
          <p rend="indent">Work done under subsidised schemes may have been worthwhile<note xml:id="ftn1-88" n="1"><p>Though the need to pay subsidies seems to indicate that it was uneconomic. In referring to subsidised public works employment, the Employment Division had written: ‘…subsidies are granted out of the Employment Promotion Fund to meet the cost in excess of the economic value of the work.’—Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, <date when="1938">1938</date>, p. 9.</p></note> but, under pressure of war, much of it had ceased by <date when="1942">1942</date>. To what extent it ceased because there was more urgent work to be done, and to what extent because there was no longer an unemployment problem to justify payment of subsidies, is difficult to decide. Some of the subsidised work, particularly that concerned with roads, would not again employ men on the pre-war scale, but the issue still remains confused, because changes in methods and increased mechanisation played a part in reducing labour requirements.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It is surprising that, even after recruitment had substantially exceeded the pre-war unemployment pool, the Government was still paying out substantial amounts for employment promotion schemes. This apparent anomaly did not escape attention at the time. The <hi rend="i"><name key="name-122303" type="work">Dominion</name></hi> in a leader on <date when="1942-08-24">24 August 1942</date> headed ‘Employment in Wartime’ said:</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘It will seem anomalous to very many people that, at a time when the country is faced with a serious shortage of manpower—a position that can be said to have been developing rapidly from the day war was declared—the Government should, in the past year, have expended no less than £1,288,000 on the promotion of employment. That the total showed a decline of £1,124,000 when compared with the expenditure of the previous year is something, but the fact remains that in the last two years New Zealand has expended £3,700,000 on the various employment promotion plans.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘The scheme that has absorbed over £3,100,000 of that amount is known officially as Number 13 and it provides for full time employment at award rates with local bodies and other employing authorities of registered and eligible men. During <date when="1940">1940</date> there were, on occasions, over ten thousand men employed under Number 13 scheme, but the total fell steadily last year and in December touched 4,258, when the seasonal demand was probably at its heaviest. At March 31 last the total was 2,092 and the large majority of the men are said to be fit only for the lightest type of work. But it seems evident that some of them could be usefully employed in production—though not economically at full rates—for they were reported to be engaged on drainage, river protection, sewerage schemes, public works and land development. Probably they were the younger men, but any
<pb n="89" xml:id="n89"/>
man capable of doing that class of work could be useful in a milking shed.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘The men working under Scheme Number 4B, which provides for employment under contract for the improvement and development of farms, are considered by the authorities to be reasonably fit because of the nature of the work they do. This scheme was not suspended until November last, and in 1941–42 there was a monthly average of 990 men employed. At that time it was left open for all work which had been started to be completed, but in February instructions were given that no more men were to be employed and commitments were to be cancelled although current contracts could be finished. Last year over 2,000 were allocated to this class of work, which included top dressing, road and track formation, repairing of flood damage and the ploughing of virgin land. Men who could undertake that should be able to find immediate employment in the vital work of maintaining production—the routine work of the average farm.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘This year the estimated expenditure on the promotion of employment, including administration expenses, is only £263,000, and while the marked decline will be satisfactory it will create serious doubt as to whether an expenditure of £1,288,000 last year was at all justified at a time when there was an increasing demand for labour. It seems hardly credible that in two complete years of war, with manpower at a premium, this country should have spent over £3,700,000 on employment promotion schemes.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Be that as it may, some 17,000 men who were unemployed or in these types of subsidised work at the outbreak of war had been absorbed into industry or the armed forces by the end of <date when="1942">1942</date>.<note xml:id="ftn1-89" n="1"><p>The problem raised by the <hi rend="i"><name key="name-122303" type="work">Dominion</name></hi> leader can be studied in better perspective when post-war experience is also taken into consideration. See also <ref type="page" target="#n20">Chapter 20</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Under stress of war, labour for industry was also augmented from groups of people not normally in the labour force, particularly married women and retired men. In a rather speculative labour force analysis, the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> estimated<note xml:id="ftn2-89" n="2"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 134.</p></note> that the number of women in civilian employment increased by nearly a quarter in just over two years, from 180,000 at the outbreak of war to 224,000 by the end of <date when="1942">1942</date>.</p>
        </div>
        <pb n="90" xml:id="n90"/>
        <div n="12" xml:id="c5-12">
          <head>Women Replace Men in Industry<note xml:id="ftn1-90" n="1"><p>Figures given for manufacturing employment in this section are those used prior to a statistical reclassification of manufacturing in 1951–52. The years quoted are years ended 31 March.</p></note></head>
          <p rend="indent">Women drawn into industry for the war period played the major part in filling gaps left by the withdrawal of men for the armed services. Soljak writes:<note xml:id="ftn2-90" n="2"><p>Philip J. Soljak, <hi rend="i">New Zealand, Pacific Pioneer</hi>, p. 141. Soljak was born in New Zealand, domiciled in <name key="name-008197" type="place">America</name> and wrote to introduce New Zealand to American readers.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Women from the cities joined those in the country in the work of maintaining and increasing farm production, vital to New Zealand's war effort. Members of the Women's Land Army drove tractors, grew fruit and vegetables, milked cows, tended sheep and helped in many other phases of agriculture.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘All organisations were co-ordinated under the Women's War Service Auxiliary, which recruited women for service with the armed forces auxiliaries and conducted classes in first aid, signalling, truck driving and canteen, clerical and farm work. Membership of the WWSA and affiliated groups exceeded 75,000.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘As in other countries, thousands of women took wartime jobs in the Government services and in the food, clothing and munitions industries. New Zealand women in employment totalled 230,000 (including 35,000 who worked in war plants), compared with 180,000 in <date when="1939">1939</date>.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Specific references will be made to the part played by women in various industries, but at this stage a quick look at employment in manufacturing is revealing. Between 1939 and 1942 the number of women engaged in manufacturing increased rapidly from 25,700 to 35,200, a rise of 37 per cent in three years. The number of men, on the other hand, after increases in 1940 and 1941, fell in <date when="1942">1942</date> and was then less than two thousand above its <date when="1939">1939</date> level. Whereas in <date when="1939">1939</date> one would have found only 33 women for every hundred men working in manufacturing, there were 43 women for every hundred men in <date when="1942">1942</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">For the remainder of the war, the number of women in manufacturing stayed comparatively stable at between 36,000 and 37,000, but fell post-war to 34,000 in <date when="1946">1946</date>, and remained thereabouts for the next two years. Male employment, on the other hand, started to increase rapidly after <date when="1944">1944</date> and had reached over 106,000 by <date when="1948">1948</date>.<note xml:id="ftn3-90" n="3"><p>Compared with 76,000 in 1939 and 82,000 in <date when="1944">1944</date>.</p></note> At this stage there were 32 women for every hundred men in manuacturing as compared with 43 in 1942 and 33 in <date when="1939">1939</date>. Women replaced men during the war period so that manufacturing
<pb n="91" xml:id="n91"/>
industries could expand and make their contribution to wartime production. In many cases these women yielded place to men in industry when the men returned from the armed services.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 18 shows the changing proportion of women engaged in manufacturing:</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart18">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco023a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart18-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 18</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">EMPLOYMENT IN FACTORY PRODUCTION</hi><lb/>
NUMBER OF WOMEN PER HUNDRED MEN</head>
              <figDesc>chart of employment statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div n="13" xml:id="c5-13">
          <head>Women's Organisations for War Work</head>
          <p rend="indent">Most of the wartime effort of women was by individuals who became salary or wage earners, and accepted employment in industries where wartime recruitment of men had left vacancies. However, a great deal of unpaid work was also done, while a considerable organisation was devoted to attracting more women into war work and co-ordinating their efforts. A group of Women's Auxiliary Services was set up and played an important part in freeing men for the armed forces and for essential work.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Women's War Service Auxiliary was established in <date when="1940">1940</date> to provide a national organisation co-ordinating the war effort of New Zealand women.<note xml:id="ftn1-91" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 28.</p></note> The Auxiliary kept a register of all women
<pb n="92" xml:id="n92"/>
volunteering for work which would assist the war effort. The strength of the Auxiliary and affiliated organisations reached a peak of over 75,000 in <date when="1942">1942</date>, when 250 district committees were operating under the Central Executive.</p>
          <p rend="indent">From the register, the Auxiliary organised groups of voluntary workers. The largest was the Canteen Section, twenty thousand strong, who helped staff canteen huts at military camps, service clubs and hospitals throughout New Zealand. Next in importance was the Clerical Section of ten thousand members who undertook the bulk of the clerical and typing work for the <name key="name-024736" type="organisation">Home Guard</name> and the Emergency Precautions Scheme. For long periods members attended in the evenings at army offices and at service camps to overtake arrears of clerical work. Their clerical and typing contribution played an important part in the mobilisation of New Zealand's military forces, especially during the period in <date when="1942">1942</date> when the possibility of Japanese invasion required diversion of all possible manpower to active service.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The third most numerous group was the Transport Group, comprising five thousand members trained in all aspects of civilian transport. In most districts, members of this group were seconded to the Emergency Precautions Scheme and undertook convoy duties, collection of waste paper and similar work.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There was a Hospital Group of two thousand women who, besides undertaking hospital visiting, trained as hospital aids in kitchen and laundry work. Members also performed voluntary work for Hospital Boards, such as clerical and telephone work, and admission of patients.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Smaller groups of women were concerned with vegetable growing, obstetrical work and signalling.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Up to <date when="1942-10">October 1942</date> the Auxiliary was responsible for the recruitment of women for the Women's Auxiliary Armed Forces, and, throughout the war, helped with national campaigns such as loans, bond sales, and patriotic fund appeals. The Auxiliary performed valuable work by co-operating with the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> in keeping in touch with members of the Women's Land Service and by acting in an advisory capacity on the general welfare of service personnel and the employment of women in war work.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Women's Auxiliary Air Force was established in <date when="1941-01">January 1941</date> and reached a peak strength of nearly four thousand in <date when="1943-08">August 1943</date>. By VJ Day<note xml:id="ftn1-92" n="1"><p><date when="1945-08-15">15 August 1945</date>.</p></note> the strength had dwindled to about 2500, but there were 600 women still serving as late as <date when="1946-03">March 1946</date>. Members of this force were employed as shorthand-typists,
<pb n="93" xml:id="n93"/>
clerks, domestics, kitchen workers, and dental and medical assistants. During the period of peak mobilisation in New Zealand many were employed on technical work such as radio location.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Women's Army Auxiliary Corps came into being towards the end of <date when="1941">1941</date>, when a draft of thirty volunteers embarked for the <name key="name-005853" type="place">Middle East</name>. This corps reached a peak strength of 4600 in <date when="1943-07">July 1943</date>. By VJ Day the numbers had shrunk to about 2500, and by <date when="1946-03">March 1946</date> fewer than a thousand women were still serving.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The strength of the Women's Royal Naval Service in New Zealand rose steadily after its inception in <date when="1942-05">May 1942</date> to a peak of over five hundred in <date when="1944-10">October 1944</date>. Most of the women served ashore, in clerical or domestic work, although some were engaged in manning motor-launches in the <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name> harbour. Over a thousand women in these three services served overseas.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Women's Land Service, where over two thousand women were serving by the second half of <date when="1944">1944</date>, was established on a small scale in <date when="1940">1940</date> to supplement male labour on farms when recruitment started to have serious effects. The contribution made by these women is discussed in the chapter dealing with farming.<note xml:id="ftn1-93" n="1"><p>Chapter 8.</p></note></p>
        </div>
        <div n="14" xml:id="c5-14">
          <head>Labour Losses on Farms</head>
          <p rend="indent">The impact of recruitment on farming labour was well summed up by the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>.<note xml:id="ftn2-93" n="2"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 35. See also <ref type="page" target="#n83">p. 83</ref>.</p></note> The Department's statement was completely frank about the reasons behind the exclusion of farming from the early lists of reserved occupations. It said:</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘In the early months of the war no special importance attached to the farming industry. World food sources had not been disturbed, and the effects of submarine warfare seemed likely to throw strong emphasis on conservation of shipping by shortening of supply lines. Under such circumstances the farming industry neither expected nor received any special protection. Consequently considerable numbers of farm workers entered the Armed Forces. The loss of <name key="name-120004" type="place">Denmark</name> and the Low Countries in <date when="1940-05">May, 1940</date>, greatly (and unexpectedly) altered the picture. The loss of these sources of food and the certainty of a long and difficult struggle raised food-producing throughout the Empire to a priority level, although there was still some uncertainty as to whether shipping difficulties would enable supplies to be cleared from such distant sources as New Zealand. During the 1940–41 season, therefore, farming remained on the priority borderline, with the brake being increasingly applied to the recruitment of farm workers.</p>
          <pb n="94" xml:id="n94"/>
          <p rend="indent">‘Before the opening of the 1941–42 season the position of the New Zealand farming industry had crystalised to a clear first priority. For that season the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> asked for a diversion of a portion of the country's dairying industry from butter making to cheese making, and, with the assistance of the Government, nearly four thousand milk suppliers were changed over and New Zealand increased her cheese-production in one year by 29·7 per cent. In the following year <name key="name-005976" type="place">Britain</name>'s needs required a change back to butter production, and the switch over was made accordingly. These changes inevitably involved considerable manpower adjustments both within the industry and in ancillary industries supplying containers and plant. The Japanese attack in <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>, followed by the swift progress of Japanese forces in the southward thrust towards <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and New Zealand, necessitated the speedy mobilization of considerable forces for home defence in the early months of <date when="1942">1942</date>. The protection of the Dominion's own shores had to come first, and the farming industry, in common with all others, had to make a further contribution of manpower to the Armed Forces. As in all other industries, <date when="1942">1942</date> was the farming industry's most difficult year ….’</p>
          <p rend="indent">It is regrettable that, though various estimates have been made, there is no reliable measure of the numbers of men lost by farming to the armed services. Nor is there any reliable count of numbers engaged in farming at any point between the <date when="1936">1936</date> and the <date when="1945">1945</date> population censuses. According to the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>,<note xml:id="ftn1-94" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 134.</p></note> some 20,000 men were lost to farming by <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>, but this must be regarded as a very rough estimate.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the early stages of war, an attempt was made to record losses by various industries to the armed forces. Copies of all enlistment forms were sent to the head office of the Social Security Department, where the intention was to sort and classify them. The purpose of this arrangement was to find replacements for men withdrawn from their occupations. Apparently the Department was soon bewildered by the flood of forms and nothing was achieved. Except for industries such as manufacturing, where annual statistics of numbers engaged continued to be collected throughout the war, there was no accurate indication of the effect of wartime recruitment on employment in various industries. Manpower policy to this extent was carried out without adequate knowledge. Farming particularly was affected by this lack of knowledge and at least one glaring mistake resulted.<note xml:id="ftn2-94" n="2"><p>See <ref type="page" target="#n493">p. 493</ref>.</p></note></p>
        </div>
        <pb n="95" xml:id="n95"/>
        <div n="15" xml:id="c5-15">
          <head>The Manpower Problem Extends to Secondary Industries</head>
          <p rend="indent">Manufacturing progress was affected by the policy of import selection which, as the natural outcome of import and exchange control, had been in operation since <date when="1938">1938</date>. A number of secondary industries had been building up behind the shelter of this protection. War requirements and the continuance of import controls gave a further fillip to manufacturing industry and led to the emergence of another crop of new industries.<note xml:id="ftn1-95" n="1"><p>Manufacturing production is dealt with in <ref type="chapter" target="#c7">Chapter 7</ref>.</p></note> Yet there was no general shortage of labour for manufacturing until <date when="1941">1941</date>. The reason was the increasing employment of women in many industries where the labour force had previously been predominantly male.<note xml:id="ftn2-95" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="chart" target="#chart18">Chart 18</ref>, p. 91.</p></note> By way of example, the meat freezing and preserving industry, while staffed predominantly by men, employed two and a half times as many women in 1942–43 as in 1938–39. More than four hundred extra women had moved into the industry. Over the same period a loss of over a hundred men in dairy factories was more than made good by recruitment of extra women.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In electricity generation and supply women had made up only about 10 per cent of total staff, but in the first four years of war losses of men were made good by recruiting women, and in 1942–43 women made up 18 per cent of staff. In these four years the number of women in sheet-metal industries doubled and the number in foundries and boiler making trebled.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Even in 1942–43, when an extra 125,000 men had been absorbed into the armed forces, manufacturing industries had a labour force 12,000 higher than at the outbreak of war.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The war period comes into the earlier stages of a fairly rapid change in the economic structure of New Zealand, when secondary industry was moving up from its subordinate place to reach a position, in the 1950s, where it was to rival farming as the largest producer of goods. To some extent the pre-war upsurge of manufacturing made the strains of war tolerable, but then again manufacturing thrived on wartime demands and its upward impetus was strengthened.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Wartime demands for manufacturing production were much more direct than those on farming, and by the middle of <date when="1941">1941</date> manufacturing too was feeling the pinch as a result of the drastic reductions in civilian manpower. Two extracts from letters by the Factory Controller to the Director of National Service are of
<pb n="96" xml:id="n96"/>
interest. On <date when="1941-06-10">10 June 1941</date>, he wrote in protest at the continued drawing off of men for the forces, and said:</p>
          <p>‘I have no need to point out the difficulties under which many manufacturers are working today through the loss of trained workers. This position will become more difficult as further classes are enrolled and as we have to improvise more and more in our production.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Then, on <date when="1941-10-02">2 October 1941</date>, he protested against employers in non-essential industries taking key men from essential work.<note xml:id="ftn1-96" n="1"><p>Both letters on National Service file 13/2/5, Pt. 1. Extracts in War History narrative No. 51.</p></note></p>
          <p>‘In each case I have used my best endeavours to have the man retained on military work, but, as I have no power to control workers' movements, moral suasion only has been open to me.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">As the position became more difficult, there was considerable pressure for protection of key industries, but, from the dropping of the original reserved occupations lists in <date when="1940-09">September 1940</date> until it finally decided on direction of civilian manpower in <date when="1942-01">January 1942</date>, the Government firmly refused to give any industry a blanket protection by declaring it essential.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="16" xml:id="c5-16">
          <head>Other Industries</head>
          <p rend="indent">Losses suffered by other industries depended to a large extent on whether their occupations were regarded as sufficiently important to be listed as reserved or important occupations.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Transport and communications suffered severe losses of men to the forces. These losses were to some extent made good by recruitment of women, though the Railways did not find it so easy to use women as did the <name key="name-024991" type="organisation">Post and Telegraph Department</name>. Road transport drivers also became scarce as military needs competed directly with civilian services.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Pressure of defence construction work and losses of men to the forces increased the labour difficulties of the building and construction industry. By <date when="1941-11">November 1941</date> the industry generally was working a forty-five to fifty-four hour week.<note xml:id="ftn2-96" n="2"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 39.</p></note> Difficulties were accentuated when the entry of <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> into the war in <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date> gave urgency not only to local defence works but also to the mobilisation of all possible manpower for the home forces. It was evident that the Government could not for much longer delay taking power to direct men into essential industries.</p>
        </div>
        <pb n="97" xml:id="n97"/>
        <div n="17" xml:id="c5-17">
          <head>The Coming of Employment Controls</head>
          <p rend="indent">By the end of <date when="1941">1941</date> 17 per cent of all men in industry had been taken into the armed forces. Since <date when="1940-10">October 1940</date>, conscription had been necessary to find sufficient numbers for the armed forces.<note xml:id="ftn1-97" n="1"><p>Under National Service Emergency Regulations gazetted on <date when="1940-06-18">18 June 1940</date>.</p></note> In industry this had led to further inroads on the labour supply.</p>
          <p rend="indent">As competition for labour grew fiercer and the production from some of New Zealand's industries became more vital to the war effort, it was increasingly apparent that more than persuasion would be necessary to safeguard staffs of essential industries.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The entry of <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> into the war, in <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>, resulted in accelerated recruiting for the Forces in New Zealand and threw further burdens on industry. In the next three months the strengths of the armed forces were increased by 40 per cent, but were still regarded as inadequate. Some idea of the pressure on manpower at this stage is given by Wood when he says, ‘… no conceivable disposition of manpower could find, even untrained, more than half the men judged necessary for the local defence of New Zealand.’<note xml:id="ftn2-97" n="2"><p>Wood, <hi rend="i"><name key="name-110071" type="work">Political and External Affairs</name></hi>, p. 223.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Some measure of compulsion became necessary and the Government, which had first resorted to military conscription in <date when="1940-10">October 1940</date>, took specific powers in <date when="1942-01">January 1942</date> to conscript workers for industrial purposes.<note xml:id="ftn3-97" n="3"><p>By amendment to the National Service Regulations, <date when="1942-01-10">10 January 1942</date>. (The Emergency Regulations Amendment Act of <date when="1940-05-31">31 May 1940</date> had already given more general powers to control the labour force.)</p></note> It became possible to require civilians to register for work, to direct them into work of national importance, to stop workers leaving industries which were regarded as essential, and to restrict the engagement of labour in industries not regarded as essential. Measures could also be taken to combat industrial absenteeism. These powers were given to the Minister of National Service, subject to a right of appeal to a local <name key="name-024840" type="organisation">Manpower Committee</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">A formal declaration by the Minister of National Service that an industry or undertaking was engaged in essential work was the starting point for industrial control. Once this declaration was made, the movement of workers in and out of the industry and the employers' right to dismiss became subject to control by the District Manpower Officers. As a corollary, measures became necessary to protect workers who were held in essential industries against unfair wages or working conditions and to require from them reasonable standards of attendance and performance.</p>
          <pb n="98" xml:id="n98"/>
          <p rend="indent">The principal industries affected by declarations of essentiality were:<note xml:id="ftn1-98" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1943">1943</date>, p. 44.</p></note></p>
          <p>
            <table rows="6" cols="2">
              <row>
                <cell>Mining</cell>
                <cell>Food processing</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Sawmilling</cell>
                <cell>Clothing and footwear</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Defence construction</cell>
                <cell>Provision of meals</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Railways</cell>
                <cell>Government Departments</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Power supply</cell>
                <cell>Education</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Engineering and shipbuilging</cell>
                <cell>Hospitals, Fire Boards, and sanitation</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">In many cases the acceptance or otherwise of defence contracts was crucial in deciding whether particular undertakings should be declared essential. For this purpose the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> depended on the Factory and the Munitions Controllers to specify the businesses which were concerned with defence contracts, so that their labour supply could be conserved.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By the end of <date when="1942">1942</date> some 230,000 workers, or about one-third of the working population, were in industries which had been declared essential. Farming, despite its paramount importance, was never actually declared essential, but from <date when="1940">1940</date> onwards always featured prominently in the Government's arrangements for the protection of the internal economy. There were said to be administrative difficulties in the way of providing the formal procedures necessary to declare farming essential.<note xml:id="ftn2-98" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n194">p. 194</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Of the introduction of manpower controls the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> wrote:<note xml:id="ftn3-98" n="3"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 30.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘By the middle of <date when="1941">1941</date>, … it had become apparent that the war must be a long one, requiring a further steady flow of reinforcements overseas. While, up to that point, industry had been able to adapt itself to the increasing labour shortage by voluntary measures, a close study of the over-all man-power position then carried out showed that, with 73,000 men already withdrawn from industry and in the Forces by the end of <date when="1941-06">June, 1941</date> (including 42,000 actually overseas), these voluntary measures of adjustment could not continue to meet the position for much longer. In <date when="1941-09">September, 1941</date>, the Department therefore began to study the question of introducing compulsory measures of industrial mobilization (man-power controls) in New Zealand whenever the strain of mobilization might make this necessary. In doing so it had available the measures already adopted by the British Government.</p>
          <pb n="99" xml:id="n99"/>
          <p rend="indent">‘The outbreak of war with <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> in <date when="1941-12">December, 1941</date>, brought the question of industrial mobilization to a head with unexpected urgency. The need for home defence became of paramount importance. It became immediately necessary to withdraw a further 45,000 men from industry for the home-defence Forces in the early part of <date when="1942">1942</date>, followed by further withdrawals, until, by <date when="1942-09">September, 1942</date>, industry had lost some 170,000<note xml:id="ftn1-99" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">Sic</hi>. This figure may refer to enrolments rather than to numbers lost at a specific time. See also table on <ref type="page" target="#n82">p. 82</ref>.</p></note> men to the Armed Forces overseas and within New Zealand. The necessity for mobilization on such a scale made the introduction of man-power controls a matter of urgent necessity almost overnight. In <date when="1942-01">January, 1942</date>, Amendment No. 8 of the National Service Emergency Regulations <date when="1940">1940</date> was gazetted providing for such controls and for the appointment throughout the Dominion of District Man-power Officers to administer them under the direction of the Minister of National Service. These regulations were later taken out of the National Service Emergency Regulations and gazetted separately as the Industrial Man-power Emergency Regulations <date when="1942">1942</date>, and then came under the administration of the Minister of Industrial Man-power.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Under these regulations industries or individual units of industries in which it became necessary to hold or reinforce the labour content could be declared to be “essential”. The first declarations were made in <date when="1942-01">January, 1942</date>, covering butter and cheese making, electric-power production and supply, the manufacture and supply of coal-gas, hospitals, the sawmilling, coalmining and linen-flax industries, and the manufacture of munitions and Army equipment. As war production mounted and as further mobilization decreased the labour force available to industry as a whole, it became necessary to extend the coverage of declarations not only to protect actual war production, but also to protect vital ancillary production and services, until by <date when="1944-03-31">31st March, 1944</date>, it was estimated that approximately 255,000 workers, representing 40 per cent of the Dominion labour force, were employed in undertakings declared essential.’</p>
        </div>
        <div n="18" xml:id="c5-18">
          <head>Manpower Registers</head>
          <p rend="indent">The regulations made every civilian liable for direction to work of national importance, irrespective of age or sex, and provided for the registration of persons by successive age and occupation
<pb n="100" xml:id="n100"/>
groups.<note xml:id="ftn1-100" n="1"><p>The first sentence of Clause 7 (1) read: ‘The Minister may, by notice given in such manner as he thinks fit, direct all persons of any specified class or of specified classes, whether normally engaged in any occupation or not, to register for employment with the nearest District Man-power Officer or with any other specified official.’</p><p rend="indent">Clause 7 (3) read: ‘Every person registered under this regulation shall, as required by the District Man-power Officer, undertake such employment or training for employment as that Officer may direct, and shall continue in such employment or training for such period as the said Officer may require.’</p></note> Originally it had been announced by Mr Fraser<note xml:id="ftn2-100" n="2"><p>On 13 February. Mr Fraser was then Deputy Prime Minister. Reported in <hi rend="i"><name key="name-122303" type="work">Dominion</name></hi>, <date when="1940-03-21">21 March 1940</date>.</p></note> that information collected from the Social Security registration forms would provide the basis of a National Register of Manpower. A considerable amount of work was done in classifying the Social Security forms,<note xml:id="ftn3-100" n="3"><p>As authorised by the Social Security (Supplementary) Regulations, gazetted <date when="1940-03-20">20 March 1940</date>, which also required extra information to be supplied by persons 16 years old or over, when registering. Previously, for example, only those under 20 had been required to give information on their ages.</p></note> but it was wasted when the job had to be abandoned to get quicker action on a narrower front. Full-scale registration had proved too formidable a task. Men or women were required to register in groups as needed. Administration was decentralised, with registration in the hands of individual District Manpower Officers. The size of the group to be registered was determined by the capacity of the manpower officers to cope with the work, and new groups were not registered until work on previous groups was nearing completion.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In general, the system was to call on all persons within certain narrow age ranges to register their names; but, to meet the pressing needs of some industries, persons in broader age groups with particular types of skill or experience were also required to register. Some 115,000 men had registered their names with the manpower officers by <date when="1943">1943</date>, including civilians between the ages of 18 and 45 whose liability to register for military service came before their liability to register for employment.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There was some hesitation in calling for registration of women and, when the first registration order went out in <date when="1942-03">March 1942</date>, only young women aged 20 and 21 were asked to register. The upper age limit was gradually extended to reach 30 in <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>, and, in <date when="1943-02">February 1943</date>. girls of 19 and 20 were also required to register. Finally, women up to the age of 40 were included in <date when="1944-01">January 1944</date>. Registration was not compulsory for those women whose domestic duties included the care of children under 16 years old. By the end of <date when="1944-03">March 1944</date>, 147,000 women were registered for employment.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The following table of successive registration orders illustrates the growing intensity of the search for men and women who could be directed to fill gaps left in essential industries by armed
<pb n="101" xml:id="n101"/>
forces recruitments. Men aged 18 to 45 had already registered for military service, and those who had not yet been called up or who had been rejected for military service were also available for direction if required. The search for men with special skills went side by side with the search for those with no immediate military responsibilities.</p>
          <p>
            <table rows="14" cols="2">
              <head><hi rend="sc">Registration for Work of National Importance</hi><lb/>
Dates of Registration Orders<note xml:id="ftn1-101" n="1"><p>Based on table in Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 133.</p></note></head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Date</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Classes covered</hi>
                  <note xml:id="ftn2-101" n="2">
                    <p>As a general rule exempted classes were provided for in each case, including, <hi rend="i">inter alia</hi>, persons already registered, members of the Forces, invalids, and other classes definitely unavailable for direction into (other) employment.</p>
                  </note>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>18/3/42</cell>
                <cell>Men aged 46–49 inclusive, and women aged 20–21 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>18/3/42</cell>
                <cell>Men with experience in building and construction, aged 18–70 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>18/3/42</cell>
                <cell>Men with experience in engineering and metal trades, aged 18–70 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>8/4/42</cell>
                <cell>Men aged 50 but not 51</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>7/5/42</cell>
                <cell>Men with experience in the timber industry, aged 18–65 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>15/7/42</cell>
                <cell>Women aged 22–25 inclusive, resident in boroughs of <name key="name-120018" type="place">Hamilton</name> and <name key="name-008388" type="place">Cambridge</name></cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>3/8/42</cell>
                <cell>Women aged 22–23 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>24/9/42</cell>
                <cell>Women aged 24–30 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>8/10/42</cell>
                <cell>Men aged 51–59 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>8/10/42</cell>
                <cell>Aliens aged 18–45 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>3/2/43</cell>
                <cell>Persons with qualifications or experience in science or engineering</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>18/2/43</cell>
                <cell>Women aged 18–19 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>26/1/44</cell>
                <cell>Women aged 31–40 inclusive</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">The order in <date when="1942-07">July 1942</date> covering women aged 22 to 25 living in <name key="name-120018" type="place">Hamilton</name> or <name key="name-008388" type="place">Cambridge</name> is specially interesting. They were required to staff a local munitions factory.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="19" xml:id="c5-19">
          <head>Direction of Labour</head>
          <p rend="indent">For the first few months of <date when="1942">1942</date> the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> used the new control over labour cautiously. Fewer than five thousand direction orders were issued up to the end of June, compared with over fifteen thousand in the following six months.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By <date when="1943-03-31">31 March 1943</date> nearly twenty-seven thousand persons had been directed into essential work, and directions were being made at the rate of three or four thousand a month. Before the war finished the total was to reach 176,000.</p>
          <pb n="102" xml:id="n102"/>
          <p>
            <table rows="6" cols="4">
              <head><hi rend="sc">Directions into Essential Work</hi><note xml:id="ftn1-102" n="1"><p>Adapted from Table 28, Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 140.</p></note><lb/>
Number of Directions Complied With</head>
              <row>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Period covered</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Males</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Females</hi>
                </cell>
                <cell>
                  <hi rend="i">Total</hi>
                </cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Up to <date when="1943-03-31">31 March 1943</date></cell>
                <cell>22,300</cell>
                <cell>4,700</cell>
                <cell>27,000</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Year ended <date when="1944-03-31">31 March 1944</date></cell>
                <cell>41,300</cell>
                <cell>11,700</cell>
                <cell>53,000</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Year ended <date when="1945-03-31">31 March 1945</date></cell>
                <cell>53,500</cell>
                <cell>16,000</cell>
                <cell>69,600</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Year ended <date when="1946-03-31">31 March 1946</date></cell>
                <cell>21,400</cell>
                <cell>5,100</cell>
                <cell>26,600</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Total to <date when="1946-03-31">31 March 1946</date></cell>
                <cell>138,500</cell>
                <cell>37,600</cell>
                <cell>176,100<note xml:id="ftn2-102" n="2"><p>Due to ‘rounding’, totals may disagree with the total of individual items as shown.</p></note></cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">For so far-reaching a control, direction of civilian labour proceeded with surprisingly little friction. The need for the co-operation of workers' and employers' organisations and, through them, of workers and employers individually, made it advisable to set up joint advisory bodies representing each important industry. Accordingly, shortly after the introduction of industrial mobilisation in <date when="1942-01">January 1942</date>, <name key="name-024847" type="organisation">Manpower Utilisation Councils and Committees</name> were established. The function of each Manpower Utilisation Council, which was a national organisation, was to advise the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> on the use of labour in the industry with which the Council was concerned. Local Manpower Committees, tributary to these Councils, were to advise the District Manpower Officers and the Armed Forces Appeal Boards on the best local use of labour. Utilisation Councils and Committees were established as the need arose, until twenty-six industries were covered.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Appeal committees were also necessary. Of their establishment the <name key="name-024912" type="organisation">National Employment Service</name> writes:<note xml:id="ftn3-102" n="3"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 33.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘With the introduction of industrial mobilization in <date when="1942-01">January 1942</date>, it became necessary to constitute independent authorities to deal with the appeals of workers and employers arising out of decisions of District Manpower Officers. Consideration was given to the suggestion that this work might well be performed by existing Armed Forces Appeal Boards or, as they were termed at the time, <name key="name-024610" type="organisation">District Advisory Manpower Committees</name>. The extreme pressure under which these bodies were working at the time, and the desirability of establishing authorities especially equipped to deal with the industrial as distinct from the military aspect of compulsory national service, decided the Government against the proposal. It was decided, instead, to establish <choice><orig>Man-
<pb n="103" xml:id="n103"/>
power</orig><reg>manpower</reg></choice> Appeal Committees, each of which would be composed of one representative of employer interests, one representative of employee interests, and a Chairman appointed independently by the Government. Four Industrial Manpower Appeal Committees were established initially, with territories based on the four main centres and empowered to deal with all appeals arising out of the decisions of Manpower Officers in their respective territories. During <date when="1942">1942</date> the volume of work of Industrial Manpower Appeal Committees grew appreciably, and in <date when="1943">1943</date> it was found necessary to establish two committees instead of one for the <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name> zone.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Under 3 per cent of direction orders were appealed against and, of these appeals, rather more than a third were allowed.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="20" xml:id="c5-20">
          <head>Manpower Fully Extended</head>
          <p rend="indent">By the end of <date when="1941">1941</date> all age groups of single men considered suitable for military service had been mobilised by successive ballots for the armed forces. In <date when="1942-01">January 1942</date> married men from 18 to 45 inclusive without children were called up, followed, during the rest of <date when="1942">1942</date>, by all successive age groups of married men from 18 to 45 with children, together with the inflow of men at age 18. After this there remained, out of the fit men aged from 18 to 45, only those held on appeal in industry and the annual inflow at 18. At the end of <date when="1942">1942</date> less than half of all males aged 18 to 45 were in industry, almost all of the rest being in the armed forces.</p>
          <p rend="indent">With this degree of mobilisation, extra demands for men for industry could be met only from men who were unfit or were outside military age, or by better disposal of those held back for important civilian work. It is small wonder that there were so many directions into essential work.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Even by mid-<date when="1942">1942</date>, the position in some industries had become so difficult that the Government had to make temporary releases of men from the armed forces and from public works. Yet the demands of the armed forces were such that balloting had to go on, in spite of a recommendation from the Director of National Service in July that it be postponed.<note xml:id="ftn1-103" n="1"><p>National Service report of <date when="1942-07-18">18 July 1942</date>. War History narrative No. 51, pp. 76–7.</p></note> Peak mobilisation was in <date when="1942-09">September 1942</date>, but the shortage of civilian manpower was to continue and worsen as demands for production from strained resources still increased.</p>
          <pb n="104" xml:id="n104"/>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 19 gives a general impression of the depleted manpower in industry during the most difficult months of the war. For every hundred workers in industry in the immediate pre-war months, only ninety were available in late <date when="1942">1942</date>. The measures adopted by different industries to provide extra production with this depleted labour force are dealt with in some of the following chapters. <ref type="chapter" target="#c18">Chapter 18</ref> returns to a further discussion of manpower problems, particularly in the later war years.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart19">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco024a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart19-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 19</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">MANPOWER CHANGES AFFECTING CIVILIAN EMPLOYMENT</hi><lb/>
SEPTEMBER 1939 TO SEPTEMBER 1942</head>
              <figDesc>chart of employment statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb n="105" xml:id="n105"/>
      <div type="chapter" n="6" xml:id="c6">
        <head>CHAPTER 6<lb/>
Problems of Supply</head>
        <div n="1" xml:id="c6-1">
          <head>Early Supply Difficulties</head>
          <p>NEW ZEALAND, before the war, depended on overseas producers for 40 per cent of the goods she used. Her supply problems in the early war years were made critical by a pitiful shortage of overseas funds to pay for these imports. Becoming painfully apparent in the second half of <date when="1938">1938</date>, this shortage of overseas funds had made it difficult to maintain normal imported supplies, let alone to build up the special reserves whose need was indicated by the threat of war. In the early war years the supply problems grew in urgency, but the shortage of funds was still restrictive. In fact it became even more hampering, as wartime interferences with traditional overseas sources necessitated a search for new suppliers.</p>
          <p rend="indent">From the supply viewpoint, New Zealand entered the war most inauspiciously, with inadequate military equipment for even small armed forces, with manufacturers' and other stocks generally below normal, and with import and exchange restrictions hindering overseas ordering.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To tell the full story, imports had been high in 1937 and 1938, but, in those years, insufficient attention was given to building up strategic reserves. Thus many of New Zealand's wartime supply difficulties stem from an unfortunate combination of pre-war circumstances. At the time when New Zealand imports were high, the Government did not take sufficient notice of official recommendations to build up supply reserves, whereas, when the Government did ultimately decide to act, the effect of its decision was to a large extent cancelled out because shortages of overseas funds had forced an overall reduction of the level of private importing.</p>
        </div>
        <pb n="106" xml:id="n106"/>
        <div n="2" xml:id="c6-2">
          <head>Terms of Trade</head>
          <p rend="indent">In a country so dependent as New Zealand on imported goods, considerable importance attaches to the purchasing power of exports. Changes in the quantity of imports purchased by a given quantity of exports are measured by the terms of trade index.</p>
          <p rend="indent">After <date when="1937">1937</date> the terms of trade turned against New Zealand. The purchasing power of exports started to decline. Importing in that year had been high. In the following year, with lower prices for exports and a continuing high level of importing, overseas reserves were run down, and it became necessary to resort to import and exchange controls. To protect New Zealand's overseas solvency these controls had to be severe. In <date when="1939">1939</date> they held the volume of imports to 11 per cent below what it had been in <date when="1937">1937</date>. It is small wonder that there were now difficulties in building up supplies of essential materials and equipment; difficulties which were aggravated by the fact that strategic goods were not always freely available overseas at this late hour.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 20 shows changes in the volume of imports.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart20">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco025a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart20-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 20</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">VOLUME OF IMPORTS</hi><lb/>
Index Numbers: Base 1936–38 (= 100)</head>
              <figDesc>chart of import statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="107" xml:id="n107"/>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1940">1940</date> the volume of imports again fell drastically, to be 25 per cent below its <date when="1937">1937</date> level, and in <date when="1941">1941</date> it was only two-thirds of <date when="1937">1937</date>. In a country where imports usually made up some 40 per cent of all goods becoming available for use, these were the really difficult supply years. In <date when="1942">1942</date> there was a small but useful improvement, and in the following year, aided by substantial imports of Lend-Lease goods, the position improved so much that <date when="1943">1943</date> importing was, in volume, 21 per cent above its <date when="1937">1937</date> level.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The terms of trade for New Zealand deteriorated in every year from <date when="1937">1937</date> up till <date when="1943">1943</date>. By that year the position had worsened so much that a given quantity of exports would purchase less than three-quarters of the imports it had purchased in <date when="1937">1937</date>. After <date when="1944">1944</date> there was, for some years, a rather halting reversal of this worsening trend but with no marked improvement until after <date when="1947">1947</date>. Not until <date when="1950">1950</date> would the purchasing power of a given quantity of imports return to its <date when="1937">1937</date> level.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 21 shows changes in terms of trade.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart21">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco026a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart21-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 21</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">TERMS OF TRADE</hi><lb/>
CHANGES IN QUANTITY OF IMPORTS PURCHASED BY A GIVEN QUANTITY OF EXPORTS<lb/>
Index Numbers: Base 1936–38 (= 100)</head>
              <figDesc>chart of import/export statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="108" xml:id="n108"/>
          <p rend="indent">Thus, the immediate pre-war period saw a decline in terms of trade, and, for the whole of the war, terms of trade were to New Zealand's disadvantage, compared with those existing before the war. In the early war years, when traditional suppliers were finding it a burden to fill New Zealand orders, this reduction in purchasing power on overseas markets restricted the already difficult search for new suppliers.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="3" xml:id="c6-3">
          <head>The Need for Reserve Stocks</head>
          <p rend="indent">Some wartime relief on the supply side was given by reserve stocks of essential materials built up before the war. However, this effect was comparatively small, most attempts to accumulate reserve supplies being frustrated by shortages of overseas funds in the immediate pre-war years. Moreover, stocks generally tended to be below normal when war was declared. In the circumstances, it was particularly fortunate for New Zealand that the expected severe interruption of overseas shipping did not in fact occur.</p>
          <p rend="indent">As early as <date when="1936-08">August 1936</date> the <name key="name-024924" type="organisation">National Supply Committee</name>, in issuing its first industrial questionnaire to manufacturers, had said:<note xml:id="ftn1-108" n="1"><p>Copy on Industries and Commerce file 55/8.</p></note> ‘… we are working on the assumption that if a war occurs in <name key="name-008008" type="place">Europe</name>, or in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name>, the minimum effect will be severe interruption to our overseas shipping for at least three months. Our main problems are concerned with the essential imports and with the keeping up of the even flow of our exports in primary products. Prolonged interruption of seaborne trade would obviously have serious repercussions.’ Neither this survey nor the one which followed it in <date when="1938-09">September 1938</date> yielded accurate information. Probably their main value was to keep manufacturers aware of the problem and to encourage them to build up their own stocks—to the extent that the Government's import and exchange controls would permit them to do so. Indeed, at its third meeting in <date when="1937-10">October 1937</date>, the <name key="name-024924" type="organisation">National Supply Committee</name> had decided that ‘the best way of keeping the question of the needs for adequate reserves of stocks before manufacturers is for the Department of Industries and Commerce to maintain a constant personal contact; and this duty should be definitely assigned to that Department.’<note xml:id="ftn2-108" n="2"><p>Quoted in memorandum from Permanent Head, <name key="name-024766" type="organisation">Industries and Commerce Department</name>, to Secretary, Public Service Commission. On Industries and Commerce file 55/8.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Certainly the questionnaires do not seem to have been of much direct use for any other purpose. They did not lead to any substantial remedial action by the Government and, in wartime, when
<pb n="109" xml:id="n109"/>
the Factory Controller came to place orders for production, he found the manufacturers' replies to the surveys unsatisactory as a basis for the allocation of orders. New inquiries had to be made in each case.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="4" xml:id="c6-4">
          <head>Pre-war Clash of Supply and Overseas Exchange Policies</head>
          <p rend="indent">Early in <date when="1939">1939</date> it became apparent that the <name key="name-024924" type="organisation">National Supply Committee</name>'s request to manufacturers and distributors to carry additional stocks was clashing with the Government's policy of import and exchange control. The <name key="name-024455" type="organisation">Allocation Committee for Sterling Funds</name> was informed of the supply policy of the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name> and asked to keep in mind the need for increased stocks when applications to import goods were being considered.<note xml:id="ftn1-109" n="1"><p>War History narrative 90/1, Ministry of Supply, p. 22.</p></note> It is not surprising that such a reminder had little effect. Increases in stocks usually implied high importing. Conservation of overseas funds required low importing. When imports had to be rationed the natural tendency was to issue licences for the minimum quantities which would keep manufacturers and traders in operation, and not to use scarce funds for building up stocks. The volume of imports fell by 12 per cent in <date when="1939">1939</date>. It is most unlikely that stocks in general increased, though stocks of some specific commodities may have increased.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="5" xml:id="c6-5">
          <head>Immediate Reserve Requirements specified in <date when="1939-03">March 1939</date></head>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1939">1939</date> it was quite hopeless to try to build up stocks generally. The emphasis shifted to provision of reserves of some of the more important commodities.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Supply Control Committee at its third meeting, on <date when="1939-03-14">14 March 1939</date>, recommended<note xml:id="ftn2-109" n="2"><p>Ibid., p. 46.</p></note> that a six months' reserve of the following imports should be purchased immediately:</p>
          <p>
            <table rows="7" cols="2">
              <row>
                <cell>Asbestos fibre</cell>
                <cell>Tenting material</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Gypsum</cell>
                <cell>Tin</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Lead</cell>
                <cell>Tinplate for use in dairying and meat industries and for petrol containers for the Air Department.</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Nitrate of Soda</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Rock phosphate</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Rubber</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Sulphur</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
          <pb n="110" xml:id="n110"/>
          <p rend="indent">Of the following goods, a six months' reserve should be purchased as soon as definite particulars could be obtained of the quantities and kinds required:</p>
          <p>
            <table rows="4" cols="2">
              <row>
                <cell>Bags and sacks</cell>
                <cell>Cardboard</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Replacement parts for sewing and weaving machines</cell>
                <cell>Salt</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell/>
                <cell>Soda Ash</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Wire</cell>
                <cell>Tinplate, for packing</cell>
              </row>
            </table>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">Goods of which a six months' reserve was desirable, but not absolutely necessary, were cotton piece goods and sewing threads.</p>
          <p rend="indent">For most of these commodities it had been left too late to build up a six months' supply before war broke out, even if import controls and shortages of overseas funds had not added to the difficulties.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="6" xml:id="c6-6">
          <head>Pacific Defence Conference also deals with Reserve Supplies</head>
          <p rend="indent">At the Pacific Defence Conference in <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name>, in <date when="1939-04">April 1939</date>, representatives from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>, New Zealand and <name key="name-000854" type="place">Fiji</name> dealt at some length with supply problems and, in particular, with the question of reserves. It was decided that services supply representatives should fix the scale of reserves for the armed services and that six months' reserves of civilian requirements was reasonably adequate. This confirmed the need for six months' reserves of essential commodities at least, but in view of the low level of importing it is doubtful whether New Zealand had six months' reserve of many imported commodities at this time or when war broke out.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The conference discussed how the productive resources of the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> could fulfil the requirements of <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and New Zealand. So that the necessary war potential in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> could be set up, the Australian and New Zealand Governments were asked to make definite estimates in peace of what their requirements would be and to place dormant orders without delay. This request to estimate requirements came two years eight months after the New Zealand Minister of Defence had said in Parliament, ‘… A committee on which some twenty Government Departments are represented is investigating the problem of supplies in war….’<note xml:id="ftn1-110" n="1"><p>See <ref type="page" target="#n31">p. 31</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">The conference also considered how the resources of <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> could be used to fulfil New Zealand requirements. New Zealand was advised that it would take approximately two years to complete the additional productive capacity and that firm orders should be
<pb n="111" xml:id="n111"/>
placed. The United Kingdom delegation gave warning of the increasing preoccupation of British industries with their own government's orders, and encouraged <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and New Zealand to manufacture war equipment.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="7" xml:id="c6-7">
          <head>Most Reserves Inadequate at Outbreak of War</head>
          <p rend="indent">Details of the actual reserves accumulated by <date when="1939-09">September 1939</date> are confused. Many producers established their own reserve stocks of small, inexpensive, but essential items required in production. The majority of reserves were carried by manufacturers or wholesalers, at their own expense, but in some cases the Government gave financial assistance. Some reserves were purchased and stored by Government departments. The stocks accumulated by the Government or with Government assistance comprised, in the main, bulk raw materials. It had been stressed to manufacturers that they were responsible for reserves of their own key materials.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Comment has already been made<note xml:id="ftn1-111" n="1"><p>See <ref type="page" target="#n37">p. 37</ref>.</p></note> on the pitifully small sum of £512,000 set aside for Government purchases of reserve stocks of essential commodities. Moreover, there was a distinct possibility that, even when the Government did import, normal imports of the same commodities might be cut back through exchange difficulties. The Co-Secretary of the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name> reported to the Supply Control Committee on <date when="1939-07-07">7 July 1939</date>:<note xml:id="ftn2-111" n="2"><p>Memorandum on Industries and Commerce file 55/7, Pt 1.</p></note></p>
          <p>‘… the main difficulty which now arises is that no guarantee can be given for funds for the normal importations of current requirements of the articles in the approved list. Generally speaking, it may be said that the £512,000 represents three months' consumption required as a reserve to bring the average three months' stock up to the basis of six months. Therefore in the next six months it is desirable that we import the normal six months' requirements plus three months' extra stock for building up reserves. On this basis the amount involved to build up and protect reserve stocks of items already approved amounts to three times the value of the reserves, that is approximately £1,536,000.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The pressure on overseas funds was temporarily relieved when Mr Nash, in the same month, succeeded in negotiating sterling credits for imports from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>,<note xml:id="ftn3-111" n="3"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n26">p. 26</ref>.</p></note> but it was too late for the required build-up of stocks before war broke out.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In his first Parliamentary Report,<note xml:id="ftn4-111" n="4"><p>H-38, <date when="1940">1940</date>, p. 2.</p></note> in <date when="1940">1940</date>, the Minister of Supply said:</p>
          <pb n="112" xml:id="n112"/>
          <p>‘… the reserve stocks created with the assistance of the Government comprised in the main bulk raw materials. These included amongst others, asbestos, rubber, tin, lead, tinplate, galvanised iron, gypsum, jute goods, phosphates, sulphur, nitrate of soda, and various other chemicals which are consumed in bulk by our manufacturing industries. To protect the food situation reserve stocks of wheat and sugar were also arranged.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">However, a six months' reserve of an essential supply was the exception rather than the rule when war broke out, and in the first report of the Factory Controller on <date when="1939-09-11">11 September 1939</date>, he stated:<note xml:id="ftn1-112" n="1"><p>Factory Controller to Minister of Supply, on Industries and Commerce file 55/8.</p></note> ‘It is evident that some essential raw materials are in very short supply, and in view of world conditions today this is a matter of serious moment. A list according to my views of priority is being prepared so that in the allocation of sterling credits any curtailment will be placed on materials of lesser importance, even though this involves unemployment. The question is, of course; mainly one of sterling funds, but it is also bound up with the rising commodity prices during times of war and curtailment of sources of supply.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Unfortunately it is impossible now to draw a comprehensive picture of stocks at the outbreak of war. In the pre-war years there were no detailed statistics of stock holdings and the uncertainties which exist have been increased by the loss of relevant supply files.<note xml:id="ftn2-112" n="2"><p>The <date when="1946">1946</date> annual report of the Department of Industries and Commerce (Parliamentary Paper H–44) says on p. 2: ‘It is much to be regretted that the great pressure of work and shortage of staff in those years did not permit of thorough compilation and complete assimilation of records and statistics, for these would have greatly enhanced the value of the experience gained….’ War History narrative 90/1, Ministry of Supply, says on p. 1: ‘An opportunity was taken when the Department (of Industries and Commerce) later shifted its premises to destroy many of the files without selection’.</p></note> For some commodities the extent of the building up of special reserves before the war is known, but it is not always clear what had happened to normal stockholdings while these special reserves were being set aside. A brief sketch of the special reserve stocks was given in <ref type="chapter" target="#c2">Chapter 2</ref>,<note xml:id="ftn3-112" n="3"><p>See <ref type="page" target="#n38">p. 38</ref>.</p></note> but further information is now given on some of the key commodities.</p>
          <p rend="indent"><hi rend="i">Corrugated Roofing Iron:</hi> The Public Works Department purchased and stored <date when="2000">2000</date> tons valued at £60,000. This was equivalent to about five weeks' supply of corrugated iron for the whole of New Zealand. Normal stocks carried throughout the Dominion usually amounted to some 5000 tons, or about three months' supply, but, because of air-raid precautions in <name key="name-005976" type="place">Britain</name>, shipments to New Zealand during 1938 and 1939 had been considerably reduced and stocks had fallen to approximately <date when="2000">2000</date> tons. Thus all stocks, including the special reserve, were only about four-fifths of normal.</p>
          <pb n="113" xml:id="n113"/>
          <p rend="indent">In his second report on 20 September the Factory Controller stated, concerning galvanised iron, ‘there is definitely a shortage at the present time and suppliers have been rationing deliveries. The shortage is due in some measure to the demands of the A.R.P. in England…. For a few months at least I do not anticipate any acute shortage.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Public Works reserve was purchased primarily to meet military requirements and was less than the estimated needs for this purpose alone. In <date when="1939-07">July 1939</date> the Engineer-in-Chief of the Public Works Department had estimated corrugated iron requirements for ‘emergency mobilization buildings’ as 2682 tons.<note xml:id="ftn1-113" n="1"><p>Official War History of Public Works Department, Vol. I, p. 96.</p></note> However, it was possible from these public works stocks of <date when="2000">2000</date> tons to make some corrugated iron available to builders to meet cases of extreme hardship.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 22 compares stocks of corrugated iron at the outbreak of war with imports for 1936 to 1941.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart22">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco027a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart22-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 22</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">IMPORTS AND RESERVE STOCKS - CORRUGATED IRON</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of import/reserve stock statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent"><hi rend="i">Gypsum Rock:</hi> This rock was imported from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and was essential for the manufacture of cement and plaster. Reserves of 7000 tons, equivalent to about six months' normal usage, were imported and financed by New Zealand companies.</p>
          <pb n="114" xml:id="n114"/>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 23 shows imports of gypsum, which increased quite rapidly up to <date when="1940">1940</date>, and compares reserve stocks.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart23">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco028a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart23-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 23</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">IMPORTS AND RESERVE STOCKS - GYPSUM</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of gypsum statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent"><hi rend="i">Wheat:</hi> Stocks and arrangements for Australian supplies were put on a satisfactory footing before war broke out.<note xml:id="ftn1-114" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n38">p. 38</ref>.</p></note> The relationship of these stocks and imports to New Zealand production is discussed later in this chapter.<note xml:id="ftn2-114" n="2"><p>pp. 142–3.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent"><hi rend="i">Raw Sugar:</hi> The Colonial Sugar Refining Company at <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name> purchased and stored 15,000 tons of raw sugar, which was equivalent to some two months' normal New Zealand use.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Imports and reserve stocks of raw sugar are compared in <ref type="chart" target="#chart24">Chart 24</ref>.</p>
          <p rend="indent"><hi rend="i">Rock Phosphate:</hi> The British Phosphate Commissioners supplied 80,000 tons of rock phosphate to be stored at phosphate works throughout the Dominion. This was equivalent to about four months' normal supply. Except for internal freight and handling charges, costs did not have to be met until the stocks were used.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 25 shows imports and reserve stocks of rock phosphate. It should be noted also that imports of other phosphates declined from over 80,000 tons a year in <date when="1937">1937</date>, <date when="1938">1938</date>, and <date when="1939">1939</date> to under 35,000 tons a year in 1940 and 1941.</p>
          <pb n="115" xml:id="n115"/>
          <p rend="indent"><hi rend="i">Other Commodities:</hi> Reserve stocks of corn sacks, woolpacks, calico for flour bags, tinplate, asbestos fibre, rubber, sulphur and other chemicals, and cream of tartar are also known to have been built up, but generally on a small scale.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart24">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco029a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart24-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 24</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">IMPORTS AND RESERVE STOCKS - RAW SUGAR</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of raw sugar statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">As has been indicated, these special reserves were no guarantee of an adequate general stock position. In fact the continuance of strict import and exchange controls had made this unlikely. The change in volume of imports is shown in <ref type="chart" target="#chart20">Chart 20</ref> on page 106. The selective nature of import controls might have been expected to avoid interference with the more important supplies, but embarrassing gaps appeared in a number of areas where high priorities would have been expected. The declared policy required import controls to give preference to manufacturers' materials and producers' equipment, particularly where production was regarded as essential; but this selective effect of import controls can easily be over-emphasised. In actual fact, imports of producers' materials fell in value in <date when="1938">1938</date> and again in <date when="1939">1939</date>, while imports of producers' equipment fell substantially in <date when="1939">1939</date>, and were then 7 per cent below their <date when="1937">1937</date> level. In the circumstances it is not surprising that the Factory <choice><orig>Con-
<pb n="116" xml:id="n116"/>
troller</orig><reg>controller</reg></choice>, in a letter to the Minister of Supply on <date when="1939-09-21">21 September 1939</date>, wrote:<note xml:id="ftn1-116" n="1"><p>Letter on Industries and Commerce file 54/3. Its purport was to recommend more orderly purchasing of certain materials.</p></note> ‘… I have previously brought under your notice that the stocks of some essential raw materials are very low….’, and in the same letter, ‘… generally, our factories which are dependent on imported raw materials, are working on very much lower stocks than is generally the case….’</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart25">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco030a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart25-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 25</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">IMPORTS AND RESERVE STOCKS - ROCK PHOSPHATE</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of rock phosphate statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">Other surprising shortcomings were revealed. For example, the equipment necessary to provide more adequate storage space for perishable exports had not been imported, which seems to indicate that the selective effects of the import control policy did not always ensure that materials and equipment which were regarded as of high priority for war preparations were brought into the country.<note xml:id="ftn2-116" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n44">p. 44</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Some of the special reserves were still in existence in mid-<date when="1940">1940</date>. As long as normal supplies were available, the policy was to purchase current requirements and use the reserves in rotation. In this way the reserves were maintained in volume and kept in good condition.
<pb n="117" xml:id="n117"/>
Some were used as buffer stocks, temporary shortages being bridged by issues on loan, subject to replacement. With public realisation of the needs of war, it was to become more expedient politically to use import controls selectively. Later there were to be more orderly purchasing arrangements, which would help to protect stocks of essential commodities.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="8" xml:id="c6-8">
          <head>The <name key="name-024924" type="organisation">National Supply Committee</name>'s Contribution</head>
          <p rend="indent">The work of the <name key="name-024924" type="organisation">National Supply Committee</name>, while not fully effective, for reasons already mentioned, proved most valuable on the outbreak of war. Firstly, all the action to be taken by Government officials had been predetermined and recorded in a Government War Book, together with drafts of the emergency legislation required. Built up in peacetime, the organisation was ready for the declaration of emergency. It enabled New Zealand to pass with comparative ease from peace to war conditions. Secondly, those reserves which had been accumulated helped New Zealand industries to carry on during the early period when overseas supplies were difficult to obtain.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Stocks were generally below normal, except in some essential lines which had received special attention, but it is probable that stocks of many essential commodities were not as far below normal as they would have been without the Committee's jogging of both Government and private enterprise.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="9" xml:id="c6-9">
          <head>The First Rationed Item – Motor Spirits</head>
          <p rend="indent">Imports of motor spirits had been a record in <date when="1938">1938</date>, but so had motor vehicle registrations. In fact the number of motor vehicles registered had been increasing so fast that, though motor spirits imports were again a record in <date when="1939">1939</date>, there was a very substantial fall in imports per registered motor vehicle. Consequently, stocks of motor spirits held at the outbreak of war were unsatisfactory. In the circumstances, it is not surprising that New Zealand resorted to petrol rationing from the first week of war, and, thereafter, fluctuations in the supply position were met mainly by changes in the ration allowed to private motor-car owners. The reduction in the ration to private motorists was, at times, most severe.<note xml:id="ftn1-117" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="chapter" target="#c15">Chapter 15</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">By way of contrast, <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> did not introduce petrol rationing until <date when="1940-10">October 1940</date>. Even then, in deference to considerable public opposition to rationing, there was comparatively little reduction in the amount used by private motorists in <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> until <date when="1941-04">April 1941</date>.</p>
          <pb n="118" xml:id="n118"/>
          <p rend="indent">Motor-car tyres were in short supply throughout the war and essential users had first call on them.<note xml:id="ftn1-118" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n139">p. 139</ref> and <ref type="chapter" target="#c15">Chapters 15</ref> and <ref type="chapter" target="#c17">17</ref>.</p></note> The tyre position for the private motorist would have been much more difficult had a better supply of petrol been available to enable him to indulge in a larger amount of running. As it was, the private motorist took his chance for any tyres which were left over from essential uses, and in the latter stages of the war the less fortunate were forced to use considerable ingenuity in patching up old tyres. Some motorists were even forced off the road through inability to obtain tyre replacements, but most were able to carry on with the limited running the rationed petrol allowed them.</p>
          <p rend="indent">A small proportion of private motorists installed producer gas plants on their cars. Others eked out their petrol ration with mixtures containing such unlikely fluids as kerosene and turpentine, but most allowed their pleasure running to be regulated by the petrol ration.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Essential users were kept supplied with petrol, but had to accept rationalisation of the transport industry to conserve precious supplies.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 26 compares imports of motor spirits with stocks held at the outbreak of war.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart26">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco031a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart26-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 26</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">IMPORTS AND RESERVE STOCKS - MOTOR SPIRITS</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of motor spirits statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <pb n="119" xml:id="n119"/>
        <div n="10" xml:id="c6-10">
          <head>A Windfall – The Port Bowen</head>
          <p rend="indent">The incident of the <hi rend="i">Port Bowen</hi> throws an interesting sidelight on the shortage of refrigerating space, and of materials generally, when war broke out. This cargo vessel of 8000 tons ran aground off the port of <name key="name-008123" type="place">Wanganui</name> in <date when="1939-09">September 1939</date>, and could not be refloated. She was fitted with refrigerating plant. Following the Court of Inquiry in <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name> in <date when="1939-11">November 1939</date>, the Government was successful in acquiring the wreck free of all charges. Using local labour, the majority of whom were men previously engaged in subsidised work,<note xml:id="ftn1-119" n="1"><p>Scheme 13.</p></note> and with the co-operation of the Public Works and Railways Departments, who built a pier and extended the railway line, the wreck was dismantled.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Large quantities of valuable materials were recovered, including several tons of bronze from the propellers and about 8000 tons of steel plates of various sizes from the hull and bulkheads. The Navy Department took over a lot of urgently required gear, and the winches were removed and put to new uses.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Perhaps the most interesting aspect of this salvage effort was the removal from the ship of a complete refrigerating unit.<note xml:id="ftn2-119" n="2"><p>See <ref type="chapter" target="#c2">Chapter 2</ref> for discussion of the need for refrigerating equipment.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">The following extract from <hi rend="i">Hansard</hi> for <date when="1941-07-30">30 July 1941</date><note xml:id="ftn3-119" n="3"><p><hi rend="i">NZPD</hi>, Vol. 259, p. 642.</p></note> is revealing:</p>
          <p rend="indent">Mr Barrell (<name key="name-120018" type="place">Hamilton</name>): ‘… We found on that ship a first-class refrigerating plant, complete with many thousands of feet of granulated cork insulation. It was a fully equipped plant. Honourable Members will also appreciate the importance of that fact, coming, as it does, at a time when refrigerating space is of such importance to us.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘… Ultimately, it was decided to investigate the possibilities of rehabilitating the old freezing works at Kakariki, an excellent building that had got into disrepair over the years, not having been used since <date when="1919">1919</date>. The Minister's Committee was asked to consider the question of installing in the freezing works that valuable plant from the “Port Bowen”. The estimated value of the plant was between £23,000 and £25,000. The Minister finally approved of the work, and today we have that establishment almost ready to begin operations in cool-storing butter, meat and cheese.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Mr Polson: ‘Are the electric motors there?’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Mr Barrell: ‘Yes, we have everything, and the works are almost
<pb n="120" xml:id="n120"/>
ready to commence operations. They will provide approximately 462,000 cubic feet of cool space, which means that we can store 4,075 tons of meat, as well as a considerable amount of butter and cheese in these works.’</p>
        </div>
        <div n="11" xml:id="c6-11">
          <head>Supplies from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> fall Away</head>
          <p rend="indent">In the immediate pre-war years the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> had supplied nearly half of all goods imported into New Zealand, but, as the war progressed, and <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> production became geared to an all-out war effort, many items previously imported by New Zealand were no longer being made. New Zealand had to seek alternative sources or to place more reliance on local production.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Imports from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> had reached a peak value of close to £28 million in <date when="1937">1937</date>, but then decreased in value each year until <date when="1942">1942</date>, first because of New Zealand import restrictions and then, particularly in the war years, because of the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>'s inability to supply. In <date when="1942">1942</date> their value was only a little above £20 million, but the situation was to improve considerably in the following year.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="12" xml:id="c6-12">
          <head>Supplies from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name></head>
          <p rend="indent">As wartime supplies from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> fell away, New Zealand turned to <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>, where manufacturing potential was expanding rapidly. <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> was in fact following the same path as New Zealand, but was many years ahead in her conversion from a predominantly primary producing country to a country with a broad range of productive effort.</p>
          <p rend="indent">As early as <date when="1936">1936</date>, the Supply Committee of the <name key="name-021381" type="organisation">Organisation for National Security</name> had recommended that New Zealand should support the growing Australian industries by ordering for defence and war stores. This idea was again supported by the Pacific Defence Conference in <date when="1939">1939</date>, but the Australian delegates pointed out that, if their country was to supply New Zealand's needs, it would be necessary to create additional productive capacity, which would take approximately two years and would have to be supported by firm orders.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To try to speed up supply arrangements, a delegation went to <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> in <date when="1940-06">June 1940</date> and it was agreed that New Zealand would be ‘regarded as one of the Australian States in matters relating to requirements for defence purposes and obtainable in <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>.’ The Australian authorities asked for forward estimates of requirements so that their production plans could be suitably expanded.</p>
          <p rend="indent">However, total imports from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> in the difficult years, 1941 and 1942, were actually below their 1937 and 1938 level. They
<pb n="121" xml:id="n121"/>
were to be much higher for the next two years, but by this time United States Lend-Lease supplies were becoming available and the crisis was past.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="13" xml:id="c6-13">
          <head>The Critical Supply Years, 1941 and 1942</head>
          <p rend="indent">As overseas suppliers became more concerned with the wartime demands of their own countries, the supply position deteriorated so far as New Zealand was concerned. Reserve stocks were in most cases inadequate to meet the situation. Shortage of overseas funds now became a secondary consideration and the major problem was to obtain goods from any available source.</p>
          <p rend="indent">This meant, on the one hand, developing New Zealand industries to produce munitions and other war supplies, and, on the other, a general switch from European and Empire sources to <name key="name-002804" type="place">North America</name>, particularly the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name>. With the emphasis changed to procurement at all costs, rather than examination of the sterling position and its effects on the ability to import, the Commissioner of Supply increasingly made decisions about imports, rather than the Comptroller of Customs or the <name key="name-024767" type="organisation">Industries Committee</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">During <date when="1941">1941</date> an expanding world scarcity of essential raw materials and finished goods, and the need to ensure a share for New Zealand, made it increasingly necessary for Government bulk buying arrangements to take the place of private importing. The organisation set up for the purpose considerably enlarged the functions of the Ministry of Supply. Before long, a large portion of the country's requirements of imports essential for the maintenance of the wartime economy were procured by or through the Ministry of Supply. Within a year or two the Ministry of Supply became, in effect, the largest importer of goods into New Zealand, arranging supplies from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name>, the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States of America</name>, <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>, <name key="name-005952" type="place">India</name> and <name key="name-008001" type="place">South Africa</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">With this centralisation of control, New Zealand's wartime supply records should have been comprehensive and reliable, but this is far from the case. Records, for most commodities, are inadequate. The rapid growth of staff in the Ministry of Supply was a problem. It was necessary to build up quickly from a staff of eighty to 550. Many of the additions were temporary public servants, directed to the Ministry under manpower control.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To add to the difficulties, the keeping of adequate statistical records was abandoned early in the war, when serious staff shortages began to be felt. Some doubt may arise about the efficiency of an import or a supply control which was not accompanied by adequate statistical records as a running check on decisions and achievements.
<pb n="122" xml:id="n122"/>
Whether or not this doubt is justified, the supply records which have survived are surprisingly poor.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1942">1942</date> supplies were so short and shipping so scarce<note xml:id="ftn1-122" n="1"><p>Losses to U-boats were high for the whole of <date when="1942">1942</date> and for the early months of <date when="1943">1943</date>.</p></note> that it was decided to use a system of allocation of shipping space to competing private orders placed in the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> and <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name>. A specially constituted Priorities Section issued certificates of recommendation, according to essentiality for the direct war effort or for civilian wartime needs.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="14" xml:id="c6-14">
          <head>Increasing Pressure on Local Industries</head>
          <p rend="indent">Pressure for extra production from New Zealand manufacturers increased. Important classes of war goods were made in New Zealand under contracts arranged by the Factory Controller, and controlled through the Ministry of Supply, notably radio, textile, and footwear requirements.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 27 shows changes in the proportion of goods for use in New Zealand which were locally produced.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart27">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco032a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart27-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 27</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">GOODS AVAILABLE FOR USE IN NEW ZEALAND</hi><lb/>
LOCAL PRODUCTION AS PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL</head>
              <figDesc>chart of economic statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="123" xml:id="n123"/>
          <p rend="indent">Before the war, New Zealand producers had been called upon to supply 60 per cent, on average, of all goods used in New Zealand. In wartime, with scarcity of shipping and the inability of traditional suppliers to meet orders, combined with restrictions through import controls on orders of goods which were not considered essential, the contribution made by imports fell rapidly, and for the years 1940–41, 1941–42 and 1942–43, New Zealand producers supplied over 70 per cent of all goods for local use. After 1942–43, <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> supplies under Lend-Lease started to have their effect and, for the rest of the war, imports supplied approximately one-third of all goods used in New Zealand, while local production supplied the other two-thirds.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="15" xml:id="c6-15">
          <head>Pricing for New Zealand Production</head>
          <p rend="indent">Since demand for most commodities exceeded manufacturing capacity, the tender system of placing Government contracts was not suitable and production was arranged by allocating to various manufacturers orders for quantities fixed in the light of their respective capacities and equipment.<note xml:id="ftn1-123" n="1"><p>The Factory Controller had adequate powers, when he found it necessary to use them. Regulation 3 (1) of the Factory Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date> (<hi rend="i"><name key="name-122677" type="work">New Zealand Gazette</name></hi>, p. 2385) read: ‘The Controller may from time to time, by notice to the occupier of any factory, whether or not the factory was in operation at the date of these regulations and whether or not it is the subject of any licence granted under these regulations, direct that the occupier cease, restrict, or increase the production of the factory or of any branch thereof either generally or in respect of any specified goods or class of goods, or that the occupier produce at the factory or at any branch thereof goods of such kinds, descriptions, types, sizes, quantities, and qualities and in such order of urgency as may be specified in the notice.’</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">In the early stages, prices for production were fixed at a value assessed by the staff of the Commodities Sections, or on the basis of costs submitted by various manufacturers. During 1942 and 1943 Ministry of Supply investigating accountants verified costs from the manufacturers' own records and then negotiated prices. It was difficult to keep up-to-date with this work. As there was not enough staff to investigate all contracts, first attention was given to larger contracts. The problem of costing production for the Ministry was made complex by the high competing demand for production of civilian goods which could not be imported.<note xml:id="ftn2-123" n="2"><p>The problem is more fully discussed in <ref type="chapter" target="#c13">Chapter 13</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">The Government had taken a stand against profiteering from war contracts but administering departments had to face the fact that in other production lines there was a seller's market and high profits could be made. In many cases, manufacturers not only tended to find civilian production more profitable but were anxious to secure retail outlets to assist their post-war activities.</p>
        </div>
        <pb n="124" xml:id="n124"/>
        <div n="16" xml:id="c6-16">
          <head>Forward Estimates of Supply Requirements</head>
          <p rend="indent">We have seen that attention had been given before the war to stocks and supplies of a number of essential commodities. In the early war years there were frequent surveys of reserves, and quite a number of special purchasing arrangements were made to ensure continuity of supplies. All this involved making forward estimates of requirements for many strategic commodities, but it was not until <date when="1942">1942</date> that forward programming became the general rule. In that year the increasing world scarcity of materials, foodstuffs, and shipping emphasised the need for an orderly disposition of resources among the allied nations. For this purpose the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> and the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> established a system of Combined Boards in <name key="name-202800" type="place">Washington</name>. Much of the production of both countries would henceforth be based on forward planning. Programme planning then became an essential pre-requisite to an elaborate system of rationing or apportioning raw materials and finished products in short supply. It enabled a complete picture of the requirements of members of the allied nations to be obtained in <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name> and <name key="name-202800" type="place">Washington</name>, making possible comprehensive planning of production and the best allocation of the goods produced in the interests of the war effort. Allocations under this system took the place of the priority system previously used for procurement from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The effect on New Zealand was to make it necessary to programme all requirements ahead and to follow these programmes by bulk forward requisitions. This meant that, from <date when="1943">1943</date>, essential requirements from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> had to be purchased by the Government.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Before long <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name>, <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and <name key="name-005952" type="place">India</name> also requested forward estimates of requirements from their production, and, in New Zealand, this necessitated a broader and more systematised basis for programming most of the country's essential imports.</p>
          <p rend="indent">As early as <date when="1940-06">June 1940</date>, the Ministry of Supply had been given power to buy stocks for reserve purposes,<note xml:id="ftn1-124" n="1"><p>Supply Control Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date>, Amendment No. 1 (<date when="1940">1940</date>/121), p. 431, Reg. 4 (5).</p></note> and in <date when="1940-09">September 1940</date> the power had been made more immediate and general when Cabinet approved<note xml:id="ftn2-124" n="2"><p>Cabinet approval of <date when="1940-09-03">3 September 1940</date> on Industries and Commerce file 55/7, Pt 1.</p></note> ‘that authority be given to the Minister of Supply to purchase reserve stocks of necessary commodities as and when such may be available’.</p>
          <pb n="125" xml:id="n125"/>
          <p rend="indent">The introduction of forward programming and bulk ordering for allied requirements considerably extended the functions of the Ministry of Supply. For a very wide variety of essential commodities it now had to make forward estimates, order in bulk, arrange shipment, reception and storage, allocate supplies to users and retain suitable stocks.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="17" xml:id="c6-17">
          <head>Lend-Lease</head>
          <p rend="indent">Completion of United States Lend-Lease arrangements was to mark a new era in wartime supplies for New Zealand. As wartime pressures increased, it had become more and more difficult for the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> to fill New Zealand orders. Australian capacity to produce was expanding rapidly, but was, at this stage, unable to cope with any great proportion of New Zealand's requirements. There had been an increasing tendency to turn to the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name>, but soon New Zealand, in common with other Commonwealth countries, was faced with a serious shortage of dollar exchange and was forced to restrict orders.</p>
          <p rend="indent">It was to cope with this situation that the United States Lend-Lease Act was passed in <date when="1941-03">March 1941</date>. New Zealand became eligible to trade under the Act in <date when="1941-11">November 1941</date>, and a New Zealand Supply Mission was set up in <name key="name-202800" type="place">Washington</name> to deal with Lend-Lease and cash requisitions. In <date when="1942-06">June 1942</date> delays were reduced when a <name key="name-025195" type="organisation">United States Joint Purchasing Board</name> was established in New Zealand, strengthening <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> administrative representation here and making it possible to fix, in New Zealand, the eligibility and priority of local requirements. Lend-Lease requests from New Zealand were screened by an ‘Allied Committee’ of representatives of the Lend-Lease Administration, the Joint Purchasing Board and the Commissioner of Supply.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1942">1942</date> New Zealand imports under Lend-Lease were valued at £11 million out of a total of £54 million of imports for the year. As a result, the volume of imports, which had fallen each year since <date when="1937">1937</date>, now showed a moderate increase, still, however, leaving arrivals at 26 per cent below the average of the three pre-war years. In <date when="1943">1943</date> Lend-Lease imports were £27 million and total imports £95 million. The volume of imports moved, in this year, to 28 per cent above the pre-war figure. Substantial arrivals of defence materials and equipment from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> and increased imports from <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> also augmented the total, which was a record not to be equalled again until <date when="1950">1950</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Reciprocal Aid provided by New Zealand under the Lend-Lease arrangements totalled nearly £7 million in <date when="1943">1943</date>, compared with £27 million of <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> supplies received. There was to be a
<pb n="126" xml:id="n126"/>
closer balance in <date when="1944">1944</date>, with Lend-Lease Aid from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> valued at £32 million and Reciprocal Aid provided by New Zealand at £24 million, and in the following two years Reciprocal Aid provided by New Zealand would exceed in value Lend-Lease Aid received from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Nearly 70 per cent of the Lend-Lease Aid received from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> was in the form of direct war materials, but substantial quantities of commodities such as oil, petrol, tinplate and wire were also received, as well as producers' equipment. Nearly half of the Reciprocal Aid provided by New Zealand was foodstuffs.</p>
          <p rend="indent">One important contribution to production made by Lend-Lease Aid was the supply of considerable quantities of mechanical equipment for farms. For example, over seven thousand farm tractors were supplied in the years 1943 to 1945. Some idea of the significance of these 7000 tractors can be gathered from the fact that, in <date when="1940">1940</date>, there were only about eleven thousand tractors on New Zealand farms. The rapid mechanisation of farming played an important part in extending allied food supplies. Only in this way could farming step up its production to meet wartime demands, in spite of shortages of labour.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 28 shows the accounting values of Lend-Lease and Reciprocal Aid in successive years.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart28">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco033a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart28-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 28</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">LEND - LEASE AND RECIPROCAL AID</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of economic statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="127" xml:id="n127"/>
          <p rend="indent">The Lend-Lease arrangements solved many of New Zealand's very embarrassing problems of inadequate supplies of munitions and war stores, and also made available scarce farming and manufacturing equipment. New Zealand's contribution under the Reciprocal Aid arrangements helped maintain the <name key="name-023372" type="organisation">United States Forces</name> in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name>, but added to pressure for New Zealand farm produce and, in various ways, aggravated the shortage of civilian manpower. These and other effects are discussed later.<note xml:id="ftn1-127" n="1"><p>Chapters 14 and 17.</p></note> Much of the Reciprocal Aid went to <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> forces in New Zealand, whose arrival in <date when="1942-06">June 1942</date> had reduced the threat of Japanese invasion.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="18" xml:id="c6-18">
          <head>Relief in <date when="1943">1943</date></head>
          <p rend="indent">With the substantial volume of supplies under Lend-Lease in <date when="1943">1943</date> came also record imports from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> and <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>. Total importing in that year reached £95 million, of which nearly half was munitions and war stores. This was, in value, 70 per cent higher than imports had ever been before. The worst of New Zealand's supply problems were over.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 29 shows the increase, in <date when="1943">1943</date>, in value of imports from the principal supplying countries.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart29">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco034a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart29-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 29</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">IMPORTS FROM PRINCIPAL SUPPLYING COUNTRIES</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of economic statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <pb n="128" xml:id="n128"/>
        <div n="19" xml:id="c6-19">
          <head>Effects of Import Selection</head>
          <p rend="indent">Import selection has always been associated, to a greater or lesser degree, with the quantitative restriction of imports which New Zealand has used for the primary purpose of conserving overseas exchange. Restricted imports in wartime, and the need to give priority to defence requirements, put extra emphasis on the selection aspect of import controls.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By <date when="1941">1941</date>, imports were, in volume, only two-thirds of what they had been in <date when="1937">1937</date>. There was some improvement in <date when="1942">1942</date>, but no real recovery until <date when="1943">1943</date>. For many commodities, arrivals were at their lowest ebb in 1941 and 1942.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There were remarkable changes in the types of goods arriving, induced by varying availability overseas as well as by import selection. In the usually insignificant group of ‘unclassified’ import items it was customary to include munitions and war stores. Consequently the group became anything but insignificant in time of war. Before the war, less than £1 million a year was spent on these imports but, for the year <date when="1943">1943</date>, they were valued at £46 million. This was the peak year. In the following year unclassified imports were valued at nearly £30 million, but in <date when="1945">1945</date> had fallen to under £4 million.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Many civilian lines had to give way to make room for this upsurge in war requirements. Imports of materials for the building and construction industry started to fall away in <date when="1939">1939</date> and decreased steadily until, in <date when="1942">1942</date>, arrivals were under half of what they had been in <date when="1938">1938</date>. Imported supplies remained low for the remainder of the war period and would not again reach pre-war levels until <date when="1947">1947</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Imports of materials for farming also decreased after <date when="1939">1939</date> and, in <date when="1942">1942</date>, reached their lowest point at a little over half of their <date when="1939">1939</date> level. Recovery here was more rapid, and pre-war levels were reached in <date when="1945">1945</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Manufacturing materials, in marked contrast to other producers' materials, arrived in greatly increased values for the whole of the war period. These imports had reached a peak in <date when="1937">1937</date>, but were at quite high levels in 1938 and 1939. In <date when="1940">1940</date> they set a new record, being then some 25 per cent higher than any pre-war figure. There was a slight fall in <date when="1941">1941</date>, followed by a significant drop in <date when="1942">1942</date> of about 10 per cent. This, however, left imports of manufacturing materials in <date when="1942">1942</date> still 14 per cent by value above the highest prewar figure. In <date when="1943">1943</date> another record was reached with imports 57 per cent above the <date when="1937">1937</date> peak. There was a further increase in <date when="1944">1944</date>, and by <date when="1946">1946</date> the value of imports was twice what it had been before
<pb n="129" xml:id="n129"/>
the war. In this fast upward movement under war conditions, manufacturers' materials were unique. Apart from munitions and war stores, the only major group coming anywhere close was producers' plant and equipment, where imports by <date when="1946">1946</date> reached 87 per cent above the immediate pre-war value.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The high degree of preference given to manufacturers' materials and equipment enabled New Zealand manufacturers to go a long way towards filling gaps in supplies of munitions, war stores, and many types of consumer goods which could not be imported in sufficient quantities because of competing allied demands for them. In some cases it also enabled New Zealand manufacturers to supply new types of goods for export to fill orders from allied countries.<note xml:id="ftn1-129" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="chapter" target="#c7">Chapter 7</ref></p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Imports of transport equipment suffered the most drastic curtailment in the war years. Civilian rather than war use was affected, a good deal of transport equipment for military and allied purposes being imported during the war as munitions and war stores. The import group, transport equipment, which stood at over £8 million for each of the years 1937 and 1938, fell to £7 million in <date when="1939">1939</date> and to under £3 million in <date when="1940">1940</date>. It was to fall further to be under £2 million in each of the years 1942 and 1943, and to remain at low levels for the remainder of the war, not recovering its pre-war position until <date when="1947">1947</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Also seriously affected were imports of consumers' goods which, over the war period, averaged about half of their level in the immediate pre-war years. With transport equipment for civilian use, they took the main brunt of wartime import selection.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="20" xml:id="c6-20">
          <head>Munitions and War Stores increase to Nearly Half of all Arrivals</head>
          <p rend="indent">Imports of munitions and war stores, which were under 1 per cent of total imports in <date when="1939">1939</date>, had moved up to nearly half of all imports in <date when="1943">1943</date>. Consumers' goods, on the other hand, were about a quarter of all imports in the immediate pre-war years, but had fallen to one-sixteenth by <date when="1943">1943</date>, illustrating strikingly the effectiveness of wartime supply arrangements that tended to concentrate scarce shipping, scarce funds and scarce overseas production on supplies for war and the means to manufacture such supplies, at the expense of consumers' goods and the less essential types of materials and equipment.</p>
          <pb n="130" xml:id="n130"/>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 30 shows changes in types of imports.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart30">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco035a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart30-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="u">Chart 30</hi><lb/><hi rend="b">IMPORTS CLASSIFIED BY PURPOSE</hi><lb/>
VALUES OF MAIN ITEMS ONLY</head>
              <figDesc>chart of economic statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
        </div>
        <div n="21" xml:id="c6-21">
          <head>Eking out Available Supplies — The Powers of the Controllers</head>
          <p rend="indent">From the outset, the various Controllers under the Minister of Supply had very wide powers over the distribution and use of goods. The Factory Controller, for example, was given power ‘to regulate, restrict and control the use, sale, supply, and distribution and disposal of factory materials, to decide what kinds and qualities and quantities of goods may be made in any factory, and to decide the order of urgency in which goods are to be made.’ He also had power to commandeer stocks of materials and to direct any factory to use substitute materials. The Building Controller, besides his function of issuing permits, without which work could not commence, was given power ‘to regulate, restrict or control the use, sale, supply and distribution and disposal of building materials, and to direct the use of substitutes.’ Similar powers were given to the Mining Controller, the Electricity Controller and the Timber Controller. The Food Controller and the Sugar Controller were specifically given power ‘to take any steps necessary to ensure continuity of supply’, and equal powers were given to the Wheat and Flour Controller. Besides
<pb n="131" xml:id="n131"/>
the usual powers, the Oil Fuel Controller was given a specific power to withhold supplies of oil fuel for any purpose and ‘direct that no person shall use oil fuel or any specified oil fuel or kind of oil fuel for any specified purpose if in the opinion of the Controller such action is necessary for the public welfare.’ The Medical Supplies Controller was ‘to regulate and secure the adequacy and continuity of supply and distribution of medical supplies.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">These were very extensive responsibilities and powers, and in some cases were not fully used. For the most part, the investigation work required to ensure continuity of supplies and their best use fell on the Supply Sections of the <name key="name-024766" type="organisation">Industries and Commerce Department</name>, which were strengthened numerically by special wartime recruitments. The following sketches relating to various commodities give some idea of the activities involved.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="22" xml:id="c6-22">
          <head>Iron and Steel</head>
          <p rend="indent">In the immediate pre-war years, New Zealand's principal sources of supply for iron and steel and for steel products were <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and Great Britain. Most arrivals were private imports, requiring, after <date when="1938">1938</date>, an import licence.</p>
          <p rend="indent">As the wartime commitments of the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> industry increased rapidly, from <date when="1939-09">September 1939</date>, supplies of steel and steel products from that source dwindled and soon practically ceased. At the same time, the nature of New Zealand's problem was emerging—to maintain a steady flow of imports of different kinds of steel and steel products averaging from 150,000 to 200,000 tons a year and to avoid, as far as possible, using scarce dollar funds.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Rapid deterioration of overseas supply required the immediate regulation of use in New Zealand. Control over the allocation of most raw materials became the responsibility of the various Controllers, and the duty of rationing supplies of iron and steel fell to the Controllers of the more important industries using these commodities—the Factory, Building, Munitions, Primary Industries and Mining Controllers. A number of notices were issued by the Factory Controller, from <date when="1939-12">December 1939</date>, relating to the sale and use of iron and steel sheets, and a series of notices by the Building Controller restricted the use of galvanised iron and steel for building purposes. In <date when="1941">1941</date> a Building Control Regulation made it necessary to obtain the prior consent of the Controller to erect a new building containing over half a ton of reinforcing steel or estimated to cost over £<date when="2000">2000</date>. Local authorities could not issue permits for dwellings, where corrugated iron was to be used, without the prior consent of the Building Controller.</p>
          <pb n="132" xml:id="n132"/>
          <p rend="indent">There were serious delays in supplies from all British countries, including <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>, during <date when="1940">1940</date>. To conserve dollar exchange every effort was made at this time to avoid purchases from <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> or the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States of America</name>. However, by the end of <date when="1940">1940</date>, it was necessary to seek supplies from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> if the munitions and other essential industries were to be maintained. The position eased a little when 3000 tons of pig iron were purchased from <name key="name-005952" type="place">India</name> and, in <date when="1941">1941</date>, 36,000 tons of steel billets arrived from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name>. Supplementary purchases from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> continued and grew in volume as Australian supplies diminished.</p>
          <p rend="indent">At the outbreak of war, New Zealand's only rolling mills, at Dunedin, were working on a single shift, re-rolling, from imported Australian billets, 350 to 400 tons a month of certain sizes of finished sections for the <name key="name-025035" type="organisation">Railways Department</name> and other users. Quantities of rails and special railway material were also obtained from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <date when="1940-09">September 1940</date> the Factory Controller directed that a second shift be worked in the Dunedin rolling mills, a practice which was to be continued until <date when="1944-01">January 1944</date>. In <date when="1941">1941</date> this was still not enough and, to meet the shortage of building steel, the Government decided, in April, to erect a duplication of the rolling mills, adjacent to the existing privately owned plant in Dunedin. An endeavour was made to build up stocks of steel billets from the imports from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> and <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> to feed the increased rolling mill capacity. The plant was duly erected, the machinery, with the exception of special items such as the rollers, being manufactured in New Zealand. It commenced rolling operations in <date when="1943-04">April 1943</date>, but, by October of the same year, the supply of finished sections from overseas had considerably improved and the Government suspended further operations.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Throughout <date when="1941">1941</date>, orders for steel for various essential purposes, including ship repairs, were forwarded to the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name> by the Ministry for placing through the <name key="name-024500" type="organisation">British Purchasing Commission</name>. In March the Lend-Lease Act was passed. New Zealand became eligible for Lend-Lease supplies in <date when="1941-11">November 1941</date> and soon steady deliveries of iron and steel of various grades were being received. However, it was not until <date when="1943">1943</date> that Lend-Lease supplies became sufficient to make up for losses from elsewhere.</p>
          <p rend="indent">From the beginning of <date when="1942">1942</date>, procurement policy became more settled. The Minister of Supply was able to arrange for the supply of 50,000 tons a year from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>, provided it was ordered through one New Zealand purchasing agency. The <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States of America</name> agreed to release a little more than 100,000 tons to New Zealand during the year, while the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> allocated 40,000 to 50,000 tons to meet the balance of New Zealand's needs.</p>
          <pb n="133" xml:id="n133"/>
          <p rend="indent">As supplies came to hand they were made available for work which had the approval of the Factory Controller. To protect supplies further, the Iron and Steel Control Notice was issued by the Factory Controller in <date when="1942-04">April 1942</date>, providing that, except with his prior consent, no iron or steel, wrought or cast, could be used for about thirty specified purposes.</p>
          <p rend="indent">As the result of a visit by an Anglo-American steel mission in <date when="1943-04">April 1943</date>, the position of Steel Controller was established and Mr <name key="name-024982" type="person">F. R. Picot</name><!-- Picot, F. R. -->, Commissioner of Supply, was appointed. From <date when="1944-01">January 1944</date>, all persons purchasing steel from merchants for use or for works stocks were required to surrender signed permits from the Controller, the purpose being to keep a record of all steel used or withdrawn from stocks.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Iron and steel imports, with the assistance of Lend-Lease supplies, were in <date when="1943">1943</date> about one-third higher than before the war and continued quite high into the following year. By <date when="1944-05">May 1944</date> the steel crisis was over, and the relaxation of controls began in <date when="1944-10">October 1944</date>. In November the position of Steel Controller was abolished. By this time permits were required only for galvanised and black steel sheets. By <date when="1946-02">February 1946</date> nearly all classes of iron and steel were again being imported privately, subject to import licence.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="23" xml:id="c6-23">
          <head>Non-Ferrous Metals</head>
          <p rend="indent">The wartime story of non-ferrous metals furnishes a good illustration of the threatened loss in wartime of New Zealand's traditional sources of supply for many commodities. From the very beginning, non-ferrous metals had been among the raw materials whose shortage was most critical. Immediately the war began, the United Kingdom Government had banned all exports of non-ferrous metals, and <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> had taken similar action soon afterwards.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Because of the importance of these imports to industry, negotiations to keep supply lines open were carried out at the highest level on a Government-to-Government basis. The results of negotiations were summarised in a <date when="1940">1940</date> Ministry of Supply report to Parliament:<note xml:id="ftn1-133" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper H–38, p. 4.</p></note></p>
          <p>‘… Arrangements have now been concluded through official approaches to the controlling authorities overseas for supplies of non-ferrous metals in their ingot form. In addition, the Dominion depends entirely upon overseas suppliers for semi-manufactured non-ferrous metals such as bar, tube, and sheet, and the supply of these had also to be considered…. It was not until February of this year that any serious interruptions in supply of these semimanufactured non-ferrous metals were experienced, but in that
<pb n="134" xml:id="n134"/>
month the authorities in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> prohibited all exports of these commodities. This necessitated urgent representations to the authorities in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> for the largest quota which could be allocated for export to New Zealand in view of the fact that this Dominion has always been very largely dependent on the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> for these supplies. The Ministry of Supply in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> has agreed to facilitate deliveries of certain tonnages, and the system has been evolved whereby an authority to export from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> is obtained on the recommendation of the New Zealand Ministry of Supply.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">As a result of these arrangements, it was decided to ensure that supplies reached the most vital war production by restricting to the Government all overseas purchases of a number of basic non-ferrous ingot metals. Hence copper, tin, lead, and zinc were among the first commodities to be ordered and distributed solely by the Ministry of Supply. Later, aluminium, antimony, brass, gun-metal, magnesium and certain aluminium alloys were added to the list. With some of the non-ferrous metals, a quota, revised annually, was arranged with the exporting countries through the Combined Raw Materials Board.<note xml:id="ftn1-134" n="1"><p>Writing of events after <name key="name-020840" type="place">Pearl Harbour</name>, J. Hurstfield says on p. 406 of <hi rend="i">History of the Second World War, The Control of Raw Materials</hi>: ‘The opportunity and the need now existed for the pooling of the fighting resources of the Allies and for the close co-ordination of their production programmes. In <date when="1942-02">February 1942</date> the Combined Raw Materials Board was accordingly set up in <name key="name-202800" type="place">Washington</name>. This was one of the celebrated “two-men boards”, in this case the British Minister of Production and the American chairman of the <name key="name-025226" type="organisation">War Production Board</name>, both of them acting through deputies. Combined Raw Materials Board was made responsible for allocating between the nations of the non-Axis world the available supplies of critical raw materials and for enlarging, as might be necessary and possible, the amounts or the areas under production.’</p></note> In general, approximately 50 per cent of New Zealand's wartime requirements of processed and semi-processed forms were obtained from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and most of the balance from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> and <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The use of non-ferrous metals was restricted to essential purposes approved by the Factory Controller.<note xml:id="ftn2-134" n="2"><p>The Non-Ferrous Metals Control Notice of <date when="1942-05-20">20 May 1942</date>.</p></note> Specific restrictions were placed on the use of copper and brass sheets, and on nickel chromium wire. The use of zinc for a number of galvanising purposes and for the manufacture of brass castings, or of sheet for decorative and furnishing work, was prohibited without the prior approval of the Factory Controller.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="24" xml:id="c6-24">
          <head>Munitions</head>
          <p rend="indent">For most of the early years of the war New Zealand was hopelessly short of munitions. The reluctance of the Labour Government before the war to indulge in warlike preparations, accentuated, from
<pb n="135" xml:id="n135"/>
<date when="1938">1938</date>, by shortage of funds, gave her a most unfortunate start. By about <date when="1938">1938</date>, also, it was becoming difficult to find munitions suppliers in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>, as producers there became preoccupied with orders from their own Government. The rapidly expanding Australian productive capacity filled a few gaps, but, here again, there was considerable pressure of domestic requirements, leaving little over for a neighbouring country. Some early assistance was obtained from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name>, but imports from this source had to be restricted as dollar funds ran short. Ultimately, from late in <date when="1942">1942</date>, United States Lend-Lease arrangements enabled imports to be stepped up.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the meantime New Zealand manufacturers had demonstrated their ability to provide a substantial portion of the requirements of some types of munitions. In the main, however, New Zealand remained dependent on overseas sources. The fact was that, while New Zealand was in a position to train troops and to send them overseas in uniform, if it could be assumed that most munitions would then be supplied to them from other sources, she was not in a position, either from her own manufactures or from what she could import, to supply adequate munitions for her own armed forces either overseas or in New Zealand.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Speaking of the position in <date when="1942-03">March 1942</date>, Wood says:<note xml:id="ftn1-135" n="1"><p><hi rend="i"><name key="name-110071" type="work">Political and External Affairs</name></hi>, p. 223.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘At this stage New Zealand was pressing primarily for aircraft and for equipment for the army…. It was painfully clear … that New Zealand was utterly dependent on her overseas friends for equipment. Quite apart from her basic industrial weakness, the deliberate policy in the early days of the war had been to rely on overseas supplies.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">Nevertheless the contribution made to munitions production by New Zealand manufacturing must not be under-emphasised and Wood recognises it. An interesting outside viewpoint on this contribution is given in the following extract from a <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> war history:<note xml:id="ftn2-135" n="2"><p>H. Duncan Hall and C. C. Wrigley, <hi rend="i">Studies of Overseas Supply</hi> (United Kingdom Civil Series, History of the Second World War), p. 484.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘In volume, New Zealand's total munitions production was only a fraction of <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>'s, and its character and function were altogether different. The aim was not self-sufficiency in a wide variety of equipment, which would have been quite impracticable, but rather a surplus of a few stores selected as particularly suitable for production in a country with very limited industrial experience or equipment. In New Zealand there were no government ordnance factories, and the nearest approach to a specialised munitions firm was the <name key="name-024545" type="organisation">Colonial Ammunition Company</name>, which
<pb n="136" xml:id="n136"/>
made .303-inch ball cartridges. Apart from this, munitions production was made possible only by the fact that the <name key="name-024709" type="organisation">General Motors</name>, Ford and Dominion Motor Companies had established automobile plants which could be used to assemble components made in the various small workshops that constituted New Zealand's manufacturing industry. This, incidentally, was a system which called for very skilled direction at the centre. The problem for the Dominion Government, the <name key="name-024623" type="organisation">Eastern Group Supply Council</name> and the United Kingdom Government was to make full use of New Zealand's assets, especially her very intelligent and adaptable labour, without using too much shipping space in the bringing in of raw materials, components and machinery and without setting the country to do what could be done elsewhere more economically. In other words it was necessary to find stores, the manufacture of which was within New Zealand's capabilities and which would yet be of real value to the Commonwealth as a whole.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Unfortunately, during the first eighteen months of war the solution of this problem was left almost entirely to the New Zealand authorities, who made arrangements for the production of small arms ammunition, tracked carriers, mortars, mortar bombs and hand grenades. This was unfortunate, not because the selection was unsuitable or because any opportunity of securing supplies for the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> was lost—during this period New Zealand was fully occupied in meeting her own requirements—but because this production was not at first fitted into the general scheme of Commonwealth supply. The Ministry of Supply did not take full cognisance of New Zealand capacity until the spring of <date when="1941">1941</date>, when the country was visited by a section of the Roger Mission, and by that time an adequate supply of many of the stores which New Zealand could produce had been arranged elsewhere. Hand grenades were a case in point. At the time of the Mission's visit the initial <name key="name-022826" type="organisation">New Zealand Government</name> order for 200,000 grenades was nearing completion, and in default of external orders the makers would soon have had to be allowed to revert to civil production. But there appeared to be no general scarcity of grenades, and the most <name key="name-008904" type="place">London</name> could offer was an order for the negligible quantity of 25,000. As it happened, however, the difficulty was solved by an unforeseen increase in War Office requirements later in the year, which enabled the Ministry of Supply to keep New Zealand grenade makers busy for years to come; and much the same applied to the other stores mentioned above, in each of which New Zealand became one of the leading Eastern Group producers. Dependence on imported components, however,
<pb n="137" xml:id="n137"/>
made the manufacture of any but the simplest munitions a precarious business. For instance, once the production of Universal carriers had developed in <name key="name-002804" type="place">North America</name>, there was clearly very little to be said for shipping components thence to be assembled on the far side of the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name>, and New Zealand production accordingly came to an end in <date when="1943">1943</date>. Similarly, a venture into the radio field proved somewhat unfruitful. In <date when="1943-12">December 1943</date>, the Ministry of Supply asked New Zealand authorities to supply 15,000 sets, but owing to delays in the supply of American components only 7,170 were ever produced,<note xml:id="ftn1-137" n="1"><p><hi rend="i">Sic.</hi> According to New Zealand records 14,589 sets were delivered to the Defence Service Provision Office for shipment.—War History narrative 90/2, p. 39, and Industries and Commerce file 48/8/78. See also p. 168, <ref target="#ftn1-168">note 1</ref>.</p></note> and those so late that no outlet could be found for them.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘It was no mean achievement on the part of New Zealand to have produced a sizeable export surplus of carriers, 2-inch mortars, mortar bombs, hand grenades and small arms ammunition in addition to meeting her own needs of these and some other stores, including 3-inch mortars and Sten guns. Still more remarkable, however, were her achievements in aircraft production, though limited to propellers,<note xml:id="ftn2-137" n="2"><p>Not limited to propellers. See also <ref type="chapter" target="#c7">Chapter 7</ref>.</p></note> and in shipbuilding, which resulted in the completion of a dozen minesweeping trawlers and a number of smaller craft. Many things were done in New Zealand during the war which had never been done before, such as the production of precision instruments and the operation of the complex automatic machines used in the manufacture of fuses.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand's main economic contribution to the allied war effort was as a supplier of food. Though she remained, throughout the war, dependent on overseas supplies for most of the munitions she needed, it was no small achievement for the country, with food production to keep up and with so little munitions production before the war, to have made the contribution she did to allied supplies of war equipment.<note xml:id="ftn3-137" n="3"><p>Munitions making is also discussed in <ref type="chapter" target="#c7">Chapter 7</ref>.</p></note></p>
        </div>
        <div n="25" xml:id="c6-25">
          <head>Medical Supplies<note xml:id="ftn4-137" n="4"><p>Based on information obtained from War History narrative 90/1, Ministry of Supply, and from Parliamentary Paper H–38, <hi rend="i">Activities of the Ministry of Supply in Relation to the War</hi>, <date when="1940">1940</date>, p. 9.</p></note></head>
          <p rend="indent">Although the control of medical supplies was more directly the responsibility of the Health Department, the Medical Supplies Controller, appointed on the outbreak of war, was answerable to the Minister of Supply, and the Ministry was involved in the procurement and distribution problems.</p>
          <pb n="138" xml:id="n138"/>
          <p rend="indent">To facilitate the accumulation of reserves, some degree of standardisation was necessary, and, with the assistance of the <name key="name-024979" type="organisation">Pharmacological Committee</name> of the Medical School of <name key="name-036860" type="organisation">Otago University</name>, the <date when="2000">2000</date> items normally stocked in New Zealand were reduced to a basic schedule of 600 requirements essential to the civilian population and the armed forces.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By <date when="1940-12">December 1940</date>, stocks of essential drugs and chemicals had increased a little, and, with a view to assisting wholesalers to build up a twelve months' reserve, discussions were held with the principal wholesale drug houses. As a result, blanket licences were issued to permit increased imports. At this time supplies from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> were below New Zealand requirements. Delays in shipping and losses by enemy action added to the difficulties; in one case some £8000 worth of drugs and chemicals were lost in one bottom. Other markets were explored to the fullest possible extent, particularly in <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name>, the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name>, <name key="name-005952" type="place">India</name> and the <name key="name-020796" type="place">Netherlands East Indies</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">By <date when="1942-03">March 1942</date>, stocks of drugs were sufficient to last six months. By then the extension of existing facilities and the erection of emergency hospitals was making heavy calls for equipment, but all were supplied with essential needs at least. Much of the metal and enamel hospital-ware had to come from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>, whose own needs were considerable, and there was difficulty in getting sufficient supplies.</p>
          <p rend="indent">During the next two years, the problems of supply changed so often and so rapidly that the responsibilities of the Ministry had to be extended to include procurement under Lend-Lease, bulk ordering by means of Government-to-Government requests, and sponsorship of private orders. With the advent of Lend-Lease supplies and bulk orders, the Ministry had to supervise distribution. The extremely critical drugs, such as bismuth, anti-malarials, menthol, permanganate of potash, and glycerophosphates, and rubber dental and surgical appliances required close supervision to make sure that they reached users who required them primarily for medical purposes. Many materials in short supply were closely controlled at different times, under the Medical Supplies Emergency Regulations <date when="1939">1939</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There was, as we have seen, an improvement in supplies generally in <date when="1943">1943</date>, but in <date when="1944">1944</date> distribution of the following drugs was still restricted by the Controller to prescriptive use only, owing, particularly in the case of quinine and bismuth, to a world shortage: menthol, natural and synthetic; caffeine and its salts; quinine and its salts; dextrose; bismuth and its salts and sulfonamides.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The Medical Supplies Section of the Ministry of Supply was disbanded on <date when="1945-12-01">1 December 1945</date>.</p>
        </div>
        <pb n="139" xml:id="n139"/>
        <div n="26" xml:id="c6-26">
          <head>Rubber and Tyres</head>
          <p rend="indent">The stock position of raw rubber and of tyres furnishes yet another example of the spottiness of preparations for war. Good quantities of raw rubber were held in reserve when war broke out, but stocks of motor-car and truck tyres were inadequate. At the outbreak of war New Zealand already had a small but expanding industry producing rubber goods, but no motor-car or truck tyres were manufactured until <date when="1946">1946</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Rubber goods manufactured in New Zealand during the war included milking rubberware, retreading rubber, universal carrier wheels, cycle tyres, jungle boots, industrial hose, components for radio transmitting sets, groundsheets, fruit-jar rings, naval lifebelts, gas masks, aeroplane matting, dough for the manufacture of battery boxes, soles and heels, pram tyring, a multiplicity of parts for Air Force planes, treading solutions, footwear solutions, cushion gum, general mechanical rubber goods for industrial purposes and gum-boots.</p>
          <p rend="indent">With the advance of the Japanese forces in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name> and the loss of <name key="name-007464" type="place">Malaya</name> and the <name key="name-020796" type="place">Netherlands East Indies</name> early in <date when="1942">1942</date>, rubber became one of the most acute raw material problems for the allied nations. The source of approximately 90 per cent of the world's supply of raw rubber had passed under the control of the enemy.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The crisis found New Zealand in a relatively favourable position as regards stocks of raw rubber, this being a case where the policy of accumulating reserves before the war had been effective. To safeguard the reserves, the use of raw rubber for any purpose was prohibited in <date when="1942-04">April 1942</date>, except with the prior consent of the Factory Controller.<note xml:id="ftn1-139" n="1"><p>The Rubber Control Notice, <date when="1942">1942</date>. Gazetted <date when="1942-04-16">16 April 1942</date>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Total stocks in the country, including rubber owned by the mills, reserve stock, and crepe purchased by the Factory Controller, were sufficient for at least one year's normal usage, but the severe restrictions placed on rubber manufacturers resulted in stocks being adequate for approximately two years. During <date when="1942">1942</date> the Samoan raw rubber production was allocated to New Zealand by the Combined Raw Materials Board, and, in <date when="1943">1943</date>, negotiations resulted in an allocation of the Fijian production.<note xml:id="ftn2-139" n="2"><p>241,000 lb arrived from <name key="name-000854" type="place">Fiji</name> in <date when="1943">1943</date>, also 128,000 lb. from <name key="name-005889" type="place">Western Samoa</name>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">Scrap rubber was brought under control in <date when="1942-07">July 1942</date><note xml:id="ftn3-139" n="3"><p>The Scrap Rubber Control Notice, <date when="1942">1942</date> (<date when="1942">1942</date>/220).</p></note> and could be disposed of only as authorised by the Minister of Supply and Munitions. Agents were appointed throughout the country to receive scrap rubber on behalf of the Minister. Arrangements were made
<pb n="140" xml:id="n140"/>
between the Factory Controller and the local mills for the extension of the <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name> reclaim factory and the establishment of a new one at <name key="name-007584" type="place">Christchurch</name>. Both these factories came into full production towards the end of <date when="1942">1942</date>, their product being used principally in the manufacture of battery boxes, soles and heels, and B grade retreads. Scrap rubber was also used in part or full substitution for raw rubber wherever possible.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Import restrictions and severe cuts in the licences available before the war for motor tyres had reduced stocks and they were below the usual peacetime level when war broke out. There was an attempt to make up leeway in 1940 and 1941, but it was hampered by difficulties in securing shipping space and by losses through enemy action. The number of tyres received showed no great improvement. It was estimated that, by the end of <date when="1941">1941</date>, stocks were only one-third of normal. Control over the distribution of tyres began in <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Early in <date when="1942">1942</date> a decision was made to concentrate on securing supplies of truck tyres rather than car tyres. New Zealand, with its high proportion of rugged country, cannot be well served with railway transport and the proportion of road transport is much higher than in many other countries. The majority of this road transport was engaged in work classified as of extreme importance to the war effort. Moreover, the difficulty in securing supplies from overseas, and the large quantities of tyres requisitioned by the Army from civilian stocks, reduced stocks of truck tyres to a dangerously low level. Supplies arrived from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> during the second half of <date when="1942">1942</date> but, while these were sufficient to keep heavy transport on the road, on a severely restricted basis, the position remained critical.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Arrangements were made for improved supplies of truck tyres, mainly from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>, and, in <date when="1943">1943</date>, tyres and tubes received from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> were valued at £445,000 compared with £145,000 in the previous highest year. Imports of these items from the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> had fallen away drastically in <date when="1942">1942</date>, and the Australian increase, even when supplemented by some extra supplies from the <name key="name-031090" type="place">United States</name>, was not sufficient to make up the leeway.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To give some idea of the stringency of restrictions on the use of motor-car tyres, the normal demand for car tyres was roughly 320,000 per annum,<note xml:id="ftn1-140" n="1"><p>190,000 imported as tyres and 130,000 as tyres fitted to cars. There is some further discussion of the wartime troubles of the private motorist in <ref type="chapter" target="#c15">Chapters 15</ref> and <ref type="chapter" target="#c17">17</ref>.</p></note> whereas issues under permit were approximately 20,000 in 1942 and 46,000 in <date when="1943">1943</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The various controls associated with rubber and goods made principally of rubber had to be enforced from dire necessity. In general, the needs of the armed services, essential civilian transport, the dairy industry and other important users were met, but this was possible only by careful rationing of available supplies.</p>
          <pb n="141" xml:id="n141"/>
          <p rend="indent">Gumboots became subject to strict rationing to protect supplies for the dairy industry and it was, for a time, almost impossible to get them without proof of ownership of at least twelve cows.<note xml:id="ftn1-141" n="1"><p>Or some equivalent claim to priority.</p></note> Local production of gumboots was increased considerably after <date when="1940">1940</date> and, by <date when="1945">1945</date>, reached 500 pairs a day. This was equivalent to over half the pre-war rate of use and, with such supplies as could be imported, enabled the needs of dairymen and others to be met fairly well.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Stocks and rationing of gumboots provided an interesting example of a wartime communications breakdown. Purchasing and accumulation of stocks was under the control of the Ministry of Supply. Rationing to users was arranged by the <name key="name-024450" type="organisation">Department of Agriculture</name><!-- Agriculture, Department of -->. With increasing local production, stocks became unnecessarily large, and it was decided to relax rationing so that an increased range of users could be supplied. Due to inadequate communications, the <name key="name-024450" type="organisation">Department of Agriculture</name><!-- Agriculture, Department of --> continued stringent rationing for some time after this decision was made.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 31 summarises the rubber supply situation.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart31">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco036a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart31-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 31</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">SUPPLIES OF RUBBER AND TYRES</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of economic statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="142" xml:id="n142"/>
          <p rend="indent">Wartime shortages of rubber focussed attention, in a number of countries, on synthetic rubber production and on plastics generally, as substitutes for natural rubber and other scarce materials. The post-war years were to see many useful applications of this development.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="27" xml:id="c6-27">
          <head>Wheat and Flour</head>
          <p rend="indent">Throughout the war, strenuous efforts were made to maintain adequate reserves of essential imported foodstuffs. Arrangements with regard to wheat, which had to be imported in substantial quantities to augment New Zealand production, furnish a good illustration of one of the more successful schemes.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The satisfactory New Zealand supply position for wheat was attributable, in the early stages, to the precautions taken by the <name key="name-024924" type="organisation">National Supply Committee</name> prior to the outbreak of war. Arrangements had been made with the flour millers to carry additional stocks of wheat.<note xml:id="ftn1-142" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n38">p. 38</ref>.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand wheat production was boosted by a guaranteed price and it was possible to import substantial quantities of wheat from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> at favourable prices.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand's requirements of wheat were estimated, in <date when="1939">1939</date>, at nearly ten million bushels a year, but were to rise to over thirteen million bushels a year by <date when="1945">1945</date>. Extra demands for flour, as a result of some other foods being rationed, and the loss of supplies of alternative grains, such as rice, sago, and tapioca, contributed to the extra need for domestic use. Wheat requirements for poultry also more than doubled as imported feeds such as barley, maize, bran and pollard became unobtainable from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>, and wheat had to be used in their place. <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> placed an export embargo on bran and pollard in <date when="1940-11">November 1940</date>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand production of wheat increased considerably during the war years but was at no time large enough to avoid the necessity for substantial imports. In most years, well over half of New Zealand's requirements were imported.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Towards the end of the war, arrangements were made to obtain extra wheat from <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> under Mutual Aid. Some two and three-quarter million bushels were so landed and a further nearly two and a half million bushels were received after hostilities ceased, and paid for at the ruling rate. About one million bushels of this wheat went to the poultry industry.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> there was a shortage of sacks and, for the first shipments, they had to be provided from New Zealand. The cost of
<pb n="143" xml:id="n143"/>
bagging was heavy and the loss of time in loading too great. <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> requested that bulk cargoes be accepted. No wheat had ever been landed in New Zealand in bulk, and ports were not suitably equipped. The two <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name> mills, however, had grain silos for storage. A scheme was devised for unloading the wheat with coal grabs straight into elevated tanks under which lorries could run for loading by chute. Lorries were converted to carry wheat in bulk, and the scheme proved so successful that the <name key="name-002817" type="place">Auckland</name> mills thereafter preferred their wheat in bulk.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 32 shows sources of New Zealand's wheat supply.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart32">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco037a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart32-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 32</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">WHEAT SUPPLIES</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of wheat supply statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">The supply of edible grains was adequate at reasonable prices during the war years, and it is significant that it was not until after the war—in <date when="1946-05">May 1946</date>—that the extraction rate for flour in New Zealand mills was raised. The extraction rate had been about 73 per cent. In <date when="1946-05">May 1946</date> it was raised to 80 per cent,<note xml:id="ftn1-143" n="1"><p>The Flour Extraction Control Notice, <date when="1946">1946</date>. Gazetted 26 April (<date when="1946">1946</date>/60).</p></note> and this only when wheat prices reached high levels as the result of a combination of poor harvests and extensive commitments by allied nations for the relief of hitherto occupied and enemy countries. The change for
<pb n="144" xml:id="n144"/>
New Zealand meant that, instead of extracting about 73 tons of flour for every hundred tons of wheat, as had been done before and throughout the war, the millers were now required to extract 80 tons and so use less wheat in making the flour needed. By way of comparison, the extraction rate in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> had been fixed much more severely, at 85 per cent for most of the war, and was raised in 1946 to 90 per cent.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand was well supplied with wheat during the war years. Some countries would have regarded her low extraction rate throughout the war, and her practice of feeding so much wheat to poultry, as evidence of over-supply to the extent of waste. There was, in fact, some criticism by the <name key="name-024547" type="organisation">Combined Food Board</name> and its successor, the <name key="name-024773" type="organisation">International Emergency Food Council</name>, which were responsible for the allocation of allied wheat supplies and had to approve shipments from <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name>; however, New Zealand usually got the quota she asked.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="28" xml:id="c6-28">
          <head>Canadian Mutual Aid</head>
          <p rend="indent">Canadian Mutual Aid came later in the war than Lend-Lease, an agreement between the Governments of New Zealand and <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> being concluded in <date when="1944-06">June 1944</date>. Imports from <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> had fallen from nearly £5 million in <date when="1938">1938</date> to under £2½ million in <date when="1942">1942</date>, but were well over £11 million in <date when="1943">1943</date> and remained over £5 million a year for the rest of the war. Some £6 million of imports were received into New Zealand under the Mutual Aid agreement, mostly in the years 1945 and 1946. The wheat mentioned above<note xml:id="ftn1-144" n="1"><p>p. 142.</p></note> was valued at £1·2 million and direct war materials at £3·7 million, the next largest item being machinery and hardware at £0·4 million.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There were no Canadian forces in New Zealand and no other opportunity to provide reciprocal aid to <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name>. The substantial balance in <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name>'s favour was written off after the war, and Mutual Aid represented a very generous contribution by <name key="name-007274" type="place">Canada</name> to the war effort.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="29" xml:id="c6-29">
          <head>Reclamation of Waste</head>
          <p rend="indent">With supplies of materials generally short, it became important to salvage and use waste materials wherever possible. A National Council for the Reclamation of Waste Material was set up by the Minister of Supply in <date when="1940-06">June 1940</date>. The Council organised 110 volunteer committees and, by various means, was responsible for collecting over 27,000 tons of waste paper for use by the paper and board
<pb n="145" xml:id="n145"/>
mills, 5000 tons of waste rubber, including half a million used car and truck tyres, over 300,000 lb. of cleaning rags for the armed services, over 5,000,000 bottles and glass containers, and <date when="2000">2000</date> tons of non-ferrous metals and cast iron. Much of this waste material was sold to private industries, and the proceeds given to Patriotic Funds. Arrangements ran smoothly, though there were occasional difficulties about transport; waste material, having a comparatively low value for bulk, did not receive a high priority at a time when transport was scarce.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The return of waste rubber back into supply channels was the greatest contribution by the Council, the amount collected equalling in weight all the rubber usually imported in the form of raw rubber and tyres over a period of eighteen months. So great was the need for tyres that the Government asked for all tyres collected to be inspected when received at depots. If fit for repairing or retreading they were to be sorted out, reconditioned and sold to permit holders only, or to firms or persons engaged in essential war work. In cooperation with garages and retreaders, thousands of second-hand tyres were repaired, classified as to possible mileage, priced and sold to essential users. Farmers' needs for tyres for trailer vehicles were also supplied in large numbers by these means.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Over £50,000 was paid to the <name key="name-017562" type="organisation">National Patriotic Fund Board</name> from the proceeds of sales of reclaimed materials.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="30" xml:id="c6-30">
          <head>The Vital Story of Supply</head>
          <p rend="indent">Supply in time of war is absolutely vital, and this chapter should rank as one of the most important in the book. It is a pity it could not have been one of the more satisfying chapters, but in fact it contains many gaps which no amount of research at this late stage can fill.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Much of the information contained here is built up from incomplete basic information. Adequate statistics were not kept, and many supply files, which should have been available, have been destroyed.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The short-run nuisance of having to keep statistical records of administrative action is obvious to all. The long-run hopelessness of continuing to make administrative decisions without the benefit of such records should be equally obvious. It is for this latter reason that most departments have systematic up-to-date summaries of decisions made and of the resulting action, however strong the pressure of administrative work on staff may be. It would have been nothing short of miraculous had the Ministry of Supply been able to function efficiently without proper statistical records. The loss of
<pb n="146" xml:id="n146"/>
relevant files makes it impossible now to discern whether or not a miracle did occur. In any event this writer strongly recommends against expecting one on any future occasion.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Outstanding in the wartime supply story were the bad start given by shortages of overseas funds in the immediate pre-war years, the inability of a private enterprise subject to import and exchange controls to create adequate reserves before the war, and the apparent neglect by the Government to set aside adequate funds for the purpose until too late. There were some conspicuous exceptions where reserves were built up.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Then came the first three difficult war years, with overseas supplies hard to get and New Zealand manufacturing playing a brave part in filling some of the shortages. Munitions were still quite inadequate, in spite of New Zealand's expanding production of a range of small arms. Relief came in <date when="1943">1943</date> with the full flow of Lend-Lease goods and with improved supplies from other sources. Munitions and other war supplies were now making up nearly half of all imports. Other supplies, particularly of consumer goods, would have to wait till later for their relief.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In the supply story, luck played no small part. When New Zealand failed to prepare for a complete disruption of shipping, none occurred; when she was without sufficient munitions to repel an invader, no enemy reached her shores. For these things we should be extremely grateful, but they give us no real cause for pride.</p>
        </div>
      </div>
      <pb n="147" xml:id="n147"/>
      <div type="chapter" n="7" xml:id="c7">
        <head>CHAPTER 7<lb/>
Manufacturing under War Conditions</head>
        <div n="31" xml:id="c7-31">
          <head>Employment in Manufacturing</head>
          <p>IN WAR, New Zealand's still immature manufacturing industries were called on as never before to provide increased output and new products to fill supply gaps. Not only was an extensive range of war equipment produced for the first time in New Zealand, but also many essential consumer goods, no longer available in sufficient quantities from traditional overseas suppliers, had to be made locally.</p>
          <p rend="indent">To give a general impression of the stage of industrial development in New Zealand in <date when="1939">1939</date>, there were then six persons employed in manufacturing for each 100 of the population, compared with eight in <name key="name-008963" type="place">Australia</name> and fourteen in the <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name>.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Before the war New Zealand manufacturing had a somewhat chequered career, though showing an underlying tendency to increase in relative importance. Most industries had been hit hard by the economic depression of the early 1930s, and it was not until 1935–36 that the labour force in manufacturing was built up again to what it had been in the pre-depression year, 1929–30. Nearly 83,000 people had then been employed in manufacturing, but by 1931–32 this number had fallen to 69,000.<note xml:id="ftn1-147" n="1"><p>Figures used here are taken from the 1947–49 <hi rend="i">Official Yearbook</hi>. They have since been revised as a result of a change in coverage of industrial production statistics, but these are the figures which were available and which provided the basis for wartime thinking. They include generation and supply of gas and electricity, and the logging operations of sawmillers, all of which were transferred to other sectors after 1951–52.</p></note> This was the worst year of the depression. There followed a slow recovery, which gathered strength. The labour force reached 79,000 in 1934–35, and 87,000 in 1935–36. The 1934–35 figure was still below 1929–30 and 1935–36 was only 4000 above it. Two years of rapid growth followed. In 1936–37 there was an increase of 10,000, and in 1937–38 a further increase of 6000, bringing the numbers employed in manufacturing up to 102,000. This was 23 per cent above the highest pre-depression level.</p>
          <pb n="148" xml:id="n148"/>
          <p rend="indent">Manufacturing was then affected by the depressive influence of the <date when="1938">1938</date> reduction in overseas earnings. Between 1937–38 and 1938–39 its labour force increased by only 200. But, for manufacturing, the <date when="1938">1938</date> recession was to be a blessing in disguise. It provided the Labour Government with a new and more effective means of nurturing secondary industries.<note xml:id="ftn1-148" n="1"><p>The <name key="name-003416" type="organisation">Labour Party</name> manifesto for the <date when="1935">1935</date> General Election included ‘the fostering of secondary industries’. Quoted by J. T. Paul in <hi rend="i">Humanism in Politics</hi>, p. 174.</p></note> The rapid fall in overseas assets forced the Government to take drastic action to correct the trade unbalance. It decided on exchange controls and quantitative controls over imports, accompanied by an import selection policy which gave a high priority to materials and equipment for New Zealand producers and a low priority for many manufactured imports. As a result, manufacturing entered the war with a very high degree of protection against outside competition.</p>
          <p rend="indent">In some industries, particularly those concerned with metals, the diversification resulting from the high level of protection against imports considerably increased the need for skilled labour, and there were some staffing difficulties before the war, in spite of the quite large pool of unemployed labour still available. Special training schemes were started to provide suitable labour, and some skilled labour was recruited overseas, but not all the gaps could be filled.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The metalworking industries, with the clothing industries, were to bear a particularly heavy load in providing war stores, but most other industries were also affected. The war made ever-increasing demands on many branches of manufacturing.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Of one important group, engineering, shipbuilding and repair, the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> wrote:<note xml:id="ftn2-148" n="2"><p>H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Parliamentary Report of <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 54.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘During the war years the industry was called upon for a tremendous war effort, which included the manufacture of wireless sets, Sten guns, Bren-gun carriers, bombs, grenades, fuses, aeroplane-fuel tanks, water-bottles, steel helmets, wire nails, barbed wire, ammunition, batteries, agricultural machinery and implements, the manufacture and maintenance of machinery used in essential production and services, the repair of vehicles and equipment from the Pacific War Zone, the building and repair of aircraft, repair of ships, the fitting of defensive armament and protective equipment to ships, and the building of minesweepers, Fairmile patrol boats, tow-boats, steel tugs, powered lighters, and barges of various types. In addition, it continued to meet civilian requirements of high priority.’</p>
          <p rend="indent">The first three war years were years of quite rapid expansion in manufacturing employment. The labour force increased by 6000 in the first year, 5000 in the second year, and 3000 in the third year,
<pb n="149" xml:id="n149"/>
to reach 117,000 in 1941–42. This was an average growth of 5 per cent a year. But manufacturing was now being affected by the faster rate of mobilisation which followed the entry of <name key="name-002006" type="place">Japan</name> into the war in <date when="1941-12">December 1941</date>. Losses to the armed forces were, for a time, more than made good by recruiting extra women and older persons, but, in 1942–43, there was an overall decrease of 3000 persons. This, however, was the only war year in which the numbers engaged in manufacturing declined.</p>
          <p rend="indent">When the lessening of the threat of invasion made it possible to reduce the size of the home army, numbers employed in manufacturing increased again. By 1944–45 there were 122,000 and, in the last war year, 1945–46, over 128,000, which was some 26,000 above the immediate pre-war level.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Over the seven years between 1938–39 and 1945–46, the manufacturing labour force increased by a quarter, an average growth of 3¼ per cent a year, which compares with a population increase of a little over 1 per cent a year and would have been considered fast under much less difficult conditions.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Chart 33 shows changes in numbers employed in manufacturing over the depression, the pre-war, and the war years. It is apparent that recruitment for the armed forces caused only a temporary setback in the upward trend of manufacturing employment. In this, manufacturing is unusual; most groups were much more severely affected. So great was the pressure of extra wartime demand that manufacturing remained seriously short of labour, in spite of the fact that its work-force grew faster than in most other groups.</p>
        </div>
        <div n="32" xml:id="c7-32">
          <head>New Demands for Manufactured Goods</head>
          <p rend="indent">Wartime demands for munitions and war stores, together with the growing need to supply essential commodities which could no longer be imported, required considerable diversion of manufacturing resources from other production. The readjustments and delays involved in this diversion tended to slow up the overall rate of manufacturing expansion. The metalworking industries, in particular, had to become much more versatile in order to meet the very urgent needs of war at a time when many of New Zealand's usual suppliers were too hard pressed to come to her assistance.</p>
          <p rend="indent">New Zealand industries turned to the manufacture of mortars, shells, grenades, anti-tank mines and Tommy guns. Small-arms ammunition had been manufactured in New Zealand before the war, but much higher outputs were now required. Bren-gun carriers and light armoured vehicles were produced in considerable numbers. Aircraft frames and parts were made and light tanks and aircraft
<pb n="150" xml:id="n150"/>
assembled. These calls on New Zealand manufacturing were not unforeseen. It had become apparent as early as <date when="1938">1938</date> that many <name key="name-029547" type="place">United Kingdom</name> suppliers were going to be too busy to attend to New Zealand's requirements of military equipment.</p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="chart33">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco038a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="chart33-g"/>
              <head>
                <hi rend="u">Chart 33</hi>
                <lb/>
                <hi rend="b">PERSONS ENGAGED IN MANUFACTURING</hi>
              </head>
              <figDesc>chart of employment statistics</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p rend="indent">Heavy calls were made on the clothing industry for military clothing. Boots, clothing and blankets for the New Zealand armed services were produced in New Zealand. The necessary industries had been in existence before the war; they now had to adjust their organisation to the making of military requirements.</p>
          <p rend="indent">There was an infant shipbuilding industry in New Zealand before the war. It had to come rapidly to maturity under the heavy demands made on it for war needs. Minesweepers, patrol vessels, barges and tugboats were built, and there were increasing demands for repairs to warships and merchant vessels.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Imports of farm implements and plumbing supplies declined, and the New Zealand metal industries had to turn to the production of these and other requirements to fill the gap.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Apart from the usual processing of farm products, the food industries were called on to meet special orders for manufactured foods for the United Kingdom War Office. The commodities required were mainly canned meats, service biscuits, chocolate, oatmeal
<pb n="151" xml:id="n151"/>
and processed cheese. During the war, goods to the value of over £6 million in New Zealand currency were supplied in fulfilment of War Office contracts. This was in addition to the bulk purchases of farm products arranged in the early days of war by the United Kingdom Government.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The wide variety of goods supplied, under Reverse Lend-Lease<!-- Lend-Lease, Reverse -->, for the <name key="name-023372" type="organisation">United States Forces</name> in the <name key="name-008892" type="place">Pacific</name> included many manufactured goods, and, by arrangement with the <name key="name-024623" type="organisation">Eastern Group Supply Council</name>, a substantial manufacturing programme was undertaken to supply goods required by other allied forces. Radio transceivers<note xml:id="ftn1-151" n="1"><p>A general purpose transmitter and receiver.</p></note> were the most important item ordered by the Council, but many other manufactured goods were sent.</p>
          <p rend="indent">The upsurge of defence construction work accentuated the shortage of building steel and required extra output from the rolling mills in Dunedin. Many other building materials had also to be made in New Zealand.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Rubber goods industries before the war were increasing their output, but were still too insignificant to be shown separately in factory production statistics. After the Japanese conquests of rubber-producing countries early in <date when="1942">1942</date>, imports of rubber goods fell away drastically and New Zealand production had to be stepped up wherever possible. Local output increased in value from £200,000 in 1939–40 to £1,400,000 in 1945–46. With raw rubber imports severely curtailed after <date when="1941">1941</date>, reclaimed rubber became an important link in the production chain.<note xml:id="ftn2-151" n="2"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n145">p. 145</ref>.</p></note> A reclaim factory was set up at very short notice to provide rubber for retreads, soles, heels, gumboots and canvas shoes. The need for rubber goods became so urgent that factories had to accept rigid restrictions on their range of products to ensure that scarce rubber went only into the most urgently needed goods.</p>
          <p rend="indent">One important new rubber manufacture was gumboots. Imports fell from an average of about 240,000 pairs before the war to only 24,000 pairs in <date when="1942">1942</date>. Severe rationing became necessary<note xml:id="ftn3-151" n="3"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n141">p. 141</ref>.</p></note> and New Zealand manufacturers had to step in and try to fill the gap. By <date when="1945">1945</date>, production was at the rate of 125,000 pairs a year, enabling the most urgent needs of dairymen and others to be met fairly well, with the assistance of the reduced supplies from overseas.</p>
          <p rend="indent">These were just a few of the extra wartime demands on New Zealand manufacturing.</p>
        </div>
        <pb n="152" xml:id="n152"/>
        <div n="33" xml:id="c7-33">
          <head>Difficulties in Non-Essential Industries</head>
          <p rend="indent">As wartime pressures increased, reducing the availability of manpower, and still further restricting the range of imported materials and equipment, it became increasingly difficult for those industries which were engaged in making luxury or non-essential lines to maintain their production.</p>
          <p rend="indent">An indication of increasing wartime difficulties, especially in non-essential industries, was given by the Department of Industries and Commerce in its <date when="1941">1941</date> annual report:<note xml:id="ftn1-152" n="1"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-44, <date when="1941">1941</date>, p. 6.</p></note></p>
          <p rend="indent">‘To some extent the quantity of goods produced has been conditioned not by the consumer demand, but by the adequacy of the supply of raw materials required in the processes of manufacture. As regards the demand for domestically manufactured goods, under the operation of the Import Control Regulations this has shown an increasing tendency as stocks of similar lines of previously imported goods have become non-existent. On the production side, manufacturers appear to have received reasonable supplies of raw materials, although in some cases these have been inadequate to enable the demand for finished goods to be fully met. On the other hand, certain other factors affect production, the chief of which is the shortage of skilled and even casual labour, so that in some cases the reduced staffs now available would be unable to cope with greater quantities of raw materials.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Production has been limited to some extent by the amount of sterling or dollar funds available, which is unavoidable. Certain luxury trades have felt this restriction most. In general, the effects have not proved unduly severe.</p>
          <p rend="indent">‘Unfortunately, as the year progressed, the shipping position deteriorated, and the non-delivery of orders placed by manufacturers has affected production. This difficulty, combined with the difficulty involved in obtaining export licences from overseas countries, has placed a limit on expansion through resulting shortages in supplies of raw materials. Overseas prices of most raw materials continue to show substantial increases. Plant for expansion purposes is limited, as the emergencies of the war situation make it imperative that plant of a nature essential to the maintenance of output in non-luxury lines only is imported. Factories engaged in the production of military requirements for the most part worked extended hours. In industries not directly concerned with the war effort output, having regard to existing conditions, has been surprisingly well maintained.’</p>
          <pb/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco039a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco039a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco039a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">defence construction</hi><lb/>
Levelling the site at <name key="name-002857" type="place">Waiouru Camp</name> in <date when="1940-08">August 1940</date></head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of construction machinery</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco039b">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco039b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco039b-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">camp buildings</hi><lb/>
Carpenters at work on a dormitory at <name key="name-021590" type="place">Waiouru</name> in <date when="1940-09">September 1940</date></head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of construction</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco040a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco040a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco040a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">aircraft engines</hi><lb/>
Assembling engines for training aircraft</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of aircraft engine</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco040b">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco040b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco040b-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">aircraft assembly</hi><lb/>
Assembly of De Havilland training aircraft in a <name key="name-008844" type="place">Wellington</name> factory</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of aircraft construction</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco041a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco041a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco041a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">munitions making</hi><lb/>
Modern small-arms were produced in considerable quantities</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of gun construction</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco041b">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco041b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco041b-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">war production</hi><lb/>
Production of Bren carriers in a motor-car assembly plant</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of construction of gun carriers</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb/>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco042a">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco042a.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco042a-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">special war industries</hi><lb/>
A 100-ton press stamping out steel helmets for the <name key="name-024736" type="organisation">Home Guard</name> and E.P.S.</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of helmet making</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <p>
            <figure xml:id="WH2Eco042b">
              <graphic url="WH2Eco042b.jpg" mimeType="image/jpeg" xml:id="WH2Eco042b-g"/>
              <head><hi rend="sc">manufacture of war equipment</hi><lb/>
Trailer fire pumps for the <name key="name-005851" type="place">Far East</name> forces</head>
              <figDesc>black and white photograph of fire fighting equipment</figDesc>
            </figure>
          </p>
          <pb n="153" xml:id="n153"/>
          <p rend="indent">One of the failings of import discrimination against goods regarded as non-essential is the tendency for local production to fill the gaps and to concentrate unduly on the very non-essential goods against which import restrictions discriminate. The imposition of import controls does nothing to change the demand; it merely cuts back supply, and, if demand has enough money backing, local industry will try to fill the resulting supply shortage. Demand may then be frustrated at another stage, if materials and equipment to make the non-essential lines become in their turn restricted imports. Under war conditions, non-essential production may also become short of labour, but, if demand is still high, it often remains strong enough financially to bid successfully for labour, unless direction of labour is invoked in favour of essential industries. Even then, the non-essential industry may find ways to carry on if demand raises the price for its products high enough.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Essential and non-essential are not clearly defined concepts. Tobacco processing, for example, was one of the industries declared essential.<note xml:id="ftn1-153" n="1"><p>See also <ref type="page" target="#n174">p. 174</ref>.</p></note> The whole process of selection in fact tended to be short-term and arbitrary in its application, but was no doubt justifiable under the extreme pressures of war conditions.</p>
          <p rend="indent">Dealing with industries not declared essential, the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name> gives the following list:<note xml:id="ftn2-153" n="2"><p>Parliamentary Paper H-11<hi rend="sc">a</hi>, Report of the <name key="name-017564" type="organisation">National Service Department</name>, <date when="1946">1946</date>, p. 57. Farming was another major industry not declared essential, but it was, nevertheless, accorded priority for employment purposes.</p></note></p>
          <p>
            <table rows="6" cols="2">
              <row>
                <cell>Beverage industries</cell>
                <cell>Leather-goods manufacture (certain classes)</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Confectionery manufacture</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Finance</cell>
                <cell>Recreation, amusement, and sport</cell>
              </row>
              <row>
                <cell>Fur dressing and manufacture</cell>
                <cell/>
              </row>
              <row>
                <ce